The Inspector acts as a mouthpiece for Priestley to criticize the upper classes for their wrongdoings that led to Eva Smith's death, representing how capitalism turns people into objects that can be bought and sold rather than valued as human beings. He questions Mr. Birling's dismissive attitudes towards socialism and reveals the flaws in the family that represent society's anxieties about changing social structures. Sheila evolves by opposing her father, reflecting Priestley's ideas about gender equality, while Eric corrupted Eva's innocence and adopted socialist ideas, showing how the younger generation was more open-minded.
The Inspector acts as a mouthpiece for Priestley to criticize the upper classes for their wrongdoings that led to Eva Smith's death, representing how capitalism turns people into objects that can be bought and sold rather than valued as human beings. He questions Mr. Birling's dismissive attitudes towards socialism and reveals the flaws in the family that represent society's anxieties about changing social structures. Sheila evolves by opposing her father, reflecting Priestley's ideas about gender equality, while Eric corrupted Eva's innocence and adopted socialist ideas, showing how the younger generation was more open-minded.
The Inspector acts as a mouthpiece for Priestley to criticize the upper classes for their wrongdoings that led to Eva Smith's death, representing how capitalism turns people into objects that can be bought and sold rather than valued as human beings. He questions Mr. Birling's dismissive attitudes towards socialism and reveals the flaws in the family that represent society's anxieties about changing social structures. Sheila evolves by opposing her father, reflecting Priestley's ideas about gender equality, while Eric corrupted Eva's innocence and adopted socialist ideas, showing how the younger generation was more open-minded.
Position the audience in direct opposition to Mr Birling Structure of questioning Attitudes between the older and younger generation Dismissive attitude of Socialism Open minded attitude Breakdown of society The family represents anxiety and fear of new society Eva is a manifestation of the family’s wrongdoings Destructive consequences of wealth Capitalism turns people and forgiveness as something that can be bought Priestley is using the Inspector to criticise and reveal to the upper classes their sins Sheila evolves as a character when she voices her opinion and opposes her father Reflects Priestley's idea of gender equality Sheilas use of dramatic language shows her indefinite acceptance of guilt Juxtapose (shy and assertive) tells the audience that he is flawed and an outsider / creates suspicion Drinking suggests he wants to escape capitalism Eric corrupted the innocence of ‘Eve’ Eric adopts a socialst persona / demeanour / outlook Upper class ideals revolve around money Gerald does not value Eva as a human being and instead objectifies her as he only describes her physical appearance
Denied! Failing Cordelia: Parental Love and Parental-State Theft in Los Angeles Juvenile Dependency Court: Book One: the Cankered Rose and Esther's Revenge