You are on page 1of 7

Human Reproduction Vol.23, No.2 pp. 387–393, 2008 doi:10.

1093/humrep/dem370
Advance Access publication on December 11, 2007

Is a2-macroglobulin important in female stress


urinary incontinence?

Y. Wen1, W.C. Man, E.R. Sokol, M.L. Polan and B.H. Chen
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive,
H333 Stanford, CA 94305, USA
1
Correspondence address. Tel: þ1-650-723-9536; Fax: þ1-650-723-7737; E-mail: yanwen@stanford.edu

BACKGROUND: Loss of mechanical stability of the urethra and bladder is thought to be important in the
development of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The vaginal wall is the main supporting tissue for pelvic organs
and changes in components of supporting tissues are known to be involved in the pathophysiology of SUI.
METHODS: We evaluated changes in expression of a2-macroglobulin (a2-M), a protease inhibitor, in vaginal wall

Downloaded from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 22, 2014


tissues from premenopausal women (aged 42–45 years) with SUI (n 5 28) compared with menstrual cycle-matched
continent women (controls, n 5 29). The distribution of a2-M in vaginal wall tissues and fibroblasts was analysed
by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. Expression levels of a2-M mRNA and protein was determined
by relative real-time quantitative PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Protease inhibition
was measured to assess bioactivity. RESULTS: Vaginal wall tissues do express a2-M. Expression of a2-M mRNA
and protein was significantly higher in tissues from controls compared to women with SUI in both proliferative
and secretory phases (P < 0.05). Protease inhibitory activity of a2-M was significantly higher in tissues from controls
compared to women with SUI in the secretory phase (P < 0.05), but we found no difference in the proliferative phase
between groups. a2-M protein level was lower in the proliferative phase than the secretory phase in both controls and
SUI patients, while for a2-M mRNA this was found only in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased expression of a2-M
mRNA and protein and protease inhibitory activity in the vaginal wall tissues of women with SUI may contribute to
the development of SUI.

Keywords: extracellular matrix; stress urinary incontinence; a2-macroglobulin; vaginal wall; proteases

Introduction fibrous elements (collagen and elastic fibers) and a viscoelastic


Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common, costly and matrix (proteoglycans, glycoproteins). The collagens and
distressing condition for women (Nygaard and Heit, 2004; elastin fibers confer tissue strength and elasticity, respectively,
Anger et al., 2006; Subak et al., 2006). Frequency of SUI whereas structural glycoproteins create tissue cohesiveness.
increases with age, and peaks in prevalence first around meno- The ECM of the vaginal tissue largely determines its tissue
pause and then after age 65 (Hannestad et al., 2000). SUI is tensile strength and its mechanical stability. Therefore, the
defined as the involuntary loss of urine which occurs when relationship between production and degradation of the ECM
intra-abdominal pressure exceeds urethral pressure. Factors components is crucial for maintaining mechanical integrity of
affecting urethral pressure include bladder neck mobility; ure- pelvic supporting tissues. Abnormal quantity and quality of
thral sphincter muscle and nerve integrity; urethral smooth ECM components in pelvic supporting tissues have been
muscle and vascular plexuses; and surrounding tissue reported to be involved in the pathophysiology of SUI and/
support. The vaginal wall is the main supporting tissue and pro- or pelvic organ prolapse (Liapis et al., 2001; Ewies et al.,
vides a stable base for the urethra and bladder neck, preventing 2003; Goepel et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2004; Karam et al.,
urethral and bladder neck descent (Nygaard and Heit, 2004). 2007; Wen et al., 2007).
The loss of mechanical stability of the urethra and bladder is ECM undergoes continuous tissue remodeling in response to
thought to be an important factor in the development of SUI different environmental stimuli (Alperin and Moalli, 2006).
(Weber et al., 2004). Proteolysis regulates ECM assembly, degradation of excess
The vaginal wall comprises sequanous epithelium, sub- ECM components, remodeling of ECM structures and the
epithelium, smooth muscle and adventia. All elements are release of growth factors and bioactive fragments (Weber
embedded in an extracellular matrix (ECM), composed of et al., 2004). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and serine

# The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. 387
All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Wen et al.

protease (neutrophil elastase, NE) are capable of degrading with 5% Triton. After washing with Tris –HCl-Tween buffer
ECM components (collagen, elastin, proteoglycans and glyco- (TBS-T) and blocking with 5% normal secondary serum, the slides
proteins). In previous studies, we documented that the relative were incubated overnight with rabbit anti-a2-M (1/200, Sigma, St
activity of MMPs and NE are increased whereas their respect- Louis, MO, USA) primary antibody at 4ºC. Non-immune serum of
the primary antibody was used as a negative control. Then, after
ive inhibitors [tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1)
washing, the slides were stained with goat anti-rabbit-immunoglobulin
and a1-antitrypsin (ATT)] is decreased in the vaginal wall
(Ig)G- fluorescein isothiocyanate (1/50, Sigma) at room temperature
tissues of women with SUI compared with controls (Chen for 1 h. 40 ,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole staining was used to observe
et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2007). Other inves- nuclei. The slides were washed three times and mounted with Vecta-
tigators have also observed accelerated remodeling of ECM in shield (Vector Laboratory, Burlingame, CA, USA).
the pelvic supporting tissues in women with SUI and/or pelvic
organ prolapse compared with controls (Moalli et al., 2005; Immunohistochemistry for a2-M
Gabriel et al., 2006; Phillips et al., 2006). a-2macroglobulin Immunohistochemical staining for a2-M was performed on fixed
(a2-M) has been characterized as an extracellular panprotei- embedded tissue as described previously (Wen et al., 2006) to localize
nase inhibitor with the unique ability to inhibit almost all the expression of a2-M in vaginal wall specimens. Briefly,
known proteases, regardless of their mechanistic classes paraffin-embedded specimens were cut into 5 mm sections,
(serine, metallo, cysteine and aspartate). Information from a de-waxed in Xylene and rehydrated through graded ethanol solutions.
knock-out mice study suggests that a2-M is involved in After washing with TBS-T, endogenous peroxidases were blocked
with 3% H2O2 in TBS-T, and non-specific binding was blocked
tissue remodeling during both pregnancy and wound repair
with 1% bovine serum albumin, 5% normal secondary antibody host
(Umans et al., 1995). However, a2-M’s role in the develop-

Downloaded from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 22, 2014


serum in TBS-T at room temperature for 1 h. After rinsing with
ment of SUI has not been examined. TBS-T, the slides were incubated with rabbit anti-a2-M (1/20,
In this study, we sought to investigate possible changes in Sigma) primary antibody overnight at 48C. Omission of the primary
the expression of a2-M by measuring its expression level antibody was used as a negative control. After rinsing with TBS-T,
and inhibitory capacity in vaginal wall tissues from premeno- slides were incubated with a secondary antibody, goat anti-rabbit
pausal women with SUI compared with controls in both the biotin conjugate (1/50, Vector Laboratory). The slides were incubated
proliferative and secretory phases of the menstrual cycle. with Vectastatin ABC Kit (Vector Laboratory) reagent for 30 min at
room temperature. Immunoreactive products were visualized by
incubating slides with the substrate solution in TBS-T buffer with
Material and Methods levamisole to block alkaline phosphatase activity. Slides were coun-
terstained with 25% of hematoxylin (Fisher, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA).
Patient selection and tissue collection They were visualized and photographed with AxioCam (Zeiss,
We selected women with SUI (n ¼ 28) and controls (n ¼ 29) from Oberkochen, Germany).
both the proliferative and secretory phases of the menstrual cycle
for this study. Phase of cycle was confirmed by endometrial histology. Relative real-time quantitative PCR
Women with a history of endometriosis, gynecologic malignancies, Expression of a2-M mRNA was analysed by real-time quantitative
pelvic inflammatory conditions, connective tissue disorders, emphy- PCR (QPCR) in SUI and control patients. The extraction of RNA
sema, prior pelvic surgery and advanced pelvic organ prolapse from the tissue sample was carried out with the RNA-STAT-60
(greater than stage II by pelvic organ prolapse-quantification) were reagent (Tel-Test, Inc., Friendswood, TX, USA). The complementary
excluded. The Institutional Review Board of Stanford University DNA (cDNA) was generated from total RNA, as described previously
School of Medicine approved this study. Informed consents were (Chen et al., 2004). PCR primers used to amplify a2-M cDNA were
obtained from all participants. forward: 50 -TTCGTAAACCCAAAA TGTGTCCA-30 and reverse:
In women undergoing surgery for SUI, 1 cm2 of full-thickness, 50 -GTGAGGCTCTTCAACAT GCAC-30 . Real-time QPCR was
peri-urethral vaginal mucosa was excised 1 cm lateral to the urethro- carried on the Mx3005P Multiplex Quantificative PCR System with
vesical junction identified by a Foley balloon. Smaller, 0.5 cm2 biop- MxPro QPCR software (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Brilliant
sies of vaginal mucosa from a similar area were excised from controls SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix (Stratagene) was used to perform
undergoing benign gynecologic surgeries for fibroids, dysfunctional PCR. QPCR was performed as described previously (Wen et al.,
bleeding or ovarian cysts. At the time of tissue collection, the epi- 2006). The amplifications were carried out following a 10-min hot
thelial layers were removed with a razor blade. A representative cross- start at 958C in a three-step protocol with 30 s denaturation (948C),
section was fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 16 h, processed with 1 min annealing (558C) and extension at 728C for 30 s. Forty cycles
paraffin embedding and used for immunohistochemistry. Tissue were performed. Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl-transferase 1
from a patient was collected into a tube containing Dulbecco’s modi- (HPRT1) was used as an endogenous reference (Wen et al., 2006)
fied Eagle’s medium for the isolation of fibroblasts from vaginal wall against which the different template values were normalized. All
tissue for immunofluorescence staining as described previously (Chen PCR reactions were performed in duplicate. Cycle of threshold (Ct)
et al., 2004; Wen et al., 2006). The remainder of the tissue was frozen methods was used for quantification. Relative quantification of the
immediately in liquid nitrogen and then stored at 2808C for further gene of a2-M, corrected for the quantity of the normalizer gene
processing. (HPRT1), was divided by one normalized control sample value (cali-
brator sample) to generate the relative quantification to calibrator (Rel.
Immunofluorescence staining for a2-M Quant. to Cal.). The PCR products were sequenced to ensure that the
Immunofluorescence staining of fibroblasts from the vaginal wall was correct gene sequence was amplified, and were also loaded on 2%
performed as previously described (Chen et al., 2004). Briefly, fibro- agarose gel to confirm their size (134 bp).
blast cells from the vaginal cuff were cultured in a 4-well chamber We were only able to run 24 samples (two groups of 24, in dupli-
slide. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and treated cate) at a time for RT–PCR because the Mx3005P Multiplex

388
a2-Macroglobulin expression in vaginal wall tissues

Quantificative PCR System only has a 96-well blot. Samples from from that of the corresponding succinylated casein well. The a2-M
controls and women with SUI from the same phase of the menstrual protease inhibitory activity was then normalized by total protein
cycle were run together. Then, samples from the controls or women concentration.
with SUI from the different phases of the menstrual cycle were run
together. Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-tests. The level of
Western blot analysis significance was set at P , 0.05. JMPIN software version 5.1 was
Protein extraction was performed as described previously (Chen et al., used (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
2004). Total protein concentrations were determined using the
Bradford method (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The samples were
reduced with a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer contain- Results
ing 5% of 2-mercaptoethanol and boiled for 5 min. The samples We recruited 57 participants: 14 (mean age, 43.2 + 1.6 years)
were subjected to 8% SDS– polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with SUI, and 14 (mean age, 45.6 + 1.4 years) controls in the
(SDS –PAGE). The gels were blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes
proliferative phase, as well as 14 (mean age, 45.6 + 1.2 years)
(Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) in an electrophoretic transfer cell
(Bio-Rad). Blots were blocked with 5% non-fat milk at 48C overnight,
with SUI and 15 (mean age, 42.7 + 1.0 years) controls in the
then probed with goat anti-a2-M (1:1000, Affinity Biologicals, Inc., secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. There were no signifi-
Ontario, Canada) at room temperature for 1 h. After washing three cant differences in mean age and in number of vaginal deliv-
times with phosphate buffered saline with 0.1% Triton, pH 7.4 eries between SUI and control groups in both phases of the
(PBS-T), the membrane was then incubated in 1:10 000 dilution of cycle. The small tissue sample size limited our ability to

Downloaded from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 22, 2014


mouse anti-goat IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) perform all the assays on each specimen. Where tissue
(GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, samples were large enough, we performed all assays. Where
followed by three washes in PBS-T. Blots were developed by chemi- tissue samples were too small for the entire panel of assays,
luminescence. The blots were re-probed with rabbit anti- we included more participants from each group. This accounts
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) polyclonal for the discrepancy in the number of tissue samples included in
antibody (1/2500, Abcam, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA), then
each experiment.
1/10 000 dilution of donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to HRP (GE
Healthcare, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The band density was determined
by Bio-Rad Quality One Software (Bio-Rad). Identification and localization of a2-M expression
in vaginal wall tissue
Measurement of total a2-M The presence of a2-M in cultured human embryonic lung fibro-
We used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Assay- blasts has been reported previously (Ma et al., 2004). Our
pro, St Charles, Mo, USA) to measure total a2-M in the vaginal wall immunoflouresence study shows that a2-M is also expressed
tissue extracts prepared as described above for the Western blot. in the fibroblasts isolated from vaginal wall tissue (Fig. 1).
A 96-well plate was pre-coated with a polyclonal anti-a2-M antibody. The immunohistochemistry results further indicate that a2-M
Fifty microliters of standard or samples were added into the wells in is expressed in both cells and ECM of the vaginal wall
duplicates for 2 h at room temperature. After washing, anti-a2-M bio- tissue, but the expression is primarily localized in the cells
tinylated polyclonal antibody was added to the plates for 1 h at room (Fig. 2).
temperature. Plates were then incubated with 50 ml of streptavidin-
peroxidase conjugate for 30 min at room temperature. Substrate was
Expression levels of a2-M mRNA in vaginal wall tissue
added to the wells for 15 min for color development, and then termi-
nated by addition of 0.5 N HCl. The absorbance at 450 nm was from controls and women with SUI
measured on a plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, The expression levels of a2-M in tissues from women with SUI
USA). According to the manufacturer, intra-assay and inter-assay and control groups from the proliferative and secretory phases
coefficients of variation are 5.1% and 7.8%, respectively. The level of menstrual cycle were evaluated using relative real-time
of total a2-M in the samples was normalized by protein concentration. QPCR. The RT – PCR fragments of a2-M run on 2% agarose
gels confirmed their size (134 bp, Fig. 3A). The expression
The a2-M protease (thermolysin) inhibitory activity assay level of a2-M mRNA in the control group (n ¼ 8) was 11
The ability of a2-M in vaginal wall tissue extracts to inhibit proteases times higher than that in the SUI group (n ¼ 8) during the pro-
was assessed using QuantiCleave Protease Assay Kit (Pierce) (Wu and liferative phase (P ¼ 0.03) and the level of a2-M mRNA in the
Pizzo, 2001). Briefly, 50 ml of the tissue extracts or a2-M standard continent control group (n ¼ 9) was 8 times higher
were added in duplicate to 96-well plates containing 50 ml of thermo- (P ¼ 0.01) than that in the SUI group (n ¼ 9) during the
lysin (0.02 mg/ml, Sigma) per well, and pre-incubated at 378C secretory phase (Fig. 3B).
for 30 min. After pre-incubation, 100 ml of Tris –HCl buffer To examine the in vivo ability of reproductive hormones to
(0.01 M Tris –HCl, 0.002 M CaCl2, pH 8.2, control blank) or 100 ml
alter the mRNA expression levels of a2-M in vaginal wall
of succinylated casein (2 mg/ml) was added into each well and
incubated at 378C for 1 h. Finally, 50 ml of trinitrobenzene sulfonate
tissue from both SUI and control groups, we compared the
solution was added and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. expression levels of a2-M mRNA between the proliferative
The plates were read on a microplate reader at 450 nm. According and the secretory phases of the menstrual cycle in both
to the manufacturer’s protocol, a2-M attributable thermolysin groups. The expression level of a2-M mRNA in the control
inhibitory activity was calculated for the change in absorbance at group was 3 times higher (P ¼ 0.01) in the secretory phase
450 nm by subtracting the absorbance at 450 of the control blank (n ¼ 12) compared to the level in the proliferative phase
389
Wen et al.

Figure 1: Fibroblasts from the vaginal wall of a control patient were cultured
The cells were fixed and subjected to immunofluorescence staining analysis using anti-a2-M antibody (green). 40 ,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole
was used to stain nuclei (blue)

Downloaded from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 22, 2014


Figure 2: Immunohistochemical localization of a2-M, which was detected in the cells and throughout the ECM of vaginal wall tissue

(n ¼ 9) (Fig. 4). However, the expression level of a2-M a2-M secondary proteolysis. Densitometric analysis shows
mRNA in the SUI group was similar during the proliferative that the 180/90 kDa and 180/50 kDa ratios for a2-M were
(n ¼ 10) and the secretory phases (n ¼ 10) (Fig. 4). similar for control and SUI groups. Both groups also had equi-
valent a2-M (180 kDa) /GAPDH (40 kDa) ratios. Western blot
Characterization of proteolytic a2-M fragments analysis of the proteolytic state of a2-M in the tissue extracts of
in the vaginal wall tissues from continent both controls and SUI groups in the proliferative phase shows
controls and women with SUI similar results (data not shown).
a2-M may be proteolytically degraded during severe inflam-
matory processes, resulting in decreased inhibitory function Total concentrations of a2-M protein in vaginal
and increased proteolysis. This proteolytic process is character- wall tissues determined by ELISA
ized in reducing SDS – PAGE and Western blot as the appear- We measured a2-M concentrations in the tissue extracts using
ance of additional a2-M fragment bands (smaller than 90 kDa) ELISA (Table I). For controls (n ¼ 7) in the proliferative
rather than 180 and 90 kDa bands (Wu and Pizzo, 2001). phase, the mean concentration of total a2-M was 2-fold
Figure 5 shows Western blot analysis of the proteolytic state higher than for women with SUI (n ¼ 8, P ¼ 0.048, Table I).
of a2-M in the tissue extracts of both control and SUI groups For controls (n ¼ 8) in the secretory phase, the mean concen-
in the secretory phase. In controls, a2-M shows a similar tration of total a2-M was roughly 3-fold higher than for
protein pattern as the SUI group, consisting of the 180 kDa sub- women with SUI (n ¼ 7, P ¼ 0.044, Table I). Within the SUI
units and the 90 kDa fragments resulting from a2-M bait group, the mean concentration of total a2-M was also 2-fold
region proteolysis, together with the 50 kDa fragments from higher in the secretory phase compared with the mean
390
a2-Macroglobulin expression in vaginal wall tissues

Downloaded from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 22, 2014


Figure 3: Relative real-time QPCR analyses were performed to determine and compare the mRNA expression levels of a2-M in vaginal wall tissue
from both the controls and SUI patients in the proliferative and the secretory phases
Relative quantification of the gene of a2-M, normalized to the internal control (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl-transferase 1), was divided by one
normalized control sample value (calibrator sample) to generate the relative quantification to calibrator (Rel.Quant. to Cal.). (A) The RT–PCR frag-
ments of a2-M shown on a 2% agarose gel confirm their size (134 bp). (B) The bars represent the mean + SEM. a2-M mRNA expression level was
higher in both control groups than in the SUI groups during the proliferative phase (11-fold increase, P ¼ 0.03) and secretory phase (8-fold increase,
P ¼ 0.01). Relative Quantity to Calibrator Average (baseline-corrected, reference dye—normalized fluorescence) [Rel. Quant. to Cal. Avg (dRn)]

concentration in the proliferative phase (P ¼ 0.049, Table I). Protease inhibitory activity of a2-M in vaginal wall tissues
Within controls, the mean concentration of total a2-M Having shown that a2-M protein levels are increased in controls
was 2-fold higher in the secretory phase compared with the compared with women with SUI in both proliferative and
mean concentration in the proliferative phase (P ¼ 0.015, secretory phases, we sought to correlate these differences with
Table I). the ability of a2-M to inhibit proteases (Table II). We specifi-
cally measured the a2-M-attributable thermolysin inhibitory
activity and found a significantly higher mean protease

Figure 4: Comparative relative real-time QPCR analyses were per-


formed to determine the ability of reproductive hormones to modulate Figure 5: Western blotting of a2-M in vaginal wall tissues from 9
mRNA expression of a2-M in vaginal wall tissue from women with SUI and 10 continent control patients in the secretory phase
SUI and the continent controls in both the proliferative and the a2-M shows three main bands on the blot; the 180 kDa subunit and the
secretory phases 90 kDa fragments resulting from a2-M bait region proteolysis,
The bars represent the mean + SEM. The expression level of a2-M together with the 50 kDa fragments from a2-M secondary proteolysis.
mRNA in SUI groups shows no difference between the proliferative ‘M’ represents protein marker. ‘C’ represents controls. ‘S’ represents
(n ¼ 10) and secretory phases (n ¼ 10).The expression level of women with SUI. Densitometric analysis showed that the 180/90 kDa
a2-M mRNA in the continent control group was 3 times higher or 180/50 kDa and a2-M (180 kDa) / glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
(P ¼ 0.01) in the secretory phase (n ¼ 12) compared with the level dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (40kDa) ratios were similar between the
in the proliferative phase (n ¼ 9) two groups

391
Wen et al.

are maintained through a precise balance between proteolytic


Table I. Total a2-M concentrations in vaginal wall tissues (mg/mg/ml).
and a2-M inhibitory activity in the ECM. a2-M has a broad-
Menstrual Phase SUI (mean + SE) Controls (mean + SE) P-values specificity proteinase inhibitory ability in the ECM (Jensen
and Sottrup-Jensen, 1986). Decreased a2-M expression and
Proliferative phase 3.45 + 0.63** 7.58 + 1.65*** 0.048*
Secretory phase 6.20 + 2.19** 17.73 + 4.5*** 0.044* protease inhibitory activity could result in higher proteolytic
activity in the ECM. Excessive degradation of collagen,
Total a2-M concentrations in the tissue extracts were determined by elastin and other components in the ECM then weakens the
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Values are mean + SEM for the group.
*Significant difference between SUI and control groups. pelvic supporting tissues.
**P ¼ 0.049 [difference between the proliferative (n ¼ 8) and the secretory a2-M is not only a broad-specificity proteinase inhibitor, but
phases (n ¼ 7) in SUI group]. also a carrier of tissue repair growth factors, such as TGF-b
***P ¼ 0.015 [difference between the proliferative (n ¼ 7) and secretory
phases (n ¼ 8) in the continent control group]. (Ma et al., 2004). TGF-b1, a profibrotic factor, enhances col-
lagen and elastin production (McGowan and McNamer,
1990; Gleizes et al., 1997). It also suppresses ECM degradation
Table II. a2-M attributable-thermolysin inhibitory activity was measured by by down-regulating the expression of proteinases, such as col-
QuantiCleave Protease Assay Kit.
lagenase and elastase, and up-regulating proteinase inhibitors,
Menstrual Phase SUI (mean + SE) Controls (mean + SE) P-values such as the TIMPs (Overall et al., 1991). Low level of a2-M
in SUI vaginal tissue may also cause decreased synthesis of
Proliferative phase 0.125 + 0.016** 0.139 + 0.03*** 0.64*
Secretory phase 0.096 + 0.008** 0.166 + 0.019*** 0.02* ECM components through a decrease in TGF-b1. As a result,
the weakened connective tissues lose their tensile strength

Downloaded from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 22, 2014


The mean + SEM for the group is presented in the table and mechanical stability, accelerating the development of SUI.
*Significant difference between SUI and control groups.
**P ¼ 0.3 [comparison between the proliferative (n ¼ 9) and secretory The bands of 180 and 85– 90 kDa of a2-M can normally be
phases (n ¼ 8) in SUI group]. observed by reducing SDS– PAGE. The enhanced degradation
***P ¼ 0.34 [comparison between the proliferative (n ¼ 8) and secretory of a2-M by secondary proteolysis could produce the smaller
phases (n ¼ 8) in continent control group].
fragments of a2-M (lower than 85 –90 kDa), as has been
observed in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluids and the
inhibitory level in the controls (n ¼ 8) compared to women with plasma of patients with severe and lethal acute pancreatitis
SUI (n ¼ 8) during the secretory phase (P ¼ 0.02, Table II). We (Wu and Pizzo, 2001; Bı́saro de Lorenc et al., 2005). Our
saw no significant difference between the mean protease inhibi- Western blot data show that the protein pattern of a2-M in
tory level in controls (n ¼ 8) compared to women with SUI the SUI group is similar to that in the control group with
(n ¼ 9) during the proliferative phase (P ¼ 0.64, Table II). three forms of a2-M fragments. The ratios of 180/90 kDa
Within each group, there was no significant difference and 180/50 kDa bands are not significantly different between
between the proliferative and secretory phases. the SUI and control groups, indicating that higher secondary
protease activity involved in a2-M cleavage is not observed
in vaginal wall tissues from women with SUI or controls.
Discussion This suggests that SUI is a chronic, as opposed to an acute,
In the present study, we investigated the expression and pro- inflammatory process that gradually develops years after an
tease inhibitory capacity of a2-M in the vaginal wall tissues injury resulting from vaginal childbirth and/or pregnancy.
of women with and without SUI during the proliferative and a2-M is synthesized by granulosa cells of follicles in the rat
secretory phases of the menstrual cycle. We found that the ovary after the LH surge (Gaddy-Kurten and Richards, 1991).
expression levels of a2-M mRNA and protein in vaginal wall In our present study, we observed a significant increase in
tissues are significantly higher in controls than in women a2-M mRNA expression in vaginal wall tissues during the
with SUI during both proliferative and secretory phases. The secretory phase compared with the proliferative phase in the
capacity of a2-M to inhibit protease activity in vaginal wall control group. However, a2-M mRNA expression did not
tissues is also higher in controls than in women with SUI change in the SUI group. This difference between groups
during the secretory phase. In the proliferative phase, we did suggests that a2-M expression may be regulated by reproduc-
not observe a significant difference between the SUI and tive hormones, and that pregnancy may favor the development
control groups in a2-M protease inhibitory capacity, which of SUI in women with a genetic predisposition to SUI, through
differs from our PCR and ELISA data. This may be due to a relative decrease in a2-M expression compared with controls.
the small number of patients in each group or because the Given the scope of this study, we are unable to differentiate
assay was not sensitive enough to pick up small differences. whether the observed difference in a2-M expression is the
This could also be due to cyclic variation in other factors cause or the result of SUI. This requires further study.
which affect enzyme activity. Our study suggests that the imbalance of ECM synthesis and
Collagen and elastin play a major role in maintaining tissue degradation in vaginal wall tissues of women with SUI could
tensile strength and the mechanical stability of pelvic support- be caused in part by decreased levels of a2-M expression
ing tissues. Their functions are complementary, with collagen and a corresponding decrease in protease inhibitory activity.
being involved with tensile strength and elastin with defor- These data, combined with our previous observation of low
mation and recoil. The quantity and quality of collagen, expression of the protease inhibitors, ATT and TIMP-1,
elastin and other components in the pelvic supporting tissues strongly suggest that decreased expression of protease
392
a2-Macroglobulin expression in vaginal wall tissues

inhibitors in ECM may contribute to the development of SUI. Jensen PE, Sottrup-Jensen L. Primary structure of human alpha
2-macroglobulin. Complete disulfide bridge assignment and localization of
This information may lead to the discoveries of new methods two interchain bridges in the dimeric proteinase binding unit. J Biol Chem
to prevent and treat SUI and/or pelvic organ prolapse. 1986;261:15863– 15869.
Karam JA, Vazquez DV, Lin VK, Zimmern PE. Elastin expression and elastic
fibre width in the anterior vaginal wall of postmenopausal women with and
Acknowledgement without prolapse. BJU Int 2007;100:346–350.
The authors thank Lorna Groundwater for her excellent editorial help. Liapis A, Bakas P, Pafiti A, Frangos-Plemenos M, Arnoyannaki N, Creatsas G.
Changes of collagen type III in female patients with genuine stress
incontinence and pelvic floor prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
2001;97:76–79.
Funding Liu X, Zhao Y, Gao J, Pawlyk B, Starcher B, Spencer JA, Yanagisawa H, Zuo J,
National Institute of Health (AG 17907); Mary Lake Polan Li T. Elastic fiber homeostasis requires lysyl oxidase-like 1 protein. Nat
Genet 2004;36:178–182.
Transition Fund from Stanford University. Ma H, Li R, Zhang Z, Tong T. mRNA level of alpha-2-macroglobulin as an
aging biomarker of human fibroblasts in culture. Exp Gerontol
2004;39:415– 421.
References McGowan SE, McNamer R. Transforming growth factor-beta increases elastin
Alperin M, Moalli PA. Remodeling of vaginal connective tissue in patients production by neonatal rat lung fibroblasts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
with prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006;18:544– 550. 1990;3:369–376.
Anger JT, Saigal CS, Madison R, Joyce G, Litwin MS. Increasing costs of Moalli PA, Shand SH, Zyczynski HM, Gordy SC, Meyn LA. Remodeling of
urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries. J Urol vaginal connective tissue in patients with prolapse. Obstet Gynecol
2006;176:247–251; discussion 251. 2005;106:953–963.
Bı́saro de Lorenc L, Ramos AM, Sánchez MC, Montenegro R, Chiabrando GA. Nygaard IE, Heit M. Stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol

Downloaded from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 22, 2014


Structural evaluation of plasma alpha2-macroglobulin in acute pancreatitis. 2004;104:607–620.
Clin Chem Lab Med 2005;43:1183–1189. Overall CM, Wrana JL, Sodek J. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional
Chen BH, Wen Y, Li H, Polan ML. Collagen metabolism and turnover in regulation of 72-kDa gelatinase/type IV collagenase by transforming
women with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse. Int growth factor-beta 1 in human fibroblasts. Comparisons with collagenase
Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002;13:80–87; discussion 87. and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase gene expression. J Biol
Chem 1991;266:14064–14071.
Chen B, Wen Y, Polan ML. Elastolytic activity in women with stress urinary
incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23: Phillips CH, Anthony F, Benyon C, Monga AK. Collagen metabolism in the
119 –126. uterosacral ligaments and vaginal skin of women with uterine prolapse.
BJOG 2006;113:39– 46.
Chen B, Wen Y, Yu X, Polan ML. The role of neutrophil elastase in elastin
metabolism of pelvic tissues from women with stress urinary incontinence. Subak LL, Brown JS, Kraus SR, Brubaker L, Lin F, Richter HE, Bradley CS,
Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:274–279. Grady D. The “costs” of urinary incontinence for women. Obstet Gynecol
2006;107:908–916.
Ewies AAA, Al-Azzawi F, Thompson J. Changes in extracellular matrix
proteins in the cardinal ligaments of post-menopausal women with or Umans L, Serneels L, Overbergh L, Lorent K, Van Leuven F, Van den Berghe
without prolapse: a computerized immunohistomorphometric analysis. H. Targeted inactivation of the mouse alpha 2-macroglobulin gene. J Biol
Hum Reprod 2003;18:2189–2195. Chem 1995;270:19778–19785.
Gabriel B, Watermann D, Hancke K, Gitsch G, Werner M, Tempfer C, Hausen A. Weber AM, Buchsbaum GM, Chen B, Clark AL, Damaser MS, Daneshgari F,
Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase 2 in uterosacral ligaments is Davis G, DeLancey J, Kenton K, Weidner AC et al. Basic science and
associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct translational research in female pelvic floor disorders: proceedings of an
2006;17:478–482. NIH-sponsored meeting. Neurourol Urody 2004;23:288– 301.
Gaddy-Kurten D, Richards JS. Regulation of alpha 2-macroglobulin by Wen Y, Polan ML, Chen B. Do extracellular matrix protein expressions change
luteinizing hormone and prolactin during cell differentiation in the rat with cyclic reproductive hormones in pelvic connective tissue from women
ovary. Mol Endocrinol 1991;5:1280– 1291. with stress urinary incontinence? Hum Reprod 2006;21:1266– 1273.
Gleizes PE, Munger JS, Nunes I, Harpel JG, Mazzieri R, Noguera I, Rifkin DB. Wen Y, Zhao YY, Li S, Polan ML, Chen BH. Differences in mRNA and protein
TGF-beta latency: biological significance and mechanisms of activation. expression of small proteoglycans in vaginal wall tissue from women
Stem Cells 1997;15:190– 197. with and without stress urinary incontinence. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1718–
1724.
Goepel C, Hefler L, Methfessel H-D, Koelbl H. Periurethral connective tissue
status of postmenopausal women with genital prolapse with and without Wu SM, Pizzo SV. Alpha(2)-macroglobulin from rheumatoid arthritis synovial
stress incontinence. Acta Obstetr Gynecol Scand 2003;82:659– 664. fluid: functional analysis defines a role for oxidation in inflammation. Arch
Biochem Biophys 2001;391:119– 126.
Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based
epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian
EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Submitted on August 17, 2007; resubmitted on October 15, 2007; accepted on
Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:1150–1157. October 19, 2007

393

You might also like