Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spring 2023
(AY 2022-23)
Taught by:
1
CONTENTS
PART I
General Information………………………………………………………………………Page 3
PART II
a. Course Description………………………………………………………………………………
Page 4
b. Course Aims…………………………………………………………………………….Page 4
PART III
a. Keyword Syllabus…………………………………………………………………….Page 7
b. Course Policies……………………………………………………………………..Page 7-8
PART IV
General Information
This information shall form part of the University database and may be
uploaded to the KOHA Library system and catalogued and may be
distributed amongst 1st or 2nd year Law students for B.A.LL.B. (Hons),
B.B.A.LL.B. (Hons); B.Com. LL.B. (Hons), B.A. (Hons) Legal Studies, B.A.
(Hons) Criminology and Criminal Justice; LL.B.; and LL.M. courses if
necessary.
Criminal
Course Procedure
Title: Code
Course
Code: L-CT 0007
Course
Duration: One Semester
No. of Credit
Units: 4
Level: Undergraduate
Medium of
Instruction: English
PART II
a. Course Description
This course is meant to be an overview of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (CrPC)
which underpins the functioning of the criminal justice system. Students will be taught
the procedure to be followed by the police, the courts, and other stakeholders when a
crime has been committed or is suspected to have been committed. Starting from the
filing of an FIR right to the investigation of the crime to the trial and sentencing of the
accused, the students will be given a complete overview of criminal procedural law.
b. Course Aims
The aim of the course is to help familiarize the students with procedural aspects of the
criminal justice system thereby creating a sound conceptual framework for studying
substantive criminal law. By the end of the course the students should be able to:
The details of the grades as well as the criteria for awarding such grades are provided
below.
a.Keyword Syllabus
b.Course/Class Policies
Students who need support may register any time during the semester up until a month
before the end semester examination begins. Those students who wish to continue
receiving support from the previous semester, must re-register within the first month of
a semester. Last minute registrations and support might not be possible as sufficient
time is required to make the arrangements for support.
The DSC maintains strict confidentiality about the identity of the student and the nature
of their disability and the same is requested from faculty members and staff as well. The
DSC takes a strong stance against in-class and out-of-class references made about a
student’s disability without their consent and disrespectful comments referring to a
student’s disability.
This course may discuss a range of issues and events that might result in distress for
some students. Discussions in the course might also provoke strong emotional
responses. To make sure that all students collectively benefit from the course, and do
not feel disturbed due to either the content of the course or the conduct of the
discussions. Therefore, it is incumbent upon all within the classroom to pledge to
maintain respect towards our peers. This does not mean that you need to feel restrained
about what you feel and what you want to say. Conversely, this is about creating a safe
space where everyone can speak and learn without inhibitions and fear. This
responsibility lies not only with students, but also with the instructor.
P.S. The course instructor, as part of introducing the course manual, will discuss the
scope of the Safe Space Pledge with the class.
PART IV
Investigation
Process to compel appearance & production of things
Week 3-5
Sec. 167
Week 6-8 Commencement of judicial proceedings
Framing of charge
Elements of fair trial
Week 9-10
Trial
Week 13-14
Mandatory:
Section 1,2 (relevant definition clauses), 4-29, 303-304 of The Code of
Criminal Procedure 1973 Bare Act
Suggested:
Herbert Packer, Two Models of the Criminal Process, 113 University of
Pennsylvania Law Review 1 (1964)
Mandatory:
Section 154-173 (except section 164 and 167) The Code of Criminal
Procedure 1973 Bare Act
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (2014) 2 SCC 1
Yanub Sheikh v. State of WB (2013) 6 SCC 428
Nandini Satpathy v. PL Dani (1978) 2 SCC 424
Mahabir Singh v. State of Haryana (2001) 7 SCC 148
Joginder Nahak v. State of Orissa (2000) 1 SCC 272
Anju Chaudhary v. State of UP (2013) 6 SCC 384
TT Antony v. State of Kerala (2001) 6 SCC 181
Shivappa v. State of Karnataka (1995) 2 SCC 76
Sakiri Vasu v. State of UP, (2008) 2 SCC 409
Suggested:
State of Telangana v. Sarveshwar Reddy (Crim Appeal No. 1662/2019)
Manu Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2010) 6 SCC 1
State of WB v. Swapan Kumar Guha (1982) 1 SCC 561
Criminal Procedure (identification) Act 2022 and the Rules
Mandatory:
Sections 41-60A, Section 61-81, 87-104, 164 The Code of Criminal
Procedure 1973 Bare Act
DK Basu AIR 1997 SC 610
Joginder Kumar v. State of UP 1994 SCC (4) 260
V S Kuttan Pillai v. Ramakrishnan, AIR 1980 SC 185
Arnesh Kumar V. State of Bihar 2014 8 SCC 273 case
Virendra Khanna v. State of Karnataka 2021 SCC Online Kar 5032
Abhinav Sekhri, On Digital Devices and Criminal Investigations, The India
Forum.
Suggested:
Radha Kishan v. State of UP AIR 1963 SC 822
Manish Dixit v. State of Rajasthan (2000) 1 SCC 596
Shyam Lal Sharma v. State of MP (1972) 1 SCC 764
State of Maharashtra v. Christian Community Welfare Council (2003) 8 SCC
546
Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar v. Union of India (2018) 10 SCC 443
6-8 Sec. 167 – rules regulating investigation beyond 24 hours – remand – custody –
right to default bail.
Mandatory:
CBI v. Anupam Kulkarni 1992 AIR 1768
Sanjay Dutt v. State (1994) 5 SCC 410
Suggested:
Chaganti Satyanarayana v. State of AP (1986) 3 SCC 141
Aslam Desai v. State of Maharashtra (1992) 4 SCC 272
Uday Mohan Acharya v. State of Maharashtra (2001) 5 SCC 453
Sudha Bharadwaj v. NIA January (2021 SCC OnLine Bom 4568)
Mandatory:
Section 190-194, 200-210 The Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 Bare Act
Abhinandan Jha v. Dinesh Mishra AIR 1968 SC 117
Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police (1985) 2 SCC 537
Vinubhai Malaviya v. State of Gujarat (2019 14 SCALE 1)
Kishun Singh v. State of Bihar (1993) 2 SCC 16
DL Reddy v. VN Reddy (1976) 3 SCC 252 (overruled by Vinubhai)
HS Bains v. State (UT of Chandigarh) (1980) 4 SCC 631
Suggested:
Kewal Krishnan v. Suraj Bhan (1980) Supp. SCC 499
Mandatory:
William Slaney v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1956 SC 116
UoI v. Prafulla K Samal (1979) 3 SCC 4
State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi (2005) 1 SCC 568
Suggested:
Justice V S Malimath Committee Report (2003)
Kamil v. State of UP, AIR 2019 SC 45
Ajmal Kasab v. State of Maharashtra, (2012) 9 SCC 1
Nitya Dharmananda v. Gopal Sheelum Reddy (2018) 2 SCC 93
Mandatory:
Section 436-439, 441, 445 The Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 Bare Act
Gudikanti Narsimhulu v. Public Prosecutor (1978) 1 SCC 240
Gurcharan Singh v. State AIR 1978 SC 179
Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020 5 SCC 1)
P Chidambaram v. ED 2019 SCC OnLine SC 1549 (INX Media case)
Suggested:
State v. Jaspal Singh 1984 3 SCC 555
Sanjay Chandra v. CBI (2012) 1 SCC 40
Arnab Goswami v. State of Maharashtra (2020 SCC OnLine SC 964)
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab 1978 CriLJ 20 (AB)
Taking Bail Seriously: The State of Bail Jurisprudence in India (select chapters)
Shah, M.G. and Chadha, V. (2021). Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in
India. Janus.net, E-journal of International Relations.12(1), 251-264.
Section 225-265, 300-304, 309 313, 319, 320, 321 The Code of Criminal
Procedure 1973 Bare Act