Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paper 1
Cambridge IGCSE™
Thai – First Language 0518
For examination from 2018
Version 1.0
In order to help us develop the highest quality resources, we are undertaking a continuous programme
of review; not only to measure the success of our resources but also to highlight areas for improvement
and to identify new development needs.
We invite you to complete our survey by visiting the website below. Your comments on the quality and
relevance of our resources are very important to us.
www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/GL6ZNJB
Would you like to become a Cambridge International consultant and help us develop support
materials?
Please follow the link below to register your interest.
www.cambridgeinternational.org/cambridge-for/teachers/teacherconsultants/
Question 1.........................................................................................................................................................................6
Example Candidate Response – high............................................................................................................................6
Example Candidate Response – middle......................................................................................................................10
Example Candidate Response – low...........................................................................................................................14
Question 2.......................................................................................................................................................................18
Example Candidate Response – high..........................................................................................................................18
Example Candidate Response – middle......................................................................................................................22
Example Candidate Response – low...........................................................................................................................28
Example Candidate Responses – Paper 1
Introduction
The main aim of this booklet is to exemplify standards for those teaching Cambridge IGCSE Thai - First Language
0518, and to show how different levels of candidates’ performance (high, middle and low) relate to the subject’s
curriculum and assessment objectives.
In this booklet candidate responses have been chosen from June 2018 scripts to exemplify a range of answers.
For each question, the response is annotated with a clear explanation of where and why marks were awarded or
omitted. This is followed by examiner comments on how the answer could have been improved. In this way, it is
possible for you to understand what candidates have done to gain their marks and what they could do to improve their
answers. There is also a list of common mistakes candidates made in their answers for each question.
This document provides illustrative examples of candidate work with examiner commentary. These help teachers
to assess the standard required to achieve marks beyond the guidance of the mark scheme. Therefore, in some
circumstances, such as where exact answers are required, there will not be much comment.
The questions and mark schemes used here are available to download from the School Support Hub.
These files are:
Past exam resources and other teacher support materials are available on the School Support Hub:
www.cambridgeinternational.org/support
Question
How to use this1booklet
Example Candidate Responses – Paper 1
This booklet goes through the paper one question at a time, showing you the high-, middle- and low-level response for
each question. The candidate answers are set in a table. In the left-hand column are the candidate answers, and in
Question
the right-hand column are the 1
examiner comments.
Example Candidate Response – high Examiner Comments
Example Candidate Response – Question 1, high
Example Candidate Response – high
Examiner comments
1Examiner Comments
The question asked for an
explanation of ‘why the boy
1 The question asked for an
needed
explanationtoofspeak
‘why thetoboyhis father
before
needed the start
to speak of father
to his the new school
before the start of the new school
term’ and the response focused
term’ and the response focused
closely
closely ononthisthis
pointpoint and provides
and provides
aaclear answer
clear answer toquestion,
to this this question,
thereby gaining the one mark
thereby
available. gaining the one mark
1 available.
Mark for (a) = 1 out of 1
1
Mark
2 Thefor (a) =
question 1 out
asked ‘howof
the1
Examinerfather comments
felt when he wasare silent for
a moment
alongside the and why’. Although
answers. These the
The‘anxious’
2 words question asked
and ‘worry’ were ‘how the
Answers are by real candidates in exam conditions. explain where
father
not the felt and
exactwhen why
feeling he marks
wordswas in thesilent for
These show you the types of answers for each level. 2
wereaawarded.
mark
momentscheme, This helps
it is clear
and why’. thatyouthe
Although the
candidate attempted to depict
Discuss and analyse the answers with your learners in to interpret
words the standard
‘anxious’ and
the same feeling using his/her
of ‘worry’ were
the classroom to improve their skills. Cambridge
not
ownthe exams
words.exact so you can
feeling
The concluding words
part in the
2 help mark
your
of thelearners
answer, which
scheme, toitrefine
explained
is clear that the
the reason why the father was
3
their candidate
exam technique.
silent, was attempted
evidence of secure to depict
understanding
the same feeling and justified
using thehis/her
award of both marks for this
own words. The concluding part
question.
ofMark
theforanswer, which explained
How the candidate could have improved their answer (b(i) = 2 out of 2
the reason why the father was
The candidate was able to identify keywords in the text and utilised them as 3part of the answers.
silent, was
3 CandidateThis candidate
evidence
is able of secure
to explain
that the father hoped for better
interpreted explicit and implicit information, including the writer’s attitude. The candidate understanding
also
luck.
demonstrated and justified the
understanding of how to write using appropriate language and structure to effectively answer the questions.
award of both marks for this
Mark for (b)(ii) = 1 out of 2
question.
Mark for (c) = 2 out of 2
This section explains how the candidate could
Mark for(d)(b(i)= 1 out
Mark for = of2 1out of 2
have improved each answer. This helps you to
interpret the standard of Cambridge exams and
3 Candidate is able to explain
helps your learners to refine their exam technique.
that the father hoped for better
luck.
Common mistakes candidates made in this question Mark for (b)(ii) = 1 out of 2
The question asked why the author uses these particular phrases to convey his meaning. Mark
Manyforcandidates
(c) = 2only
out of 2
gave the definition or explained the phrases without giving the reasons why the author used these particular phrases.
Mark for (d) = 1 out of 1
Therefore, the reponses gained only one mark.
Often candidates were not awarded Lists the common mistakes candidates made
marks because they misread or
Cambridge IGCSE Thai First Language (0518)
in answering
6
each question. This will help your
misinterpreted the questions. learners to avoid these mistakes and give them
the best chance of achieving the available marks.
Question 1
9 This is an incomplete
response. The candidate attempts
to use own words to explain an
awareness of author’s attitude
toward his parents. Only one mark
is awarded for the first part of the
answer.
Question 2
Writing – Band 5
The candidate skillfully linked four bullets of the question and this conveyed a secure and holistic understanding of
Khiri Wong village and why students should attend a school trip if they were interested in environment. The response
was effective and convincing, though there was inconsistent tone/style for the audience and purpose. The writing,
overall, communicated clearly. Spelling and grammar were generally accurate with a wide range of vocabularies,
a range of varied sentence types and structures, and a secure use of constructed paragraphs. This answer was
certainly in Band 5 for Writing as it fulfilled all the criteria in the mark scheme descriptors for a Band 5 Writing
response. If there was consistent use of language, good use of grammar, and accurate spelling, this candidate might
have scored a higher mark.
Writing – Band 4
The article was interesting with a good introduction and conclusion though there were no constructed paragraphs. The
composition was a relevant response to the topic which was interesting to the reader. The candidate could express
some reasons for attending the school trip to Khiri Wong. The tone of the language was generally appropriate to
communicate meaning to the reader, though there was little awareness of audience including inconsistent use of
vocabularies. There was the use of spaces in wrong places. The candidate used some precise words, which made
the article more persuasive and attractive to the audience. A wide range of vocabularies was used to convey intended
meaning. If the use of vocabularies was consistent with constructed paragraphs including the correct use of spaces,
this candidate might have scored a higher mark.
Writing – Band 2
The response was incomplete. The candidate used own words initially. Although it was sometimes unclear and
generally unconvincing, they attempted to convince the reader to visit Khiri Wong village. Sequence of ideas was
sometimes confusing. For example, in the answer, visitors liked to visit the village because there were many careers
which they could study. This was not relevant. The use of vocabularies was simple and not always appropriate.
Frequent errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar hindered communication. The candidate did not demonstrate
the required range of ideas and vocabulary. The language used should have been sufficiently accurate to
communicate meaning clearly to the reader and to persuade school friends to take part in the trip.
Writing
• The response was unclear or unconvincing.
• Sequence of ideas was confusing.
• Vocabulary was simple, limited, and inappropriate.
• No awareness of appropriate tone/style for audience and purpose.
• Frequent errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar which hindered communication.
• No constructed paragraphs.
• Lack of coherence.