Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/266662359
CITATIONS READS
6 976
3 authors, including:
Djebbar Tiab
University of Oklahoma
153 PUBLICATIONS 2,873 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Djebbar Tiab on 25 December 2021.
This paper was prepared for presentation at the Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition held in Abuja, Nigeria, 6–8 August 2012.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been
reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its
officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce
in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.
!!
! !! ! !!
!! (2) !! ! !! !! (6)
!! !!!! !!" !"!" !!
!
is called the mean hydraulic radius For shaly formation, applying the same concept applied in
!! the derivation of equation (4) to equations (6), the following
equation is obtained:
It was shown that the mean hydraulic radius can be
al., 1993). This led to the concept of hydraulic flow unit !! ! ! ! (7)
!!!!! !!
and rock typing.
Sample Field Case
Correlating the horizontal mean hydraulic radius with
vertical permeability yields the following relationship as Sandstone reservoirs are not as stress sensitive as carbonate
developed by Zahaf and Tiab (2002): reservoirs. There depositional processes mostly control
petrophysical properties. They are mostly not as
!!
!! heterogeneous as their carbonate counterparts are. They are
!! ! !! (3) relatively easier to characterize, since the effects of post
!!
depositional attributes are mostly negligible. Different
Where: relationships between vertical permeability and other
petrophysical parameters exist for sandstone formation.
A1 and B1 are constants.
Niger-Delta Sandstone Case
A New Permeability Relationship for Shaly The field was formed during the tertiary period and is made
Formation up of at least seven different reservoir facies with shale
intercalations. The facies were described from the core
For shaly formations, the clay content, clay type and clay
taken from the reservoir. The facies that where identified
distribution affect both the value of horizontal and vertical
include the transgressive sands, tidal channels, tidal flats,
permeability by reducing the pore volume and thereby
point bars, upper and lower shore faces. The reservoir is
reducing the effective porosity. Removing the effect of
layered and has vertical heterogeneity. The log data and
shale volume from the effective porosity gives the effective
drilling operation confirmed the presence of gas in the
porosity with respect to the sum of pore and matrix volume
reservoir. The porosity was calculated from core-calibrated
i.e.
well logs. Permeability was measured in the lab.
!!
!! ! ! The zone that was used for the analysis was easily identified
! ! !!! and characterized from wireline log and core data. The
depth of the zone ranges from 11850 ft. to 12150 ft. and is
Substituting into equation (3) gives: made up of at least seven different discrete rock types. The
!!
average grain density of the layers is 2.66 g/cm3. The
!! ! !!
!! !!!!!
(4) variation of vertical and horizontal permeability with depth
!! and effective porosity are shown in figures (1), (2), (3) and
(4) respectively. It could be seen from figures (1) and (2)
The effect of the clay type and distribution would affect the that both horizontal and vertical permeability generally
value of the two constants, hence, A1 and B1 becomes A2 and decreases with increase in depth. In addition, figures (3) and
B2 constants. (4) show a semi log relationship between effective porosity
and permeability in both horizontal and vertical directions.
Also, by multiplying both sides of equation 1 with !! and Combining both relationships in figure (3) and (4) yields a
taking square root of both sides results in: relationship between vertical and horizontal permeability.
From figure (8) through (13), the following correlations are Acknowledgments
obtained:
The authors wish to thank the board and members of staff of
!!!!"" the African University of Science and Technology Abuja
!!
!! ! !!!"#$ (R! = 0.9389) (9) and the African Union for their financial support. Special
!!
thanks go to the Almighty God for the wisdom and strength
!!!"#$
that He gave for this work.
!! ! !!!"#$ !! !! (R! = 0.9334) (10)
!!!"##
A, B = correlation constants
!! ! !
!! ! !!!"## (R! = 0.9293) (12) D = depth, ft.
!!!!!
F, f = pore shape factor, dimensionless
!!!"#$
!! ! !!!"#$ !! ! ! !!! !! (R! = 0.9445) (13) GR = gamma ray, API
!!
!!!!"# I = shale index, dimensionless
!! ! !!!"#$ ! ! !!!
!!
(R! = 0.9411) (14)
K, k = permeability, mD
4. Plot of !! vs.
!!
gave a better correlation References
!!
Appendix 1)))))!
"#!$!&)1634736124387!
2*)))! 1))))!
!"#$%&'()"#*"&+,',-./(*0(
"#!$!%&'()*+,-./!(!&'()0!
1))!
1*)))!
1)!
1))))! "#!
1!
)! )61! )62! )6&!
*)))!
"6"%$!"()3#37,-.(
1))))!
13#,435-&'()"#*"&+,',-./(*0(
2*)))!
"5!$!%&'()*+,-./!(!&'()0!
1)))!
2))))!
13#,435-&'()"#*"&+,',-./(*0(
1))!
1*)))!
1)!
1))))! "5!
1!
*)))! )! )61! )62! )6&!
"6"%$!"()3#37,-.(
)! Figure 4- Variation of horizontal permeability with effective
11*))! 113))! 114))! 121))! 12&))! 12*))! porosity for Niger-Delta sandstone case.
0")-1/(2(
1)))))! 162!
"#!$!)62443"5 16)3)3!
9:!$!)64*;&! 1!
1))))!
)6<!
1)))!
8!981(
)60!
1))! )6;!
)62!
1)!
)!
)! )61! )62! )6&! )6;! )6*!
1! "6"%$!"()3#37,-.(
11*))! 1))))!
110))!
113))! 1)))!
11<))!
114))!
0")-1/(2(
1))!
12)))!
121))!
122))! 1)!
12&))!
12;))! 1!
12*))! 1! 1)! 1))! 1)))! 1))))!
)! )6*! 1! 16*!
=-"5>87/!
8!981(
Figure 8- Variation of vertical permeability with mean
Figure 6- Variation of anisotropic permeability ratio with hydraulic radius for the Niger-Delta sandstone case.
depth for the Niger-Delta sandstone case.
SPE 163011 7
1)))))! 1)))))!
"#!$!26&1;3=-"587/26)<1&! "#!$!1601<<C=?"587>-1%@A5/B261&;;!
9:!$!)64&&;! 9:!$!)6424&!
1))))!
1))))!
!"#$%&'()"#*"&+,',-./(*0(
1))!
1))!
1)!
1)!
1!
)61! 1! 1)! 1))! 1)))!
=-"587/! 1!
)61! 1! 1)! 1))!
Figure 9- Variation of vertical permeability with ! ! !! =?"587>-1%@A5/B!
for the Niger-Delta sandstone case.
Figure 11- Variation of vertical permeability with
!! !! ! ! ! !!! for the Niger-Delta sandstone case.
1)))))!
1)))))!
"#$!)6)31<=?"5-1%@A5/>87B26)4)1! "#!$!16)204D"5C=?87-1%@A5/BE16);12!
1))))!
9:!$!)64*&! 9:!$!)64;;*!
1))))!
!"#$%&'()"#*"&+,',-./(*0(
!"#$%&'()"#*"&+,',-./(*0(
1)))!
1)))!
1))! 1))!
1)! 1)!
1! 1!
)61! )61!
1! 1)! 1))! 1)))! )61! 1! 1)! 1))! 1)))! 1))))!
=?"5-1%@A5/>87B! "5=?87-1%@A5/B(
Figure 10- Variation of vertical permeability with Figure 12- Variation of vertical permeability with
!! ! ! !!! !!! for the Niger-Delta sandstone case. !! ! !! ! ! !!! for the Niger-Delta sandstone case.
8 SPE 163011
1))))))!
"#!$!)6123*?-1%@A5/=-"5>87/B26))0*!
9:!$!)64;11!
1)))))!
!"#$%&'()"#*"&+,',-./(*0(
1))))!
1))!
1)!
1!
1! 1)! 1))! 1)))! 1))))!
)61!
-1%@A5/=-"5>87/!
Figure 13- Variation of vertical permeability with
! ! !!" ! ! !!! for the Niger-Delta sandstone case.