Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2019
A call for applications for ERC Advanced Grants, which provide up to €2.5 million over 5
years for an established, leading Principal Investigator (PI) to pursue a ground-breaking,
high-risk project, will open on 21st May.
The deadline is 29 August 2019 (internal deadline: 22 August).
1
The ERC uses ‘science’ and ‘scientific’ to refer to research in all disciplines, not just the natural sciences.
1
Who is eligible to apply?
There are no specific eligibility criteria with respect to academic requirements, but PIs
are expected to be active researchers who have a track-record of significant research
achievements in the last 10 years. PIs should be exceptional leaders in terms of the
originality and significance of their research contributions.
The 2019 Work Programme (pp. 25-26) provides the following benchmarks for
academic track record and leadership potential:
o 10 publications as main author in major international peer-reviewed journals
o 3 major research monographs, with at least one translated into another
language
Applications may be made in any field of research.
The PI does not necessarily need to be employed (on an established/permanent basis
or otherwise) by the host institution at the time that the proposal is submitted.
Advanced Grants support projects carried out by an individual researcher, who can
employ researchers of any nationality as team members. It is also possible to have
one or more team members located in a non-European country.
2
What is the timeline for applications?
The ERC has published the following timeline for ERC Advanced Grants in the 2019 Work
Programme.
3
What does a proposal contain?
Part A of the proposal deals with administrative data, budget, and ethical issues (where
applicable).
Part B of the proposal is the research proposal. This is split into two parts: Part B1 (further
split into the cover page, and sections a, b, and c) and Part B2 (also further split into
sections a, b, and c).
Part B1 contains (a) an extended synopsis of the research proposal (5 pages); (b) a CV of
the PI (2 pages); and (c) a ‘ten year track record’ of the PI (2 pages).
Part B2 is the research proposal itself, which must be no longer than 15 pages.
Only Part B1 is assessed at step 1 of the application process; at step two, both parts are
assessed. At step 1, the panel has no access to part B2.
4
What criteria are used to judge applications?
Proposals are evaluated in a two-step process. Evaluation is carried out by
international expert panels and reviewers.
Scientific excellence is the sole criterion of evaluation. This will be applied in terms of
the ground-breaking nature, ambition and feasibility of the project and the
intellectual capacity, creativity, and commitment of the PI.
In general, projects wholly or largely consisting in the collation and compilation of
existing material in new databases, editions or collections are unlikely to constitute
ground-breaking or ‘frontier’ research and are therefore unlikely to receive funding.
Assessment is carried out by 25 subject area panels, each covering a spread of
research areas. Applicants from Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences will normally be
assessed by one of the six Social Science and Humanities panels. Applicants may
select the panel they feel is most relevant.
The 2019 Work Programme (pp. 37-38) provides the following, more detailed criteria:
To what extent is the outlined scientific To what extent does the PI demonstrate
the level of commitment to the project
approach feasible bearing in mind the
necessary for its execution and the
extent that the proposed research is high willingness to devote a significant amount
risk/high gain (based on the Extended of time to the project (minimum 30% for
Synopsis)? Advanced and Synergy of the total
To what extent are the proposed research working time) (based on the full Scientific
methodology and working arrangements Proposal)?
appropriate to achieve the goals of the
5
project (based on the full Scientific
Proposal)?
To what extent does the proposal involve
the development of novel methodology
(based on the full Scientific Proposal)?
To what extent are the proposed
timescales and resources necessary and
properly justified (based on the full
Scientific Proposal)?
MH, 11/04/2019