1. Mergers and acquisitions require approval by boards of directors and shareholders as specified by statute. In asset deals, only the target company's shareholders must approve if it is the sale of "all or substantially all" assets. In mergers, both companies' boards and shareholders must approve.
2. Freeze-out mergers allow the controlling shareholder to force out minority shareholders in exchange for cash. Some jurisdictions require a legitimate business purpose, while Delaware uses a test of overall fairness in dealing and price. Conditions like independent special committee approval and a majority of minority shareholders can avoid the fairness test.
3. Sales of individual shareholders' stock do not require board or shareholder approval unless an agreement states otherwise.
1. Mergers and acquisitions require approval by boards of directors and shareholders as specified by statute. In asset deals, only the target company's shareholders must approve if it is the sale of "all or substantially all" assets. In mergers, both companies' boards and shareholders must approve.
2. Freeze-out mergers allow the controlling shareholder to force out minority shareholders in exchange for cash. Some jurisdictions require a legitimate business purpose, while Delaware uses a test of overall fairness in dealing and price. Conditions like independent special committee approval and a majority of minority shareholders can avoid the fairness test.
3. Sales of individual shareholders' stock do not require board or shareholder approval unless an agreement states otherwise.
1. Mergers and acquisitions require approval by boards of directors and shareholders as specified by statute. In asset deals, only the target company's shareholders must approve if it is the sale of "all or substantially all" assets. In mergers, both companies' boards and shareholders must approve.
2. Freeze-out mergers allow the controlling shareholder to force out minority shareholders in exchange for cash. Some jurisdictions require a legitimate business purpose, while Delaware uses a test of overall fairness in dealing and price. Conditions like independent special committee approval and a majority of minority shareholders can avoid the fairness test.
3. Sales of individual shareholders' stock do not require board or shareholder approval unless an agreement states otherwise.
i. For statutory mergers, sales of assets or consolidations:
If you want to know whether approval of the board and/or
the shareholders is required, ____check the statutes.
a. In asset deals, _a majority of the board of the
acquirer present at a meeting where quorum is present needs to approve the deal, but no shareholder vote is required on the acquirer side (unless the consideration in the deal is stock and shareholders need to vote to increase the number of authorized shares). On the target side, where the sale is of “all or substantially all” of the assets of target, __a majority of the directors present at a meeting where quorum is present need to approve the deal, and also _a majority of outstanding shares__________________ _______________.
b. In mergers, __________________ of the directors
of the acquirer present at a meeting where quorum is present need to approve the deal. A majority of the shareholders of the acquirer need to approve the deal, unless a statutory exception applies, like in Delaware where acquirer shareholder approval is not required if the shares issued as consideration in the merger do not exceed 20% of the shares outstanding before the merger. On the target side, _a_majority________________ of the directors present at a meeting where quorum is present and a_majority_________________ of the outstanding shares of the target need to approve the merger.
If you want to know whether appraisal rights (also known
as dissenters’ rights) attach, check the statute.
Reed Bus. Assoc. Summary Document – Spring 2020 1
a. In Delaware, appraisal rights are only available in merger transactions. In mergers, appraisal rights only attach if a shareholder is a “_dissenting shareholders___,” meaning they voted against or abstained from voting on the merger. Appraisal rights are available to (i) dissenting shareholders of the merging company; and also to (ii) dissenting shareholders of the surviving company (except in the case where shareholders of the surviving company do not vote on the merger) – see statute for other exceptions.
ii. For sales of shares by individual shareholders, _no vote_________
of the board of the target directors and _no overall vote_______ of the target shareholders is required absent a written agreement to the contrary – even if all shareholders elect to sell their shares and the result is a change in control of the company. Similarly, no appraisal rights attach. Instead, each shareholder gets to decide on their own whether or not to sell.
iii. Freeze-Out Mergers
A “freeze-out”, or “squeeze-out”, or “cash-out” merger is
when a controlling block of shareholders forces minority shareholders out by causing a merger that results in a cash payment to the minority.
Some jurisdictions require a ____legitimate business
purpose________ before they allow the minority to be cashed out. Eliminating transaction and litigation costs associated with large groupings of shareholders is generally considered a legitimate business purpose.
In Delaware, they quickly jettisoned the business purpose
test in favor of ____an overall fairness_____ test inquiring as to fair dealing and fair price. Fair dealing embraces questions of how the transaction was timed, how it was
Reed Bus. Assoc. Summary Document – Spring 2020 2
initiated, how it was negotiated, how it was structured, how it was disclosed to shareholders and directors and how approvals of the board and shareholders were obtained.
If a public company is cashing out shareholders such that
the company will no longer be publicly-owned, we call that transaction a “_going private____” transaction. Some going private transactions involve the controlling shareholder squeezing out the minority (which is our focus in this course), but some “friendly” going private transactions are conducted by a third party and all shareholders are being cashed out.
A going private transaction in which a controlling
shareholder is cashing out the minority can avoid the entire fairness test and be protected by _business judgment rule_ if in the transaction:
a. the controller conditions the procession of the
transaction on the approval of both a Special Committee and a majority of the minority stockholders; AND
b. the Special Committee is independent; AND
c. the Special Committee is empowered to freely
select its own advisors and to say no definitively; AND
d. the Special Committee meets its duty of care in
negotiating a fair price; AND
e. the vote of the minority is informed; AND
f. there is no coercion of the minority
To show that a director is not independent, plaintiffs must
demonstrate that a director is beholden to the controlling party or is so under the controller’s influence that he or she Reed Bus. Assoc. Summary Document – Spring 2020 3 can’t exercise independent discretion. The director’s connections to the controlling person must be material, which is to say sufficiently substantial that the director cannot objectively discharge his or her fiduciary duties.