AppendixE.1 MRF T1-3

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: JOY B. ROSARIO Name of Rater: NOVA R. DEL MONTE

Position: TEACHER I Position: MASTER TEACHER 1
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SDO1 PANGASINAN Date of Review:
Rating Period:
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality
Education Knowledge and of content within and rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services Pedagogy across curriculum agreement form about knowledge
teaching areas. of content within and across
curriculum teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developed highlighting integration
of content knowledge within and
across subject areas
3. Instructional materials highlighting
mastery of content and its
integration in other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) Efficiency
highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality
Education teaching strategies rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services that enhance learner agreement form about teaching
achievement in strategies that enhance learner
literacy and numeracy achievement in literacy and
skills. numeracy skills
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used
in teaching highlighting learner-
centered strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy skills
learner-centered strategies that
Weight per
KRA
promote literacy and/or numeracy Efficiency
skills
4. Performance tasks/test material(s)
used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used in
teaching
annotations)
Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality
Education teaching strategies to rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services develop critical and agreement form about teaching
creative thinking, as strategies to develop critical and
well as other higher- creative thinking, as well as other
order thinking skills. higher-order thinking skills
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used
in teaching highlighting different
teaching strategies that develop
critical and creative thinking
and/or other HOTS
different teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative
thinking and/or other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test material(s)
used in demonstration teaching Efficiency
5. Results of assessment used in
teaching
Timeliness
annotations)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality
Education Environment structure to engage rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services and Diversity of learners, individually agreement form about managing
Learners or in groups, in classroom structure that engages
meaningful learners in various activities
exploration, discovery 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
and hands-on highlighting various classroom
activities within a management strategies that engage
range of physical learners in activities/tasks in Efficiency
learning different physical learning
environments. environments
Weight per
KRA
Basic 5. Managed learner Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality
Education behavior rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services constructively by agreement form about teacher
applying positive and management of learner behavior using
non-violent discipline the following strategies:
to ensure learning- 1. Providing motivation
focused 2. Praising the learners/Giving
environments. positive feedback
3. Setting house rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active Efficiency
participation
5. Allowing learners to express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities to
learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
annotations)
Timeliness
Basic 6. Used differentiated, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality
Education developmentally rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services appropriate learning agreement form about using
experiences to address differentiated, developmentally
learners’ gender, appropriate learning experiences
needs, strengths, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
interests and developed highlighting
experiences. differentiation in content, product,
process, learning environment or
others according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths, interests
and experiences Efficiency
3. Instructional materials developed
highlighting differentiation in
content, product, process, learning
environment or others according to
learners’ gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
Weight per
KRA
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality
Education and Planning and implemented rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services developmentally agreement form about using
sequenced teaching developmentally sequenced
and learning teaching and learning process
processes to meet 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
curriculum highlighting developmentally
requirements and sequenced instruction that meet
varied teaching curriculum goals and varied
contexts. teaching contexts
3. Instructional materials used to
implement developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning
process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied teaching
contexts
4. Others (Please specify and provide Efficiency
annotations)
Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of teachers on Quality
collegial discussions LACs/FGDs/meetings with proof
that use teacher and of attendance
learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on
enrich teaching use of teacher and learner feedback
practice. to enrich teaching practice with
proof of attendance
Efficiency
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality
Education developed, organized rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services and used appropriate agreement form about using
teaching and learning appropriate teaching and learning
resources, including resources, including ICT
ICT, to address Examples:
learning goals.  Activity sheets/task sheets/work
sheets
 PowerPoint presentations
 Video clips Efficiency
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic Intervention
Materials
 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with
appropriate instructional materials
appended
annotations)
Weight per
KRA
Timeliness
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality
Education and Reporting selected, organized rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services and used diagnostic, agreement form about using
formative and diagnostic, formative and
summative summative assessment strategies
assessment strategies 2. Prepared lesson plans/modified
consistent with DLLs highlighting appropriate use
curriculum of formative assessment strategies
requirements. 3. Developed diagnostic tests: (a)
with TOS reviewed by superior;
(b) with sample accomplished
questionnaire/answer sheets
4. Developed summative tests: (a)
with TOS reviewed by superior;
questionnaire/answer sheets
5. Developed performance tasks: (a)
with rubrics reviewed by superior;
rubrics
annotations) Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of a learner’s written Quality
Education evaluated learner work with summary of results and
Services progress and with signature of parents
achievement using 2. Formative/summative assessment
learner attainment tools with TOS and frequency of
data. errors with identified least
mastered skills
Efficiency
3. Class records/grading sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
showing index of mastery
Basic 12. Communicated 1. At least 3 samples of corrected test Quality
Education promptly and clearly papers of the same 3 learners in the
Services the learners’ needs, same learning area with parents’ or
progress and guardians’ signature and date of
achievement to key receipt
stakeholders,
including
parents/guardians.
Weight per
KRA
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Efficiency
Parent-Teacher conferences in all
quarters with proof of
parent’s/guardian’s attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using various
modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing entries
per quarter Timeliness
6. Other documents showing learner
needs, progress and achievement
submitted to other stakeholders
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or Quality
Education related Participation
Services works/activities that 2. Certificate of Training
contribute to the 3. Certificate of Speakership
teaching-learning 4. Committee involvement
process. 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular
activities
6. Book or Journal Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorship Efficiency
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
8. Coaching and mentoring learners
in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-service
teachers
annotations)
Timeliness
NOVA R. DEL MONTE JOY B. ROSARIO JAIME A. TAMONDONG

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

AppendixE.1 MRF T1-3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

AppendixE.1 MRF T1-3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: JOY B. ROSARIO Name of Rater: NOVA R. DEL MONTE

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

NOVA R. DEL MONTE JOY B. ROSARIO JAIME A. TAMONDONG

You might also like