Kalinga state university

Graduate Studies

Name: Philip G. Atma

Statistic

A. State the null hypothesis

> Found that there are significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents along moderator
variables.

>Found that there were no significant differences in the needs of respondents along moderator variables
B. Alternative Hypothesis

Condition Decision
P. Value > 0.05 Accepted Ho
P. Value ≤ 0.05 Reject Ho

C. Population of the Study

Population of Parent District Affiliation

PDA Counts % of Total Cumulative %

ETD3 32 5.2 % 5.2 %

ETD4 90 14.8 % 20.0 %
ETD5 236 38.7 % 58.7 %
ETD6 180 29.5 % 88.2 %
ETD9 52 8.5 % 96.7 %
ETD10 20 3.3 % 100.0 %

Population as to Age

AGE Counts % of Total Cumulative %

25-30 234 38.4 % 38.4 %

31-35 244 40.0 % 78.4 %

36 and above 132 21.6 % 100.0 %

 Population as to Highest Educational Attainment

HEA Counts % of Total Cumulative %

Elementary Level 50 8.2 % 8.2 %

Elementary Graduate 108 17.7 % 25.9 %
High School level 112 18.4 % 44.3 %
Population as to Age

AGE Counts % of Total Cumulative %

High School Grad 122 20.0 % 64.3 %

College Level 116 19.0 % 83.3 %
College Graduate 102 16.7 % 100.0 %

Population as to Socio-Economic Status

SES Counts % of Total Cumulative %

Below 10,957 208 34.1 % 34.1 %

10,957-21,914 136 22.3 % 56.4 %
21,914-43,823 46 7.5 % 63.9 %
43,823-76,669 156 25.6 % 89.5 %
76,669 and above 64 10.5 % 100.0 %

Population as to Number of Children

Number of Children Counts % of Total Cumulative %

1 108 17.7 % 17.7 %

2 198 32.5 % 50.2 %
3 188 30.8 % 81.0 %
4 100 16.4 % 97.4 %
4 and above 16 2.6 % 100.0 %

D. MOTHER TABLE Experienced by Parents as To Parenting

MOTHER TABLE WM
Factor 1. Experiences as to Parenting
1.  When it comes to having a structure to facilitate instruction to my child or children, I am
3.37
sufficiently knowledgeable.

2.  I am having difficulty comprehending the module's lessons/questions/assignments. 2.51

3.  I am having difficulty ensuring that my youngster comprehends the module's material. 3.75

4.  I am able to answer all of my children's queries regarding their modules. 3.01

5.  I have multiple kids, and I can help more than one kid at once. 3.4

6.  I am concerned about the future of my child on this platform. 4.36

7.  I lack the time to assist my child in completing his or her modules. 2.89

8.  I will have time to retrieve my child's module from school. 2.67

9.  I am able to assist my children's education while pursuing income opportunities. 3.23

Sub Area Mean 3.24

 

E. ANNOVA with Interpretation

ANNOVA TABLE: Experienced by Parents as To Parenting based on their Parent District Affiliation

ANOVA – EPPT

  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p

PDA 3.86 5 0.772 2.46 0.032

Residuals 189.46 604 0.314    

The above table shows that the computed probability value (P.value) of 0.032 is greater than 0.05 margin of error, hence, the null
hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is no significant difference of Experienced by Parents as to District Affiliation.

 ANNOVA TABLE: Experienced by Parents as to parenting based on their Age

  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F P

AGE 13.0 2 6.479 21.8 < .001

Residuals 180.4 607 0.297    

 The above table shows that the computed probability value (P.value) of 0.01 is lesser than 0.05 margin of error, hence, the null
hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is a significant difference of Experienced by Parents as to age.

ANNOVA TABLE: Experienced by Parents as to parenting based on their Highest Educational Attainment

  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p

HEA 115.5 5 23.103 179 < .001

Residuals 77.8 604 0.129    

  The above table shows that the computed probability value (P.value) of 0.01 is lesser than 0.05 margin of error, hence, the null
hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is a significant difference of Experienced by Parents as to Parenting as to highest
educational attainment.

ANNOVA TABLE: Experienced by Parents as To Parenting based on their Socio Economic Status

  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p

SES 159.6 4 39.8891 715 < .001

Residuals 33.8 605 0.0558    

   The above table shows that the computed probability value (P.value) of 0.01 is lesser than 0.05 margin of error, hence, the null
hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is a significant difference of Experienced by Parents as to socio economic status.
ANNOVA TABLE: Experienced by Parents as To Parenting as to Number of Children

  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p

# CA 7.37 4 1.842 5.99 < .001

Residuals 185.96 605 0.307    

 The above table shows that the computed probability value (P.value) of 0.01 is lesser than 0.05 margin of error, hence, the null
hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is a significant difference of Experienced by Parents as to number of children.