AUTHORS:

ALEX MBOGO & EMMANUEL MAKINI

EDITOR
KIIZA HILLARY

You are free to copy or redistribute the

material in any medium or format.

All Scriptural references in this book are from the King James
Version.

i
Click to go back to Table of contents
Table Of Contents

What is a true church? ...................................................................................... 2

Is the SDA church God’s church? ...................................................................... 6
Criteria for coming out of a church. ................................................................ 18
Is the SDA church Babylon? ............................................................................ 23
Additional Remarks by Emmanuel Makini ...................................................... 26
Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 38

ii
Click to go back to Table of contents
 Introduction.

Jesus says in Matthew 16:18 that the gates of hell will not
prevail against the church that is built upon the fact that
Peter just confessed earlier in verse 16 of the same
chapter. Peter confessed that Jesus is the Son of the Living
God. All Christians ought to be a part of the church that
confesses this. Babylon is made up of false doctrines. All
sincere Christians should come out of it. This book aims at
presenting the true Church of God in contrast to Babylon and
assist the Seventh-day Adventist Christians to go back to
their early organization of their pioneers. For it is the
true church. May the Lord provide the grace of His Spirit to
enlighten every mind that reads the pages of this brief work

1
Click to go back to Table of contents
 CHAPTER I
What is a true church?

The Bible summarily puts it this way:

1 Timothy 3:15 - “But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to
behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living
God, the pillar and ground of the truth.”

The house of God, the church of the living God is the pillar and ground of the
truth. Should any church be found that is not a pillar and ground of the truth,
it is not a true church. Even common sense dictates that a church cannot
be called God’s church if it has Babylonian doctrine(s) and to
make matters worse, it pushes these doctrines down the
throats of its superstitious members.
This is a fact the reformers struggled to explain to the Catholic Church and its
adherents. Look at these declarations made by popes:

Pope Innocent III (A.D. 1198 – 1216): “With our hearts we

believe and with our lips we confess but one Church, not
that of the heretics, but the Holy Roman Catholic and
Apostolic Church, outside which we believe that no one
is saved.” (Denzinger 423)

2
Click to go back to Table of contents
 Pope Leo XII (A.D. 1823 – 1829): “We profess that there is
no salvation outside the Church. …

For the Church is the pillar and ground of the truth.

With reference to those words Augustine says: `If any
man be outside the Church he will be excluded from the
number of sons, and will not have God for Father since
he has not the Church for mother.'” (Encyclical, Ubi
Primum)

Pope Pius IX (A.D. 1846 – 1878): “It must be held by

faith that outside the Apostolic Roman Church, no one can be
saved; that this is the only ark of salvation; that he
who shall not have entered therein will perish in
the flood.” (Denzinger 1647)

The popes declared that outside the Catholic Church there is

no salvation. Pope Pius IX went further to say that the church
is “the only ark of salvation; that he who shall not have entered
therein will perish in the flood,” an argument that is today used by many
Adventists in their ship analogy of the General Conference hereafter
abbreviated as GC.
The superstitious Catholics believed that the church can be as evil as it likes yet
God will still be at the wheel. This gross presumption was countered by reformers
who uttered words that are echoed by Non- Trinitarian reformers of today.
Melanchthon for example said:
‘In the days of the Reformation, the gentle and pious Melanchthon declared,
“There is no other church than the assembly of those who have the word of
God, and who are purified by it.”’ 4SP 237.2
Amen. There is no other church than the assembly of those who have the word of
God and are purified by it. That’s why Ellen White wrote:

3
Click to go back to Table of contents
“God has a church. It is not the great cathedral, neither is it the
national establishment, neither is it the various denominations; it
is the people who love God and keep His commandments. “Where two or three
are gathered together in My name, there am I in the midst of them.” [Matthew
18:20.] Where Christ is even among the humble few, this is Christ’s
church, for the presence of the high and holy One who inhabiteth
eternity can alone constitute a church. Where two or three are present
who love and obey the commandments of God, Jesus there presides; let it be in
the desolate place of the earth, in the wilderness, in the city enclosed in prison
walls. The glory of God has penetrated the prison walls, flooding with glorious
beams of heavenly light the darkest dungeon.” 4LtMs, Lt 108, 1886, par. 17

To insist, God's church "is not the great cathedral, neither is it the national
establishment, neither is it the various denominations;"

What is it??

"It is the people who love God and keep His commandments."

When Ellen White wrote this quote, the SDA church was denominational yet she
said that God’s church is not the various denominations but “it is the people who
love God and keep His commandments...Where Christ is even among the humble
few, this is Christ’s church,”. Why? Because God’s church and its organization are
not so glued together such that when the organization apostatizes, it still remains
being God’s church. The fact that a true church has been organized into a
denomination does not mean that the denomination will still be God’s church if it
persists in apostasy. When the organization of God’s churches has apostatized,
God still has a church and it is not the apostatizing denomination but it is “the
people who love God and keep His commandments.” In other words, those
who have not gone after their denomination in doing evil.

4
Click to go back to Table of contents
That’s why we are told:

“We are not saved as a sect; no denominational name has any

virtue to bring us into favor with God. We are saved individually
as believers in the Lord Jesus Christ.” RH February 10, 1891, par. 6

Having established that God’s church is a group of people that love God and keep
His commandments, that “There is no other church than the assembly of
those who have the word of God, and who are purified by it.”, we move to
establish whether SDA is God’s church.

5
Click to go back to Table of contents
 CHAPTER II
Is the SDA church God’s church?

When the term SDA is mentioned, many minds rush to the General
Conference as the definition of the SDA church. Should this be the case?
We read:

“Christ was a Seventh-day Adventist, to all intents and

purposes. It was He who called Moses into the mount and gave him
instruction for His people.” 16LtMs, Lt 51, 1901, par. 2

Christ was an SDA. Did the General Conference exist in the

days of Christ? If Christ was an SDA, then were the disciples for He was
their master. Did the GC (General Conference) exist in the days of the
apostles? The point here friends is that being an SDA, a true SDA that
is, does not necessarily mean being part of the GC especially if the GC
is in open apostasy. Being a true SDA is being one “to all intents and
purposes” as was Christ and as were the apostles. Throughout centuries,
especially in the recent days of those we call pioneers, God has been
building the SDA church and the timbers that were laid down are not to be
removed.

“In the future, deception of every kind is to arise, and we want solid ground
for our feet. We want solid pillars for the building. Not one pin is to be
removed from that which the Lord has established.” RH May
25, 1905, par. 28

6
Click to go back to Table of contents
Throughout centuries, God has been building the fundamental principles
which we are told are not to be removed and they will be preserved.

“But the way-marks which have made us what we are, are

to be preserved, and they will be preserved, as God has signified
through His word and the testimony of His Spirit. He calls upon us to hold
firmly, with the grip of faith, to the fundamental principles
that are based upon Unquestionable authority.” SpTB02 59.1

A true SDA is one that is “a Seventh-day Adventist, to all intents and

purposes” as were the people through whom God built the fundamental
principles which will be preserved. There exists a certain class that thinks
to be at liberty not to walk in the ways of its righteous fathers and still
call itself Seventh Day Adventists. This class has a striking similarity to the
Pharisees of old. We read:

“The Pharisees had declared themselves the children of Abraham. Jesus

told them that this claim could be established only by doing
the works of Abraham. The true children of Abraham would live,
as he did, a life of obedience to God. They would not try to kill
one who was speaking the truth that was given Him from God. In plotting
against Christ, the rabbis were not doing the works of Abraham. A mere
lineal descent from Abraham was of no value. Without a
spiritual connection with him, which would be manifested in
possessing the same spirit, and doing the same works,
they were not his children.” DA 466.6

Wow. The claim of the Pharisees to be the children of Abraham could only
be established by them doing the works of Abraham. "A mere lineal
descent from Abraham was of no value." A spiritual descent is what was
needed. They had to possess the spirit of Abraham.
7
Click to go back to Table of contents
You know where am heading, a mere descent from the pioneers has no value
if you don't have their spirit, if you are not doing their works.

Read how the quote continues:

“This principle bears with equal weight upon a question that has
long agitated the Christian world, — the question of apostolic
succession. Descent from Abraham was proved, not by name and lineage,
but by likeness of character. So the apostolic succession rests not upon
the transmission of ecclesiastical authority, but upon spiritual
relationship. A life actuated by the apostles’ spirit, the belief and
teaching of the truth they taught, this is the true evidence of apostolic
succession. This is what constitutes men the successors of the first teachers
of the gospel.” DA 467.1

I can replace some words in the quote to bring more clarity to the context of
our study:

“This principle bears with equal weight upon a question that has long agitated
the Non/Pro Trinity camps, —the question of pioneers' succession.
Descent from Abraham was proved, not by name and lineage, but by
likeness of character. So the pioneers' succession rests not upon the
transmission of ecclesiastical authority, but upon spiritual relationship. A
life actuated by the pioneers’ spirit, the belief and teaching of
the truth they taught, this is the true evidence of pioneers’
succession. This is what constitutes men the successors of the first
teachers of the full three angels’ message.” DA 467.1

8
Click to go back to Table of contents
True apostolic succession rests upon:

1. A life actuated by the apostles’ spirit.

2. Belief and teaching of what the apostles taught.

True SDA succession also rests upon the above criteria which is, living a life
actuated by the pioneers’ spirit and believing and teaching what the
pioneers taught. That’s why we were advised thus:

“When men come in who would move one pin or pillar from the
foundation which God has established by His Holy Spirit,
LET THE AGED MEN WHO WERE PIONEERS IN OUR WORK
SPEAK PLAINLY, and let those who are dead speak also by reprinting
of their articles in our periodicals. Gather up the rays of divine light
that God has given as He has led His people on step by step in the way of
truth. This truth will stand the test of time and trial.” 20LtMs,
Ms 62, 1905, par. 20

In this group, we have quoted the pioneers multiple times and we have seen
that the Non-Trinitarian doctrine of the one True God was held unanimously
by them. This is summarily shown in the opening words of the 1872
Fundamental Principles. We read:

“In presenting to the public this synopsis of our faith, we wish to have it
distinctly understood that we have no articles of faith, creed, or discipline,
aside from the Bible. We do not put forth this as having any authority with
our people, nor is it designed to secure uniformity among them, as a system
of faith, but is a brief statement of what is, and has been,
with great unanimity, held by them.” FP1872 3.1
9
Click to go back to Table of contents
The Fundamental Principles were with great unanimity held by the pioneers.
The first two read:
—I—

That there is one God, a personal, spiritual being, the

creator of all things, omnipotent, omniscient, and eternal, infinite in
wisdom, holiness, justice, goodness, truth, and mercy; unchangeable, and
everywhere present by his representative, the Holy Spirit.
Psalm 139:7 FP1872 4.2
And
—II—

That there is one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Eternal
Father, the one by whom God created all things, and by whom they do
consist; FP1872 4.3

Thus were the beliefs in the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit stated, the Father
being the one God, Jesus being the son of the Eternal Father and the Holy Spirit being
the representative of God. These Fundamental principles we are told to cling to:

“But the waymarks which have made us what we are to be preserved, and
they will be preserved, as God has signified through His Word and the
testimonies of His Spirit. He calls upon us to hold firmly, with the grip of faith, to
the fundamental principles that are based upon unquestionable authority.” 20LtMs, Lt
95, 1905, par. 3

Ellen White spoke of a new organization that would give up the

Fundamental Principles that were given to the pioneer church. We
read:

10
Click to go back to Table of contents
“The enemy of souls has sought to bring in the supposition that a great
reformation was to take place among Seventh-day Adventists, and that this
reformation would consist in giving up the doctrines which stand
as the pillars of our faith, and engaging in a process of reorganization.
Were this reformation to take place, what would result? The principles of
truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be
discarded. Our religion would be changed.
The fundamental principles that have sustained the work
for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A
new organization would be established. Books of a new
order would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy would be
introduced. The founders of this system would go into the cities, and do a
wonderful work. The Sabbath, of course, would be lightly
regarded, as also the God who created it. Nothing would be
allowed to stand in the way of the new movement. The leaders would teach
that virtue is better than vice, but God being removed, they would place
their dependence on human power, which, without God, is worthless. Their
foundation would be built on the sand, and storm and
tempest would sweep away the structure.” SpTB02 54.3

We get that if a great reformation were to take place, the following would
happen:

1. The doctrines that stand as pillars of our faith will be discarded.

(‘Our faith’ is the faith of the pioneer church for this statement was
written in 1904).
2. A reorganization will take place.
3. The principles of truth will be discarded.

11
Click to go back to Table of contents
4. SDA religion will be changed.
5. The Fundamental Principles that have sustained the church for
the past 50 years (1854-1904) will be accounted as errors.
6. Books of a new order will be written.
7. The Sabbath will be lightly regarded.
8. God will be removed.
9. The foundation will be built on sand and tempest will sweep
away the structures.

I will especially highlight the following points:

“Our religion would be changed”

What is ‘our religion’? It is the SDA religion. We are told that the SDA
religion would be changed. Has this happened? How is religion changed? Religion
is changed obviously when an idol is erected in the place of God and this, the GC
has fulfilled especially by adopting the pagan Trinity
doctrine, a god that was not known by its fathers. GC SDA’s
historians put it this way:

“Some Adventists today think, that our beliefs have

remained unchanged over the years, or they seek to turn back the
clock to some point when we had everything just right. But all attempts to
recover such “historic Adventism” fail in view of the facts of our
heritage.” {Adventist Review Jan 6, 1994 p. 10, written by William G.
Johnson, Editor of the Adventist Review, Article “Present Truth – Walking
in God’s Light”.}

12
Click to go back to Table of contents
Dear GC Adventist, don’t think that your beliefs have remained
unchanged over the years.

“Most of the founders of Seventh-day Adventism would not

be able to join the church today if they had to subscribe to
the denomination’s Fundamental Beliefs. More specifically,
most would not be able to agree to belief number 2, which
deals with the doctrine of the trinity.” (George R. Knight–
professor of church history at the Theological Seminary, Andrews University,
Berrien Springs, Michigan; Ministry, October, 1993, p. 10)

GC admits that most of its founders would not be able to join the church.
Some of us too after awakening to the great deception that had taken place
could not continue staying in the church unless for the purpose of blowing
the whistle, a job that cost many respect and reputation.
“The Development of the Trinity doctrine demonstrates that sometimes
doctrinal changes require the passing of a previous generation. For Seventh-
day Adventists, it took over 50 years for the doctrine of the
Trinity to become normative.” Burt, Merlin D. (2006) “History of
Seventh-day Adventist Views on the Trinity,” Journal of the Adventist
Theological Society: Vol. 17: Iss. 1, Article 9. (P. 139)

“That most of the leading SDA pioneers were non-

Trinitarian in their theology has become accepted Adventist
history. Either the pioneers were wrong and the present church is right, or the
pioneers were right and the present Seventh-day Adventist Church has apostatized from
biblical truth.” {Jerry Moon “The Trinity” p. 190}
It is either you member of GC SDA or the pioneers that is serving an idol.

“One of the remarkable aspects of the history of the Seventh-day Adventist

Church is the development of the position of the trinity and the deity of
Christ. These doctrines did not become normative in the church until

13
Click to go back to Table of contents
the middle of the twentieth century”. (Merlin Burt, ‘Demise of Semi-
Arianism and anti-trinitarianism in Adventist theology, 1888-1957-page iv
‘Preface’).
It is in the middle of the 20th century that is in the 1950s, that the Trinity
doctrine became normative in the SDA church.

“The church gradually shifted during from the 1930s to

1950s to the ‘orthodox’ Christian view on the trinity and
deity of Christ . . . .During the 1940s an ever increasing majority of the
church was believing in the eternal underived deity of Christ and the trinity,
yet there were some who held back even actively resisted the change.” (Ibid,
pages 47- 48)
Yes, between 1930 and 1950, the church shifted to the Orthodox view of
God. Orthodox means mainstream or that that is accepted by most
Christians. GC SDA thus adopted the gods of her neighbours.
In light of these statements made by GC and its prominent members, who
can doubt that GC SDA has changed gods?

Jeremiah 2:11 - “Hath a nation changed their gods, which are

yet no gods? But my people have changed their glory for that which doth
not profit.” and aren’t we astonished? Vs 12, “Be astonished, O
ye heavens, at this, and be horribly afraid, be ye very desolate, saith the Lord.”

“The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last
fifty years would be accounted as error.”
Many GC SDAs unblushingly state that the pioneers were wrong on the
doctrine of God. The doctrine of God which they unanimously
subscribed to and eventually put in writing in the 1872 Declaration
of Fundamental Principles is called an error by many poor souls. In

14
Click to go back to Table of contents
the place of this true doctrine of God is a philosophical idol that destroys the
identity of God.
“The Sabbath, of course, would be lightly regarded”
Of course a Sabbath is more than lightly regarded when congregants gather
to worship a false god. Isn’t this an insult to the Lord of the Sabbath? See
Ezekiel 20:16,24,30 and James 2:10. Why desecrate His day with idols?

“but God being removed, they would place their dependence on

human power, which, without God, is worthless.”

‘but God being removed,’ and indeed He has been removed and an SDA
historian testifies:
“The church gradually shifted during from the 1930s to 1950s to the
‘orthodox’ Christian view on the trinity and deity of Christ . . .. During
the 1940s an ever increasing majority of the church was believing in the
eternal underived deity of Christ and the trinity, yet there were some who
held back even actively resisted the change.” (Merlin Burt, ‘Demise of Semi-
Arianism and anti-trinitarianism in Adventist theology, pages 47-48)

And another one says:

“That most of the leading SDA pioneers were non-Trinitarian in their

theology has become accepted Adventist history. Either the pioneers were
wrong and the present church is right, or the pioneers were right and
the present Seventh-day Adventist Church has apostatized from biblical
truth.” {Jerry Moon “The Trinity” p. 190}
GC SDA has put the Trinity idol in the place of the True God. “Hath a
nation changed their gods, which are yet no gods? but my people have
changed their glory for that which doth not profit.”
15
Click to go back to Table of contents
“Their foundation would be built on the sand, and storm and tempest
would sweep away the structure”

“A knowledge of God is the foundation of all true education

and of all true service. It is the only real safeguard against temptation. It is
this alone that can make us like God in character.” MH 409.2
As a true knowledge of God is the foundation of all true education, true
doctrines that is, a false knowledge of God is the foundation of all false
education, false doctrines that is. The Catholic Church states:
“The mystery of the Holy Trinity is the most fundamental of our faith. On it
everything else depends and from it everything else derives.
Hence the Church’s constant concern to safeguard the revealed truth that
God is One in nature and Three in Persons.”
https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/culture/catholic-contributions/
catholic-doctrine-on-the-holy-trinity.html

GC's and RCC's Trinity foundation is built on sand and it is a matter of time
before the structure is swept away.

To summarize this section, I will say that the SDA that is God’s church is that
which:

1. Is the pillar and ground of the truth.

2. Keeps the commandments of God and have the faith of Jesus.

The GC SDA does not meet any of the above criteria for it is not a pillar and
ground of the truth. The foundation of its education is not a true knowledge
of God. The GC also does not keep the commandments of God for it breaks
16
Click to go back to Table of contents
the 1st commandment with a zeal almost equal with which it keeps the 4th.
“For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point,
he is guilty of all.” James 2:10.
Yes, the GC teaches to the world the 4th commandment while ensuring that
its members break the 1st one. A member shall be disfellowshipped if he
professes a
“Denial of faith in the fundamentals of the gospel and in the fundamental
beliefs of the Church or teaching doctrines contrary to the same” (SDA
Church Manual pg. 62)
And the Trinity is the 2nd Fundamental Belief.

17
Click to go back to Table of contents
 CHAPTER III
Criteria for coming out of a church.
Babylonian doctrines are the criteria number one for coming out of a church.
‘In the days of the Reformation, the gentle and pious Melanchthon declared,
“There is no other church than the assembly of those who have the word of
God, and who are purified by it.” Adventists, seeing that the
churches rejected the testimony of God's word, could no
longer regard them as constituting the church of Christ,
“the pillar and ground of the truth;” and as the message,
“Babylon is fallen,” began to be proclaimed, they felt
themselves justified in separating from their former
connection.’ 4SP 237.2

A rejection of the testimonies of God’s words is akin to choosing to cling to

Babylonian doctrines and when this happened, the Adventists “felt
themselves justified in separating from their former
connection.”

Read this counsel in regards to doctor Kellogg:

‘The work would not have been hindered, as it has been for the past several
years, if Dr. Kellogg were a converted man. “Come,” I call, “come ye
out and be separate from him and his associates whom he
has leavened.” I am now giving the message God has given me, to give to
all who claim to believe the truth, “Come ye out from among them, and be
separate,” else their sin in justifying wrongs and framing deceits will continue
to be the ruin of souls. [2 Corinthians 6:17.] We cannot afford to be on the wrong
side. We cannot afford to cover the truth with scientific

18
Click to go back to Table of contents
problems.’ 21LtMs, Ms 21, 1906, par. 20

Dr. Kellogg’s mistake was?

“You are not definitely clear on the personality of God, which

is everything to us as a people. You have virtually destroyed the
Lord God Himself.” 18LtMs, Lt 300, 1903, par. 7

Kellogg was not clear on the personality of God and his teaching of his newly
found faith prompted the words, “Come,” I call, “come ye out and be
separate from him and his associates whom he has
leavened.” If your church pastor is not clear on the personality of God, the advice
is clear, “Come,” I call, “come ye out and be separate from
him and his associates whom he has leavened.”

God hates it when we go to sit with those that are absorbing error let alone
preaching it. We read:

“I was shown the necessity of those who believe that we are having the
last message of mercy, being separate from those who are daily
imbibing new errors. I saw that neither young nor old should attend
their meetings; for it is wrong to thus encourage them while
they teach error that is a deadly poison to the soul and teach
for doctrines the commandments of men. The influence of such
gatherings is not good. If God has delivered us from such darkness
and error, we should stand fast in the liberty wherewith He has set us free and
rejoice in the truth. God is displeased with us when we go to
listen to error, without being obliged to go; for unless He sends us to
those meetings where error is forced home to the people by the power of the
will, He will not keep us. The angels cease their watchful
care over us, and we are left to the buffetings of the
19
Click to go back to Table of contents
enemy, to be darkened and weakened by him and the
power of his evil angels; and the light around us becomes
contaminated with the darkness.” EW 124.3

We get these points:

a) We are to separate from those that are

imbibing/drinking new errors.
b) Neither young nor old should attend their meetings.

c) It is wrong to encourage by our attendance those

that teach for doctrines the commandments of men. These
commandments of men include the Trinity idolatry and
Sunday sacredness.

d) We are to go to those meetings ONLY when God has

sent us of course to blow the trumpet, not to sit to
continue imbibing errors in the name of politeness or unity.

e) When without God’s bidding we attend the meetings

of those that drink error from the pulpit, the truth in us
becomes contaminated. We have seen the fire of those that
burnt with the One True God message being extinguished
simply because of sacrificing truth for the sake of peace
and unity.

The choice of separating from erroneous companies has always been difficult
for a number of God’s people. Listen to Martin Luther:

20
Click to go back to Table of contents
“Yet it was not without a terrible struggle with himself that
Luther decided upon a final separation from the church. It
was about this time that he wrote: “I feel more and more every day
how difficult it is to lay aside the scruples which one has
imbibed in childhood. Oh, how much pain it has caused me,
though I had the Scriptures on my side, to justify it to
myself that I should dare to make a stand alone against
the pope, and hold him forth as antichrist! What have the
tribulations of my heart not been! How many times have I
not asked myself with bitterness that question which was
so frequent on the lips of the papists: ‘Art thou alone wise?
Can everyone else be mistaken? How will it be, if, after all,
it is thyself who art wrong, and who art involving in thy
error so many souls, who will then be eternally damned?’
‘Twas so I fought with myself and with Satan, till Christ, by
His own infallible word, fortified my heart against these
doubts.” —Martyn, pages 372, 373. GC 143.1

It is so potent that I have highlighted a good chunk of it. Non Trinitarians we

are weak, defective etc and we are often asked, ‘Art thou alone wise?’
We have the Bible and SOP on our side to justify us yet the Truth has brought us
pain that some of us had not foreseen in the excitement of being lifted from
error.

Yet we are comforted because God's promise to the true church is sure:
"The church may appear as about to fall, but it does not fall." 4LtMs,
Lt 55, 1886, par. 18.

“I was pointed to those who claim to be Adventists, but who reject

the present truth, and saw that they were crumbling and that the hand of the
Lord was in their midst to divide and scatter them now in the gathering time,
21
Click to go back to Table of contents
so that the precious jewels among them, who have formerly been deceived,
may have their eyes opened to see their true state. And now when the
truth is presented to them by the Lord's messengers, they
are prepared to listen, and see its beauty and harmony,
and to leave their former associates and errors, embrace
the precious truth and stand where they can define their
position.” EW 69.2

The message is about a different group of Adventists that had rejected the 4th
commandment but the principle still applies to those that
reject the 1st. “And now when the truth is presented to
them by the Lord's messengers, they are prepared to
listen, and see its beauty and harmony, and to leave their
former associates and errors, embrace the precious truth
and stand where they can define their position.”

So to end this section, we are to come out from a church if it fulfills the
following conditions:

a) Its leaders teach error.

b) Its members imbibe error.

22
Click to go back to Table of contents
 CHAPTER IV
Is the SDA church Babylon?
The answer to this question depends on which SDA you are
referring to. If it is the SDA which has a Spiritual relationship with the old
organization, the answer is NO. That SDA is not Babylon and will never be
Babylon for it is a commandment keeping body of God’s people.

However, if you are referring to the GC SDA, then the answer is YES.
GC SDA is Babylon, or a harlot rather, for it has joined her
neighbours in harlotry.
Jeremiah 3:1 - “They say, if a man put away his wife, and she go from him,
and become another man's, shall he return unto her again? Shall not that land
be greatly polluted? but thou hast played the harlot with many
lovers; yet return again to me, saith the Lord.”
The GC SDA church has played the harlot with three yet one lover(s). Unless
she returns to the God whom she has removed, she shall remain being a
harlot.

Ezekiel 16:28 - “Thou hast played the whore also with the Assyrians,
because thou wast unsatiable; yea, thou hast played the harlot with
them, and yet couldest not be satisfied.”

Based on how harshly the GC denounces those that teach against a Trinity
idol, we can rightly judge that she is yet to be satisfied with
harlotry.
What does the messenger of God say?

23
Click to go back to Table of contents
“The Lord Jesus will always have a chosen people to serve
Him. When the Jewish people rejected Christ, the Prince of life, He took
from them the kingdom of God and gave it unto the Gentiles. God will
continue to work on this principle with every branch of His
work. When a church proves unfaithful to the Word of the
Lord, whatever their position may be, however high and
sacred their calling, the Lord can no longer work with them.
Others are then chosen to bear important responsibilities. But
if these in turn do not purify their lives from every wrong
action; if they do not establish pure and holy principles in all
their borders, then the Lord will grievously afflict and humble
them and, unless they repent, will remove them from their
place and make them a reproach.” 18LtMs, Ms 33, 1903, par. 13

It is so powerful that I have bolded almost the whole of it.

Anyone that attended grade three and knows how to read can see that
“When a church proves unfaithful to the Word of the Lord,
whatever their position may be, however high and sacred
their calling, the Lord can no longer work with them.
Others are then chosen to bear important responsibilities.”
It doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter what your position is or
how high and sacred your calling is. When you start playing the harlotry, God
sends Elijahs and you punish them, God will remove the high
state of honor from you. Quit the papal pride that urges people to stay
in a sinking ship declaring that outside the church no soul shall be saved.

Pope Pius IX (A.D. 1846 – 1878): “It must be held by faith that
outside the Apostolic Roman Church, no one can be saved; that this is the only
ark of salvation; that he who shall not have entered therein
will perish in the flood.” (Den zinger 1647)

24
Click to go back to Table of contents
As of now, GC SDA is a daughter to Babylon/Mother of harlots
and thus it is Babylon by inheritance. Unless Babylon is healed,
she will continue being Babylon. Will she be healed? Will these
words be fulfilled for her? Jeremiah 51:9 - “We would have healed
Babylon, but she is not healed: forsake her, and let us go every one
into his own country: for her judgment reacheth unto heaven, and is lifted up
even to the skies.”

25
Click to go back to Table of contents
 CHAPTER V
Additional Remarks by Emmanuel Makini
When we read the statements of Ellen White, people think they are at liberty
to explain them as they like. But the writer says this of her writings:

"Regarding the testimonies, nothing is ignored; nothing is cast aside; but

time and place must be considered. Nothing must be done untimely.
Some matters must be withheld because some persons would make an
improper use of the light given. Every jot and tittle is essential and must
appear at an opportune time. In the past, the testimonies were carefully
prepared before they were sent out for publication. And all matter is still
carefully studied after the first writing. 1SM 57.2.
The same principle applies when it comes to the identity of the true Church
and of Babylon. What are the things that would make a church to be called
Babylon and what are the things that could make a church be called the true
Church?
Can a church in apostasy be called the true Church or does it have to repent
first?
Does God have respect to any organizational name?
What If the church turns to worship another god? As I read my Bible I notice the
following:
1. Satan was part of the church of the first born above but when he and
his sympathizers apostatized, they were cast out of heaven when they refused
to repent.
2. Adam and Eve were cast out of the garden of God due to apostasy.
3. Cain was cast out of God's presence due to apostasy.
4. The antediluvians were destroyed due to apostasy and so was Sodom,
Gomorrah and the idolatrous heathen nations.

26
Click to go back to Table of contents
The conclusion from the above points is that God is not a respector of
persons. "For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down

to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto

judgment; And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a
preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the
ungodly; And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes
condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those
that after should live ungodly;"

Does the same principle apply to those who proclaimed to be worshippers of

God?
Let's consider Israel:
At the foot of Sinai, God entered into a covenant relationship with Israel but
we notice that for Israel to be God's chosen people, they had to obey him.
We notice the usage of “if…. then"

"Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant,

then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth
is mine" Exodus 19:5.

When Israel was in apostasy did they remain God's chosen people? Or did
they have to repent first? Nobody is God's child if he lives in
disobedience. Every time Israel was in apostasy, God's protection was
withdrawn and the Philistines, Assyrians, Moabites etc plundered them.
When they repented God was merciful. (Read the book of judges). The
apostasy was so great till they had to be dispersed in Assyria and Judah was
taken captive in Babylon. By the time Christ came, the Jewish religion was
very different. Christ labored for them and at last he had to give them up and
say, "behold your house is left unto you desolate". The ministry of Christ was

27
Click to go back to Table of contents
self-supported. He did not depend on the Sanhedrin. The disciples were
called out and Christ set up his church on earth.

Was the church set up by Christ and the apostles ever in apostasy? Christ said
that the gates of hell could never prevail against his church. What church did
he refer to? Paul said that after his departing grievous/ravening wolves would
come not sparing the flock. Did this happen? If this happened, then how true
was Christ's word?

We notice that when the apostles died, others arose who knew not God and
errors were introduced into the mainstream church. Those who were true to
God were pushed out and the church became "the church of the wilderness".
The mainstream church or universal church claimed to be the true Church
but did God regard them so? The true Church was the church in the
wilderness. The Catholic Church could not be the church of God.

When the apostasy of the Catholic Church reached fever

pitch, God called out a people and the reformation began.
Those who came out of the apostate church became part of
the true Church but again after the leaders of the
reformation died, the churches apostatized and God called
out a people called the Millerites.

We see one principle: irregardless of position, gifts and status any church that
proved unfaithful had to be cast out. God could not work with that church or
through that church.

The remnants of the millerites became organized into SDAs in the 1860s. The
question is, if this church became unfaithful, will God ignore that
unfaithfulness and work with them or will he work through the same
28
Click to go back to Table of contents
principle he worked with from beginning? I think that if SDA proved
unfaithful, if God was to work with it irregardless of it's unfaithfulness then
God has changed. But because God changes not, if the church became
unfaithful, the church must repent first if God would work with it.

What is SDA? And who are Seventh Day Adventists?

The word Adventist is from the roots word Advent which according to
Webster means "second coming of Christ". All those that wait the second
coming are called Adventists. The movement called "the millerites" was often
called "great Advent movement". And all those associated with it became to
be called Adventists. Those that accepted the Sabbath were called Sabbath or
Seventh day Adventists while those that rejected the Sabbath were called first
day Adventists. The main features of first day Adventists are:
1. They united with apostate churches in opposing the work of sister
white. 1 SM 69.4
2. Time setting 1T 73.1
3. Bitterest foes to S. D Adventists 1 TT 429.3.
4. Against the law (including Sabbath)
5. Strongly opposed to church order.

We'll say something on church order. Many first day Adventists and even
seventh day Adventists were opposed to church organization for they had
seen the results of denominationalism in the churches they came from. But in
the 50s and 60s the pioneers saw that for the purpose of the work of the third
angel to move forward, organization was indispensable.
"As our numbers increased, it was evident that without
some form of organization there would be great confusion,
and the work would not be carried forward successfully. To

29
Click to go back to Table of contents
provide for the support of the ministry, for carrying the
work in new fields, for protecting both the churches and
the ministry from unworthy members, for holding church
property, for the publication of the truth through the press,
and for many other objects, organization was
indispensable". TM 26.2
The name that was settled for this new organization was Seventh-Day
Adventists. A name that describes what we are. Those that keep the
commandments of God and have the faith of Jesus. The work for the
Seventh-Day Adventists is one to proclaim the third angel's message.

"Let every Seventh-day Adventist ask himself, "What can I do to proclaim the
third angel's message?" ChS 145.2. But in order to proclaim this message we
needed to have a firm platform.

The church was built on strong foundations and firm principles among them:

1. The sanctuary message including the 2300 days and

investigative judgement.
"The subject of the sanctuary should be carefully examined, as it lies at the
foundation of our faith and hope."— J. S. White, The Advent Review.
2. Personality of God and Christ.
"Those who try to bring in theories that would remove the pillars of our faith
concerning the sanctuary or concerning the personality of God or of Christ are
working as blind men. They are seeking to bring in uncertainties and to set the
people of God adrift without an anchor". YRP 235.4.

3. Righteousness by faith incorporating the

commandments of God and faith of Jesus. This message
includes both proclamation of the gospel and tracing out
the application of the prophecies that bring us to the third
angel's message.
30
Click to go back to Table of contents
For us to define Seventh-Day Adventists we ought to look at the distinctive
features of Adventism. We read. "Not as though the word of God hath taken
none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel" Romans 9:6. "For
he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly ..... But he is a Jew, which is one
inwardly" Romans 2:28-29. Again, "Neither, because they are the seed of
Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is,
they which are the children of the flesh, these are not

the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the
seed." Again, "Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are
the children of Abraham." Paul was echoing the words of Christ, "If ye were
Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.” In short a true
adventist is not counted by the virtue of birth into the organization or by his
words that he is an Adventist but rather by the faith? So what is the faith of
Adventism?

"One thing it is certain is soon to be realized, —the great apostasy, which is

developing and increasing and waxing stronger, and will continue to do so
until the Lord shall descend from heaven with a shout. We are to hold
fast the first principles of our denominated faith, and go
forward from strength to increased faith. Ever we are to
keep the faith that has been substantiated by the Holy
Spirit of God from the earlier events of our experience until
the present time. We need now larger breadth, and deeper, more
earnest, unwavering faith in the leadings of the Holy Spirit. If we needed the
manifest proof of the Holy Spirit's power to confirm truth in the beginning,
after the passing of the time, we need today all the evidence in the
confirmation of the truth, when souls are departing from the faith and giving
heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils. There must not be any
languishing of soul now. SpTB07 57.1

31
Click to go back to Table of contents
If we want to find the true Adventist, we must compare the belief to the first
principles of the denominated faith. If they are a match, then that is a true
Adventist. If they are out of harmony that is not a true Adventist. If the
principles of the GC are in harmony with our fundamental principles, then
that's not Babylon. If they are out of harmony, then it is Babylon. If a
ministry is in harmony with the fundamental principles, then it is not
Babylon. If it's out of harmony, then it is Babylon.
"The principles of truth that God has revealed to us are our only true foundation 1 SM
201.

"This foundation was built by the Master Worker, and will stand storm and tempest
(Ibid., p. 204).

"We have our Bibles. We have our experience, attested to by the miraculous
working of the Holy Spirit. We have a truth that admits of no compromise.
Shall we not repudiate everything that is not in harmony with this truth?
(Ibid.,p. 205)?

"The principles for which we fought in the early days . . . were brought out in the power
of the Holy Spirit (Ibid., p. 206).

"Messages of every order and kind have been urged upon Seventh-day
Adventists, to take the place of the truth which, point by point, has been
sought out by prayerful study, and testified to by the miracle-working power
of the Lord. But the waymarks which have made us what we are, are to be preserved,
and they will be preserved, as God has signified through His Word and the
testimony of His Spirit. He calls upon us to hold firmly, with the grip of faith, to the
fundamental principles that are based upon unquestionable authority. (Ibid.,p. 208).

32
Click to go back to Table of contents
"The truths given us after the passing of the time in 1844 are
just as certain and unchangeable as when the Lord gave them
to us in an answer to our urgent prayers. The visions that the Lord
has given me are so remarkable that we know that what we have accepted is
the truth. This was demonstrated by the Holy Spirit. Light, precious light from
God, established the main points of our faith as we hold them today. (Manuscript
Releases, vol. 1, p. 53; Letter 50, 1906).

"We can confidently say, the truth that has come to us through the Holy
Spirit’s working is not a lie. The evidences given for the last half century bear the
evidence of the Spirit’s power. (The Paulson Collection of Ellen
G. White Letters, p. 257).
"Ever we are to keep the faith that has been substantiated by the Holy Spirit of God
from the earlier events of our experience until the present time. (The Upward Look, p.
352; December 4, 1905).

For anyone to say whether the Seventh - day Adventist church today is
Babylon or not, we need to compare what the church believes today and the
foundation principles. The question is does the church today stand on the
same foundation principles as it stood on in 1900?

Some statements to be considered alongside those shared that the church is

not Babylon

"The voice from Battle Creek, which has been regarded as authority in
counseling how the work should be done, is no longer the voice of God. —
Manuscript Releases 17:185 (1896).

33
Click to go back to Table of contents
It has been some years since I have considered the General Conference as the
voice of God. —Manuscript Releases 17:216 (1898).
That these men should stand in a sacred place, to be as the voice of God to
the people, as we once believed the General Conference to be—that is past. —
The General Conference Bulletin, April 3, 1901, p. 25. LDE 50.2 -
LDE 50.4

"I was confirmed in all I had stated in Minneapolis that a reformation must
go through the churches. Reforms must be made, for spiritual weakness and
blindness were upon the people who had been blessed with great light and
precious opportunities and privileges. As reformers they had come out of the
denominational churches, but they now act a part similar to that which the
churches acted. We hoped that there would not be the
necessity for another coming out. While we will endeavor to keep
the "unity of the Spirit" in the bonds of peace, we will not with pen or voice
cease to protest against bigotry 6LtMs, Ms 30, 1889, par. 14

For any fair and honest analysis we should compare these statements and
those produced earlier on that SDA can never be Babylon so that we get a
full picture.
I had a question about the current study and I hope it will assist us all.

What qualifies a church to be called Babylon? Or what features should be

considered when calling a church Babylon?

I'm looking at the second angel's message:

"And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen,

that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of
her fornication."
34
Click to go back to Table of contents
"As the churches refused to receive the first angel's message, they rejected the
light from heaven and fell from the favor of God. They trusted to their own
strength, and by opposing the first message placed themselves where they
could not see the light of the second angel's message. But the beloved of
God, who were oppressed, accepted the message, “Babylon is fallen,” and left
the churches. Near the close of the second angel's message, [See Appendix.] I
saw a great light from heaven shining upon the people of God. The rays of
this light seemed bright as the sun. And I heard the voices of angels crying,
“Behold, the Bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet Him!”" EW 237.2 - EW
238.1.

The second angel's message was fulfilled in 1844. And the churches called
Babylon are the apostate protestant churches.
We read that the second angel's message does not refer to Rome
"The message of Revelation 14 announcing the fall of Babylon, must apply to
religious bodies that were once pure and have become corrupt. Since this
message follows the warning of the Judgment, it must be given in the last
days, therefore it cannot refer to the Romish Church, for that
church has been in a fallen condition for many centuries.
GC88 382.3
Again I read Revelation 18:2
"And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen,
is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a
cage of every unclean and hateful bird."

The angel in Revelation 18:2 sounds a while later than the second
angel of Revelation 14. We notice a comment.
"I saw angels hurrying to and fro in heaven, descending to the earth, and
again ascending to heaven, preparing for the fulfillment of some important
35
Click to go back to Table of contents
event. Then I saw another mighty angel commissioned to descend to the
earth, to unite his voice with the third angel, and give power and force to his
message. Great power and glory were imparted to the angel, and as he
descended, the earth was lightened with his glory. The light which attended
this angel penetrated everywhere, as he cried mightily, with a strong voice,
"Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils,
and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful
bird." The message of the fall of Babylon, as given by the
second angel, is repeated, with the additional mention of
the corruptions which have been entering the churches
since 1844. The work of this angel comes in at the right time to join in the
last great work of the third angel's message as it swells to a loud cry. And the
people of God are thus prepared to stand in the hour of temptation, which
they are soon to meet. I saw a great light resting upon them, and they united
to fearlessly proclaim the third angel's message. EW 277.1

The angel in Revelation 18 gives the declaration that Babylon is fallen but
gives additional message including the corruptions which have been
entering the churches since 1844. Is Seventh day Adventists
included among these churches that have corruptions entering since 1844?

"Furthermore, in the eighteenth chapter of the Revelation, in a message

which is yet future, the people of God are called upon to
come out of Babylon. According to this scripture, many of
God's people must still be in Babylon. And in what religious
bodies are the greater part of the followers of Christ now to
be found? Without doubt, in the various churches
professing the Protestant faith. At the time of their rise, these
churches took a noble stand for God and the truth, and his blessing was with
them. Even the unbelieving world was constrained to acknowledge the
beneficent results that followed an acceptance of the principles of the gospel.
In the words of the prophet to Israel, "Thy renown went forth among the

36
Click to go back to Table of contents
heathen for thy beauty; for it was perfect through my comeliness, which I had
put upon thee, saith the Lord God." But they fell by the same desire which
was the curse and ruin of Israel, —the desire of imitating the practices and
courting the friendship of the ungodly. "Thou didst trust in thine own beauty,
and playedst the harlot because of thy renown."
Many of the Protestant churches are following Rome's example of iniquitous
connection with "the kings of the earth;" the State churches, by their relation
to secular governments, and other denominations by seeking the favor of the
world. And the term Babylon—confusion—may be
appropriately applied to these bodies, all professing to
derive their doctrines from the Bible, yet divided into
almost innumerable sects, with widely conflicting creeds
and theories. GC88 382.3 - GC88 383.1.

We are told that the fall of Babylon predicted in Revelation 18 was yet future
in the year 1888. But this message was to include the corruptions that have
been entering into the churches since 1844. The churches here referred are
those that claim the "protestant faith". And what is the

Protestant faith? Sola scriptura. Is the Seventh - day Adventist church

included in this list

37
Click to go back to Table of contents
 CHAPTER VI
Conclusion
‘Of those who boast of their light, and yet fail to walk in it, Christ says, “But
I say unto you, it shall be more tolerable for Tyre and
Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you. And thou,
Capernaum [Seventh- day Adventists, who have had great
light], which art exalted unto heaven [in point of privilege],
shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have
been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until
this day. But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable for the
land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.” RH
August 1, 1893, par. 5

38
Click to go back to Table of contents