You are on page 1of 11

| |

Received: 25 July 2020    Revised: 5 December 2020    Accepted: 16 December 2020

DOI: 10.1111/andr.12964

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Fertility potential in adult men treated for uncorrected bilateral


cryptorchidism: A systematic literature review and analysis of
case reports

Wade Muncey1,2  | Rahul Dutta3 | Ryan P. Terlecki3 | Lynn L. Woo1,2,4 |


Kyle Scarberry1,2,4

1
Case Western Reserve University School
of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA Abstract
Objective: Reports of adult orchidopexy for bilateral undescended testicles (bUDT)
2
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical
Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
3
are sparse, and fertility outcomes are not well established. Our aim was to determine
Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-
Salem, NC, USA prognosis for restoration of spermatogenesis among adult men (≥18 years) undergo-
4
Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, ing orchidopexy for bUDT.
Cleveland, OH, USA
Methods: A systematic literature review, conforming to the PRISMA statement, was
Correspondence conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through March
Wade Muncey, Urology Institute,
2020 using search terms "adult” AND “bilateral orchidopexy" OR "bilateral cryptor-
University Hospitals – Cleveland Medical
Center, Mailstop LKS 5046, 11100 Euclid chidism.” Relevant referenced articles from non-indexed journal were identified by
Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Google Scholar search and additionally included.
Email: wade.muncey@UHhospitals.org
Results: Fifty-seven publications including adult men with uncorrected bilateral UDTs
were identified. Baseline semen analysis was reported in 157 men, all of whom dem-
onstrated azoospermia. Testosterone values were reported in 82 cases and were nor-
mal in 89%. Germ cells could not be identified in 72.6% of histologic specimens from
62 testicles. Abdominal testicles more frequently lacked germ cells (90%, p = 0.038)
on univariate analysis.
Eleven cases identified ejaculated spermatozoa following adult bilateral orchidopexy
(8 publications). Sperm extraction (TESE) during orchidopexy or orchiectomy was re-
ported in 13 men without success. Delayed TESE (median 10 months) was performed
in 22 persistently azoospermic men with success in 10 (45.5%), none of whom had
abdominal testicles prior to orchidopexy. Six men experienced successful paternity
via natural conception (3) or assisted reproduction (3).
Conclusion: Fertility is possible in adult men with inguinal bUDT following orchi-
dopexy. Subsequent sperm retrieval may involve ejaculated specimens or delayed
TESE. TESE performed prior to or at time of orchidopexy is unlikely to be of benefit.

KEYWORDS
infertility, bilateral cryptorchidism, spermatogenesis, orchidopexy

© 2020 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology

Andrology. 2021;00:1–11.  |
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/andr     1
|
2      MUNCEY et al.

1  |  I NTRO D U C TI O N including semen analysis and hormone values, histology and sperm
retrieval from testis tissue, and paternity. Hypogonadism was defined
Cryptorchidism is the most common male sexual development as a testosterone value <300 ng/dl. Four histopathologic patterns
anomaly, affecting up to 4% of full-term infants.1 Failure of testicu- were assigned to biopsy or orchiectomy specimens: reduced sper-
lar descent is associated with impaired spermatogenesis, hormonal matogenesis with all germ cell types present (hypospermatogenesis);
abnormalities, and increased risk of testicular neoplasm.1 In order arrest of spermatogenesis with any area demonstrating germ cells
to preserve future fertility and decrease risk of malignancy, orchi- without mature spermatozoa (maturation arrest [MA]); complete ab-
dopexy for recognized cases is typically performed at 6–12 months sence of germ cells (Sertoli cell only; SCO); or neither germ cells nor
of age. 2 Only 1% of infants with cryptorchidism reach adulthood Sertoli cells present (tubular atrophy).8 TESE success was defined by
without surgical intervention. 3 Given the rarity of delayed recogni- the publication authors, but in general was characterized by retrieval
tion and the potential for differences in management, the benefits of one or more spermatozoa. TESE performed with microdissection
of surgery for cryptorchidism in adults are not well established.4 was not analyzed separately, but is represented as “mTESE” when
Unlike children, adults with unilateral cryptorchidism are usually possible in our results.
advised to undergo orchiectomy because of increased risk of malig- Statistical associations were assessed with Stata SE, version 13.0
nancy and low perceived spermatogenic potential. 5 Compromised (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Mean variable values are reported
fertility has been identified in nearly 50% of men with a history of with standard deviation (±), and median values are presented with
childhood orchidopexy for bilateral undescended testicles (bUDT),6 range or interquartile range (IQR) as a measure of variability. Two-sided
but very little is known regarding fertility potential and hormonal Student’s t test was used to compare continuous variables. Fisher’s
function in adults who have not undergone orchidopexy. The liter- exact and Pearson’s chi-square tests were used to compare categorical
ature is limited to case reports or small series, with many published variables. A p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
before the advent of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) techniques
and other advances in assisted reproductive technologies. The pur-
pose of this systematic review is to examine the available research 3  |  R E S U LT S
to characterize fertility potential following adult orchidopexy for
bUDT. Using the aforementioned criteria, 57 publications were included for
analysis, yielding 231 cases of uncorrected bUDT (Figure 1). Included
publications were from twenty-eight countries, with most patients
2  |  M E TH O D S from reports from Turkey (7 reports, n = 50), India (9 reports, n = 42),
China (3 reports, n = 32), the United States (8 reports, n = 21), Japan
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the (3 reports, n = 13), the United Kingdom (3 reports, n = 13), Nigeria
electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE through (1 report, n = 10), and Sudan (1 report, n = 8) (Table S1). The reason
October 2019. The search was restricted to articles written in for men presenting to a healthcare provider was not frequently de-
English. The following search terms were utilized: “Adult” AND “bi- scribed: 62 (26.8%) presented for infertility and 34 (14.7%) for tes-
lateral orchidopexy” OR “bilateral cryptorchidism”. Following this ticular cancer. Associated developmental abnormalities were rarely
screening process, eligible articles underwent a full-text review reported, consisting of nine cases of persistent Müllerian duct syn-
with inclusion of all studies involving any adult men presenting drome (8 of which had associated germ cell malignancy), one case of
with bUDT. Publications were excluded if they were not available unspecified ambiguous genitalia, one case of androgen insensitivity
online or in English, if orchidopexy was performed as a child (age syndrome, and one case of Klinefelter syndrome.
<18), or reports were limited to adults with a unilateral unde- At least one semen analysis was obtained in 157 men at initial
scended testicle only. Studies included case reports, case series, presentation, all of which demonstrated azoospermia. Testosterone
case-control, and cohort designs. References within identified ar- levels were reported in 82 cases, with hypogonadism identified in 9
ticles were screened for additional studies. References that ap- (11%) after excluding men with cancer or associated developmental
peared relevant, but were absent within indexed databases, were conditions. Exact laboratory values were reported in 35 men, with
located by free-text searching within Google Scholar to identify a median testosterone of 383 ng/dl (range 90–780), and a median
the full text. Two individual authors (KS and WM) independently FSH of 23.5 mIU/ml (range 5.6–65). Age was not associated with
performed the initial review, extraction, and data screening, with laboratory diagnosis of hypogonadism (mean 36 ± 10.8 vs. 29 ± 7.7
relevant titles and abstracts identified We applied the Preferred years, p = 0.078), nor was testis location as patients with abdominal
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis testicles experienced low testosterone at similar rates as those with
(PRISMA) statement to report results.7 Figure 1 depicts the results non-abdominally located testes (9.1% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.734)
of the systematic search. Men with hypogonadism were not associated with age (mean 36
Patient data relevant to fertility and outcomes following orchi- ± 10.8 vs. 29 ± 7.7 years, p = 0.078), nor was it more common in men
dopexy were extracted and included for analysis. This included de- with abdominal cryptorchidism compared with inguinal/unidentified
mographic data such as age and comorbidities, laboratory values locations (9.1% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.734) on univariate analysis.
MUNCEY et al. |
      3

Idenficaon
Records idenfied through Addional records idenfied
database searching through other sources
(n = 1,233) (n = 27)

Records aer duplicates removed


(n = 1,239)
Screening

Records screened Records excluded


(n = 1,239) (n = 1,128)

Full-text arcles assessed Full-text arcles excluded


for eligibility (n = 54)
Eligibility

(n = 111)

Studies included in
Included

qualitave synthesis
(n = 57)

F I G U R E 1  Literature search results

Histologic assessment of cryptorchid testis biopsy or orchi- Orchidopexy was performed by varied methods for 165 men
ectomy specimens was reported for 41 men (62 testicles) across across 37 reports with a median age at orchidopexy of 28 years
18 studies, with no samples exhibiting normal histology or hy- (range 18–56, IQR 23–34). In total, 34 underwent unilateral (24.3%)
pospermatogenesis. Germ cells with MA were identified in 17 and 106 underwent bilateral orchidopexy (75.7%), despite all men
testicles (27.4%), with the remainder exhibiting SCO (56.5%) or having bUDT. At presentation, both testicles were located intra-ab-
tubular atrophy (16.1%). Associations between specimens with or dominally in 66 (40.0%), one inguinal and one abdominal in 8 (4.9%),
without germ cells identified are described in Table 1, with germ inguinal bilaterally in 33 (20.0%), and an unspecified location in the
cells less likely to be identified in abdominally located testicles remainder (n = 58, 35.1%). Reported testosterone values following
(10.0% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.038) on univariate analysis. Five stud- orchidopexy were normal in 24 of 29 men (82.8%) in five publica-
ies involving a total of 13 men reported results from concomi- tions, with no statistically significant associations observed with tes-
tant TESE at time of orchidopexy or orchiectomy. None of these tis location or bilateral procedure (p > 0.05).
procedures (19 testicles—6 abdominal and 13 inguinal) identified Postoperative semen analyses were reported in 51 men across
spermatozoa. 17 reports. At a median follow-up of 12 months (range 2–168),
|
4      MUNCEY et al.

TA B L E 1  Patient characteristics by
Germ cells identified No germ cells All results
histology result
(n = 17 testes) (n = 45 testes) (n = 62 testes) p

Age, median 27 (18–38) 31 (20–56) 31 (18–56) 0.070


(range)
Location, n (%)
Abdominal 2 (10) 18 (90) 20 (32.3) 0.038
Inguinal 13 (32.5) 27 (67.5) 40 (65.5)
Unknown 2 (100) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.2)
Median FSH, 19.1 (5.6–43) 23.5 (9.1–67.1) 23.4 (5.6–67.1) 0.082
IU/ml
(range)
Median testis 5.9 (1–13) 6.8 (2–18.1) 6.4 (1–18.1) 0.207
size, ml
(range)
Specimen, n (%)
Biopsy 15 (88.2) 35 (77.8) 50 (80.7) 0.352
Orchiectomy 2 (11.8) 10 (22.2) 12 (19.4)

persistent azoospermia was reported in 78.4%. Eleven cases iden- No variables were significant associated with TESE success (p > 0.05).
tifying ejaculated spermatozoa following adult bilateral orchidopexy Successful paternity was reported in six men: via natural conception (3),
have been described in the literature (8 publications), with patient intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with ejaculated spermatozoa (1),
characteristics listed in Table 2. A younger mean orchidopexy age or ICSI with spermatozoa obtained by TESE (2). One patient had success-
was observed in men who developed spermatozoa in their ejaculate ful TESE 7 years after orchidopexy even though TESE at time of surgery
(24 ± 3.9 vs. 29 ± 5.9, p = 0.026) but preoperative testosterone (518 and mTESE 10 months postoperatively were both unsuccessful.
± 132.0 vs. 372 ± 164.6, p = 0.061) and FSH levels (26.1 ± 18.3 vs.
28.8 ± 11.2, p = 0.680) were similar.
TESE performed in a delayed fashion (median 10 months post-orchi- 4  |  D I S C U S S I O N
dopexy) has been reported in 22 persistently azoospermic men across
seven publications (Tables 3a and 3b). Successful retrieval was noted in 10 In his 1911 report of one of the earliest large orchidopexy series,
men, none of whom had intra-abdominal testicles prior to orchidopexy. Dr. William Coley (the “Father of Cancer Immunotherapy”) noted

TA B L E 2  Studies with ejaculated sperm obtained (N = 11)

Age at
Author/Year Study orchidopexy Location Right/Left Operation

Hand et al. 1956 Case Series 25 Bilateral orchidopexy

Comhaire et al. 1978 Case Report 25 Inguinal/Inguinal Bilateral orchidopexy


20
Silber Case Report 18 Abdominal Bilateral autotransplantation

Heaton et al. 1993 Case Report 23 Inguinal/Inguinala  Bilateral orchidopexy

Shin et al. 28 Case Report 23 Inguinal/Inguinal Bilateral orchidopexy and varicocelectomy

Giwercman et al. 29 Case Report 27 Inguinal/Inguinal Bilateral orchidopexy

Giwercman et al. 29 Case Report 27 Inguinal/Inguinal Bilateral orchidopexy

Zhang et al.19 Cohort Study 18 Inguinal/Inguinal Bilateral orchidopexy


19
Zhang et al. Cohort Study 31 Inguinal/Inguinal Bilateral orchidopexy
Zhang et al.19 Cohort Study 27 Abdominal/Inguinal Orchiectomy/Orchidopexy
18
Duong et al. Case Report 26 Abdominal/Inguinal Bilateral orchidopexy

SA, Semen analysis; blank cell, not reported.


a
Testicles described to be at the external ring or “suprascrotal” position.
MUNCEY et al.       5 |

something of particular interest to him: a “patient suffering from Orchiectomy has generally been advocated to reduce the risk of
double undescended testes” had become a father. He described a future testicular malignancy.15 The unilateral cryptorchid testicle
thirty-year-old man who underwent orchidopexy in 1885 and sub- has been thought to add little fertility potential in the presence of a
sequently fathered a child in 1903 after a year of marriage.9 At the normally descended contralateral testicle, and these men generally
time, Dr. Coley described this as only the second reported case have normal testosterone levels.16 Historically, men with bUDT who
of paternity by a man with bUDT. More than a century later, only undergo a post-pubertal orchidopexy have been described as having
six additional reports have been identified. Given the rarity of this irreversible gonadal damage along with an increased risk of malig-
presentation, providers are limited in guidance for counseling of nancy.15 The role for surgery in these cases has been less clear. The
affected patients. The literature consists largely of case reports or potential for fertility following orchidopexy has seldom been evalu-
small series, often in non-indexed journals and with pertinent details ated, and bilateral orchiectomy eliminates any possibility of fertility,
frequently buried within the discussion. As such, we sought to ag- results in the need for hormonal replacement, and may result in psy-
gregate available data, such that an analysis may offer some useful chologic stress/negative self-image.
input for clinical efforts. Our study supports what was well under-
stood before recognition and treatment of cryptorchidism in child-
hood became common: uncorrected bilateral cryptorchidism results 4.1  |  Return of spermatozoa to ejaculate
in universal fertility impairment.
Although baseline azoospermia was seen in all men undergoing Despite declarations of futility relative to bilateral orchidopexy in
semen analysis in the reports identified by our literature search, there adult men,17 our review uncovered 11 patients with return of sper-
were three reports describing men with uncorrected bUDT who were matozoa to ejaculate following surgery (Table 2). The location of the
fathers.10–12 Interestingly, all three had intra-abdominal testicles found undescended testicle was identified in 10 of these men, with nine
at the time of surgery for removal of large (≥15 cm) pelvic masses, sub- undergoing bilateral or unilateral inguinal orchidopexy. A case re-
sequently identified to be metastatic germ cell tumors. Two of the men port by Duong et al. in 2019 described a patient undergoing repair
had persistent Müllerian duct syndrome, and semen analysis revealed of both an abdominal and inguinal testis, and a patient from a 2018
azoospermia in one. As such, the validity of the paternity claims is sus- cohort study by Zhang et al. underwent an inguinal orchidopexy
pect, and inaccuracies in history and/or reporting seem likely. with contralateral orchiectomy.18,19 The sole report of fertility fol-
Pediatric patients treated in a timely manner for unilateral lowing treatment of an adult with bilateral abdominally located tes-
cryptorchidism can achieve normal or near-normal rates of pater- ticles was by Silber in 1982, who described an autotransplantation
nity in adulthood.13,14 Adults presenting with uncorrected unilat- technique in which a microanastomosis of the spermatic vessels to
eral cryptorchidism may frequently demonstrate abnormalities on the inferior epigastrics was performed. 20 Barring this isolated case
semen analysis, but many still achieve pregnancy by natural means.4 of autotransplanation, our review would suggest that successful

Biopsy at time of Final SA reported with return Final sperm count (in millions Preoperative
Orchidopexy of sperm (time performed) per ml) Testosterone (ng/dL) Paternity

No—Primary spermatocytes 6–11 months A few non-motile spermatozoa No


(MA) on delayed biopsy
No 16 months 22 683
Yes—Primary spermatocytes 16 months 15 650
(MA)
No 3 months A few spermatozoa Yes—IUI (1) and
natural (3)
No 12 months 7.6 417 Yes, IVF/ICSI (2)
and natural (1)
Yes—Primary spermatocytes 21 months 16 No
(MA)
Yes—Primary spermatocytes 10 months 1.6 Yes—IVF/ICSI (1)
(MA)
No 36 months 6.3 537
No 25 months 11.4 343 Yes—Natural (1)
No 8 months A few spermatozoa 483
Yes—SCO 6 months 2
6     | MUNCEY et al.

TA B L E 3 A  Sperm obtained by delayed TESE (N = 10)

Testis
Timing of volume,
Author/ Type of Age at Location delayed Biopsy or TESE at Baseline FSH Right/
Year extraction orchidopexy Right/Left Orchidopexy TESE Orchidopexy elevation Left (ml) Reported yield Paternity

30
Lin et al. TESE 18 Inguinal/ Bilateral 14 years No Yes (30.1 14, 13 A few Yes—with
Inguinal mIU/ml) spermatozoa ICSI

Raman TESE or >20 Bilateral >6 months Yes—6 months prior


et al. 32 multiple (results not
biopsy reported)

Raman TESE or >20 Bilateral >6 months Yes—6 months prior


et al. 32 multiple (results not
biopsy reported)

Raman TESE or >20 Bilateral >6 months Yes—6 months prior


et al. 32 multiple (results not
biopsy reported)

Raman TESE or >20 Bilateral >6 months Yes—6 months prior


et al. 32 multiple (results not
biopsy reported)

Wiser TESE 21
et al.47

Wiser et al. TESE >18


2009

Matsuhita mTESE 29 Inguinal/ Bilateral 10 months Yes—SCO, TESE Yes (23.5 5.4, 4.7 Yes—with
et al. Inguinala  and 7 unsuccessful mIU/ml) ICSI
2013 years

Sangster mTESE 31 Inguinal/ Bilateral Yes—14 Yes—SCO Yes (30.5 6.8, 6.7 1 Vial
et al. 38 Inguinal months mIU/ml)

Sangster mTESE 34 Inguinal/ Bilateral Yes—26 SCO (Right), No (10.0 mIU/ 8.3, 5.4 1 Vial
et al. 38 Inguinal months Spermatogonia ml)
with MA (Left)

Blank cell = not reported.


a
Testicles described to be at the external ring.

restoration of spermatogenesis after bilateral orchidopexy is primar- Biopsies were inconsistently performed but when reported
ily seen in patients with inguinal UDT. These findings are in agree- demonstrated either MA or SCO. While SCO histology on biopsy
ment with previous studies demonstrating a higher concentration in theory should predict a lower chance of fertility potential, it did
of spermatozoa and germ cells in undescended testicles anterior to not preclude potential for spermatogenesis. When paternity was
the external oblique aponeurosis when compared to an abdominal reported, four out of six men were able to father children. In com-
location.6,21 bination, our findings suggest that restoration of spermatozoa to
We found the median time to postoperative identification of the ejaculate may occur more commonly following orchidopexy
ejaculated spermatozoa was 14 months. Although three cases of inguinal testicles in younger men with normal preoperative
demonstrated return in ≤6 months, severe oligospermia was the rule testosterone.
with counts from minimal spermatozoa up to 2 million/ml. A younger
age at orchidopexy was observed in men who experienced return of
spermatozoa to ejaculate. A normal preoperative testosterone was 4.2  |  TESE after orchidopexy for bUDT
documented in all six men who had this reported, with a 40% higher
average testosterone concentration compared with persistently Hadziselimovic et al. reported that despite successful orchidopexy in
azoospermic men. Although mean testosterone values were not sig- childhood, nearly half of bUDT patients and 13% of unilateral UDT
nificantly different in these two groups (518 vs. 372, p = 0.061), the patients later demonstrated azoospermia.6 Epididymal anomalies are
majority of the azoospermic men had levels at or below the median common in cryptorchid testicles (37–60%), 22,23 but iatrogenic injuries
value of 410 ng/dl (56.0% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.083). While not statis- to the vas deferens and other spermatic cord components during or-
tically significant, given the small sample size and risk of type two chiopexy are also possible.24 Some have suggested obstruction may
error, testosterone could still be considered a potential marker of be fully or partially responsible for azoospermia in approximately half
successful return of spermatozoa to ejaculate. of men undergoing orchiopexy.25 This is somewhat supported by the
MUNCEY et al. |
      7

TA B L E 3 B  Sperm not obtained by delayed TESE (N = 12)

Testis
Timing of volume
Author/ Type of Age at Location delayed Biopsy or TESE at Baseline FSH Right/Left
Year extraction orchidopexy Right/Left Orchidopexy TESE Orchidopexy elevation (ml)

Raman TESE or >20 Bilateral >6 months Yes—6 months


et al.32 multiple prior (results
biopsy not reported)
Raman TESE or >20 Bilateral >6 months Yes—6 months
et al.32 multiple prior (results
biopsy not reported)
Raman TESE or >20 Bilateral >6 months Yes—6 months
et al.32 multiple prior (results
biopsy not reported)
Raman TESE or >20 Bilateral >6 months Yes—6 months
et al.32 multiple prior (results
biopsy not reported)
Raman TESE or >20 Bilateral >6 months Yes—6 months
et al.32 multiple prior (results
biopsy not reported)
Chiba TESE 30 Inguinal/ Bilateral 10 months Yes—SCO (Right/ Yes (23.5 12, 12
et al.17 Inguinal Left), TESE mIU/ml)
unsuccessful
Sangster mTESE 36 Abdominal/ Bilateral 14 months Yes— Yes (21.0 13, 9
et al.38 Abdominal Spermatocytes mIU/ml)
with MA (Right),
Sertoli only
(Left)
Sangster mTESE 23 Abdominal/ Bilateral 16 months Yes—Sertoli only Yes (40.6 8.7, 6
et al.38 Abdominal (Right) mIU/ml)
Sangster mTESE 25 Abdominal/ Unilateral— 10 months Yes—Sertoli only Yes (35.9 8.5, 7.1
et al.38 Inguinal Left (Left) mIU/ml)
Sangster mTESE 36 Inguinal/ Unilateral— 15 months Yes—SCO (Right) Yes (16.2 7.4, 6
et al.38 Abdominal Right mIU/ml)
Sangster mTESE 34 Abdominal/ Bilateral 12 months Yes—SCO (Right), Yes (22.6 8.3, 5.4
et al.38 Abdominal mTESE mIU/ml)
unsuccessful
Barbotin TESE 23 Bilateral
et al.33

Blank cell = not reported.

results of our study, as TESE was successfully performed in 10 of 22 testis tissue. Odds of successful conception are additionally aug-
men following adult orchidopexy for bUDT (Table 3a). mented by other modern advances in infertility treatment, such as
By 6–8 months of age, undescended testicles demonstrate ar- ICSI. In our review, this technique facilitated half of the successful
15
rest of gonocyte evolution into adult dark spermatogonia. The paternity cases following adult bilateral orchidopexy. 28–31
development of adult dark spermatogonia is critical for future The data to set patient expectations for chances of sperm retrieval
fertility because they serve as a lifelong supply of spermatogonial after orchidopexy is limited. In their 2003 series, Raman and Schlegel
stem cells. 26 This gonadal damage could persist or progress in the reported that patients undergoing bilateral orchidopexy after 20 years
post-pubertal patient and may explain why TESE may ultimately fail of age had a 44% TESE success rate compared with 94% in those
in a large percentage of these men.17 Fedder et al. reported a strong treated before age 10, suggesting age at orchidopexy predicts suc-
association between a history of cryptorchidism and an inhomoge- cess.32 However, other modern series report the absence of such an
neous histological pattern, with islands of normal testicular tissue association.33,34 Similarly, some have suggested FSH levels may predict
found in testicles otherwise exhibiting SCO. 27 They concluded that success of TESE after orchidopexy,33 while reports assessing outcomes
for azoospermic men with a history of cryptorchidism, it may be in men with non-obstructive azoospermia generally have suggested it
particularly relevant to consider multiple TESEs and microsurgery is unreliable.25,32,35,36 The same is true for testicular volume.32,35–37 A
to obtain spermatozoa from the often isolated islands of normal 2018 meta-analysis concluded that neither FSH nor testicular volume
|
8      MUNCEY et al.

Abdominal bUDT
or
Inguinal bUDT and no
fertility interest

Age <50 y Age > 50 y

1. Surveillance (preferred)
2. Orchiectomy or
orchidopexy with biopsy*
(if unable/unlikely to
Testosterone Assessment follow-up)
Low Normal

1. Orchiectomy 1. Orchidopexy with


(preferred) biopsy* (if feasible)
2. Surveillance 2. Surveillance *Advise very low fertility potential in
abdominal cryptorchid testicles

F I G U R E 2  Suggested pathway for management of bilateral undescended abdominal testicles and men without interest in fertility

alone is predictive of TESE success.37 The number of publications in


our review to report pre-orchidopexy FSH (4 out of 8, median 26.8 4.3  |  Testis biopsy at time of orchidopexy
mIU/ml) and testis size (eight testicles in four reports, mean volume 8
ml) in TESE patients were few, limiting our ability to make any conclu- Testicular biopsy at the time of adult orchidopexy has been recom-
sions regarding their value as predictive tools. mended as a screen for malignancy, with multiple specimens ad-
In our review, the only successful instances of sperm extraction vised by European guidelines.39 The rate of testicular cancer and
were from TESE procedures performed in delayed fashion after orchi- incidental germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) is higher in men with
dopexy for bUDT. Of note, however, one series reported successful a history of cryptorchidism than for the general population, with
synchronous mTESE at time of orchidopexy for unilateral undescended 5–10% of cases appearing in men with a history of undescended
inguinal testis in two men, but this cannot necessarily be extrapolated to testicles.40,41 However, Ateş et al. evaluated 244 testicles removed
bUDT patients.38 The average time between bilateral orchidopexy and from men with unilateral cryptorchidism and reported one case of
successful TESE was ~3 years. Promotion of spermatogenesis, possi- seminoma (0.4%).42 A study of 100 biopsies at the time of adult
bly stimulated by normalization of testis position and temperature, may orchidopexy found no instances of malignancy.3 Smaller series in-
be a prolonged process necessitating provider and patient patience. In volving adult cryptorchid men report rates of GCNIS ranging from
2013, Matsushita et al. described a patient with unsuccessful TESE 10 2% to 23%.15,43,44 Incidental GCNIS was seldom reported in our
months after orchidopexy, but who achieved a successful pregnancy review and not addressed by our analysis, but in light of available
7 years later after mTESE and ICSI.31 Furthermore, our review found literature, routine tissue sampling in men considering orchidopexy
no instance of successful TESE for men with purely abdominal bUDT. for improved fertility may afford a risk that outweighs the potential
On histological review, only 10% of abdominal testicles had germ cells benefit. Schlegel and Su have reported transient adverse physiologic
identified. Additionally, orchidopexy for an abdominal testis seems effects in testicles up to 6 months after biopsy for sperm retrieval,
likely to require more stress on the testis and spermatic cord. Success and even complete devascularization of the testicle following multi-
was achieved in three of four patients when mTESE was performed a ple biopsies.45
year or more following inguinal orchidopexy. Based on this information, In our review, histology taken from cryptorchid testes prior to
providers may wish to counsel patients with abdominal bUDT that TESE orchidopexy failed to reveal spermatids in any case, and most were
is of limited utility and that those undergoing inguinal orchidopexy may without germ cells. Regardless, three men with SCO and four with
be best served by waiting at least a year before mTESE. MA would later demonstrate spermatogenesis, suggesting adverse
MUNCEY et al. |
      9

should be considered for orchidopexy. An important finding of


Inguinal bUDT and interest this review is that TESE at the time of surgery is unlikely to be
in fertility successful and should be omitted. Following scrotal repositioning
of the testicle or testicles, these men should be advised to per-
form self-examination to monitor for development of testicular
masses. A semen analysis at 6 months is reasonable to assess for
Orchidopexy
without *If preoperative imaging and serum presence of spermatozoa, and assisted reproductive techniques
tumor markers do not suggest neoplasm
biopsy/TESE* may be considered when feasible and appropriate. If azoospermia
persists beyond a year, mTESE can be considered, while under-
standing that successful commencement or recovery of sper-
Semen Analysis
matogenesis may take years.
· Can offer at 6 -
12 months Chances for fertility among men presenting with abdominal
bUDT are exceedingly low. Although this may prompt some to
universally advocate for bilateral orchiectomy in these men, a re-
Sperm found cent review found that for healthy men > 50 years old, the risk of
Azoospermia ≥
1 year · Consider death from complications following orchiectomy is higher than
referral for ART
that from a germ cell tumor. 53 For men younger than 50 with ab-
dominal bUDT, considerations include surveillance, orchidopexy,
or orchiectomy. Surveillance protocols should consider imaging
Offer mTESE and serial assessments of tumor markers annually. Based upon
the available literature, most men with bUDT have normal base-
line testosterone (89%). Therefore, bilateral orchidopexy may
F I G U R E 3  Suggested pathway for fertility management in allow for testicular self-examination and avoidance of lifelong
bilateral undescended inguinal testicles
exogenous testosterone administration. Despite the risks previ-
ously described, it is still felt that men undergoing orchidopexy
or diagnostic laparoscopy for bUDT should undergo testicular
histology at orchidopexy may not preclude future fertility potential. biopsy to assess for malignancy. Following orchidopexy, these
Primary spermatocytes represented the highest phase of maturation patients should be counseled that despite no documented cases
identified in any biopsy. Given the potential for testis injury, diagnos- of spermatogenesis in this population, birth control may still be
tic biopsy and/or TESE at time of orchidopexy in men with hopes of necessary and that vasectomy may be ill-advised if spermatic
fertility may be undesirable. vessel ligation was performed at time of surgery.
Readers must be cautioned that while this review provides evi-
dence of spermatogenesis commencement after orchidopexy, there
4.4  |  Surgical decision-making for adult bUDT are significant limitations. Given the rarity of this presentation and
subsequent treatment, there is a high likelihood of publication bias
Men with bUDT presenting for infertility should undergo a com- in favor of positive results. There is not agreed upon definition of or-
plete history and physical examination, parallel assessment of chidopexy success, and included studies frequently did not describe
female partners, and laboratory testing for testosterone, FSH, kar- the surgical method utilized or surgical outcomes, such as postop-
yotype, and Y chromosome microdeletion.46 Routine assessment erative testis location or size, potentially limiting generalizability of
of testis cancer tumor markers has been recommended and may be the results. The studies evaluated in this review were all small and
considered.47 Magnetic resonance imaging and/or ultrasonography may not be generalizable. Our search strategy was comprehensive
should be routinely utilized, as some lesions which may necessitate and scrupulous, but we cannot eliminate the possibility of having
orchiectomy, such as testis tumors or Müllerian remnants, can be overlooked relevant publications. Finally, study variations involving
identified.48,49 We have proposed an algorithm to assist with clini- age at orchidopexy, follow-up protocols, procedural interventions,
cal decision-making following workup for these patients (Figures and clinical end points, render formation of definitive conclusions
2 and 3). difficult.
Although bilateral orchiectomy is often recommended and
performed in men with bUDT, 50,51 our review has found tes-
tis preservation may afford adequate endogenous testosterone 5  |  CO N C LU S I O N S
production and fertility potential. One study noted an inverse
association with testosterone values and age at orchidopexy, sug- Adult orchidopexy can induce spermatogenesis in men presenting
gesting surgery may prevent deterioration of hormone produc- with inguinal bUDT. In some cases, spermatozoa will subsequently
tion. 52 Men with inguinal bUDT interested in fathering children appear in the ejaculate, whereas others may find success via delayed
|
10      MUNCEY et al.

17. Chiba K, Ishikawa T, Yamaguchi K, et al. The efficacy of adult or-


mTESE. TESE performed at time of orchidopexy in men with bUDT chidopexy as a treatment of male infertility: Our experience of 20
is unlikely to afford benefit. Testosterone levels among men pre- cases. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1337–1339.
senting with bUDT (inguinal or abdominal) are typically normal, and 18. Duong HQ, Tang VKH, Liperis G, et al. Orchidopexy results in
the recovery of sperm in the ejaculate of a non-obstructive azo-
the benefits of tissue preservation and avoiding surgical complica-
ospermic adult with bilateral cryptorchidism — a case report. Fertil
tions should be weighed against the risk of unidentified and/or un-
Reprod. 2019;01:35–38.
treated malignancy among men uninterested in future fertility. 19. Zhang Y, Huang W, Hu Z-H, et al. Benefits of orchidopexy on the
fertility of adult men with bilateral cryptorchidism. Asian J Androl.
C O N FL I C T O F I N T E R E S T 2018;20(6):632–633.
20. Silber SJ. The intra-abdominal testes: microvascular autotransplan-
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
tation. J Urol. 1981;125:329–333.
21. Cortes D, Thorup J. Histology of testicular biopsies taken at op-
ORCID eration for bilateral maldescended testes in relation to fertility in
Wade Muncey  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-7094 adulthood. Br J Urol. 1991;68:285–291.
22. Barthold JS, González R. The epidemiology of congenital cryptorchi-
Kyle Scarberry  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9195-6873
dism, testicular ascent and orchiopexy. J Urol. 2003;170:2396–2401.
23. van Brakel J, Dohle GR, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SMPF, et al.
REFERENCES Different surgical findings in congenital and acquired undescended
1. Chung E, Brock GB. Case report Cryptorchidism and its impact on testes. BJU Int. 2012;110:E387–E391.
male fertility: a state of art review of current literature. Can Urol 24. Adamsen S, Börjesson B. Factors affecting the outcome of orchio-
Assoc J. 2011;5:210–214. pexy for undescended testis. Acta Chir Scand. 1988;154:529–533.
2. Hutson JM, Thorup J. Evaluation and management of the infant 25. Negri L, Albani E, DiRocco M, et al. Testicular sperm extraction in
with cryptorchidism. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2015;27:520–524. azoospermic men submitted to bilateral orchidopexy. Hum Reprod.
3. Moradi M, Karimian B, Moradi A. Archive of SID Adult orchidopexy: 2003;18:2534–2539.
A survey on necessity of intraoperative testicular biopsy. Archive of 26. Hadziselimovic F. On the descent of the epididymo-testicular unit,
SID. 2011;3:196–200. cryptorchidism, and prevention of infertility. Basic Clin Androl. 2017;27.
4. Jeong SC, Lee S, Ku JY, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment 27. Fedder J. History of cryptorchidism and ejaculate volume as sim-
of cryptorchidism in adults: a single center experience. World J ple predictors for the presence of testicular sperm. Syst Biol Reprod
Mens Health 2014;32:110–115. Med. 2011;57:154–161.
5. Oh J, Landman J, Evers A, et al. Management of the postpuber- 28. Shin D, Lemack GE, Goldstein M. Induction of spermatogenesis and
tal patient with cryptorchidism: An updated analysis. J. Urol. pregnancy after adult orchiopexy. J Urol. 1997;158:2242.
2002;167:1329–1333. 29. Giwercman A, Hansen LL, Skakkebaek NE. Initiation of sperm pro-
6. Hadziselimovic F, Herzog B. The importance of both an early duction after bilateral orchiopexy: clinical and biological implica-
orchidopexy and germ cell maturation for fertility. Lancet. tions. J Urol. 2000;163:1255–1256.
2001;358:1156–1157. 3 0. Lin YM, Hsu CC, Wu MH, et al. Successful testicular sperm ex-
7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for traction and paternity in an azoospermic man after bilateral post-
systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. pubertal orchiopexy. Urology. 2001;57:365.
PLoS Med.. 2009;6:e1000097. 31. Matsushita K, Yamaguchi K, Li F, et al. Achieved pregnancy with the
8. Ezeh UI, Moore HD, Cooke ID. A prospective study of multiple delivery of a healthy child by TESE-ICSI 7 years after bilateral adult
needle biopsies versus a single open biopsy for testicular sperm orchidopexy: a case report. Andrologia. 2014;46:948–950.
extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 32. Raman JD, Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction with intracy-
1998;13:3075–3080. toplasmic sperm injection is successful for the treatment of non-
9. Coley WB. THE treatment of the undescended or maldescended obstructive azoospermia associated with cryptorchidism. J Urol.
testis, with particular reference to end-results. Trans South Surg 2003;170:1287–1290.
Assoc. 1919;31:79. 33. Barbotin A-L, Dauvergne A, Dumont A, et al. Bilateral versus uni-
10. Liss MA, Khoury A, Dash A. Thirty-three-year-old man presents with lateral cryptorchidism in nonobstructive azoospermia: Testicular
abdominal mass with empty scrotum. Urology. 2012;80:971–973. sperm extraction outcomes. Asian J Androl. 2019;21:445.
11. Bhopal FG, Azhar F, Bhopal SF, et al. Testicular tumor in a cryptor- 3 4. Ortac M, Cilesiz NC, Demirelli E, et al. Undescended testis does not
chid hermaphrodite. Prof Med J. 2013;20(6):1058–1064. affect the outcome of microdissection testicular sperm extraction:
12. Desai A, Mandhare A. Bilateral UDT presenting as intra ab- Undescended testis does not affect the outcome of TESE. Urology.
dominal abdominal nsgct in adult fertile male. Int J Curr Res. 2020;141:77–81.
2018;10(01):63960–63962. 35. Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Nagy P, et al. Are there any predictive
13. Lee PA, Bellinger MF, Songer NJ, et al. An epidemiologic study factors for successful testicular sperm recovery in azoospermic pa-
of paternity after cryptorchidism: initial results. Eur J Pediatr. tients? Hum Reprod. 1997;12:80–86.
1993;152(Suppl):S25–S27. 36. Ezeh UIO, Taub NA, Moore HDM, et al. Establishment of pre-
14. Lee PA, O’Leary LA, Songer NJ, et al. Paternity after bilateral dictive variables associated with testicular sperm retrieval
cryptorchidism: A controlled study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Human Reprod.
1997;151:260–263. 1999;14(4):1005–1012.
15. Rogers E, Teahan S, Gallagher H, et al. The role of orchiec- 37. Li H, Chen LP, Yang J, et al. Predictive value of FSH, testicular vol-
tomy in the management of postpubertal cryptorchidism. J Urol. ume, and histopathological findings for the sperm retrieval rate of
1998;159:851–854. microdissection TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia: A meta-anal-
16. Rohayem J, Luberto A, Nieschlag E, et al. Delayed treatment of ysis. Asian J Androl. 2018;20:30–36.
undescended testes may promote hypogonadism and infertility. 38. Sangster P, Alnajjar HM, Ahmed K, et al. Microdissection
Endocrine. 2017;55:914–924. TESE (mTESE) following adult orchidopexy for undescended
MUNCEY et al. |
      11

intra-abdominal and inguinal testicles–surgical techniques and out- 49. Otsuka T, Nakazono T, Matsuo Y, et al. Persistent Müllerian duct
comes from a single-centre cohort. Andrology. 2020;8:166–170. syndrome suggested by magnetic resonance imaging. Radiat Med.
39. Salonia A, Bettochi C, Carvalho J, et al. EAU guidelines on sex- 2003;21:277–279.
ual and reproductive health 2020. Eur Assoc Urol Guidel. 2020. 50. Rangarajan M, Jayakar SM. Laparoscopic orchiectomy for the adult
Available at: https://uroweb.org/guide​line/sexua​l-and-repro​ducti​ impalpable testis - Experiences in a rural teaching hospital. Surg
ve-healt​h/LK-MaleS​exual​Dysfu​nctio​nUrow​eb%7C and https:// Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2007;21:66–69.
uroweb.org/guide​line/sexua​l-and-repro​ducti​ve-healt​h/FG-0 51. Cito G, Della Camera PA, Degli Innocenti S, et al. Testicular sperm
4 0. Giwercman A, Bruun E, Frimodt-Møller C, et al. Prevalence of carci- extraction after laparoscopic orchiectomy for bilateral postpu-
noma in situ and other histopathological abnormalities in testes of bertal intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: What chance of sperm re-
men with a history of cryptorchidism. J Urol. 1989;142:998–1001. trieval? Andrologia. 2018;50:e12936.
41. Ferguson L, Agoulnik AI. Testicular cancer and cryptorchidism. 52. Lee PA, Coughlin MT. Leydig cell function after cryptorchi-
Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 2013;4. dism: Evidence of the beneficial result of early surgery. J. Urol.
42. Ateş F, Soydan H, Okçelik S, et al. Clinical and histopathological re- 2002;167:1824–1827.
sults of the adult patients with unilateral cryptorchidism. Turk Urol 53. Shah A, Feustel PJ, Knuth J, et al. An updated mortality risk anal-
Derg. 2016;42:74–79. ysis of the post-pubertal undescended testis. Can Urol Assoc J.
43. Soltanghoraee H, Pourkeramati F, Khoddami M, et al. Prevalence 2018;13:E1–E6.
of carcinoma in situ in testicular biopsies of infertile Iranian men.
Andrologia. 2014;46:726–730.
4 4. Koni A, Ozseker HS, Arpali E, et al. Histopathological evaluation of S U P P O R T I N G I N FO R M AT I O N
orchiectomy specimens in 51 late postpubertal men with unilateral Additional supporting information may be found online in the
cryptorchidism. J. Urol. 2014;192:1183–1188.
Supporting Information section.
45. Schlegel PN, Su L-M. Physiological consequences of testicular
sperm extraction. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1688–1692.
46. Jarow J, Sigman M, Kolettis PN, et al. The evaluation of the azo-
ospermic male: AUA best practice statement. Linthicum Am Urol How to cite this article: Muncey W, Dutta R, Terlecki RP,
Assoc Educ Res Inc 2010. Woo LL, Scarberry K. Fertility potential in adult men treated
47. Wiser A, Raviv G, Weissenberg R, et al. Does age at orchidopexy for uncorrected bilateral cryptorchidism: A systematic
impact on the results of testicular sperm extraction? Reprod Biomed
literature review and analysis of case reports. Andrology.
Online. 2009;19:778–783.
48. Yue B, Cui Z, Kang W, et al. Abdominal cocoon with bilateral crypt- 2021;00:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12964
orchidism and seminoma in the right testis: a case report and re-
view of literature. BMC Surg. 2019;19:167.

You might also like