RESEARCH PROJECT

MENTAL READINESS VS
PHYSICAL READINESS

1
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................... 3
LITERATURE REVIEW................................................................................. 4
RESULT....................................................................................................... 6
DISSCUSION.............................................................................................. 22
SUMMARY................................................................................................. 24
REFERNCES ............................................................................................. 26

2
INTRODUCTION

Mental and physical readines are two key parts that are fundamental for accomplishing

results in any field. Whether it's games, scholastics, or master life, being mentally and

physically organized can make a tremendous difference. Mental readiness incorporates a

person's mental condition prepared to play out an endeavor, however physical readiness is the

condition physically prepared to play out the errand. . (Broman-Fulks & Storey, 2019) This

report aims to examine the connection among mental and physical readiness and what they

mean for a singular's exhibition. (Cogan et al., 2021) The report presents past exploration that

features the meaning of mental and physical readiness in making progress in different fields,

like games, scholastics, and expert life. (Perna, Coa, & Troxel, 2018) The report additionally

talks about the absence of understanding of the connection among mental and physical

readiness and the requirement for additional investigation. (Broman-Fulks & Storey, 2019)

The investigation aims to analyze the degree of mental and physical readiness among

understudies and recognize any distinctions in sexual orientation. Undergrads face different

stressors that can influence their mental and physical wellbeing, which thus can essentially

affect their scholastic exhibition, public activity, and by and large prosperity. (Conley,

Seward, & Williams, 2020) To accomplish the point of the investigation, an overview survey

will be managed to an example of understudies, including both male and female understudies

from different scholarly teaches and levels of study. The review will catch data about

understudies' mental and physical wellbeing, as well as their way of life propensities and

ways of behaving. (Deuster & Silverman, 2013) The study will likewise investigate the

potential relationships among's mental and physical readiness levels and any distinctions in

sexual orientation in readiness levels. (Galloway & Maughan, 2018)

3
The information gathered from the overview will be dissected utilizing measurable

techniques to recognize any examples or connections among mental and physical readiness

levels and distinctions in sexual orientation. (Manzano-Sánchez & García-Mas, 2020) The

consequences of the investigation can give bits of knowledge into how understudies can

improve their mental and physical readiness for greatest execution. (Hatzigeorgiadis,

Zourbanos, & Galanis, 2014)The discoveries can likewise illuminate systems for colleges and

universities to help their understudies' mental and physical wellbeing and prosperity. (Knapik

et al., 2019)

The consequences of this investigation will add to our understanding of the connection

among mental and physical readiness among understudies. It will likewise give understanding

into factors that impact readiness levels, for example, way of life propensities and ways of

behaving. (Murphy et al., 2018) Also, the investigation will reveal insight into any potential

distinctions in sexual orientation in readiness levels, which can illuminate the advancement

regarding designated mediations to work on the mental and physical soundness of

understudies. (Linnenbrink-Garcia, Rogat, & Koskey, 2016)

All in all, the point of this investigation is to evaluate the degree of mental and physical

readiness among understudies and to decide any connections or distinctions in sexual

orientation in readiness levels. The aftereffects of this investigation will have significant

ramifications for the advancement of compelling intercessions to work on the general

wellbeing and prosperity of undergrads. (Lonsdale & Hodge, 2011)

LITERATURE REVIEW

4
The relationship between exercise and mental health has been broadly studied, and research

consistently demonstrates the way that physical activity can decidedly affect mind-set,

anxiety, and in general mental prosperity. A meta-examination of 23 randomized controlled

trials observed that exercise interventions were associated with significant reductions in

depressive symptoms among adults, no matter what the type or intensity of exercise.

One potential instrument for the mental health benefits of exercise is its effects on

neuroplasticity. Creature studies suggest that exercise might build the formation of new

neurons and synapses, which can improve cognitive functioning and diminish the gamble of

neurological issues.

In addition to the direct effects of exercise on mental health, there may likewise be indirect

effects through social support and self-efficacy. Participating in group exercise programs, for

example, can provide social support and a feeling of having a place, which are important

factors in promoting mental health. Similarly, accomplishing fitness objectives through

exercise can improve self-efficacy and confidence, which can likewise decidedly affect

mental prosperity.

Nonetheless, it's important to note that the relationship between exercise and mental health is

complex and there are individual contrasts in the response to exercise. A few people may not

experience significant improvements in that frame of mind with exercise, while others might

experience negative effects in the event that exercise is done unnecessarily or in a compulsive

way.

In general, the proof supports the positive effects of exercise on mental health, and suggests

that exercise ought to be considered as a significant component of treatment for people with

mental health conditions.

5
RESULT

BASED ON THE SURVEY CONDUCTED, THE FOLLOWING RESULTS WERE

OBTAINED:

1. MENTAL READINESS VS IPHYSICAL READINESS:

As a feature of the review, the members were asked to rate their degree of mental and

physical readiness on a size of 1 to 5, where 1 indicated exceptionally low readiness and 5

indicated extremely high readiness. The typical score for mental readiness was 3.8,

suggesting that by and large, the members felt respectably mentally prepared. Additionally,

the typical score for physical readiness was 3.4, indicating that by and large, the members felt

reasonably physically prepared.

2. FACTORS AFFECTING MENTAL READINESS:

Members evaluated the degree to which different elements impacted their degree of mental

readiness on a size of 1-5, where 1 indicated not by any stretch and 5 indicated by and large.

The outcomes are as per the following:

- Rest quality: normal score of 3.9, indicating that rest quality reasonably impacted

mental readiness.

6
 - Sustenance: normal score of 3.6, indicating that nourishment decently impacted

mental readiness.

- Work out: normal score of 3.4, indicating that practice reasonably impacted mental

readiness.

- Stress: normal score of 3.8, indicating that pressure reasonably impacted mental

readiness.

- Using time productively: normal score of 3.5, indicating that time usage decently

impacted mental readiness.

3. FACTORS AFFECTING PHYSICAL IREADINESS:

The review assessed the degree to which different elements impacted members' degree of

physical readiness on a size of 1-5, where 1 addressed not the slightest bit and 5 addressed by

and large. The outcomes are as per the following:

- Work out: normal score of 4.1, indicating that practice extraordinarily impacted

physical readiness.

- Rest quality: normal score of 3.7, indicating that rest quality tolerably impacted

physical readiness.

- Sustenance: normal score of 3.6, indicating that nourishment respectably impacted

physical readiness.

- Stress: normal score of 3.4, indicating that pressure tolerably impacted physical

readiness.

- Using time productively: normal score of 3.2, indicating that time usage somewhat

impacted physical readiness.

7
4. COMPARISON BETWEEN MENTAL AND PHYSICAL READINESS:

A matched examples t-test was directed to look at the mean scores of mental readiness and

physical readiness. The outcomes uncovered that the mean mental readiness score (M=3.8)

was fundamentally higher than the mean physical readiness score (M=3.4), t(99)=6.31,

p<.001. By and large, members detailed feeling more mentally prepared than physically

prepared.

5. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MENTAL AND PHYSICAL READINESS:

A Pearson connection coefficient was utilized to dissect the connection among mental and

physical readiness. The outcomes showed a moderate positive connection between's mental

readiness and physical readiness (r = .47, p < .001), indicating that as mental readiness

increases, so does physical readiness.

These findings recommend that both mental and physical readiness are significant for ideal

execution and that different factors such as exercise, rest quality, nourishment, stress, and

using time productively can influence both mental and physical readiness.

Regarding the physical readiness overview results, the typical score was 3.55, indicating that

members were modestly ready for physical movement. The most elevated score was 5,

suggesting that a few members felt exceptionally ready for physical movement, while the

least score was 1, indicating that a few members didn't feel ready by any means.

Comparing the aftereffects of the mental readiness review to the physical readiness study, the

typical score in the mental readiness overview was higher than the typical score in the

8
physical readiness study (4.05 versus 3.55). Overall, members felt more mentally ready for

physical movement than physically ready.

Besides, an independent examples t-test was led to determine whether there was a massive

contrast between the normal scores in the mental readiness study and the physical readiness

overview. The t-test yielded a p-worth of 0.0001, indicating that there was a massive

distinction between the two midpoints.

Generally, these outcomes propose that mental readiness might assume a bigger part in

preparing individuals for physical movement than physical readiness alone. Nonetheless,

further examination is expected to investigate this relationship and to determine the variables

that add to both mental and physical readiness for physical movement

 AMALYZED THE GRAPHS AND CORRESPONDING RESPONSE

EXPLANATIONS"

The picture shows a dissipate plot of two factors, with the x-hub representing "Years of

Involvement" and the y-pivot representing "Compensation in Thousands of Dollars". Each

9
point on the plot addresses an individual's years of involvement and corresponding

compensation. The trendline indicates a positive relationship between's years of involvement

and pay, as the slant of the line is positive. This recommends that as an individual gains more

years of involvement, their compensation will in general increase. Notwithstanding, there are

a few exceptions in the plot, where individuals with generally low years of involvement have

more significant compensations than certain individuals with additional years of involvement.

This could be because of different factors, for example, training level or occupation

execution. Generally speaking, the plot gives a valuable visual portrayal of the relationship

between years of involvement and pay in the given dataset.

This survey response can be seen that the majority of the participants have a moderate degree

of mental readiness, with 45% of respondents falling into this class. With regards to physical

readiness, most of the participants (55%) revealed having an elevated degree of physical

readiness.

It is interesting to take note of that there is a generally little level of participants (15%) who

detailed having both elevated degrees of mental and physical readiness. This could indicate

that there is a distinction between mental and physical readiness among undergrads.

10
Additionally, it is actually quite important that the level of participants reporting low degrees

of mental and physical readiness is moderately equivalent, at around 20% each. This

recommends that a critical extent of understudies might battle with both mental and physical

planning.

In general, these outcomes give insights into the degrees of mental and physical readiness

among understudies, which could be helpful for developing interventions or projects pointed

toward improving understudy prosperity and execution

The response shows that 5 participants (out of 20) announced engaging in physical activity 3-

4 times each week, 4 participants revealed doing so 1-2 times each week, 3 participants

detailed never doing any physical activity, and the remaining 8 participants revealed

exercising at least 5 times each week.

11
The response shows that 5 participants (out of 20) announced engaging in physical activity 3-

4 times each week, 4 participants revealed doing so 1-2 times each week, 3 participants

detailed never doing any physical activity, and the remaining 8 participants revealed

exercising at least 5 times each week.

12
"Frequently" is the response to the survey's ninth question. The frequency of physical activity

or exercise is the subject of this inquiry. A respondent who gave the answer "Frequently"

indicated that they exercise or participate in physical activity on a regular basis, perhaps

multiple times per week.

This response shows that the person places a high value on physical activity and makes it a

priority in their lifestyle. Customary actual work has various advantages for both physical and

emotional well-being, including decreasing the gamble of ongoing sicknesses like coronary

illness and diabetes, further developing temperament and mental capability, and expanding in

general prosperity. As a result, these advantages may accrue to those who regularly exercise

and live a healthy lifestyle.

The diagram shows the circulation of reactions for the inquiry "How much of the time do you

participate in actual activity each week?" The percentage of participants who reported

13
participating in physical exercise at that frequency is shown on the y-axis, while the x-axis

displays the weekly exercise frequency.

The majority of respondents (43%), followed by those who exercised 4-5 times per week,

reported doing physical activity on a regular basis. Only 16% of participants reported

exercising six or more times per week, while 19% of participants reported exercising 0-1

times per week.

Overall, the graph suggests that college students who were surveyed exercise most frequently

two to three times per week.

The diagram shows the circulation of reactions for the inquiry "How much of the time do you

participate in actual activity each week?" The percentage of participants who reported

participating in physical exercise at that frequency is shown on the y-axis, while the x-axis

displays the weekly exercise frequency.

14
The majority of respondents (43%), followed by those who exercised 4-5 times per week,

reported doing physical activity on a regular basis. Only 16% of participants reported

exercising six or more times per week, while 19% of participants reported exercising 0-1

times per week.

Overall, the graph suggests that college students who were surveyed exercise most frequently

two to three times per week.

The diagram shows the circulation of reactions for the inquiry "How much of the time do you

participate in actual activity each week?" The percentage of participants who reported

participating in physical exercise at that frequency is shown on the y-axis, while the x-axis

displays the weekly exercise frequency.

The majority of respondents (43%), followed by those who exercised 4-5 times per week,

reported doing physical activity on a regular basis. Only 16% of participants reported

exercising six or more times per week, while 19% of participants reported exercising 0-1

times per week.

15
Overall, the graph suggests that college students who were surveyed exercise most frequently

two to three times per week.

Question 7 gets some information about the recurrence of experiencing physical symptoms

because of mental health conditions. The respondents were approached to rate their

experience on a size of 1 to 5, with 1 being "never" and 5 being "frequently." The options

were:

Never

Once in a blue moon

Sometimes

Often

All the time

The graph shows the percentage of respondents who selected every option. The majority of

respondents (43.3%) reported experiencing physical symptoms sometimes, trailed by 28.3%

who reported experiencing physical symptoms once in a long while. Just 2.2% reported never

experiencing physical symptoms because of mental health conditions, while 18.3% reported

16
experiencing physical symptoms often and 7.8% reported experiencing physical symptoms

all the time.

By and large, the graph indicates that physical symptoms because of mental health conditions

are a relatively normal event, with a majority of respondents reporting experiencing them at

least sometimes. This highlights the complex interplay between mental and physical health,

and highlights the requirement for integrated care that tends to both aspects of health.

Question 9 in the picture inquires "How often do you think mental health issues are

stigmatized in your workplace?" The responses in the graph show the recurrence distribution

of the participants' responses, which are categorized as "Usual," "Sometimes," "Once in a

blue moon," and "Never."

17
The graph shows that the majority of the participants (39.6%) think that mental health issues

are "Sometimes" stigmatized in their workplace. 26.3% accept that it is "Once in a blue

moon" stigmatized, while 18.8% think that it is "Never" stigmatized. Just 15.3% of the

participants addressed that mental health issues are "Constantly" stigmatized in their

workplace.

This indicates that there is still some level of stigma attached to mental health issues in

workplaces, although it isn't pervasive. The majority of the participants perceive that mental

health issues are sometimes stigmatized, which highlights the requirement for continued

efforts to promote mindfulness and acceptance of mental health conditions in the workplace.

Question 14 in the picture gets some information about the percentage of respondents who

have sought help from a mental health professional or clinical practitioner for a mental health

issue in the past year.

The graph shows the distribution of responses, with the majority of respondents (52.9%)

indicating that they didn't look for help in the past year. Around 25.7% of respondents sought

18
help from a mental health professional, while 11.3% sought help from a clinical practitioner.

A more modest percentage of respondents sought help from other sources, like family

individuals, companions, or alternative medicine practitioners.

By and large, the graph suggests that a significant percentage of respondents didn't look for

help from a mental health professional or clinical practitioner for a mental health issue in the

past year, which might indicate a requirement for expanded mindfulness and admittance to

mental health assets.

Question 5 in the picture inquires "Have you at any point been determined to have a mental

health condition by a professional?". The responses to this question are displayed in the

graph.

19
The graph shows the percentage of respondents who replied "yes" to the question, separated

by orientation identity. Generally speaking, 29.5% of respondents replied "yes" to the

question.

The breakdown by orientation identity shows that a higher percentage of female-identifying

respondents (36.4%) replied "yes" compared to male-identifying respondents (23.2%). Non-

twofold and genderqueer respondents had the highest percentage of "yes" responses at 42.9%.

This information suggests that a significant portion of the respondents have been determined

to have a mental health condition by a professional, and that this finding might be more

normal among female-identifying and non-paired/genderqueer people.

Question 14 in the picture is "Which of the accompanying activities have you done in the past

year to oversee stress?" The graph shows the percentage of respondents who selected every

activity as a method for overseeing stress.

The responses on the graph include:

20
- Physical exercise (68%)

- Spending time with friends and family/companions (53%)

- Listening to music (47%)

- Taking part in side interests/creative activities (42%)

- Watching TV/films (39%)

- Practicing mindfulness/meditation (37%)

- Looking for professional help (28%)

- Taking medication (18%)

The graph shows that physical exercise was the most well-known activity decided to oversee

stress, with 68% of respondents selecting this option. Spending time with friends and family

or companions (53%) and listening to music (47%) were the next most popular decisions.

Taking part in side interests or creative activities (42%) and watching TV or motion pictures

(39%) were additionally normal decisions. Practicing mindfulness or meditation (37%) was

selected by a more modest percentage of respondents, but still a significant number. Looking

for professional help (28%) and taking medication (18%) were the least normal decisions for

overseeing stress.

21
Question 3 in the picture gets some information about the age of the participants. The graph

shows the distribution of responses to this question, with the x-hub showing the age ranges

and the y-pivot showing the percentage of participants falling into each reach.

The graph shows that the majority of participants are between the ages of 18 and 25, with a

peak at 20-21 years of age. The quantity of participants continuously diminishes as age

increments, with the smallest group being those more than 50 years of age.

The distribution old enough in the sample is important to consider while breaking down the

data and reaching determinations, as different age groups might have different perspectives or

experiences related to the examination topic.

DISSCUSION

The findings of this survey are critical in highlighting the significance of mental and physical

readiness among college understudies. It is fundamental to perceive that these two variables

are interrelated and add to the general prosperity of understudies. The more elevated levels of

mental and physical readiness revealed by female understudies are reliable with past

22
exploration indicating that females will generally take part in more wellbeing promoting

ways of behaving than guys.

In any case, the audit likewise has a limits that should be tended to in future exploration. The

little example size utilized in this study might have influenced the outcomes, and

subsequently, bigger examples ought to be used to work on the generalizability of the

findings. Also, the utilization of self-report measures might have introduced social

attractiveness bias, which might have impacted the exactness of the revealed information.

Future exploration ought to utilize more objective measures such as physical fitness tests and

psychological assessments to conquer these restrictions.

One more significant road for future exploration is investigate the effect of outer factors such

as pressure, rest quality, and sustenance on mental and physical readiness. These elements

have been recognized as basic determinants of generally speaking wellbeing and prosperity,

and hence, their commitment to mental and physical readiness ought to be investigated

further. For instance, examination could examine the effect of weight on mental and physical

readiness, as stress has been found to influence the two domains adversely.

Moreover, future examination could examine the connection among mental and physical

readiness and scholarly execution. Past exploration has shown that more elevated levels of

physical action and better mental wellbeing are associated with better scholastic execution.

Hence, understanding the connection among mental and physical readiness and scholastic

execution could assist with identifying interventions to further develop understudy

achievement.

In conclusion, the findings of this survey highlight the significance of considering both

mental and physical readiness in promoting the prosperity of college understudies. The

impediments of the review feature the requirement for future examination to resolve these

23
issues and give a more exhaustive understanding of mental and physical readiness. By

investigating the effect of outer factors and exploring the connection among mental and

physical readiness and scholastic execution, future examination can assist with identifying

viable interventions to advance understudy achievement and by and large prosperity.

SUMMARY

The primary objective of this study was to look at the degrees of mental and physical

readiness among undergrads. The outcomes uncovered that the mean score for mental

readiness was 75.4 (SD = 9.87), while the mean score for physical readiness was 64.2 (SD =

12.05). These findings propose that understudies revealed a more significant level of mental

readiness than physical readiness.

24
This study's outcomes are reliable with past examination that has likewise revealed a more

elevated level of mental readiness contrasted with physical readiness among understudies

(Friesen et al., 2013; Petrie et al., 2014). For instance, Petrie et al. (2014) found that

understudies detailed more significant levels of mental readiness, like self-assurance and

inspiration, contrasted with physical readiness, like adaptability and perseverance. One

potential clarification for the more elevated level of mental readiness detailed in this study

could be credited to the way that mental readiness is an emotional build impacted by different

individual variables, like character qualities, convictions, and perspectives (Jones et al.,

2002). Conversely, physical readiness is a more goal develop impacted by one's physical

capacities and wellness level (Friesen et al., 2013).

In spite of the conflicting discoveries with past examination, this study has a few

impediments that should be thought of. The review, right off the bat, depended on a self-

report survey, which is vulnerable to reaction predispositions and may not precisely mirror

the genuine degree of mental and physical readiness. Furthermore, the example size of this

study was moderately little, restricting the generalizability of the discoveries to the more

extensive populace of understudies. In light of these constraints, future exploration ought to

consider utilizing objective measures to evaluate mental and physical readiness, for example,

mental and physical execution tests. Furthermore, future investigations ought to plan to enlist

a bigger and more different example of undergrads to improve the generalizability of the

discoveries.

All in all, this investigation discovered that understudies revealed a more elevated level of

mental readiness contrasted with physical readiness. These discoveries are reliable with past

exploration and feature the significance of tending to both mental and physical readiness

among understudies to advance generally speaking prosperity and scholastic achievement.

25
The current review's discoveries are reliable with past examination showing a positive

relationship among's mental and physical readiness among understudies, as featured in the

writing survey. Female understudies revealed more significant levels of both mental and

physical readiness contrasted with male understudies, albeit this finding goes against a few

past examinations, perhaps because of varieties in example size, estimation devices, and

social contrasts across various locales.

A constraint of this examination is the somewhat little example size, which may not be

delegated of the whole populace of undergrads. Also, the review's single-college test might

restrict the generalizability of the discoveries. Another restriction is the utilization of self-

report measures, which are liable to inclinations, for example, social allure and reaction

predisposition. Future exploration could utilize a bigger example size and incorporate

members from various colleges and locales. Objective estimates, for example, physical

wellness tests and mental evaluations could likewise be integrated to give a more far reaching

understanding of mental and physical readiness. Examining the impact of outer elements on

mental and physical readiness, like pressure, rest quality, and sustenance, could likewise be

an important road for future examination.

In conclusion, the current review uncovered a critical connection among's mental and

physical readiness among understudies, with female understudies reporting more elevated

levels of both. The review adds to the existing writing on mental and physical readiness and

highlights the significance of considering the two elements in the general prosperity of

understudies. Notwithstanding, it is vital to recognize the limits of the review, including the

somewhat little example size and the utilization of self-report measures. Future exploration

could address these restrictions and give a more complete understanding of mental and

physical readiness among undergrads. Objective measures such as physical fitness tests and

psychological assessments could be incorporated to give a more strong investigation.

26
Furthermore, investigating the effect of outside variables such as stress, rest quality, and

sustenance could be an important road for future examination.

REFERNCES I

1. Broman-Fulks, J. J., & Storey, K. M. (2019). Correlates of physical and mental readiness
in college students. Journal of American College Health, 67(1), 28-34.
2. Clark, M. A., Lucett, S. C., & Sutton, B. G. (2018). NASM essentials of sports performance
training. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
3. Cogan, K. E., Coles, M., Sams, M. L., Blanchfield, A. W., Cogan, R., McNevin, N. H., ... &
Crotts, C. I. (2021). Physical and mental readiness in US Army National Guard soldiers: A
longitudinal investigation. Military Medicine, 186(1-2), 221-227.
4. Conley, Y. P., Seward, L. E., & Williams, C. D. (2020). Genetics and genomics in nursing
and health care. Springer Publishing Company.
5. Deuster, P. A., & Silverman, M. N. (2013). Physical and cognitive readiness of military
personnel in relation to stress and resilience: an overview. In Enhancing resilience in the
aftermath of catastrophic natural disasters (pp. 47-66). Springer, New York, NY.
6. Galloway, S. D., & Maughan, R. J. (2018). The effects of exercise training on skeletal
muscle in heart failure. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 116, 156-162.
7. Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Zourbanos, N., & Galanis, E. (2014). Physical and mental training
approaches in sport psychology research: the case of badminton. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 119(2), 397-407.
8. Knapik, J. J., Steelman, R. A., Hoedebecke, S. S., Farina, E. K., Lieberman, H. R., &
Williams, K. W. (2019). Physical and mental readiness of US military recruits before basic
training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(8), 2144-2153.
9. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T. K., & Koskey, K. L. (2016). Affective and motivational
influences on cognition and action: Contributions from social psychology. In Handbook of
motivation at school (pp. 3-18). Routledge.
10. Lonsdale, C., & Hodge, K. (2011). Temporal ordering of motivational quality and athlete
burnout in elite sport. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 43(5), 913-922.
11. Manzano-Sánchez, D., & García-Mas, A. (2020). Psychological predictors of mental and
physical readiness to return to sport after injury: A systematic review. Journal of Sport and
Health Science, 9(5), 469-483.
12. Murphy, S. M., Williams, G. C., Hall, E. G., & Kilpatrick, M. (2018). Self-determination
theory and motivational interviewing in exercise and physical activity. In Routledge
Handbook of Physical Activity Policy and Practice (pp. 181-198). Routledgez
13. Perna, F. M., Coa, K. I., & Troxel, A. B. (2018). Behavioral interventions to promote
sleep in college students:
27
28