Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Biofloc
Biofloc
" ## $ %
& # #
' $
Why do we need intensive
closed ponds???
1. Environmental regulation prohibiting or
limiting water disposal.
2. Bio-security concerns limiting water
intake.
3. Water scarcity and/or cost. Conventional
aquaculture uses usually 2-10 m3 water to
produce 1 kg fish.
4. There is a demand for quality control and
transparency, that are difficult to achieve in
intensive systems.
5. Feed utilization may be higher than in
conventional systems. This may be an
important point.
6. In cases where production is close to
the market, space limitation is also of
concern.
7. Intensification enables easier
temperature control.
8. Intensification and automation may
save labor.
POND INTERVENTION YIELDS LIMITING FACTOR
TYPE (kg/ha*yr)
2% * #
1
!$$ %
2
" !$' !$.%
3
!$!$ % 4
5
*
6
7 & $!#% 3"
7 !!*
5 $0'%
38 ( 0$$#5
$!$0
(,34,5
%
. 6
* 3
7 * 485 %
$ %0
( 9
9
:$ * "
%
$ %
; $ !
# %
; .%
. * .<4% ;
. # ==
# *
!1 2
09 :
3;
5
<
8 <
= 6 ("9 2>16? 2
•MICROBES PRODUCE NEW CELL MATERIAL (protein)
AND ENERGY:
∆C = CO2 + ∆Ccell
∆Ccell/∆ ∆C = ε
= Microbial conversion efficiency
=normally, 0.4-0.6 for aerobic microbial
processes. Lower for anaerobic.
Bacteria are rich in respect to N (C:N ~ 4)
Thus, 1 Nitrogen is taken up for 4 ∆
=
*
*3 ∆ . / .<4 ? ∆ .
!.> ! ∆ @2 A B
=
!
! #
%
%
; !
#
%
4 =C "6( 2 ?
211D1DE
∆; / ∆ . - .-; / ∆ .>$5.$:- .-;
∆; / ∆ .> $,%,8
∆ .> / 4,∆ ;
4, *
! # % D
(
* % *
===
.
* =' *
E(µ
' =
%
= **
x40
200 µm x10 x20
200 µm 200 µm
x10 x10
F
l
o
D = (
D= (
! "
# $ !
$
1 6 3" 0$$'5
8 7 /
8
D 2
26.0
24.0
22.0
20.0
N, mg /l
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
0 2 4 6 days 8 10 12 14
Daily decrease of TSS, FV, suspended carbon and
nitrogen, during the no – feed period.
Changes in equivalent suspended solids (SS) concentration
(as dry weight) and daily uptake attributed to 1 kg fish
3
5
!#2
7
(134F5%
8
3" !.+.5
δ (+.!-,,
+,5 3(0%1
4,5 G G 3(+%1
. # 34+%8
8H # 6
+,5 34,%8
4,5 G G 34,%1
4,5 8,5
?. ? ;>0 4I<0 34+%,
; 6
; ! 7
E485 %
' * !
# @<
* %
$
8,5% A+5 #
$
%!(FF1
$ 9
9
Expt. # 1 30% 20%
Protein
51 days Protein
FEED C/N
11.1 16.6
Daily Gain (%)
1.59a 2.0b
FCR
2.62 2.17
PCR
4.38 2.42
FEED COST
0.848 0.583
Exp. # 2 (30 days)
C/N
((%( (A%A
Daily gain (%)
1.63a 2.22b
FCR
2.62 2.02
PCR
4.35 2.18
Feed cost (US$/Kg fish) 0.848 0.543
Can we use the same principles
In less intensive ponds??
> 7
G > ? H
> 30$$A5
;0#@ ;A$
.J (%A 4%4
;J ! 08 4,
5
; ! A0 08
- 4
) J (F+!
4H8 (48!
0,A
J-
1+!
4,4 (,+!
04,
J-
; ((,!
,H+ 4(!
F1A
J-
8
F
: :
(8
"
3 5
:
; H 2
(% : ! * *
%
4% 2 * " ! *
6 # %
+% & # D
K %
0% #
8% I $ %
A% > # * ! * *
E
E
01
A# %
!9 ;
*;
;<
..L L& '
<; < I&L2):9
9
305
A ) 30$)5
3
5
#
0$7 72
/= 7 B #$!$$
3*5
' = :
+
%
1 9
; 0
We have gone a long way:
Hundreds of BFT ponds
producing shrimp and tilapia
are operative successfully all
over the globe
1
2 ?
!7 I$#/ ( 8
I$+#
? ( : "F
"?; I$A$%
7
8
*$)
' *
8,5
%
Anticipated future developments
How will BFT ponds look following
another 10 years period ?
=
< !
* #
!* # #
*
* % *
4,,0 4,,4
*
* %
: # !
* 7
*
% ' #
* %'
#
# *
# *
* %I
# * * !
# # #
%
1
I
* %
# # %
%2% #
7 !4,,0
D
7 * H,5
#
3
# %
# D D
# #
#
*
%
8
* * *
$
$ %
% ##
# % # *
# %
'
* *
*
* %
"
: ! $
! # *
*
# !
$ * %
?
% *
! *
!
#
* " %
8 7