Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 Performance Process Improvement
5 Performance Process Improvement
■ QPI uses a systematic methodology and tools to find the root causes of a
performance problem and then implement a plan to correct these
problems.
■ The second approach; criteria-based approach considering risk, volume, safety, cost,..etc.
■ Prioritization should be based on qualitative and quantitative data available.
■ The initiative that have the most opportunity for improvement are often tackled first
■ High risk process usually takes priority. The level of risk determined based on potential
consequences of injury and the frequency.
■ Learning from successful teams is one of the main QPI aspects. This could happen internally or
externally
■ Prioritization Matrix is the best tool to prioritize group of initiatives.
Note: Nowadays focus shifted from the performance of individuals (Quality Assurance) to
the performance of organization’s system and process (Quality Improvement). And
the focus shifted from identifying poor performers to improving group performance
THE QPI PROCES
■ Stage 1: Consider Institutional Context: The facilitator must be aware of the goals of the larger
organization and maintain a consistent direction when defining performance targets. Familiarity
with organizational goals helps to ensure the sustainability of the interventions.
■ Stage 2: Obtain and Maintain Stakeholder Agreement: In the initial stage, the Pl facilitator, the
client and the stakeholders meet to discuss and define the desired outcomes of the activity.
■ Stage 3: Define Desired Performance: The stakeholder group creates verbal statements that define
desired performance in specific, observable and measurable terms. These statements of desired
performance address the quality, quantity and timeliness of performance project.
■ Stage 4: Describe Actual Performance: Once desired performance described, current levels of
performance are assessed using the same indicators developed to describe desired performance.
■ Stage 5: Describe Performance Gaps: After describing desired and actual levels of performance, the
difference (gap) between them should be described using the same indicators that were employed
to describe desired and actual performance and in objective terms.
THE QPI PROCES
■ Stage 6: Find Root Causes: Once performance gaps have been described, the next step is to
determine the cause of those gaps. Using the performance factors as a starting point, the
stakeholder group participates in a root cause analysis to uncover the factors that are
impeding good performance.
■ Stage 7: Select and Design Interventions: The stakeholder group next elects interventions that
will address the root causes discovered during the previous stage. Each intervention or set of
interventions must address at least one root cause.
■ Stage 8: Implement Interventions: During the implementation stage, the team recruits
additional expertise as needed, assures organizational readiness, applies the interventions.
and helps enable and monitor organizational change.
■ Stage 9: Monitoring and Evaluation: In this step, the team measures the change in the
performance gaps identified during gap analysis and evaluate the improvement. Monitoring
happens on an ongoing basis and it should be on organizational objectives
Important Messages:
The goal of performance management is to ensure meeting the
organizational visions
We start quality performance improvement (QPI) projects mainly for
identified areas of improvement to improve it, not only for
accreditation.
Before starting/ adopting QPI be sure it’s applicable and consistent
with organizations strategic plan even if its success somewhere else
QPI steps can be summarized in five steps
1. Check applicability
2. Make commitment
3. Data Collection
4. Implementation
5. Evaluation
FACTORS THAT ENSURE SUCCESSFUL QPI
1. Ensure leadership support and commitment.
To have a successful team, you should include (senior leaders) in the
team, ALWAYS
One of the best leadership commitment features for new projects is
through allocating resources for the process
2. Assess priority and feasibility of QPI initiative based on
prioritization rules.
Prioritization matrix is the best tool for prioritization, otherwise you
can use multi-voting or other tools
3. Identify the aim of conducting QPI initiative.
FACTORS THAT ENSURE SUCCESSFUL QPI
FOCUS PDCA
HFMEA
Lean
Six Sigma Model
Rapid Cycle Improvement (PDSA)
Kaizen
FOCUS PDCA
■ “Failure modes” means the ways, or modes, in which something might fail. Failures are
any potential or actual defects.
■ “Effects analysis” refers to studying the consequences of those failures. Failures are
prioritized according to its frequency and seriousness.
■ Failure Modes and Effects Analysis is a systematic, proactive method for evaluating a
process to identify where and how it might fail and to asses the relative impact of
different failures, in order to identify the parts of the process that are most in need' of
change.
FMEA includes review of the following:
■ Teams should consider calculating a total RPN for the process as described above and then set a goal for
improvement. For example, a team may set a goal of decreasing the total RPN for the medication ordering
process by 50% from the baseline.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
(FMEA) steps
Step One Select a process to Use FMEA in processes which don’t have too many sub-process (e.g.
Evaluate with FMEA instead of conducting FMEA on entire medication process, you may
select electrolyte replacement process)
Step two Recruit a multidisciplinary Be sure to include everyone who is involved at any point in the process.
team
Step Three Review the process Number/enumerated every step of the process (Flowcharting can be a
helpful tool) for outlining the steps. When you are finished, be sure to
obtain consensus from the group about steps accuracy.
Step Four List failure modes and For each step in the process, list all possible “failure modes.” Then, for
causes and its effect each failure mode listed, identify all possible causes.
on patients
Step Five Assign Risk Priority To assign RPN, answer the following: Occurrence: How likely is it that
Number (RPN) this failure mode will occur?
Detection: If this failure mode occurs, how likely is it that the failure will
be detected?
Severity: If this failure mode occurs, how likely is it that harm will occur?
RPN=Severity X Occurrence X Detection
Severity (1=Not Severe, 10= Very Severe)
Occurrence (1=Not Likely, 10 = Very Likely)
Detection (1=Easy to Detect, 10= Not easy to Detect)
Step Six Evaluate the results The score will be 1-1,000, Identify the failure modes with the
highest RPNs. These are the ones the team should consider first
as improvement opportunities.
Step Seven Create actions to reduce Failure modes with high RPNs are the most important to focus
risks improvement efforts. In this step, create actions to reduce harm
from failure modes:
Step Eight Assign responsibility for Assign responsibilities for implementing corrective actions and
actions determine project completion date
Step Nine Re-assign risk codes Determine what is RPN after actions implementation (residual risk)
(residual risk) to assist the team in prioritizing actions and to determine if the
actions were effective
Step Ten Monitor the actions and Monitor to evaluate if the risk reduction strategies have reduced risk
risk reduction and take additional actions, if necessary, to further reduce risk
HFMEA
■ Whenever more than one risk identified, hazard scoring matrix or RPN can help in
two things
– Prioritization
– Assessment: assess the severity/ risk pre and post interventions
Current Healthcare Quality Management Approaches
■ Six Sigma:
The Six Sigma approach to improving quality can be used to address many of the
challenges facing healthcare, including resource utilization, patient safety, appropriate
use of technology, and increasing market share, using data and statistical analysis to
measure and improve performance, in addition, six sigma provide better approach to
achieve long-term results. Quality is improved by eliminating errors in production and
service related processes.
Six Sigma is based on the concept of the normal distribution and the belief that there is
a point, six standard deviations from the mean, where there should be almost zero
defects. Therefore, error rates should not exceed 3.4 defects per million opportunities
(DPMO).
Lean and Six Sigma
Attitude and Discipline
Customer Focus
View Quality externally from the customer’s perspective
Measure the same way that the customer does
Meet customer expectations every time
Continuous improvement cycle
Systematic
Scientific
Fact-based
Data-driven
Process focus
Executive
• Support Six Sigma • Supports Black Belts by
• Ensure success of participating on project
GB/BB projects teams
Yellow Belts Green Belts
• Develops All • Apply Breakthrough
deployment and Employees Strategy to specific
Strategy (White Belts) projects, lead and
• Supports cultural direct teams to
change execute
• Understand vision
Champion / projects
• Apply concepts to their Black Belts
Sponsor job and work area
DEFINE
CONTROL
MEASURE
IMPROVE ANALYSE
Current Healthcare Quality Management Approaches
Define: Practitioners begin by defining the process. They ask who the customers
are and what their problems are. They identify the key characteristics important
to the customer along with the processes that support those key characteristics.
They then identify existing output conditions along with the process elements.
Measure: Next, the focus is on measuring the process. Key characteristics are
categorized, measurement systems are verified, and data are collected.
Analyze: The intent of analysis is to convert the raw data into information that
provides the most important causes of the defects or problems.
Improve: Results of process changes are seen and the company can judge
whether the changes are beneficial or if another set of changes is necessary.
■ Lean Enterprise
One of the major difference between the lean approach and traditional quality
improvement is its emphasis on investigating new ways of getting things done and
making the changes in the short period of time. The basic idea is to identify new
procedures that should be more effective than existing systems in the eliminating
waste. Quality improvement has typically used the incremental change model, but lean
enterprise is more about total redesign. A key element of success is the commitment
and the involvement of workers in change process
Current Healthcare Quality Management Approaches
■ Reengineering
There was typically a focus on restructuring systems and departments into more efficient processes.
For example, hospitals experimented with creating new positions that combined work from several
different areas. A focus on cross-functional capabilities led to the dissolution of departmental "silos".
Many hospitals thought that reengineering would increase profit margins and create financial stability.
The problem was that reengineering often became associated with downsizing and layoffs. When this
happened, employee morale declined and productivity suffered. Because of these negative
connotations, reengineering has fallen out of vogue and been replaced by other improvement models
and initiatives. The newer approach is to consider adopting the lean enterprise method to increase
financial stability by eliminating waste.
Current Healthcare Quality Management Approaches
The IHI developed the "collaborative" approach, termed the "Breakthrough Series," to bring about
rapid cycle improvements. Fundamental to the collaborative approach is the acceptance model and
establishment of infrastructure through which collaborating organizations can identify and prioritize
aims for improvement and gain access to methods, tools, and materials that will enable them to
conduct individually. The key elements of success are enlisting a broad range of “partners" utilizing
evidence-based practice and developing toolkits that contain essential information and resources for
change. At the core of the collaborative approach are PDCA cycles. The real benefits to organizations
that participate in the Breakthrough Series are that they can learn from other organizations’
successes and failures.
Current Healthcare Quality Management Approaches
■ Kaizen
■ Kaizen: The word Kaizen mean “continuous improvement” or good change. It comes
from the Japanese word “Kai” which means “change” and “zen” which means “good”.
■ Kaizen: is a system of continuous improvement in quality, technology, processes,
company, culture, productivity, safety and leadership, aims to eliminate waste
■ Kaizen in a system that involves every employee – from upper management to the
cleaning crew. Everyone is encouraged to come up with small improvement
suggestions on a regular basis. Kaizen is based on making little changes on a regular
basis, always improving productivity, safety and effectiveness while reducing waste
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
■ If the scorecard is adequately balanced, it will reflect both the needs and priorities of
the organization itself, and also those of the community and customers it service
Balanced Scorecards (BSC)
Important Note:
■ The main difference between a dashboard and a scorecard is that a scorecard describes
past performance, while a dashboard depicts performance in real time.
BENCHMARKING
■ Technique used to control the fact that different patients with the same diagnosis may have
additional conditions that can affect how they respond to treatment.
■ It is a statistical process used to identify and adjust for variation in patient outcomes that stem
from differences in patient characteristics across healthcare organizations (comparing outcome
without risk adjustment can be misleading).
■ To benchmark organizational data, we have to compare the result with similar facilities e.g. to
compare surgical site infection (SSI) in a hospital, it should be compared with SSI in similar facility
From healthcare quality perspective. Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is more appropriate than Evidence-
Based Medicine.
EBP promotes patient safety through the provision of effective and efficient healthcare, resulting in
standardization and less variation.
■ Clinical Pathways; are tools to manage quality outcomes and cost of care
based on clinical guidelines and current evidence.
Clinical pathways characteristics and benefits