Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Esg Reporting Quality and Performance
Esg Reporting Quality and Performance
a. Environmental Criteria
This criterion discusses the consideration of investors on company performance,
through friendly mining activities environment such as energy use, waste handling,
conservation of natural resources, and behavior towards flora and fauna mining activities.
Apart from that, the company's commitment to meet these criteria will have a positive
impact on company and for the environment as it gets sustainability in its business
operations if environmental conditions kind and supportive.
b. Social Criteria
Social criteria in this case include corporate relations with external parties,
society, community, media, and entities other related directly or indirectly. The presence
of social criteria in mining companies can have a positive impact on the company's
financial performance mining, because the company's image will be influenced by
whether or not the company in positioning itself on social problems that occur, as well as
companies that active to resolve the rights and constraints experienced by company
employees.
c. Criteria for Corporate Governance
On this criterion the company will focus on how the company has good
governance and internally sustainable. Governance criteria in terms of this includes
transparent, non-violating company finances ethical rights of workers, and have the
legality of activities that done. company that has good governance of course Conceptually
environment social governance is a company standard in carrying out investment
activities consisting of three criteria, namely environment (social), and governance
company (governance). The purpose of the existence of the concept of social environment
governance is to create sustainable economic development sustainable.
Nowaday, investors tend to make criteria environment social governance in making
decisions to invest in a company. Therefore, the company which since the beginning has
implemented a social governance environment in business processes to operational as a
whole tends to be successful to attract investors. The application of the concept of
environmental social governance has closely related to the sustainability of the company. As
for the three factors main company in implementing the concept of social environment
governance. This criterion discusses the consideration of investors on company performance,
through friendly mining activities environment such as energy use, waste handling,
conservation of natural resources, and behavior towards flora and fauna mining activities.
This includes transparent, non-violating company finances ethical rights of workers, and
have the legality of activities that done. company that has good governance of courseThis
meaning refers to the term social welfare (social welfare) as a condition of fulfilling material
and non-material needs material. In practice social services include five forms, namely social
security, health services, education, housing and personal social services. This allowance is
enforced in the United States of America given to the poor, most of the beneficiaries these are
the poor, the disabled, the unemployed. However, this circumstance actually gives a negative
connotation to the term well-being such as poverty, laziness, and dependency which is
actually more accurately called "social illfare" compared "social welfare".
The meaning of welfare is often carried out by individuals, social institutions,
communities and government agencies to improve the quality of life through provision of
social services and social benefits provided by country. The ideal of a welfare state that
mandates the active role of the state to regulate the economy which stated "to protect the
entire Indonesian nation and throughout Indonesia's bloodshed and to promote prosperity in
general, educating the life of the nation and participating in world order based on freedom,
eternal peace and social justice". In addition, the concept of a welfare state also exists on the
fifth precept Pancasila which reads "social justice for all The ideal of a welfare state that
mandates the active role of the state to regulate the economy has been set out in Paragraph IV
preamble to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 which stated "to protect
the entire Indonesian nation and throughout Indonesia's bloodshed and to promote prosperity
in general, educating the life of the nation and participating in world order based on freedom,
eternal peace and social justice". In addition, the concept of the welfare state also exists on
the fifth precept Pancasila which reads "social justice for all people of Indonesia". The
meaning contained in the constitution and Pancasila explains that the state has an important
role to play provide a decent living and the people are entitled to treated economically fairly
and can feel access well-being in his life.
2.4. Environmental Sovereignty
Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 has given birth to
new thinking in the field of environment life that changed a new outlook in implementation
state administration in Indonesia. According to Prof. Dr. Jimly Asshiddiqie God created
nature and everything in it, including humans, so that human life must be in balance with the
universe or natural environment, and nature must be seen as having rights in the context of
power. Equalizing environmental sovereignty position between humans and nature as
subjects has brought logical consequence that nature also holds power in the field or in
certain matters of a fundamental nature. Technological development those who carry out the
processing of natural resources must remain pay attention to the balance and preservation of
nature so that the source Natural resources will continue to benefit future generations.
The idea of environmental sovereignty has actually been outlined as well in the
Indonesian state constitution in Article 28 H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the
Republic of Indonesia which reads "Everyone has the right to live in physical and spiritual
prosperity, to have a place live, and get a good and healthy living environment as well
entitled to health services”. Likewise in Article 33 Sodikin, “The Idea of Environmental
Sovereignty in the Constitution and Its Implementation In Environmental Preservation”,
paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which mandates the
importance of the principles of development sustainable development and development
principles environmentally sound. The right to a good and healthy environment is the most
important right essential that cannot be reduced, because without this right human cannot
enjoy a good and healthy life.
Moreover, the environment is an ecological unit is a cycle of life in which humans
exist inside it. In relation to Article 33 paragraph (4) of the Constitution Republic of
Indonesia Year 1945 which reads "earth and water and the natural wealth contained therein is
controlled by the state and used for the greatest prosperity of the people. Thread red from the
constitutional verse means that earth, water and natural wealth contained in it which includes
space outer space is a unified living environment should be maintained and developed for
later use for the benefit of the people. Therefore in resource management natural resources
which include earth, water and other natural resources required to pay attention to the
ecosystem and be principled sustainable and environmentally sound so that natural wealth is
contained in Indonesia's homeland continues to provide benefits to society while protecting
the environment in order to remain sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility (ESG) is
promoted as wrong a form of corporate participation in the business world to carry out
sustainable development so that the company can develop awareness programs for the
surrounding community through creation and maintenance of balance between profit, social
functions and maintenance of the environment According to Ernst and Young in
implementing ESG, The company has four main responsibilities, namely to employees,
consumers, society, and the environment.
This becomes the basis for consideration for the company to be able implementing
ESG specifically. There are nine work programs companies can do in carrying out ESG
activities
among others:
a. Employee Programs; the company pays attention to competency development and
employee welfare starting from the side of health insurance, safety to the expansion of
other programs such as work life balance program and decision making empowerment
program.
b. Community and Broader Society; One of the company's activities carried out in this
area is through community empowerment that makes individuals, groups or
communities trying to control their lives themselves and strive to shape the future
accordingly to their liking. Implementation of empowerment community is done
through development projects that enable community members receive support to
meet their needs Campaigns and social actions that enable needs can be met by other
responsible parties answer like a company
c. Environment Program; this program deals with environmental maintenance, such as
how the company produces a product that is safe, harmless to health and
environmentally friendly
d. Reporting and Communications Program; In this program the company issues or
reports results its ESG activities through the annual ESG Report so that it can proven
real company participation in carrying out responsibilities social responsibility
e. Governance or Code of Conduct Programs The company focuses on social activities
carried out based on a system regulated by the government. The main thing carried
out in this program is how stakeholders, government, society and the business world
are able to create mutually agreed regulations to make the program effective ESG
f. Stakeholder Engagement Programs; This program is the main key pursued by the
company to create an “effective engagement program” so that company is able to
achieve the success of ESG strategy
g. Supplier Programs; Fostering good relationships on the basis of trust, commitment,
information sharing between the company and its business partners
h. Customer/Product Stewardship Programs; the company pays attention to consumer
complaints and product quality assurance produced by the company
i. Shareholder Programs; This program is carried out to increase the "share value" for
shareholder, because shareholder is a priority for company.
Companies in carrying out nickel management practices not only obliged to provide
benefits through programs that have been designed by the government, but companies as well
required to maintain environmental sovereignty through the program ESG. The essence of the
theory of environmental sovereignty above explains that in the context of making use of
natural resources contained in Indonesia, whether the state, government, entrepreneurs or
society still has to place the environment as supreme authority in the life of the Indonesian
constitution. Country permitted to carry out processing of natural resources, however the state
must also protect the environment as an equal subject have the right to life. The idea of
environmental sovereignty is enshrined in the Indonesia Constitution is implemented into
several regulations Legislation to give such shades of green fulfillment and protection of
human rights and development economy through sustainable development and insight into
the archipelago which is the limit of environmental management in the region Indonesia.
Based on the search that the researcher has done, the research that examines the distortion
of the principle of benefit in nickel management based on reclamation by mining companies
in Indonesia already has been carried out by a number of circles, but studies these have
differences in the focus of research when paired with the researcher's writing. There are a
number of studies that found by researchers are thesis was written by Dwi Indah Lestari. This
thesis discusses the responsibilities of business actors in the mining sector is then associated
with pollution environment. The similarity with the thesis that the researcher will design,
namely jointly discuss the environmental impact due to the activity mining. However, this is
the focus of this thesis, apart from environmental pollution, this thesis also discusses
concerning the legal consequences for business actors in the event of pollution environment
from mining activities carried out.
Whereas the thesis that the researcher will design will be focused on efforts carried out by
mining companies in conducting mine management. The thesis was written by Alauddin
Rusdin. This thesis discusses social responsibility and environment of gold and nickel
mining business actors in the province my north shame. The similarity with the thesis that the
researcher wants to design lies in the social and environmental responsibility of top mining
mining activities carried out by business actors. Although thus, the focus of this thesis is
more on management mineral and coal mining which refers to the principle participation,
transparency, and accountability. While that will design researchers will focus on nickel-
based management environmental social governance by mining companies. The thesis was
written by Angela Pingkan Kuluq.
This thesis discusses the implementation of damage reclamation environment of ex-coal
mining excavation in Kutai Regency West. The similarity of this thesis with the thesis that
the researcher will design, that is, both discuss efforts to return ex-mining areas for reuse.
however which being the main focus in this thesis is more to the constraints that occur the
process of reclamation of ex-mining excavations. While the script which the researcher will
design will focus on utilization nickel management based on environment social governance
by mining companies in Indonesia. Journal article written by Asti Amelia Novita. This
journal article discusses collaborative governance and environmental management in mining
areas. Similarity in the thesis that the researcher will design, namely discussing together
regarding efforts to improve internal environmental governance ensure the environment in
the mining area. But on the article.
This journal focuses more on the implementation of environmental guarantees security
and implementation of sustainable development goals. While the script which the researcher
will discuss will be focused on the concept of social environment governance on nickel
management carried out by the company mining. Journal articles written by Zulkifli and I
Made Putrawan.This journal article discusses policy evaluation management of the mining
environment on Obi Island, Maluku Province North. The similarity with the thesis that the
researcher will design, namely together to discuss environmental management in particular
mining. Even so, this journal article is more focused how to evaluate mining management
policies. Whereas the thesis that the researcher will design will focus on the efforts that will
be carried out by mining companies to protect the environment in the management of nickel
mining materials.
This journal article discusses corporate responsibility on the reclamation of ex-mining
land. The similarity with the script the researcher will design, namely both discussing the
steps mining companies to restore the function of former excavations mine so that it can be
used according to its designation. But aside from Therefore, this journal article focuses on the
level of research regulation and accountability of mining companies to reclamation of
excavated mines. while the thesis will be the researcher the design will focus on the
company's social governance environment mining on nickel management.
2.5. Management of Mining Companies in Indonesia
Laws and Regulations Related to Mining Activities 1. Law Number 11 of 1967
concerning Principles Mining. The concept of mastery as stipulated in Law Number 11 of
1967 concerning Principles of Mining is mastery over all minerals contained in the mine
Indonesian mining jurisdiction which covers natural deposits as a gift from God Almighty
Mastery over These mines have become the national wealth of the Indonesian nation and
therefore controlled and used by the state for give as much as possible to the interests of the
people. The presence of arrangements regarding the principles of mining aims to accelerate
the implementation of economic development towards a just and prosperous Indonesian
society based on Pancasila and the mobilization of all funds and resources to cultivate
potential economic power in the field of agar mining become a real economic power.
On mastery practice mining, this rule divides minerals into 3 (three) group, namely
strategic mineral class, class of mineral material vital, and non-strategic and non-vital mineral
groups. Differentiation of Law Number 11 of 1967 with regulations before lies in the basic
principle of giving opportunity to private companies engaged in mining and new
arrangements regarding the reduction of mining concessions directly by the state, so that the
state functions only as supervisors and providers of guidance and direction to the perpetrators
mining business. Apart from that, in this rule mining authority is a permit granted by the
minister to carry out activities mining. When compared with the Indische Mijnwet Staatblad
of 1899 Number 214 the mining authority referred to in this rule is almost the same as the
concession, which has the same permits, but the two are still different because of mining
authority only the power to carry out mining business and not assign mining ownership to the
power holder mining, while concessions are broader licenses and strong and direct
concessionaires have the result the mining concerned.
New arrangements regarding later work agreements in the form of a KK or mining
PKP2B is also present in the regulations In this case, KK and PKP2B arrangements become
agreements for the government Indonesia with contractors in working on mining general. The
contractors in the field of mining business include domestic investors and foreign investors.In
terms of mining principles, criminal provisions also only apply to everyone who carries out
mining business activities without holding mining concessions. Law Number 4 of 2009
concerning Mineral Mining and Coal The issuance of Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning
Mineral and Coal Mining is gaining momentumrenewal of mining law changes in Indonesia.
Atmosphere The inner formation of this law is also reflected in section consideration of Law
Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. Based on that consideration mature,
the formation of this regulation wants:
a. Management of mineral and coal mining must be mastered by the state to provide real
added value to national economy to achieve prosperity and the welfare of the people
in an equitable manner
b. Mineral and coal mining has an important role to add real value to growth national
economy and regional development in a sustainable manner
c. This regulation is expected to be a guide in managing and independently exploit
mineral and coal potential, transparent, reliable, competitive, efficient and insightful
environment, in order to guarantee national development as a whole sustainable.
Minerals and coal contained within the jurisdiction Indonesia's mining is a non-renewable
natural wealth as a gift from God Almighty who has a role important in fulfilling the needs of
many people's lives, therefore management must be controlled by the state and insightful
environment. Nickel management by mining companies applying the concept of
environmental social governance is an effort to support nickel management with an
environmental perspective, because the concept will encourage mining entrepreneurs to take
the benefits derived from nickel steadily minimize the environmental impacts it causes when
mining activities are carried out.
Nickel mining activities carried out by the company mining in potential mining areas
nickel reserves, both above ground and underground, located in the land area or sea area.
which region determined as a mining area has the following criteria:
a. Indication of mineral-bearing rock formations
b. Mining resource potential in solid form and/or liquid
Determination of mining areas, regulated in the regional plan mining as outlined in the
form of a mineral potential map derived from data and information on the results of
investigations and mining research carried out by the Minister, Governor, Regents/Mayors
that must be processed into mineral potential maps and/or coal. Explicitly regarding
management authority mineral and coal mining in Law Number 4 2009 concerning Mineral
and Coal Mining, This authority is given to the Central Government, Provincial Government,
and Regency/City Government. Arrangement This authority is a new breakthrough for the
administration governance within the framework of strengthening regional autonomy,
because before the enactment of the mineral and coal law authority to manage mineral and
coal mining tend to be centralized. But Law Number 4 Year 2009 only lasted 11 years,
because this regulation has not yet been issued respond to developments, problems, and needs
law in the implementation of mineral and coal mining. Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning
Mineral Mining and Coal In order to answer developments, problems, and legal requirements
in the implementation of mineral mining and coal, the government took a step to improve
regulation of minerals and coal in order to make a real contribution to Indonesian society.
Referring to the principle of benefit, be insightful environment, legal certainty and
accountability within the sector mining, into legal politics to change the law mineral and coal
mining in Indonesia. In line with the provisions of Article 33 paragraph (3) of the
Constitution Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 which reads "Earth, water and the natural
wealth contained therein is controlled by the state and used for the greatest prosperity of the
people "had bring logical consequences that the state is responsible for regulate, supervise,
and manage natural resources contained in the homeland for the creation of the prosperity of
the Indonesian people. There are a number of important points contained in the Act Number 3
of 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, that is:
1) Licensing management authority agreeing that control of minerals and coal held by
the government through the functions of policy, regulation, management,
management and mastery.
2) Regarding the extension of the operating license that guarantees existence
continuation of the operation of the contract of work/work agreement coal mining into
IUPK as a continuation of operations.
3) Government efforts to increase added value or downstream which is regulated
through the management and refining activities of the results mining excavations in
the country and obliges entrepreneurs mines to build refinery facilities.
4) Regarding diversification of shares which obliges the holder mining business permit
or special mining business permit at the stage of production operations whose shares
are owned by foreign companies to divest shares of 51% in stages to the central
government, regional government, BUMN, BUMD, and/or National Private Business
Entity. fifth, provides a maximum area of 100 hectares of land that owns Logan
mineral reserves with a maximum of 100 meters for the area people's mining.
Environmentally friendly and sustainable conception in activities mining as stipulated
in Law Number 3 Years 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining seems to be in
line with the concept of nickel management based on social environment governance.
Because the concept of environmental social governance in Nickel management will
prioritize environmental aspects as well minimize the impact of the damage caused by its
presence nickel mining activities, so that nickel-based management environment social
governance is able to implement the mandate of the Law on deep mineral and coal mining
framework of sustainable and insightful nickel mining activities environment. The
application of the environmental social governance concept is of course be an endeavor of the
government and also entrepreneurs to go to sustainable development in the mining sector in
Indonesia.
2.5. Nickel is Part of The Mineral Reserves that Become Wealth
Non-renewable natural resources (non-renewable resource bases), therefore
management must be maximized in order to produce added value bigger for the country.
Mistakes ever made by Indonesia as a resource owner is to only sell nickel the form of ores or
raw minerals (ores/concentrates) that cause incurring losses due to the low value of nickel ore
and for correcting this mistake, today the government through Law Number 3 of 2020
concerning Mineral and Coal Mining began to oblige mining companies to process the results
mining in the country and prohibit mining companies to export nickel ore. Based on a survey
conducted by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) in January 2021, Indonesia has
been designated as the world's largest nickel producing country.
In 2021 Indonesia has produces 760,000 metric tons of nickel which beats the
Philippines, Russia, New Keledonia, Australia and other countries. The report launched by
the Central Bureau of Statistics noted that in 2017 nickel production reached 20.96 tons, 2018
reached 38.33 tons and 2019 reached 60.94 tons which reached the nickel production figure
the highest in Indonesia in the last 4 years, but in 2020 Indonesia's nickel production has
decreased so that in 2020 Indonesia's nickel production only reached 48.04 tons. The
transportation sector as the highest carbon contributor has succeeded in changing the sector
that previously used fossil energy switch to electricity. The need for nickel today is at the
electric car segment is around 100,000 tons to 200,000 tons, even in the future, the demand
for nickel in the electric car segment is projected reached 1.7 million tons.
This becomes very reasonable when Indonesia is eyed by many investors, because
Indonesia is one of them a country that has abundant nickel reserves. The high number of
nickel production in the mining business is becoming evidence of the high demand for nickel-
type minerals. Moreover discourse on the presence of nickel as the main component of
vehicle batteries electricity. The use of nickel-based batteries does not only become world
discourse, but it is also an Indonesian discourse to utilize nickel resources, this can be proven
through the issuance of Regulations President Number 55 of 2019 concerning the
Acceleration of the Vehicle Program Battery-Based Electric Motorized (Battery Electric
Vehicle) for road transportation. The ecosystem of the electric vehicle industry in Indonesia
is wrong the other was worked on by a consortium consisting of LG Energy Solution, LG
Chem, Posco and Huayou Holding and also involved PT Battery Industry Directorate
General of Mineral and Coal, Mineral and Coal Grand Strategy: Direction of Upstream
Downstream Main Mineral and Coal Development Towards Advanced Indonesia, 2021.
Indonesia, which has four BUMN members consisting of Inalum, Antam, Pertamina
and PLN. The existence of nickel is increasing after the discourse the use of nickel as the
main component in electric vehicle batteries. But long before that, in Indonesia nickel had
become a valuable material has many benefits for the domestic industry. Starting from the
industry automotive, building construction, military, to components on tools electronics often
use nickel as a component in industry. In the automotive industry, Nike is often processed
into steel stainless steel used to make the vehicle frame, then in the building industry nickel is
trusted as a metal material for be made part of the building that is not flammable. Plus, nickel
also often used by the electronics industry by processing nickel to be found in a number of
devices such as smartphones and nanocomponents in electronics. Implementation of nickel
management based on social environment governance by mining companies will certainly be
a part supporter in order to optimize the utilization of nickel resources in Indonesia. Because
through the concept of environmental social governance Mining companies will process
nickel using technology and methods effective and efficient so that its management can be
minimized the impact of environmental damage on the mining activities carried out by
mining companies. This is certainly not only beneficial for company but also will have a
positive impact on society located around the mining area.
2.6. The Principle of Legal Benefits in Nickel-Based Management Environment Social
Governance
Talking about law is inseparable from benefits law that participates when a rule has
been promulgated. Benefits law which is the aim of law has brought logical consequences
that everyone has expected the perceived benefits after the formation of a rule and being able
to eliminate the unrest in the community. Justice is indeed a value main, but expediency is
also part of the pillars of law formation which should be prioritized. Therefore, in order to
carry out the law in a country, the comparison between benefits and sacrifices must be
proportionally so that the applicable law can reflect justice, legal certainty and benefits.
Mineral and coal reserves which are natural resources non-renewable energy has encouraged
the state to manage it optimally, efficiently, transparently, sustainably, and insightfully
environment, and obtain maximum benefits for prosperity people in a sustainable manner.
The principle of benefit in this case corresponds to concept developed by Jeremy
Bentham that puts benefits as the main purpose of law, which depends on the discussion
about whether the law formed can give happiness to humans or not. Normatively in Article 2
letter (a) Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining has outlined that
mineral and coal mining is managed based on benefit, fairness and balance. If taken thread
red from the sound of the article above, it can be interpreted that management mining, in this
case the management of nickel must be carried out with attention to several aspects such as
economic, social, cultural, environment, and others. Maximum application of the principles
management of this nickel mutatis mutandis can give birth effective, sustainable, insightful
management of nickel environment and able to support and develop nickel mining in order to
be more competitive at the national and international levels international.
The concept of nickel management principles outlined in regulations Mineral and coal
mining actually contains principles mining that is good and right and has aims and objectives
with broad dimensions, such as:
1. Controlling the distribution of nickel utilization with top priority for the benefit of the
nation and state
2. Increase mining recovery or the acquisition of nickel minerals as much as possible
3. Increasing efficiency in the use of nickel minerals to support efforts to save long-term
dimensions of basic industrial materials or savings for the benefit of future
generations . Increasing the country's foreign exchange earnings in the mining sector
because of the mining recovery that seeks to improve the amount of minerals obtained
and extend the life of nickel mining. Based on data reported through the Mining
Advocacy Network National, that in 2020 conflicts between mining companies with
the community around the mine still often occurs.
The National Mine Advocacy noted that there were 45 mining conflicts consisting of 22
cases of environmental pollution, 13 cases of expropriation land by mining companies, and 8
cases of criminalization against residents who oppose mining activities. Read more JATAM
Nasional found that until 2020, there were 3,092 abandoned mining pits pollution
Environment 51% deprivation land 30% criminalization reject citizens mine 19% open
without any process of reclamation or restoration of ex-excavated areas mine. Nickel mining
activities that do not apply the principles of and Good and correct mining principles will
certainly have an impact bad for the environment, society and also the country. Nickel
management Not paying attention to the environment will damage the environment impact on
the losses experienced by the surrounding community nickel mining areas such as
environmental destruction and decline in the quality of life of the local population.
If only nickel management maximally without efforts to protect the environment, it will
have a long-term impact on declining state revenues nickel mining sector. Nickel
management carried out by mining companies which does not pay attention to natural
conditions and does not minimize the impact mining activities mutatis mutandis have been
contradictory mandate of Article 2 letter (a) of Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral
and Coal Mining. Due to company action Such mining will hinder sustainable development
in mining sector and damage the environment around the area nickel mining which if these
mistakes continue to be made, then it is impossible for the community around the nickel mine
to have their rights to obtain a good and healthy living environment.
Guarantee for the provision of a good and healthy environment has actually been
regulated in Article 28 H paragraph (1) of the Constitution Republic of Indonesia Year 1945
which reads "everyone has the right to live in physical and spiritual prosperity, to have a
place to live, and to receive a good and healthy living environment and the right to receive
services health". The constitutional mandate has given that meaning the state is responsible
for providing guarantees for the environment good and healthy life for every citizen. Mining
activities nickel management by mining companies is actually not permissible escaped the
mandate of the constitution, because even though the management of nickel carried out by
the company, the role of the state in the activity mining is by providing regulations that are
able to comply constitutional rights of citizens, especially the right to obtain a good and
healthy living environment for the people around the area mining.
State, Government, and all stakeholders have obligation to protect and manage the
environment life in the context of implementing Indonesia's sustainable development, so that
the environment can remain a resource and support life for the people of Indonesia. In order
to carry out the development sustainability in the nickel mining sector, the state began to take
firm steps to take action against miners who do not heed the principles of mining
management contained in Article 161 B paragraph (1) Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning
Mineral and Mining Coal by imposing a maximum criminal penalty of 5 (five) years and a
maximum fine of IDR 100,000,000,000.00 (one hundred billion rupiah) to any person
holding a mining business permit or license special mining business that does not carry out
reclamation and/or post-mining, or placement of reclamation guarantee funds and/or funds
post-mining guarantee. At the regulatory level, mineral and coal mining rules not only giving
criminal sanctions to everyone who violates legal provisions in carrying out mining activities
in Indonesia, but Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Mining Minerals and Coal can also
provide administrative sanctions in the form of written warning, fine, partial or complete
suspension exploration activities or production operations, and/or revocation of IUP, IUPK,
IPR, SIPB, or IUP for sales if it violates the provisions of the provisions contained in these
rules.
Determination of the sanctions in practice mining activities become a state effort to give a
bluff to mining business actors to always restoring the environmental conditions of former
mining areas has been processed in order to provide benefits to be reused by communities
around the mining area. Various efforts have been made by the state to create sustainable
development in the mining sector, especially mining nickel. But to achieve this goal the state
also needs cooperation assistance mining entrepreneurs in order to be able to achieve goals
the. The spirit of sustainable and insightful development environment in the nickel mining
sector is the company's reason Mining began to apply a new concept, namely the social
environment governance on nickel management. These three central factors will used by
companies to measure sustainability and ethical impact from a mining activity or investment
of a company mining.
The concept of environmental social governance is the standard companies in carrying
out nickel mining practices actually become efforts of miners towards sustainable nickel
management and environmentally conscious. Mining companies that apply the concept of
environmental social governance will prioritize management nickel in an environmentally
friendly manner and technology, such as the use of efficient energy, waste handling of mining
activities as well behavior towards the flora and fauna around the mining area. At the
regulatory level, mineral and coal mining rules not only giving criminal sanctions to everyone
who violates legal provisions in carrying out mining activities in Indonesia, but Law Number
3 of 2020 concerning Mining Minerals and Coal can also provide administrative sanctions in
the form of written warning, fine, partial or complete suspension exploration activities or
production operations, and/or revocation of IUP, IUPK, IPR, SIPB, or IUP for sales if it
violates the provisions of the provisions contained in these rules.
Determination of the sanctions in practice mining activities become a state effort to give a
bluff to mining business actors to always restoring the environmental conditions of former
mining areas has been processed in order to provide benefits to be reused by communities
around the mining area. Various efforts have been made by the state to create sustainable
development in the mining sector, especially mining nickel. But to achieve this goal the state
also needs cooperation assistance mining entrepreneurs in order to be able to achieve goals
the. The spirit of sustainable and insightful development environment in the nickel mining
sector is the company's reason mining began to apply a new concept, namely the social
environment governance on nickel management.
These three central factors will used by companies to measure sustainability and ethical
impact from a mining activity or investment of a company mining. The concept of
environmental social governance is the standard companies in carrying out nickel mining
practices actually become efforts of miners towards sustainable nickel management and
environmentally conscious. Mining companies that apply the concept of environmental social
governance will prioritize management nickel in an environmentally friendly manner and
technology, such as the use of efficient energy, waste handling of mining activities as well
behavior towards the flora and fauna around the mining area.
Nickel Added Value Through Smelters Abundant mineral resources cannot be managed
optimally to increase state revenue and the welfare of the people of Indonesia which comes
from mining minerals contained in the groundwater. Because most of the companies mines in
Indonesia often operate upstream, with exporting ores (raw minerals) that have a low selling
value. For more than 40 years, Indonesia has implemented this practice until earned
Indonesia the nickname as the exported of law material specialists. As a country rich in
mineral resources already the mining sector, especially minerals, should be able to
contributed greatly to state revenues, however at the practical level the contribution is still
relatively small. This matter proven by the Indonesia Mining Association (IMA) which
statesthat in the last 10 years (2005-2012), the average acceptance countries sourced from
general mining only reaches approx. Rp. 60.42 trillion or only 6.16% of total state revenue.
Viewed from the state revenue side, raw mineral export activities have played an
important role in development Indonesia, but over time the government became negligent and
allowing the exploitation of natural mineral resources to occur exports which ultimately cause
environmental damage, diminishing reserves and disruption of mineral resilience. In order to
take decisive action as a result of such over-exploitation, the government began enacting a
mineral export ban policy raw starting January 12, 2014. The logical consequence of the ban
the export is to make a mining company to process all raw mining products in the country
through the smelter built by a mining company. The main reason for its formation
stipulations for companies to manage minerals caused by mineral ore exports which have
continued to increase since 2008 however its existence does not trigger the development of
the downstream mining sector.
In other words, Indonesia as the owner of nickel resources will experienced losses due to
depleted nickel reserves and low selling value unable to increase state revenues, but the state
is importing Indonesian nickel actually experienced a significant advantage double. Based on
the Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Number 11 of 2019
concerning the Second Amendment to Ministerial Regulations Mineral Resources Energy
Number 25 of 2018 concerning Exploitation Mineral and Coal Mining, as of 1 January 2020
Indonesia has fully reinstate the nickel ore export ban. This policy stems from Law Number 4
of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining which is obligatory for every mining
companies to increase added value minerals through the management and refining of
minerals in the country.
Mineral management policy reform is intended to encourage the transition of mineral
management from upstream to downstream. Besides impose obligations on mining
companies to perform management, this rule also requires business license holders and
holders of contracts of work to build domestic smelters, as well prohibit companies from
exporting raw minerals. However, at the practice level, the downstream policy in Indonesia is
not working good, because the mineral downstream policy is still experiencing problems for
integrating upstream mining operations and management operations downstream minerals,
both technically and financially. There are no obstacles to the successful implementation of
downstream in Indonesia only arises from the mining company side, but from the side the
government has been inconsistent in implementing policies is the reason that downstream in
Indonesia has not run optimally.
Regulatory inconsistencies regarding the export of raw minerals in Indonesia Regulation
The minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Number 7 of 2012 has contained an export
ban unqualified raw mineral (totally export tires), but in Regulation of the Minister of Energy
and Mineral Resources No. 11 of 2012 the government opens return to the faucet to export
raw minerals with conditions (conditional export). Then the government issued a regulation
Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Number 20 of 2020 to change regulations
previously contained a conditional export prohibition to country. Deliver right plan work or
cooperation in management and/or purification in domestic.
Signed change pact integrity pay off, obligation finance to country arrive right plan work
or cooperation in management and/or purification in domestic sign just pact integrity
management in the country. Pointed a seriousness for build facility purification Good direct
or cooperation. Fulfill performance environment the good one, in this rule the government
allows the export of minerals raw materials up to a specified time. Then since the enactment
of Government Regulation Number 1 of 2014 and Regulations Minister of Energy and
Mineral Resources Number 1 of 2014, the government officially banned it mining companies
to export minerals raw materials contained in Indonesia.
The government's main foothold is to impose an export ban raw mineral, especially nickel
caused by the losses experienced Indonesia. Decades of nickel resources in Indonesia are
only taken and sold at a lower price and higher profits instead obtained by the state that
manages the raw nickel ore exported from Indonesia. therefore, in order to improve nickel
added value the government began to move to stop fully on exports of nickel ore in
Indonesia. But spirit Indonesia to earn more income against nickel is not fully running well,
because there are some obstacles in efforts to increase the added value of nickel, including:
1) Lack of awareness of the benefits and importance of improvement efforts added value
of nickel in the country by stakeholders.
2) There is not yet available a comprehensive study of demand chains and supply of
materials for the production of finished goods in Indonesia
3) Lack of information regarding opportunity assessments that can be carried out for
nickel mining materials in Indonesia to then be increased added value.
Efforts to increase the added value of nickel are endeavors government to carry out
further processing of raw nickel ore into semi-finished or finished products so that the nickel
value is already processed can increase the country's foreign exchange earnings. In in order to
increase the added value of nickel, the government uses nickel downstream mechanism so
that nickel management from upstream to downstream can be run sustainably and bring a
positive impact to the country and also a mining company. As for downstreaming or what is
known as downstreaming or value-adding is an effort to reduce exports raw materials and
encourage domestic industry to use materials in order to increase domestic added value. In a
word on the other hand, downstream is a techno-economic transformation of conditions
initial mineral and commodity resources to condition with value that is greater than the
economy, utilization, and usability before which contributes to a positive impact on the
economic, social, and culture.
Domestic downstream nickel aims to increase value added to nickel minerals,
strengthening the industrial structure, and being able create jobs and business opportunities in
the country. Through downstream policy, the value generated from nickel minerals will
certainly be doubled compared to just exporting in the form of more raw nickel. Based on
data reported by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources since the implementation of
the downstream value of nickel has increased every year The downstreaming of the nickel
sector has been pursued by the government has given good results, proven in the last 5 years
period the price of nickel as a reference mineral continues to increase significantly each year
the year. The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources notes on In 2018 the nickel
reference mineral price reached USD 11304.55/ton, on in 2019 it reached USD
12832.73/Ton, and in 2020 it increased
to touch the price of USD 15059.57/Ton.
Then in period 5 in the last year, the highest nickel reference mineral price occurred in
April 2022 which reached a price of USD 35995.30/Ton. Through the published data by the
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources that in term In the last 5 years, Indonesia has
begun to successfully carry out downstream the nickel mining sector which also had a
positive impact on increasing added value in the nickel mining sector in Indonesia.
Indonesia's success in downstreaming the sector Nickel mining certainly cannot make the
government satisfied with it nickel management, because efforts to downstream nickel must
still be carried out sustainable and integrated to downstream the nickel mining sector always
able to support and give strength to the industry domestic. Apart from increasing the added
value of nickel, downstream is also necessary endeavored so that domestic companies have
power to produce its own raw materials that are in the country and not depend on imported
materials from other countries.
In the mineral mining industry, management is through a smelter is part of the mineral
production process that is mined from nature which is still mixed with other materials so
needed further management. While the smelter itself is a facility to manage useful mine
results to increase metals such as nickel, tin, gold, copper and silver. Law Number 4 of 2009
concerning Mineral and Coal Mining has mandated the government to consistently
implement obligation to build a mineral mining smelter to the company mining that has a
production operation mining business license specifically for management and refining. With
the existence of a smelter built in Indonesia, will certainly provide benefits for development
mining sector in Indonesia. The advantages of building a smelter built domestically, namely:
construction of smelters in Indonesian mining areas will be more provides an advantage over
selling only raw nickel ore abroad with low prices.
Increase the added value of nickel minerals, because it is through a smelter mining
companies will carry out the management and refining of nickel which converts the raw
material in the form of ore into a nickel metal end product. Construction of smelters by
mining companies will help government in reducing unemployment in Indonesia, because
communities residing around the mining area have opportunity to get a job. Have a positive
impact on improving industrial performance national mining, because the obligation to build
a smelter will increase the added value of national exports, and reduce the deficit increased
trade, and increased welfare public.
2.7. Relevance of Nickel Management to the Welfare State
The concept of a welfare state adopted by Indonesia, has directs the state to organize
and integrate across policies towards achieving national goals.20 In line with the concept
According to Horold J. Laski, the function of the state is: 21 "creation of those conditions
under which the members of the state may attain the maximum satisfaction of their desire”
that opinion implies that the state has an obligation to create happiness for community
through the fulfillment of community desires to the fullest. In line with the state's obligation
to create prosperity, The Indonesian Constitution has put it into Article 33 paragraph (3) The
1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which states “earth and water and the natural
resources contained therein it is controlled by the state and used as much as possible
prosperity of the people", the mandate of the article has become the foundation philosophical
and juridical concept of state control to do management of natural resources in Indonesia.
Government as entity who run the constitutional system have the authority to carry
out the management of natural resources with the argument of mastery the state, but this
mastery certainly cannot be separated from the principal benefits that must be given to the
people in doing so natural resource management. Therefore, in doing state control, the
government must make the welfare of the community as the main goal in managing natural
resources contained in Indonesia. Benefits derived from nickel management by the company
Mining is not only enjoyed by companies those who carry out mining activities, but nickel
management must in such a way as to make a real contribution to economic growth
Indonesian nation. Nickel as a non-renewable natural resource of course it is the
responsibility of the state to create policies that provide benefits to all parties involved in the
activity nickel mining, both the state, mining companies, and the community must benefit
from nickel management carried out by mining companies as a principal implementation the
benefits of nickel management itself. Based on data reported by the Ministry of Finance
Republic of Indonesia in 2021, minerals and coal have become the second contributor to
Non-tax State Revenue donate Rp. 44,835 T, non-tax state revenue in 2021 has experienced a
2-fold increase compared to 2020 which only donated Rp. 21,178 T.
Mineral and mining sector Coal has shown its essence through a rapid increase in a
period of one year and has succeeded in defeating state revenues non-tax sourced from
geothermal, natural gas, fisheries and forestry. Increasing sources of income from the sector
mining has brought a logical consequence that mining has a major role for Indonesia's state
revenue. If sector mining continues to be utilized and managed properly, the sector Mining,
especially nickel, will certainly increase state income which ultimately makes the country
capable provide welfare for all Indonesian people as has been stated in the fourth paragraph
of the Constitution of the State Republic of Indonesia in 1945. Environmental social
governance based nickel management by Mining companies are certainly an attempt by
mining business actors to carry out nickel management that is effective, efficient,
environmentally sound so that the management of these mineral resources can be sustainable.
The concept of environmental social governance that attention to the environment,
social, and corporate governance in Nickel management not only provides benefits for the
company attract investors, but the positive impact of this concept will give also benefit the
community around the mining area. As the right to the environment that has been guaranteed
in The Indonesian Constitution Article 28 H paragraph (1) of the Basic Law Republic of
Indonesia Year 1945 which gives rights to everyone to live and have a good and healthy
place to live, of course can be implemented through environment-based nickel management
social governance by mining companies, because the company mining will carry out
monitoring of the environment, carry out reclamation and/or post-mining activities so that the
surrounding area. Mining can be reused by local residents and can used properly. In addition,
the concept of social environment governance will also improve relations between parties
involved or in contact with mining activities Based on data reported by the Ministry of
Finance Republic of Indonesia in 2021, minerals and coal have become the second
contributor to Non-tax State Revenue donate Rp. 44,835 T, non-tax state revenue in 2021 has
experienced a 2-fold increase compared to 2020 which only donated Rp. 21,178 T.
Mineral and mining sector Coal has shown its essence through a rapid increase in a
period of one year and has succeeded in defeating state revenues non-tax sourced from
geothermal, natural gas, fisheries and forestry. Increasing sources of income from the sector
mining has brought a logical consequence that mining has a major role for Indonesia's state
revenue. If sector mining continues to be utilized and managed properly, the sector Mining,
especially nickel, will certainly increase state income which ultimately makes the country
capable provide welfare for all Indonesian people as has been stated in the fourth paragraph
of the Constitution of the State Republic of Indonesia in 1945.
Environmental social governance-based nickel management by Mining companies are
certainly an attempt by mining business actors to carry out nickel management that is
effective, efficient, environmentally sound so that the management of these mineral resources
can be sustainable. The concept of environmental social governance that attention to the
environment, social, and corporate governance in Nickel management not only provides
benefits for the company attract investors, but the positive impact of this concept will give
also benefit the community around the mining area.As the right to the environment that has
been guaranteed in The Indonesian Constitution Article 28 H paragraph (1) of the Basic Law
Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 which gives rights to everyone to live and have a good and
healthy place to live, of course can be implemented through environment-based nickel
management social governance by mining companies, because the company mining will
carry out monitoring of the environment, carry out reclamation and/or post-mining activities
so that the surrounding area Mining can be reused by local residents and can used properly.
In addition, the concept of social environment governance will also improve relations
between parties involved or in contact with mining activities.
2.6. Definition of Sustainability Report
In general, the company will report implementation of ESG that has been done
through reports annual report and sustainability report (sustainability report). Sustainability
report is a form a sustainability report developed by an independent organization founded in
1997 in United States, namely the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). GRI himself defines the
sustainability report as a tool in describing and measuring the company's activities as a form
of responsibility to relevant stakeholders’ organizational performance to achieve
development goals sustainable. Elkington (1997) defines a sustainability report as a report
that does not only present information company's financial performance but also present
information non-financial enabling companies can grow sustainably.
Based on the two definitions above, researchers concluded that the sustainability
report is a reports that don't just report performance information corporate finance but also
non-financial performance as form of responsibility to stakeholders achieve sustainable
development goals. Benefits of Disclosure of Sustainability Report According to the World
Business Council for Sustainability Development (WBCSD) in 2002, the benefits of which
obtained from the disclosure of the sustainability report, among others:
1) Sustainability reports can create transparency because provide information to
company stakeholders such as investors, governments, creditors, etc. so that the
prospect company increases.
2) Sustainability report as a means that can provide contribution to increase
corporate value, price market, and customer loyalty in the long term.
3) Sustainability report can be a reflection of the company in managing the risk.
4) Sustainability reports can stimulate leadership thinking and performance
supported with passion competition.
5) Sustainability report can facilitate implementation of a better management system
in managing environmental, social, and economic impacts.
Risks and controversies related to governance, environment and social can be reduced
companies by increasing transparency and oversight, by disclosing ESG (MSCI, 2012). The
results of a review of previous studies conducted by Rahman and Alsayegh (2021) also shows
that ESG disclosure can increase transparency, reputation, brand value, employee and
customer loyalty, cost reduction, business practice better, and gain legitimacy from society.
This legitimacy is a social contract that must be met by the company when operating. This is
in line with Deegan (2007) which explains the theory of legitimacy, namely the norms and
values that have been built by society must have alignment with the company's operating
activities, so that social contracts can be fulfilled. Companies that violate this contract get the
negative consequences of stakeholders, such as society. The negative consequences received
by the company are product boycotts which causes a decrease in sales so that profits also
have a downward impact. Besides that, other negative impacts are resource use violations,
increased litigation costs, and the emergence of public demands for polluting the environment
around the community.
In Indonesia's government and regulatory agencies have made several regulations
which the company is obliged to account for its operating activities that have an impact on
governance, environment, and social, so that legitimacy is fulfilled as expected stakeholders.
Government regulations, namely rules and laws regarding responsibility for Environmental,
Social and Governance contained in regulation no. about the Company Limited, Government
Regulation No. 47 article 4 paragraph 1 of 2012 concerning Responsibility Social and
Environmental Limited Company (Indonesia, 2012). Law Number 25 article 15 of 2007
concerning investment (Indonesia, 2007). But it turns out several regulations and laws issued
by regulatory bodies along with the government does not necessarily make companies,
especially in Indonesia obedient to manage them company well, and socially and
environmentally responsible.
For example on environmental permits and gold added business permits that have
been obtained by mining companies Mas Sangihe (TMS) turned out to have an impact on
forest destruction, bird habitat disrupted, and the supply of clean water for the community is
threatened (Lumbanrau, 2021). A food and beverage company in Bekasi City, West Java also
polluted it river by dumping hazardous waste. The company got the letter reprimand from the
Bekasi City Environmental Management Agency (BPLH) (Nugroho, 2017). Results a survey
conducted by the East Java Integrated Water Patrol Team found that there were seventeen
companies, including PT Mandalindo, PT Rama Emerland, PT Sumber Agung, PT Karmaji
Inti Utama, PT Indo Oli Perkasa, PT Keramik Diamond, and PT Gaweredjo did not manage
their waste properly so that it pollutes the environment around the company (Kominfo, 2019).
Apart from being responsible for the environment, there are other responsibilities that
must be carried out the company concerns employee social problems, such as problems in the
plantation sector Palm oil. The social problem that occurs in this sector is that workers are not
given decent worker rights, such as low wages, insecure places to work, unstable continuation
of work, no protection at work, and incapacitated support the household (Hardum, 2021).
Governance or givernance issues should also be considered by the company in order to
maintain the legitimacy of stakeholders. However it turns out, there are still a number of
companies that have not good governance, such as AISA, which has been in legal trouble, is
the Lippo Group, including LPKR and LPCK GCG is not implemented properly. Poor GCG
implementation can be seen in the transfer of ownership of Meikarta secretly, then the case of
SMCB shares went up significant without openness (Binsasi and Rahmawati, 2018).
Apart from violation cases ESG that occurred in Indonesia, the results of observations
on the Bloomberg database for public companies that have registered on the IDX in 2012-
2019 concerning ESG disclosure, only 92 companies made disclosures out of 799 companies.
The phenomenon of the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) gap that occurs
attracts researchers to examine what factors influence companies to disclose ESG. This
research was conducted because the researcher wanted to fill in the gap of previous research
only focuses on the impact of ESG on financial performance, firm value, market information
asymmetry, etc. some of these topics were researched by Triyani, Setyahuni and Kiryanto
(2020); Castro and Arino, (2010); De Lucia, Pazienza and Bartlett (2020); Buallay (2019);
Friede, Busch and Bassen, (2015); Duque-Grisales and Aguilera-Caracuel (2019); Siew,
Balabat and Carmichael (2016); Shakil et al. (2019); Atan et al. (2018); Aboud and Diab
(2018); and Brogy and Lalasio (2019).
Environmental damage is a fairly serious problem with the growth and development
of companies in every country. Wrong one of the causes of environmental damage is the use
of natural resources conducted in an inappropriate way to gain economic advantage the big
one. In addition, the company's production activities can also cause environmental pollution
which will have an impact on social conflict. Companies should pay more attention to social
and environmental responsibility in order to gain legitimacy for the social role and
environmental concern that has been done by the company, so the company will get the trust
and support of the community. The trust and support obtained from the community can have
a good impact on the survival of the company in the future (Gray, et al., 1995). Corporate
social responsibility program applications can be developed by using the Triple Bottom Line
concept introduced by Elkington (1998), namely People, Planet, and Profit.
All three are very aspects important to measure whether the company can be said to
be successful through three criteria, namely: economic, environmental, and social. Elkington
initiated the concept of the triple bottom line when business people Carry out company
activities only for profit. Performance The company can not only be measured through the
profits earned by company, but the success of a company is also measured by how big it is
the company's contribution to environmental sustainability and social welfare around.
Elkington (1998) states:
―focuses not just on the economic value a company or project add, but also on the
environmental and social value they add – or destroy. At its narrowest, the term ‗triple
bottom line‘ is used as a framework for measuring and reporting corporate performance
against economic, social and environmental parameters. At its broadest, the term is used to
capture the whole set of values, issues and processes that companies must address in order to
minimize any harm resulting from their activities and to create economic, social and
environmental value. This involves being clear about the company‘s purpose and taking into
consideration the needs of all the company‘s stakeholders –shareholders, customers,
employees, business partners, governments, local communities and the public.-
The government also assumes social and environmental responsibility is a very
important thing that must be done by the company. Matter This can be proven by the
emergence of regulations issued by the government through Law Number 40 of 2007
concerning "Limited Liability Company" (hereinafter referred to as the Company Law). In
the Company Law, there are regulations regarding ESG in Article 74. This article confirms
that the Company carries out the activities his business in the field of and/or related to natural
resources is obliged to implement Social and Environmental Responsibilities, for which these
obligations are budgeted and calculated as the cost of the company whose implementation is
carried out with attention to decency and fairness. If the obligation is not carried out,
sanctions will be imposed in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable (Adhari,
2015).
In addition, good corporate governance (good corporate governance) is an important
factor in measuring the level company success. Good Corporate Governance (GCG) can be
defined as a set regulation governing the relationship between shareholders, administrators
(managers) companies, creditors, government, employees, as well as all relevant stakeholders
regarding their rights and obligations. Research has discussed a lot the influence of good
corporate govermace on company performance, but deep in recent years, a new trend
emerged, where investors considering environmental, social, and corporate governance
factors with using Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores. ESG score practices
and disclosures assist investors in doing so transactions in the capital market. Investors see
abnormal returns as an indicator can be used to see the state of the market that is happening.
research that been done mostly just focusing on one variable, no covers all of the indicators in
the ESG.
Within the CFA Institute (2008, p.6) explains the indicators contained in the ESG
variable (Environmental, Social, and Governance) by considering various aspects in it. The
company's environmental performance indicators are measured using environmental
disclosure score as seen from the company's operational activities and their impact on the
environment, such as carbon emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, disclosure or
measurement, reporting, climate change (risks caused by operations companies), changes in
ecosystems, facilities that can cause damage environment, granting business licenses,
pollution, renewable energy, resource depletion natural resources, waste disposal, use of toxic
chemicals, and others. Corporate social performance in this study was measured using social
disclosure score as seen from several indicators, such as welfare environment (in this case
animals), child labor, discrimination, diversity (employees/board diversity), facilities that
may pose social risks, issues of employee wages, political contributions and risks, sexual
harassment, slavery, the election of the advisory board on executive compensation, and
others.
While corporate governance in this study is measured by using the governance
disclosure score as seen from several indicators, such as executive compensation, the
relationship between the company's stakeholders (stakeholders), rights of stakeholders
(stakeholders), division of positions, setting the authority of directors, managers,
shareholders, and other parties. The CFA Institute conducted a survey in 2015 regarding
investors what ESG factors are most widely used in considering decisions invest. Out of
44,131 respondents, only 27% said that they does not consider the ESG factor in investing.
While 73% of respondents consider environmental, social, governance factors, even a
combination of these factors in investing. Of the 73% of respondents who considering ESG
factors, the majority consider governance as Currently, the capital market in Indonesia and
Malaysia is still not efficient because capital markets in Indonesia and Malaysia are still less
sensitive to information according to the efficient market hypothesis. An efficient market is a
market that can quickly obtain relevant information (Fitriani and Hartini, 2014).
The more faster new information is reflected in security prices, the more efficient the
market will be the capital. In an efficient market it is not possible to obtain abnormal returni,
although in practice there are anomalies, namely things that deviate where events or events
are not anticipated and which are offered opportunity for investors to obtain abnormal
returns. Anomalies may occur all forms of market efficiency, both weak, semi-strong, and
strong forms. This anomaly can be used to generate abnormal returns. Abnormal return can
be calculated using several models, such as the market model/single index model and the
capital asset pricing model (CAPM). Abnormal returns are usually caused by several factors,
for example announcements dividends, productive company announcements, increasing
interest rates, demands law, and others.
Investors do not like something that is unexpected or outside of hope. Abnormal
return is something that happens beyond the expectations of investors. Abnormal returns can
be positive, where the returns that occur are more greater than investors' expectations.
Abnormal returns can also be valuable negative if the yield (return) that occurs is lower than
investors' expectations. This research will look at the influence of environmental, social, and
performance governance (ESG) on abnormal returns in Indonesia and Malaysia. Election
countries of Indonesia and Malaysia because it is still rare to find research that discusses the
environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of abnormal return by using
environmental disclosure score, social disclosure score, and governance disclosure score. In
addition, in 2010-2015 the world economy is unstable which also has an impact on price
fluctuations shares in Indonesia and Malaysia.
Fluctuating stock prices can cause abnormal returns, both positive and negative.
Previous studies have discussed how ESG score can explain the influence of the company's
level of sustainability on abnormal returns. Statman and Glushkov (2009) conducted research
on companies in the DS 400 and S&P 500 that have a high level of sustainability and
companies that have a low level of sustainability based on Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini
Research & Analytics (KLD) from 1992 to 2007. This study uses the CAPM model, the
three-factor model and the four-factor model factor. From this study it was found that there
were abnormal returns positive and significant in both types of companies. Manescu (2011)
examined the relationship between ESG scores and returns based on data from Kinder,
Lydenberg, and Domini Research & Analytics (KLD). 1992 through 2008 includes all S&P
500 and DS 400 companies. Regression cross Fama MacBeth (1973) proves that only
companies that have a relationship with the community that has a positive influence on
returns.
ESG score as a whole shows no effect on returns. In addition, there are changes in the
effect of employee relations, where from July 1992 to June 2003, employee relations have a
positive effect on stock returns. However, from July 2003 to June 2008, there were negative
influence between employee relations and stock returns. Company with low scores on public
relations have expected stock returns higher than companies that have relationship scores
high society. Lee, et al (2020) examined the performance of companies in America based on
the ESG score on Sustainable Asset Management (SAM) from 1998 to 2007 using the four-
factor Carhart model. From research it was found that there was no significant difference to
performance companies in companies that have high ESG scores and companies those with
low ESG scores. However, this study found little evidence where there are differences
between companies that have ESG scores with a company that has a low ESG score, namely
at company size, book-to-market or momentum factor.
However, research it only calculates the ESG score as a whole and not on each
indicators in ESG. The single factor that stands out the most is distinguishes between
companies that have high ESG scores and companies that have a low ESG score apart from
performance company is market risk. Eccles, et al (2014) identified 180 companies in
America, of which 90 companies have a high level of sustainability and 90 companies have
low level of sustainability using the ESG score on ASSET4 and Sustainable Asset
Management (SAM). In addition, the research also research and conduct personal interviews.
The research results reveal annual abnormal return reached 4.8% from 1993 to 2010.
Halbritter and Dorfleitner (2015) examined the relationship between social performance
companies and the company's financial performance on the American market from 1991 until
2012 based on the environmental, social, and Governance (ESG) score by using the four
factor model of Carhart (1997) and Fama cross regression MacBeth (1973).
This study is the first study to compare the impact of the level of sustainability on
companies using the three ESGs rating providers, namely ASSET4, Bloomberg, and KLD.
This research is not found significant differences in returns between companies that have
ESG high scores with companies that have low ESG scores. However, the results of the Fama
MacBeth cross-regression (1973) found a significant effect on several variables. Effect of
Company Size on ESG Disclosure Company size is the size of the company which can be
seen from various aspects such as total assets, profitability, equity, etc. In addition, company
size is also often associated with the company's ability to disclose information (Pangaribuan,
2018). Stakeholder demands to obtain information in a transparent manner (mandatory
information and voluntary) will increase when the company gets bigger.
Great company more able to disclose information voluntarily greater because of such
disclosure require high costs, while small companies assume that disclosure Voluntary
actions can threaten companies in competition (Scaltrito, 2016). Large companies are usually
watched a lot by stakeholders and are even in the spotlight government investigations
(Bhattacharyya and Agbola, 2018). Strict supervision and referrals investigations make large
companies must provide information that is transparent and accountable to the company's
stakeholders, one of which is information disclosure volunteer. The statement is in line with
the results of Scaltrito's (2016) research that Firm size has a positive effect on voluntary
disclosure. Large companies who voluntarily add information will obtain, retain, as well as
increasing the legitimacy of the company in the eyes of stakeholders (Scaltrito, 2016).
One of voluntary information disclosure is ESG. The ESG Disclosure done by the
company to make stakeholders easily get related information company's concern for
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Effect of Company Age on ESG Disclosure
The age of the company is the page where the company operates and has activities in a
certain area place. Company age is the number of years since the company was built and
started operating in the business market (Uche, Ndubuisi and Chinyere, 2019). Older age
Companies, especially companies that are listed on the stock exchange, will have more and
more demands from stakeholders to disclose information, both mandatory and voluntary
transparent and accountable. Talpur, Lizam and Keerio (2018) show that age company can
affect the level of disclosure because of the age of the company considered as a stage of
growth and development of the company. Ansah (1998) companies that have been operating
longer will disclose more information in reports annually than younger firms.
2.9. The Effect of Industry Type on ESG Disclosure
The type of industry is an industry that is divided according to the sector according to
the situation and the conditions that exist in the country's stock exchange. In Indonesia there
are nine industrial sectors, viz agriculture, mining, basic industry and chemical, various
industries, consumer good industry, property and real estate, transportation, finance, trade,
services, and investment (sahamok.net, 2021). Each industry has its own characteristics of
operations and activities that affect disclosure practices. Wallace (1988) shows that the firm
within an industry that specifically influences its disclosure practices, for example there are
significant differences in reporting practices between the manufacturing industry and industry
finance. This statement explains that the type of industry affects disclosure. One of them is
ESG Disclosure Effect of Ownership Structure on ESG Disclosure The ownership structure is
the shares owned by the entity or individual have the right to vote when making company
decisions (Pangaribuan, 2018).
This ownership structure can affect the operations and activities of the company.
according to Khan, Chand and Patel (2020) ownership structure influences voluntary practice
disclosure. One of the ownership structures in the company is institutional ownership.
Institutional ownership is the percentage of shares owned by the institution divided with the
number of outstanding shares (Barako, Hancock and Izan, 2006). Ownership percentage The
large share makes institutional investors have the power to control practice company
disclosure (Putra, Kusuma and Dewi, 2020). The higher the ownership institutional, the
higher the voluntary disclosure, such as ESG. The world economy is already interconnected
through trade and investment, then issues regarding what reporting should be disclosed by the
company to the stakeholders become an important matter (Buallay, 2019). On progress,
disclosures regarding financial reports are now deemed insufficient to meet the needs of the
public company stakeholders related to information, this is what then becomes attention for
the management of the company as a form of concern and service to stakeholders.
A successful stakeholder management strategy must leading to better environmental
performance, social performance along with governance performance and may also be related
to future financial performance (Velte, 2017). In recent years the ESG score has become a
new trend for inside investors determine investment decisions. Even though this problem
appeared a decade ago, but until 2016, the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) had not offered
written guidelines for ESG reporting, training related to ESG, and not yet requiring ESG
reporting as one rules for companies to be listed on the stock exchange. But things are
different with United The Nation Sustainability Exchange expects for all companies listed on
there discloses the impact of environmental, social, and governance practices by 2030
(Sustainability Stock Exchange, 2015). Company performance can be measured using
financial measures such as profitability ratios, market value, and so on. Performance
measurement viewed from the financial side becomes a the important thing in assessing the
success of the company is whether it has been running according to the target expected or
not. A form of disclosure made by an entity either in the form of Financial and non-financial
disclosures are of course now an important indicator in assessing as well as evaluate the
company's performance, whether the disclosure can affect the company performance or not.
With the disclosure of environmental, social and governance responsibilities The
company is expected to create a good reputation for the company. Upgrade The company's
earnings are ultimately based on increasing levels of reputation as well consumer trust in the
company so that it has an impact on the acquisition of loyalty towards the company itself.
(EY, 2020). In maintaining the existence of the company from business competition in In this
free market era, companies must have the right strategy to continue to increase the value of
the company itself. along with the development very fast business, every business activity is
required to not only concerned only with company profits, companies must see the impact
that will arise as a result of the course of the company's operational activities (Safriani, M. N
and Utomo, 2020).
Not infrequently the activities of a company have a bad impact for the environment.
Thus forest destruction is a form of decline from the environmental aspect, even though the
economy has increased (Husada & Handayani, 2021). Based on Indonesian Environmental
Statistics (2020), One of the challenges in sustainable development is con observation efforts
natural resources. If you look at the 2020-2024 RPJMN, the issue regarding The environment
is also a national priority. Therefore the Stock Exchange Indonesia (IDX) calls for the
implementation of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) or environmental, social
and governance aspects for existing business actors in Indonesia as an effort to support
sustainable finance in the capital market. The application of sustainable financial reports aims
to maintain economic stability and inclusiveness, one of which is by creating synergy
between economic, social and environmental aspects (Husada & Handayani, 2021).
So far, the industrial sector that has a high risk, such as plantations palm oil can
operate because financial service institutions participate in providing support in the form of
funding. In other words, financial services institutions such as banks indirectly have a role in
the occurrence of damage environment (Husada & Handayani, 2021). Seeing this, it is
important for the perpetrator efforts in all fields to maintain the best possible relations
between the economy, environmental, social, and governance. In this way, the company that
properly disclosing ESG will be more attractive to financial investors and other stakeholders,
as well as financially profitable in the long term because of the increased relationship
between the company and various parties (Li et al., 2018). ESG is an index ESG is a non-
financial indicator of a company that includes matters related to sustainability, social, and
corporate governance capabilities (Melinda & Wardhani, 2020).
The Financial Services Authority as the regulator issues Financial Services Authority
Regulation Number 51/Pojk.03/2017 concerning Implementation Sustainable Finance for
Financial Services Institutions, Issuers, and Companies Public. In article 1 it is stated that
products and/or Sustainable Financial Services are financial products and/or services that
integrate economic, social, and Environmental, as well as governance in its features.
Furthermore Article 10 explains that Financial Services Institutions, Issuers and Companies
The public is required to prepare a Sustainability Report. The report is mandatory submitted
to the Financial Services Authority annually according to the limit when the annual report is
submitted that applies to each FSI, Issuers, as well as Public Companies. Currently, the
Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) has launched a new index, namely the IDX ESG
(Environmental, Social, Governance) Leaders. As one attempt towards a better sustainable
investment in the capital market, IDX announce the determination of shares that have
environmental, social, Good Governance through Stock Announcement No.
Peng-00363/BEI.POP/12- 2020.
IDX collaborates with Sustainalytics to conduct an assessment the company's ESG
performance, the stock with the best rating will be selected into IDX ESD Leaders.
Companies with a higher rank in the index ESG has a higher enterprise value, by linking ESG
on company value, the ESG index will allow investors to earn major role in driving the
company which will then improve transparency and disclosure, so their reporting will also be
increased (Aboud & Diab, 2018). By making disclosures environmental, social and corporate
governance responsibilities are expected to create a good reputation for the company
(Safriani, M. N and Utomo, 2020). Indonesia is still lagging behind in the application of
conservation principles environment, social responsibility, and good governance while
running business. Even Indonesia is ranked ESG below the Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia,
and Thailand. Based on the Corporate Knights rating, at In 2019 the Indonesian capital
market ESG was ranked 36th out of 46 capital market in the world.
Meanwhile, the Financial Services Authority will require para business actors
registered on the IDX to report environmental performance Social Governance starting in
2022. Alfaruq, N. (2021, March 30). Investor.id [Web page]. Accessed from
https://investor.id/market-and-corporate/indonesiatertinggal-di-dinding-esg. In order to meet
OJK's target of requiring all business people report their ESG performance, it is necessary to
prove that ESG implementation does have a positive impact on the company as well as
investors. Judging from previous research, each pillar in ESG has a designation which are
shorter include environmental (ENV), social (SOC), and governance (GOV). Research on
Environmental Social Governance (ESG) still relatively few in Indonesia, both separately
from each pillar or in combination. Research results are still varied, research previously
indicated that indirectly environmental performance affect the value of the company through
the company's financial performance (Maryanti & Fithri, 2017).
It is concluded that ESG has a significant effect against the value of manufacturing
companies that are not included in the IDX list directly through financial performance.
Furthermore, it is said that the value of the company owned by companies on the ESG index
list are higher in comparison with other companies (Aboud & Diab, 2018). In addition, the
correlation matrix shows a positive relationship between company value and ESG ratings.
This statement is supported by research which states that ESG, ESG Combined, ENV, SOC,
GOV, and controversy have a positive effect on corporate value (Melinda & Wardhani,
2020). Contrary to statement mentioned, environmental aspects and social aspects in the
sustainability report are not significantly affect firm value (Sari et al., 2017). However, by
together economic, social, and environmental aspects as independent variables in his research
stated to have a significant influence on value company.
The writer chose this title because he wanted to test the effect of application
Environmental Social Governance (ESG) in companies listed in IDX ESG Leaders on each
company's values. There is several companies whose shares have been selected into the IDX
ESG Leaders who became the sample in this study. Proxy used for describes the value of the
company, namely Tobin's Q. Then, the size is measured as a log of total assets and leverage
as measured by total debt divided by total assets will be the control variable (Li et al., 2018).
Return on Assets (ROA) as a proxy for financial performance that divides income by total
assets as well became the control variable in this study (Aboud & Diab, 2018). In the year of
2020 Indonesia's economic conditions are facing very serious challenges due to presence of
the Covid-19 pandemic.
However, companies can take advantage of the conditions pandemic to increase ESG
adoption. Therefore, in this research there are two calculation models based on the dummy
period. on models one will use the pre-covid-19 period and for model two using the post-
covid-19 period. By having an understanding of positive impact obtained from the
implementation of Environmental Social Governance It is hoped that all business people in
Indonesia can take more initiative to participate and actively support sustainable development
through performance improvement ESG based. As explained (Xie et al., 2019) that increases
corporate awareness to implement sustainability strategy and perform disclosure of
environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information, giving impact of fundamental
changes in management and business models.
In recent years, ESG information has become more and more everyone's attention
because of the potential long-term impact it provides to the investment of stakeholders rather
than just being limited to shareholders. There are many names given to ESGs, but they are
not limited to Corporate Social Disclosure (CSD), Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure
(ESGD), etc. (Buniamin et al., 2015). It is a practice to measure, disclose, and be accountable
to all stakeholders both inside and outside the company. A company's ESG score reports their
performance against sustainable development goals. ESG Report includes resource use,
natural resources, human rights, and levels corporate corruption, how they invest in public
relations, etc. Shareholders often view ESG reports because they relate company strength,
risk management, and its effectiveness (Almeyda & Darmansya, 2019).
In Indonesia, ESG is getting more and more attention after the government Indonesia
stated its commitment to achieve 17 Sustainable Development UN Goals (SDGs) by 2030
(Bappenas, 2019). Hence, goals Sustainable development is carried out through the 5Ps,
namely:
1) People; Determined to end poverty and hunger. in everything shape and
dimensions, and to ensure that all humans can fulfill their potential in a dignified
and equal manner, and in a favorable environment Healthy.
2) Planets; Determined to protect the planet from degradation, incl through
sustainable consumption and production, managing natural resources in a
sustainable manner sustainable and take urgent action on climate change, so to
support the needs of present and future generations.
3) Prosperity; Determined to ensure that all humans can enjoy a prosperous and
satisfying life and that of economic, social progress and technology occurs in
harmony with nature.
4) Peace; Determined to promote a peaceful, just and society inclusiveness that is
free from fear and violence. There will not be sustainable development without
peace and there is no peace without sustainable development.
5) Partnerships; Determined to mobilize the necessary means for implement this
agenda through the Revitalized Global Partnership for Sustainable Development,
based on the spirit of global solidarity strengthened, especially focusing on the
needs of the poorest and most vulnerable and with the participation of all
countries, all stakeholders and all Integrating ESG aspects as the main dimension
of development sustainability into corporate strategy theoretically provides
benefits in terms of reputation, customer trust and loyalty, cost savings, access
capital, human resource management, innovation capacity, and management risk
(Ferrero-Ferrero et al., 2016).
This is also supported by ESG Indonesia Capital Market which describes the benefits
of ESG for companies as maintain reputation with increasing concern regarding social and
environmental issues, companies can maintain their reputation by demonstrating a strong
commitment to inclusion of ESG practices on operational and strategic agendas. Practice
implementation this can be supported by periodic disclosure of ESG information using
generally accepted standards. Information disclosure reporting can strengthen the sense of
trust with investors, customers and parties other interested. Manage risks and take long-term
opportunities beforehand not taken into account ESG risks can include things like lack of
management environment, local community conflicts, and changing rules and regulations,
and are often not considered in depth because they cannot be measured as easily as any other
commonly used financial metric.
However, with the increasing criticality of ESG issues and their direct impact,
companies can protect themselves by implementing a risk management system that is can
identify, measure, and respond to ESG risks in a timely manner adequate. ESG also presents
business opportunities that can be taken by company. Implementation of strong ESG
practices can improve efficiency, lower costs, increase productivity, and encourage
innovation, such as encouraged companies to expand to sectors with high growth potential,
such as technology or clean energy. Align conditions with investor demand With the onset of
the COVID-19 pandemic, investors are increasingly aware of the importance of resilience in
times of crisis, and have started to divert funds to investment that produces a good impact in
the long term, both financially financially as well as socially and environmentally.
Companies can attract more many investors by implementing ESG initiatives and
make regular reports. Besides that, the company can also be interesting long term investors,
because ESG focused investors in general aims to invest for value creation in the long term.
Prepare for changes in rules and regulations Regulators in various jurisdictions have started
to issue regulations for support sustainable finance and ESG-based investment activities. In
general, the issuance of regulations begins with reporting obligations companies. In
Indonesia, OJK has also issued OJK Regulations No. 51/POJK.03/2017 concerning
Implementation of Sustainable Finance for Institutions Financial Services, Issuers and Public
Companies, and Financial Roadmap Sustainable Phase II (2021-2025).
And in the future the regulator in the Capital Market Indonesia will continue to work
on issuing other ESG regulations which can support the development of the Indonesian
Capital Market towards sustainable finance. By integrating ESG principles into strategy and
company operational activities proactively, the company can prepare yourself for the
changing regulatory landscape, and even can be superior to other competitors in the face
change(Market, 2022). ESG disclosure is a form of dialogue between the company and the
stakeholders involved. The company will try provide disclosure of information on the
company's business activities to be able to change the perceptions and expectations of
stakeholders. Besides that, the company also use ESG disclosure as a tool to gain legitimacy
strong in the eyes of society and all stakeholders.
With thus it is hoped that a good image for the company can be created for a company
disclosures that have been made. Non-financial disclosures such as ESG are expected to
becomesocial investment in order to satisfy the interests of stakeholders who will contribute
to improving company performance. Actions sustainability carried out by the company will
create demand for it higher and greater growth for the company (Buallay, 2019). Therefore, it
is necessary to carry out a good disclosure of information that is financial and non-financial
to be able to answer the demands given by stakeholders so that stakeholders can know how
the performance a company that cares about the environment, the social condition of society
as well employees, also implement good corporate governance. Something ESG disclosures
that contain environmental care practices, social, as well as governance carried out by the
company is a signal that the company can provide to investors. The company will try provide
the best information about the condition of the company as a signal signal positive for
investors. The most ESG performance measurement widely used in previous research is the
index of reputation and content analysis. Notable examples of indices are Bloomberg,
Thomson Reuters, and KLD.
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1. Method
One type of descriptive qualitative research is research with the method or approach to
the case study (Case Study). This research focus intensively on one particular object that
studies it as a case. The case study method allows the researcher to remain holistic and
significant. According to Arikunto (2020), the research method is the methods used by
researchers in collecting research data. Research conducted by the author with the title
Process Development Analysis the micro elements of Concept Design in Start Up Companies
are research qualitative descriptive with a case approach. Qualitative research is one research
that produces data that is descriptive (description that in the form of written or oral words
from every behavior of people who observed). Nawawi (2003) suggests that "case study data
can be obtained from all parties concerned, in other words the data in this study collected
from various sources”.
As a case study, the data collected from various sources and the results of this study are
valid only in the cases investigated. Arikunto further (1986) argues that "The case study
method as a type of descriptive approach, is intensive, detailed and in-depth research on an
organism (individual), institution or certain symptoms with area or narrow subject”. Case
study is a research strategy that focuses on understanding dynamics present in a single
setting. Example of case study research including Selznick's (1949) description of TVA,
Allison's (1971) research about the Cuban missile crisis, and Pettigrew's (1973) research on
decision making in UK retailers. Case studies can involve one or several cases, and many
levels of analysis (Yin, 1984). As an example, Harris and Sutton (1986) studied 8 dying
organizations, Bettenhausen and Murnighan (1986) focuses on the emergence of norms in 19
groups laboratory, and Leonard-Barton (1988) tracked the progress of 10 projects innovation.
In addition, according to (Yin, 1984) case studies can use embedded design, that is, multiple
levels of analysis in a single study single.
For example, Warwick's study of competitiveness and change Strategic planning in the
UK's major corporations is carried out at two levels analysis: industry and company
(Pettigrew, 1988), and Mintzberg and Waters (1982) studied Steinberg's electrical research.
some changes strategy within a single company. One type of descriptive qualitative research
is research with the method or approach to the case study (Case Study). This research focus
intensively on one particular object that studies it as a case. The case study method allows the
researcher to remain holistic and significant. According to Arikunto (2020), the research
method is the methods used by researchers in collecting research data. Research conducted by
the author with the title Process Development Analysis The micro elements of Concept
Design in Start Up Companies are research qualitative descriptive with a case approach.
Qualitative research is one research that produces data that is descriptive (description that
in the form of written or oral words from every behavior of people who observed). Nawawi
(2003) suggests that "case study data can be obtained from all parties concerned, in other
words the data in this study collected from various sources”. As a case study, the data
collected from various sources and the results of this study are valid only in the cases
investigated. Arikunto further (1986) argues that "The case study method as a type of
descriptive approach, is intensive, detailed and in-depth research on an organism (individual),
institution or certain symptoms with area or narrow subject”.
Case study is a research strategy that focuses on understanding dynamics present in a
single setting. Example of case study research including Selznick's (1949) description of
TVA, Allison's (1971) research about the Cuban missile crisis, and Pettigrew's (1973)
research on decision making in UK retailers. Case studies can involve one or several cases,
and many levels of analysis (Yin, 1984). As an example, Harris and Sutton (1986) studied 8
dying organizations, Bettenhausen and Murnighan (1986) focuses on the emergence of norms
in 19 groups laboratory, and Leonard-Barton (1988) tracked the progress of 10 projects
innovation. In addition, according to (Yin, 1984) case studies can use embedded design, that
is, multiple levels of analysis in a single study. For example, Warwick's study of
competitiveness and change Strategic planning in the UK's major corporations is carried out
at two levels analysis: industry and company (Pettigrew, 1988), and Mintzberg and Waters
(1982) studied Steinberg's electrical research. some changes strategy within a single
company.
3.2. Types of research
3.2.1. Causal (Explanatory) Case Study
Explanatory or explanatory research aims to explain the relationship between two or more
symptoms or variables. This research focuses on the basic question "why". People are often
dissatisfied with simply knowing what happened and how it happened, but also want to know
why it happened. To explain the cause of an event. It is necessary to identify various
variables outside the problem to confirm the cause of a problem. Therefore, explanatory
research is also referred to as confirmatory research and is increasingly known as
correlational research. Causal research, also according to Kotler, p. 122, is "research aimed at
testing (testing) hypotheses about cause and effect relationships." In practice, causal research
is usually carried out by experiment. There is one thing that is being tried to be applied
(called treatment, treated as an independent variable which is symbolized X) to be tested
whether it causes something to happen (effect, effect, is treated as the dependent variable,
symbolized Y). In short, does X cause Y. Through this explanatory research, it can be seen
how the correlation between two or more variables, whether the pattern, direction, nature,
shape, or strength of the relationship. This correlational research begins with an implicit or
explicit question: "Is there a relationship between X and Y?" Answers to these questions can
only be obtained through explanatory or correlational research.
3.2.2 Descriptive Case Study
Descriptive method is a method of examining the status of a group of people, an
object, a set of conditions, a system of thought or a class of events in the present. The
purpose of this descriptive research is to make descriptive, systematic, actual and
accurate descriptions of the facts, characteristics and relationships between the
phenomena investigated. According to Whitney (1960), the descriptive method is
finding facts with the right interpretation. Descriptive research studies problems in
society, as well as procedures that apply in society and certain situations, including
relationships, activities, attitudes, views, and ongoing processes and effects of
phenomena.
3.2.3 Exploratory case study
Exploratory research is research that aims to test a theory or hypothesis in order to
strengthen or even reject existing research theories or hypotheses. Exploratory research is
fundamental in nature and aims to obtain information, information, data on matters that are
not yet known. Because it is fundamental in nature, this research is called exploratory.
Exploratory research is carried out if the researcher has not obtained initial data so that he
does not have a complete picture of the matter to be studied. Exploratory research does not
require a specific hypothesis or theory. Researchers only prepared a few questions as a guide
to obtain primary data in the form of information, as the initial data needed. According to
(Mintzberg 1979) “Initial definition of the research question is, in at least broad terms,
important in the theory building of the case study”. noted: “no matter how small our sample
is or what is interesting we always strive to fit into an organization with a well defined focus
on collecting certain types of data in a systematic way”.
The rationale for defining the research question is the same as in hypothesis testing
research. Without a research focus it's easy to become overwhelmed by the volume of data.
For exams, (Pettigrew. et. al 1988) defined their “research questions in terms of strategic
change and competitiveness in large British firms”, and (Leonard Barton 1988) “focused on
viable technological innovations”.
3.2.4. Testing Theory
Case studies are generally used in conjunction with survey research for triangulation
purposes in theory testing research. According to (Voss et al., 2002) “Despite the limited use
of case studies in theory testing there are examples of application areas such as
implementation strategy.” Theory development is a central activity in organizational research.
In case study research, the initial definition of the research question, at least in broad terms, is
important in building the theory of the case study. (Mintzberg 1979) noted: “No matter how
small our sample is or what our interests are, we always try to go into organizations with a
well-defined focus on collecting specific types of data in a systematic manner.” The rationale
for defining research questions is the same as in hypothesis testing research. Without a
research focus, it's easy to become overwhelmed by the volume of data.
For example, (Pettigrew. et. al 1988) define their “research questions in terms of strategic
change and competitiveness in large British firms”, and Leonard-Barton (1988) “focus on
technical innovation of feasible technologies”. As stated by (Christensen and Sundahl 2001,
Eisenhardt 1989 and Whetten, 1989) "in theory development researchers make iterative
observations and clarifications with the intention not only to prove what is in the literature
but also to look for anomalies between existing theories and practice in the real world”.
Almost the same opinion was put forward by (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007) by stating "the
process of theory development occurs through a two-way "dialogue" between the data
obtained from the data collection and the developing theory, and then compared with the
existing literature.
3.2. Data Collection Process
Case study According to (Yin 2011), "the implementation of data collection has six
sources, namely: documents, archive recordings, interviews, direct observation, participant
observation, and physical devices". The case study research process according to (Yin 2011)
is:
a. “Defining and designing research. Researchers conduct studies on the development of
theories or concepts to determine cases and design data collection protocols.
b. “Preparing, collecting, and analyzing data. Researchers carry out the preparation,
collection, and analysis of data based on research protocols that have been designed
previously.
c. “Analyze and conclude. In a single case, the research results are used to check back
on the concepts or theories that have been built in the first stage of the research.The
data collected in this case study are interviews and direct field observations.
Also at least three members of the organization were interviewed for data triangulation.
Collecting data in this study were interviews and direct field observations: Interviews are
activities to obtain information from informants by meeting directly or face to face. Interview
guidelines are prepared in advance and can be developed according to the conditions in the
field. Someone who is involved in the environment or organization being studied is taken as a
sample because the researcher thinks that this person has the information needed for the
research.
This technique makes it easy for researchers to determine the informants to be
interviewed according to the research objectives. Direct observation to the field According to
(Yin 2011), "Observations or observations are useful to provide additional information about
the topic to be studied. Observations on the social or organizational environment will add
new dimensions, to understanding the context and phenomena to be studied. Observations or
direct observations in this study were carried out by looking at the current condition of the
organizational environment at the KDI startup company.
3.3. Data analysis
The essence of qualitative research is the techniques and methods of qualitative data
analysis. According to (Miles & Huberman, 1994) "The process of analyzing qualitative data
is the most difficult stage in designing case study research for several reasons. Unlike
quantitative research which has more regular research stages starting from the stages of data
collection, data selection, data analysis to drawing conclusions, in qualitative research the
whole process runs simultaneously. According to (Yin 2009). "Some of the techniques
available in the data analysis stage are pattern matching, explanation building, time series
analysis, logic models, and cross case synthesis. The data analysis technique in this study
uses the following analysis techniques:
a. Descriptive analysis is by describing the development of the micro concept design
elements of the KDI startup company.
b. Pattern matching analysis. This analysis, according to Yin (2011) is "comparing
patterns based on empirical with predicted patterns. If these two patterns have
similarities, the results strengthen the internal validity of the case study concerned.
Pattern matching analysis in this study is to compare initial predictions or assumptions
that will occur with the actual facts on the ground.
CHAPTER IV
RESULTS
Aneka Tambang Tbk (Antam) recorded sales of IDR 38.45 trillion with a net profit of
IDR 1.86 trillion in 2021. This performance is the biggest record in the last five years.
Antam's sales increased by 40.5% compared to IDR 27.37 trillion in 2020. Antam previously
recorded sales of IDR 12.65 trillion in 2017, IDR 25.28 trillion in 2018 and IDR 32.72 trillion
in 2019. Meanwhile, net profit increased by 62% from Rp 1.15 trillion in 2020. Previously,
Antam's net profit was recorded at Rp 136.5 billion in 2017, Rp 1.64 trillion in 2018 and Rp
193.85 billion in 2019. In 2021, gold products will be the biggest contributor to sales. Antam
sold IDR 25.94 trillion of gold or 67% of Antam's total sales. Antam sold 28.28 tons of gold
domestically in 2021. This is the highest sales in the company's history.
Table 4.1 Results of PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk First Quarter in
2019-2021
The table above shows the results of PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk first quarter in 2019,
2020 and 2021 which has been selected according to the needs in this study. The results of
the first quarter of Tbk's full report for 2019, 2020 and 2021 can be seen in the attachment
section.
Profit
Total Equity Sale Total assets
Clean
2019 365,751,174 19,771,175,877 12,053,579,471 33,566,765,371
2020 84,820,75 18,103,650,10 7,917,047,168 30,033,248,781
The table above shows the results of PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk second quarter in 2019
and 2020 which has been selected according to the needs in this study. The results of the first
quarter of Tbk's full report for 2019 and 2020 can be seen in the attachment section.
Profit
Total Equity Sale Total assets
Clean
2019 561,192,400 19,947,608,029 20,801,246,785 32,654,878,387
2020 835,772,374 18,929,155,406 15,132,891,683 30,974,035,242
The table above shows the results of PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk third quarter in 2019
and 2020 which has been on selection as needed in this study. The full report results for the
third quarter of 2019 and 2020 can be seen in the appendix.
Based on the table above, it can be seen that in the first quarter of 2019 the company
PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk has a net profit of 171,668,347 and a total equity of
19,909,922,744. After calculating using the formula to find the ROE value, it is found that
the ROE value in the first quarter of 2019 PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk by 0.86%. In the first
quarter of 2020 the company had a net profit of 281,839,032 and a total equity of
18,025,049,220. After calculating using the formula to find the value of ROE and the ROE
value in the first quarter of 2020 PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk by 1.56%. Whereas in 2021 the
company has a net profit of 630,378.89 and a total equity of 9,799,680,634. After calculating
using the formula to find the ROE value, it is found that the ROE value in the first quarter of
2020 PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk by 6.43%. The ROE value has increased in 2020 and 2021
with a difference of 3.14% greater than during the pandemic.
Based on the table above, it can be seen that in the second quarter of 2019 the
company PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk has a net profit of 365,751,174 and a total equity of
19,771,175,877. After calculating using the formula to find the ROE value, it is found that the
ROE value in the second quarter of 2019 PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk by 1.85%. In the second
quarter of 2020 the company has a net profit of 84,820,750 and a total equity of
18,103,650,100. After calculating using the formula to find the ROE value, it is found that the
ROE value in the first quarter of 020 PT. Aneka Tambang Tbk by 0.47%. The ROE value
decreased in 2020 with a difference of 1.38% greater than the year before the pandemic.
6.1. Conclusion
This study aims to analyze the extent to which PT Aneka Tambang Tbk's Corporate
Social Responsibility (ESG) implementation is based on the Global Reporting Initiative
version (GRI) 4 and the level of ESG fulfillment implemented by PT Aneka Tambang Tbk
(ANTAM) and analyze the implementation of PT ANTAM's Corporate Social Responsibility
based on Archie Carroll's theory. From the results of the research and discussion in the
previous chapter, the author can draw the following conclusions: In general ANTAM has
implemented ESG consistently and continuously which can be assessed from the continuity
of disclosure, creation and publication in a sustainability report with consistent reference to
the GRI guidelines since 2003.
With reference to the GRI guidelines version 4, ANTAM meets the three categories
required by GRI, namely the economic category, the environmental category and the social
category. In the economic category ANTAM has fulfilled 7 out of 9 indicators with a
percentage of 78% while in the environmental and social category ANTAM has fulfilled 26
out of 34 indicators with a percentage of 77% and 15 out of 58 indicators with a percentage
of 26%. The three categories are included in the partially fulfilled criteria. This illustrates that
the implementation of ESGANTAM focuses on the economic and environmental fields and
ignores the social sector.
6.2. Suggestion
The limitation of the year of observation caused by the limited number of companies
that have implemented the GRI Standards in companies that follow the 2018-2019 ASRR
causes the research period to be not long enough. Therefore, in future research it is
recommended to add years of observation using a wider and more varied research object.
The measurement of the media exposure variable is only carried out on the company's
official website without considering whether the published news or articles fall into the
category of good news or bad news. Therefore, in future research it is recommended to
measure media exposure variables using company external media such as online
newspapers. In addition, the researcher suggests that future studies use news indicators or
articles that are included in the bad news category to better see how far the effect of media
exposure is on CSR disclosure in sustainability reports.
Corporate governance in this study only used 3 proxies, for further research it is
expected to add to the corporate governance proces in order to obtain better research results.
The measurement of the sustainability report variable in this study only uses the analysis of
the GRI Standards disclosure items reported in the sustainability report without considering
the quality of the disclosure. In future research it is recommended to measure in more detail
the items disclosed in the sustainability report.
REFERENCES
Abdi, Y., Li, X., & Càmara-Turull, X. (2021). Exploring the impact of sustainability (ESG)
disclosure on firm value and financial performance (FP) in airline industry: the
moderating role of size and age. Environment, Development and Sustainability,
0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01649-w
Aboud, A., & Diab, A. (2018). The impact of social, environmental and corporate governance
disclosures on firm value: Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Accounting in Emerging
Economies, 8(4), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-08-2017-0079
Alsayegh, M. F., & Rahman, R. A. (2020). Corporate Economic , Environmental , and Social
Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure. 12, 2–15.
https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/su12093910
Amir, A. Z., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence
from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87–103.
https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2
Astuti, A. D., & Juwenah, J. (2017). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Sustainability Report Terhadap
Nilai Perusahaan Yang Tergabung Dalam LQ 45 Tahun 2012-2020. Accounthink :
Journal of Accounting and Finance, 2(01), 301–313.
https://doi.org/10.35706/acc.v2i01.733
Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social,
and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies.
Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182–194.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033
Basuki, A. T., & Prawoto, N. (2017). Analisis Regresi Dalam Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis
(1st ed.). Raja Grafindo Persada. Basyaib, F. (2007). Keuangan Perusahaan Pemodelan
Menggunakan Microsoft Excel. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2001). Manajemen Keuangan (8th ed.). Erlangga.
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan (M. Masykur &
Y. Setyaningsih (eds.); 14th ed.). Cengage Learning, Salemba Empat.
Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence
from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An
International Journal, 30(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory Of The Corporation:
Concept, Evidence, and Implication. Academy of Management 10 Review, 20(1), 65–
91.
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Pacific Sociological Association Organizational
Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. Source: The Pacific
Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The
moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
Gaio, C., & Raposo, C. (2011). Earnings quality and firm valuation: International evidence*.
Accounting and Finance, 51(2), 467–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
629X.2010.00362.x
Ghozali. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (8th ed.).
Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gujarati, D. N. (2020). Basic Econometrics (4th ed.). The McGraw−Hill Companies.
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2015). Dasar-dasar Ekonometrika. Salemba Empat.
Hardiyanti, R. T., Septiyanti, R., & Dharma, F. (2021). Market Reaction to the
Announcement of Covid-19: Event Study in Indonesia. Journal Dimensie Management
and Public Sector, 2(2), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.48173/jdmps.v2i2.89
Husada, E. V., & Handayani, S. (2021). Pengaruh Pengungkapan ESG Terhadap Kinerja
keuangan Perusahaan. Jurnal Bina Akuntansi, 8(2), 122–144.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52859/jba.v8i2.173
John, E. (1998). Accounting for the riple Bottom Line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3),
18–22. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb025539
Kurniawan, T., Sofyani, H., & Rahmawati, E. (2018). Pengungkapan Sustainability Report
dan Nilai Perusahan: Studi Empiris di Indonesia dan Singapura. Kompartemen: Jurnal
Ilmiah Akuntansi, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.30595/kompartemen.v16i1.2100
Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X. Y., & Koh, L. (2018). The impact of environmental, social, and
governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power. British Accounting
Review, 50(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.007
Maryanti, E., & Fithri, W. N. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibilty, Good Corporate
Governance, Kinerja Lingkungan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Dan Pengaruhnya Pada
Nilai Perusahaan. Journal of Accounting Science, 1(1), 21– 37.
https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v1i1.773
Melinda, A., & Wardhani, R. (2020). The Effect of Environmental, Social, Governance, and
Controversies on Firms’ Value: Evidence from Asia. 11 International Symposia in
Economic Theory and Econometrics, 27, 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1571-
038620200000027011
Nafisah, N. I., Halim, A., & Sari, A. R. (2020). Pengaruh Return on Assets (Roa), Debt To
Equity Ratio(Der), Current Ratio (Cr), Return on Equity (Roe), Price Earning Ratio
(Per), Total Assets Turnover (Tato), Dan Earning Per Share (Eps) Terhadap Nilai
Perusahaan. Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 6(2), 1– 17.
https://doi.org/10.21067/jrma.v6i2.4217
Qureshi, M. A., Kirkerud, S., Theresa, K., & Ahsan, T. (2020). The impact of sustainability
(environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value:
The moderating role of industry sensitivity. Business Strategy and the Environment,
29(3), 1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2427
Rahayu, M., & Sari, B. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal
Bina Akuntansi, 2. https://doi.org/10.52859/jba.v8i2.148 Riny. (2018). Analisis Faktor
Yang Mempengaruhi Nilai Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di
Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 14(3), 152.
https://doi.org/10.31940/jbk.v14i3.1058
Safriani, M. N dan Utomo, D. C. (2020). Pengaruh Environmental, Social, Governance
(ESG) Disclosure terhadap Kinerja Perusahan. Ejournal Undip, 9 Nomor 3, 1–11.
Şamiloglu, F., Oztop, A. O., & Kahraman, Y. E. (2017). The Determinants of Firm Financial
Performance: Evidence From Istanbul Stock Exchange (BIST). IOSR Journal of
Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF), 8(6), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-
0806016267
Sari, N. A., Budi, A., & Safriansyah. (2017). Sustainability Report dan Nilai Perusahaan Di
Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Spread, 7(1), 21–30.
Sparta & Dita Ayu. (2016). Dampak Environmental Performance Dan Environmental
Disclosure Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahan, Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, vol.13
(1), Page.35-54.
Sparta, Sparta. (2020). Dampak Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Perbankan:
Market Risk sebagai Intervening. Equity, vol.23 (2), Page 167-188.
https://doi.org/10.34209/equ.v23i2.2073
Sparta, Sparta (2016), Risiko Kredit dan Efisiensi Perbankan di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmiah
Manajemen (MIX), Vol. 7 (1), page 28-44 Spence. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
Sparta, Sparta (2011), Analisis Validitas Return Net Operating Asset Dan Return On Asset
Dalam Prediksi Harga Saham Pada Industri Manufaktur Terdaftar Di Bei (Periode
2003-2009), Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, Vol. 8 (1), 12 Page 1-24
Sparta Dan Salsabiela Arbaiya (2021), Pengaruh Risiko Bisnis Terhadap Kebijakan Dividen
Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Konvensional Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia
Periode 2015 – 2019, Liabilitas: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi, Vol. 2 (6),
page 50-66
Subramanyam, K. R. (2020). Financial statement analysis. McGraw Hill Education.. In
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (11th ed., Vol. 53, Issue 9).
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R & D. Alfabeta.
Sujoko, S. (2007). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan, Strategi Diversifikasi, Leverage, Faktor
Intern Dan Faktor Ekstern Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan (Studi Empirik Pada Perusahaan
Manufaktur Dan Non Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Jakarta). JURNAL MANAJEMEN
DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN, 09, 41–48.
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2007.v11.i2.317
Syafitri, T., & et al. (2018). “Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Nilai
Perusahaan (Studi pada Perusahaan Industri Sub Sektor Logam dan Sejenisnya yang
Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2012-2016).” Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 56(1), 110–
117.
Tarigan, J., & Semuel, H. (2015). Pengungkapan Sustainability Report dan Kinerja
Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 16(2), 88–101.
https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.16.2.88-101
Tobin, J. (1969). Equilibrium Approach To Monetary Theory. Money, Credit and Banking,
1(1), 15–29.
Umar, Z., Kenourgios, D., & Papathanasiou, S. (2020). The static and dynamic
connectedness of environmental, social, and governance investments: International
evidence. Economic Modelling, 93(September 2019), 112–124.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.08.007
Wijaya, H., Tania, D., & Cahyadi, H. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Nilai
Perusahaan. Jurnal Bina Akuntansi, 8(2), 109–121.
https://doi.org/10.52859/jba.v8i2.148 Winarno. (2015). Analisis Ekonometrika dan
Statistik dengan Eviews (4th ed.). UPP SKIM YKPN.
Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and
governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and
the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
Yermack, D. (1996). Higher Market Valuation for Firms with a Small Board of Directors.
Journal of Financial Economics, 40(40), 185–211.
Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm 13 value?
Evidence from Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635
Yudanti, A. F., & Wardoyo, D. U. (2022). Pengaruh Return On Asset dan Debt to Equity
Ratio Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Cakrawala Ilmiah, 1(5), 1103–1112.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21067/jrma.v6i2.4217
Zaitul, Sri Wahyuni, A., & Hamdi, M. (n.d.). ESG Disclosure dan Nilai Perusahaan. 148,
148–162.