Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pokorny 2017
Pokorny 2017
Clinical skills
D
igital rectal examination (DRE) is an important
1 Indications for digital rectal examination
component of the physical examination. It is
essential when someone presents with rectal Bleeding from the rectum
bleeding, acute abdominopelvic pain (to check for pelvic Mucus discharge from the rectum
peritoneal irritation) or other symptoms suggestive of Change in bowel habit
anorectal or prostatic pathology (Box 1). Indeed, in days Faecal urgency
gone by, some physicians lived by the maxim: “if you
Obstructed/difficult defecation1
don’t put your finger in, you put your foot in it” (attrib-
Faecal incontinence
uted to Hamilton Bailey, English surgeon, 1894e1961).
Anorectal pain (but avoid digital
DRE can be embarrassing for the patient and, at times, for examination when an obvious fissure
the doctor. It requires a caring approach, and an explanation is seen on inspection)
of both what to expect and the potential benefits. Verbal Prostatic symptoms: eg, nocturia, hesitancy,
consent should always be obtained before the examination. poor stream, difficulty starting urination,
dribbling after urination
Cultural sensitivities may also need to be considered.
Cauda equina syndrome (anal tone) u
Complications from DRE are rare, although vasovagal
syncope may occasionally occur. Caution must be
exercised in the presence of prostatitis and prostatic and that it may be uncomfortable. It should not be
abscesses so as not to cause bacteraemia through aggres- painful, but the presence of pain may suggest
sive palpation. Moreover, DRE is best avoided in anyone pathology. If indicated, have a chaperone present,
who is myelosuppressed, owing to the risk of infection. particularly with patients of the opposite sex.
Many conditions can be diagnosed by DRE, including Position the patient on an examining couch or table in the
rectal masses suggestive of cancer, haemorrhoids and, in left lateral position and ask them to remove their lower
men, prostate abnormalities. About 25% of colorectal clothing and draw their knees up to their chest. Ensure
cancers occur in the rectum and up to half can be palpated, that adequate light is present and that the patient is
but accuracy depends on training, experience, examina- comfortable and not likely to fall off the examination table
tion technique and the length of the examining finger.2 or couch (a potential cause of litigation).
Obvious haemorrhoids or other benign conditions After parting the buttocks, carefully examine the perianal
should not be assumed to be the cause of rectal bleeding area, particularly for abscesses, skin conditions such as
until more sinister pathologies have been excluded. dermatitis and psoriasis, fissures (a clue is the presence of
The examination procedure is shown in Box 2. The a sentinel pile or skin tag), fistulae and external haemor-
physician should explain the procedure to the patient rhoids (Box 3). Ask the patient to bear down to assess
for rectal prolapse.3 Next place the
gloved index finger, with ample
2 Digital rectal examination technique
water-soluble lubricant, on the
posterior part of the anal verge (Box
2, A) and rest for a few seconds to
allow the external sphincter to relax.
Then rotate the examining finger very
slowly in a clockwise direction,
similar to a corkscrew, passing from
the anus into the rectum, with the
finger aimed towards the umbilicus,
MJA 207 (4)
148
Medical education
1 Tantiphlachiva K, Rao P, Attaluri A, et al. Digital rectal examination is a 4 Hoepffner N, Shastri YM, Hanisch E, et al. Comparative evaluation of a new
useful tool for identifying patients with dyssynergia. Clin Gastroenterol bedside faecal occult blood test in a prospective multicentre study. Aliment
Hepatol 2010; 11: 955-960. Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23: 145-154.
2 Wong RK, Drossman DA, Bharucha AE, et al. The digital rectal examination: 5 Hoogendam A, Buntinx F, de Vet HC. The diagnostic value of digital rectal
a multicentre survey of physicians’ and students’ perceptions and practice examination in primary care screening for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.
patterns. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1157-1163. Fam Pract 1999; 16: 621. -
3 Talley NJ. How to do and interpret a rectal examination in gastroenterology.
Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 820-822.
148.e1