Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English II Cl-1211
English II Cl-1211
TRIAL EXAMINATION
CLASS: XII WRITING TIME: 3 Hours
SUBJECT: ENGLISH II FULL MARKS: 100
Date: 26th November, 2021
Student Code: ……………………………….…..…… Roll No.: ……… Class & Section: ………………
DO NOT forget to write your student code and class/section on the answer sheet
Marks 5 10 10 5 10 10 5 10 10 5 10 10
Marks
awarded
Markers
Initial
Date:
Subject Teacher’s Name and Sign
TRIAL/ENGLISH II/12/2021
Copyright Reserved Punakha CS
Section A: Short Story
Direction: Answer the following questions with reference to the story Lamb to the Slaughter by Roald Dhal.
Question 1 (1 x 5 =5)
Direction: Each question below is followed by four responses. Choose the correct answer or response that best
fits the given question and circle the letter of your choice.
A sewing
B. reading a book.
C. drinking whisky.
D. humming a tune.
ii. “She loved to luxuriate in the presence of this man… almost as a sunbather feels the sun…”
A Metaphor
B. Oxymoron
C. Simile
D. Irony
iii. Mary’s first instinct was not to believe any of the things she heard Patrick say because
C. she needed to convince herself that she didn’t murder her husband.
Question 2 (5 x 2 = 10)
i. Imagine that you are Mary in the story. Write a paragraph of about 50 words explaining to your 5 year old
daughter about what happened to her father.
i. While some readers condemn Mary as a coldblooded murderer, others feel that she was forced into that
villainy. What is your view? Justify your argument with logic and evidence from the text Lamb to the
Slaughter by Roald Dhal.
ii. How is the story, The Elephant by Slawomir Mrozek, a satirical allegory? Identify at least five characters or
things used in the story and explain the symbolic meaning of each.
iii. Explain how the Story, Mirror Image by Lena Coakley, explores the theme “Ethics of Medical science and
its impact on the lives of people.”
Direction: Read the essay given below and answer the questions that follow in reference to the essay.
9 May, 2010
Rethinking language
I want to say a few words now about the most sacred cow of all – language. Quite frankly, there is a problem
in every discussion of Dzongkha being regarded as so highly “sensitive”. Surely the issue of the national
language is no clandestine project and should be squarely in the public domain.
Despite all the government encouragement and enforcement, most Bhutanese still don’t speak Dzongkha, and
most of those who do, speak it poorly with even poorer reading and writing skills. I hear it is many students’
least favourite subject and that there are not enough fluent Dzongkha speaking teachers to teach it well. And
even if you are a Dzongkha master, there is hardly any literature to read except newspapers that are easier to
understand in English.
I have even heard complaints that use of Dzongkha in Parliament disadvantages and disempowers MPs from
other areas, and that native Dzongkha-speaking MPs sometimes rely on their eloquence rather than on the
content of their arguments. And the many Bhutanese who still don’t understand Dzongkha, despite all the
government’s efforts, cannot even follow what is going on in the very forum that supposedly represents them.
Dzongkha doesn’t even preserve our precious wisdom heritage, culture, and buddhadharma, which has been
carried through Choekey, not Dzongkha. In fact Dzongkha doesn’t do much to preserve our history, prayers,
poetry, dance, songs, philosophy, and more, since there are so few Dzongkha books, and since our ancient
texts like the Kangyur and Tengyur aren’t in Dzongkha. The few Dzongkha books in existence are mostly very
recent, and generally do not represent our ancient heritage.
Even our monks often don’t understand what they are chanting, since all the prayers recited in Bhutan are in
Choekey, not in Dzongkha, and Chokey is not native to anyone in Bhutan. So the Buddhist liturgies are simply
parroted meaninglessly rather than understood.
In fact Bhutanese will soon have to learn English to study and practice the dharma, since there is already more
dharma translated into English than into Dzongkha. I know these are extremely touchy subjects. But in the
process of building a nation, tough questions have to be asked, and indeed, our new democracy requires us to
have the courage to debate these issues openly and without fear.
The biggest concern about promoting Dzongkha actually has to do with time management, since time is an
increasingly rare resource in the modern world. If you think of all our 178,000 Bhutanese students, then
millions of hours are spent each year studying Dzongkha. You cannot undertake any tertiary studies in science,
mathematics, philosophy, psychology or geography in Dzongkha, which doesn’t even have the vocabulary
really to discuss such disciplines properly. And by the time any university text is translated into Dzongkha, it
will likely be outdated, or the Dzongkha will need to be updated.
Building a new national language is extremely difficult, and we have to ask whether it is worth the huge effort
required, and whether it’s the best use of our very limited time and resources. I read that time and human
resources are the most precious resources we have in our modern economy. I would ask – if only to provoke
debate – that, if that is so, then aren’t we wasting a whole generation’s precious time in forcing them to spend
TRIAL/ENGLISH II/12/2021 Page 7 of 20
Copyright Reserved Punakha CS
hours each week and year learning a language they will hardly use – time that could be spent in much more
productive ways to build our nation?
I fully appreciate our leaders’ wish to have a unifying language as a symbol of our sovereignty. But what is the
experience of other nations in our region in that regard? India is one of the most culturally rich countries in the
world, with hundreds of dialects and many major languages, each with its own ancient literature. Attempts to
promote Hindi as the national language have not been successful, except in the popularity it enjoys in
Bollywood, and English still serves as a unifying language. At the same time India celebrates its diversity by
recognizing 18 official languages in its Constitution, and giving citizens the right to communicate in the
language of their own state and choice. Similarly diversity could be a source of pride in Bhutan.
And if we do want to render our spoken languages into written form, then we might learn from the Malays and
Indonesians, who have adopted the Roman alphabet for their own languages. Do we Bhutanese really want to
expend so much precious time and resources learning a written Dzongkha with its own distinct script?
Of course, there is nothing wrong with teaching Dzongkha or Tshangla as language studies, and even
encouraging some translation to preserve certain cultural traditions. It’s the balance between Dzongkha’s
contribution to our national identity and the huge expenditure of time and resources on cultivating Dzongkha
as the first national language that I am questioning.
And I am asking whether – given our very limited time and resources – strong Dzongkha emphasis may
actually undermine and diminish, rather than enhance, our sovereignty and potential contribution to the world.
Could we achieve those goals more effectively, as India has done, by relying on English as our unifying
language without compromising (and indeed celebrating) our rich linguistic and cultural diversity?
Question 1 (1 x 5 = 5)
Direction: Each question below is followed by four responses. Choose the correct answer or response that best
fits the given question and circle the letter of your choice.
ii. One of the impediments to growth of Dzongkha mentioned in the 2nd paragraph is
D Dzongkha is enforced.
A national identity.
B common tongue.
C a symbol of conformity.
A descriptive.
B argumentative.
C narrative.
D expository.
Question 2 (2 x 5 = 10)
i. Explain using 3 of your own examples/reasons (not from the essay) why you think Dzongkha as a language
is not doing well when compared to English.
ii. Write a paragraph of about 10 lines as a continuation of the last paragraph. Your paragraph should have a
clear topic sentence.
Direction: Read the poem given below and answer the questions that follow.
Direction: Each question below is followed by four responses. Choose the correct answer or response that best
fits the given question and circle the letter of your choice.
A onomatopoeia.
B metaphor.
C symbolism.
D satire.
A pride.
B anger.
C temper.
D vanity.
A remorseful.
B gloomy.
C defiant.
D happy.
Question 3 (1 x 10 =10)
ii. List two possible themes of the poem. Elaborate by quoting relevant lines or phrases from the poem.
Direction: Answer the questions in this section with reference to The Merchant of Venice by William
Shakespeare.
Question 1 (1 x 5 =5)
Direction: Each question below is followed by four responses. Choose the correct answer or response that best
fits the given question and circle the letter of your choice.
i. The friend who tells Antonio not to sit like an old man in Act I, Scene I, is
A Solanio.
B Salario.
C Gratianio.
D Lorenzo.
ii. In Act I, Scene III, Shylock says that Antonio is sufficient, by which he means
iii. “…Young in limbs, in judgment old,” (Act II, Scene VII) means
iv. GRATIANO: “…All things that are, Are with more spirit chased than enjoyed…” (Act II, Scene VI)
A irony.
B personification.
C metaphor.
D hyperbole.
i. Between the Prince of Morocco and the Prince of Arragon, who do you think is a better match for
Portia? Justify your choice.
Question 3 (1 x 10 =10)
i. Who do you think is the most important character in the drama? Justify your argument with logic and
evidence from the text. .
ii. Explain how the play subtly challenges anti-Semitism in context of Shylock’s revenge monologue.