Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 4 - Optical Fiber Communication - WWW - Rgpvnotes.in
Unit 4 - Optical Fiber Communication - WWW - Rgpvnotes.in
The revenue we generate from the ads we show on our website and app
funds our services. The generated revenue helps us prepare new notes
and improve the quality of existing study materials, which are
available on our website and mobile app.
If you don't use our website and app directly, it will hurt our revenue,
and we might not be able to run the services and have to close them.
So, it is a humble request for all to stop sharing the study material we
provide on various apps. Please share the website's URL instead.
Downloaded from www.rgpvnotes.in, whatsapp: 8989595022
2) Dark Current Noise: When there is no optical power incident on the photodetector a small
reverse leakage current still flows from the device terminals. This dark current contributes to the total
system noise and gives random fluctuations flow of the photocurrent. Thus the dark current noise is
given by: id2 = 2eBId. where, e is the charge on an electron and Id is the dark current. It may be
reduced by careful design and fabrication of the detector.
3) Quantum Noise:
The quantum behavior of electromagnetic radiation must be taken into account at optical frequencies
since hf > KT and quantum fluctuations dominate over thermal fluctuations. The detection of light by
a photodiode is a discrete process, and the signal emerging from the detector is dictated by the
statistics of photon arrivals. Hence the statistics for monochromatic coherent radiation arriving at a
detector follow a discrete probability distribution which is independent of the number of photons
previously detected. It is found that the probability P(z) of detecting z photons in time period τ when
it is expected on average to detect zm photons obeys the Poission distribution:
𝑍𝑧
P(z) = 𝑍!𝑚 exp
(−𝑍𝑚 ) where zm is equal to the variance of the probability distribution.
Zm = Po / hf where, [Po/ hf] is the electron rate re generate by the incident photon.
Photodetector Amplifier
Figure 4.3: Block schematic of front end of an optical receiver showing the various
sources of noise
RL
Ra AMP
hf Cd Ca
Detector Amplifier
Figure 4.4: Equivalent circuit for the front end of an optical fiber receiver
From figure 4.4, Ca is effective input capacitance, Ra is the resistance of an amplifier, Cd is detector
capacitance.
The two main sources of noise in photodiodes without internal gain are dark current noise and
quantum noise. Both of which are regarded as shot noise on the photocurrent and is given as:
i2TS = 2eB (Ip+ Id) where , e is the charge on an electron, Id is the dark current, Ip is photo current, B
is the post-detection (electrical) bandwidth of the system.
Taking into account the noise due to background radiation, the shot noise can be expanded as:
i2TS = 2eB (Ip+ Id + Ib) where, Ib is background-radiation-induced photocurrent.
When the photodiode is without internal avalanche gain, thermal noise from the detector load resistor
and from active elements in the amplifier tends to dominate.
The thermal noise due to load resistor RL is given as: i2t = 4KTB / RL
The SNR for the p-n or p-i-n photodiode receiver may be obtained by summing the noise
contributions from. It is given by:
𝑆 𝐼𝑝2
=
𝑁 2𝑒𝐵 𝐼 + 𝐼 + 4𝐾𝑇𝐵 + 𝐼 2
𝑃 𝑑 𝑅𝐿 𝑎𝑚𝑝
The thermal noise may be reduced by increasing the value of the load resistor RL, also, the noise
associated with the amplifier may be reduced with low detector and amplifier capacitance.
So, the SNR equation may be rewritten as:
The combined thermal and amplifier noise term is reduced due to avalanche multiplication of shot
noise term, then the SNR for the APD can be rewritten as:
𝑆 𝐼𝑝2
=
𝑁 2𝑒𝐵 𝐼 + 𝐼 𝑀𝑥 + 4𝐾𝑇𝐵𝐹𝑛 𝑀−2
𝑃 𝑑 𝑅𝐿
From the above expression of SNR, it may be seen that the first term in the denominator increases
with increasing M whereas second term decreases. For low M, the combined amplifier and thermal
noise term dominates the total noise power when the signal level is increased, giving an improved
SNR. However, when M is large, the amplifier and thermal noise term becomes unimportant and the
SNR decreases with increasing M at the rate of Mx. Therefore, an optimum value of the
multiplication factor exists which minimizes the SNR and is given as:
[2eB(Ip +Id)Mxop ] / [(4KTBFn / RL) M-2op] = 2/x
Figure 4.5 Binary Transmission: (a) Binary signal with additive noise (b) probability density
functions for the binary signal showing the decision case.
Where P(0/1) is the probability of falsely identifying a binary one and P(1/0) is the probability of
falsely identifying a binary zero.
For BER calculation it is assumed that the noise is almost Gaussian with standard deviations 0 and
1 , and means I0 and I1 respectively for the 0 and 1 binary levels. For an optical receiver, in general
the two standard deviations are different. For thermal noise dominated system the two become same.
The decision threshold ITH is . That is : If I ITH, bit =1 and If I < ITH, bit =0.
So a bit error occurs when bit 0 is transmitted and I ITH and when bit 1 is transmitted and I < ITH .
The BER for an unbiased data ( a data which has statistically equal number of 0 and 1 bits), the BER
is given as: BER = ½ [ P(0/1) + P(1/0) ]
where P(0/1) is the probability of error in bit-1, i.e. probability of current remaining below the
threshold when actually bit-1 has been received. P(1/0) is the probability of error in bit-0, i.e.
probability of current becoming greater than or equal to the threshold when actually bit-0 has been
received.
The two probabilities are given as
𝟏 𝑰𝑻𝑯 𝑰−𝑰𝟏 𝟐
P(0/1) = 𝝈 − dI = ½ erfc[ (I1 – ITH) / 12 ] and
𝟏 √𝟐𝝅 −∞ 𝟐𝝈𝟐𝟏
𝟏 ∞ 𝑰−𝑰𝟎 𝟐
P(1/0) = 𝝈 − dI = ½ erfc[ (ITH – I0) / 02 ]
𝟎 √𝟐𝝅 𝑰 𝑻𝑯 𝟐𝝈𝟐𝟎
where the complementary error-function (erfc(x)) is defined as
∞
erfc(x) = 2/ 𝝅 𝒆𝒙𝒑 𝒚𝟐 𝒅𝒚
The BER for the binary data is then given as:
BER = ¼ {½ erfc[ (I1 – ITH) / 12 ] + ½ erfc[ (ITH – I0) / 02 ] }
The BER is function of the decision threshold current. The threshold is to be optimized to get the
minimum BER.
Minimum BER occurs when the threshold is ITHopt = (0I1 + 1I0) / (0 + 1)
For thermal dominated system, 0 and 1 are equal and the threshold is mean of I0 and I1. That is the
threshold is half way between the 0 and 1 levels.
For shot noise dominated system, 0 << 1 , and the threshold comes closer to I0 .
For the optimum threshold, the BER becomes, BER = ½ erfc ( Q/2)
Where Q is defined as, Q = (I1 – I0 ) / (0 + 1)
The quantity essentially gives the fractional noise margin of the received binary signal.
The BER is a very steep function of Q. For change in Q by 1, the BER drops almost by 3 orders of
magnitude. For a BER of better than 10-9, Q should be > 7.
System Performance:
System performance is decided by three major blocks they are transmitter, optical fiber links and
receiver. The designer should choose proper light source, proper optical fiber and proper photo
detector to get high bit rate and high S/N ratio.
Regarding optical fiber, the single mode step index fiber is the proper choice. Even in that to reduce
dispersion proper choice of the refractive index profile is necessary. These single mode step index
fibers are preferable.
Regarding optical sources, single mode laser diodes are suitable for single mode stop index fibers.
For multi mode fibers, hetero junction LEDs are selected.
Regarding optical receivers, the p-i-n photodiodes and avalanche photodiodes APD are preferable.
Here also they should be quantum noise limited.
The maximum transmission distance is limited by the net loss of fiber cable such that
L=10/α log10 (Pt/Pr)
α = not loss (in dB/1cm)
Pt=average power from transmitter
Pr=average power detected at receiver =Np hv B
Np=minimum no of photons/bit required
hv=energy of photon
B=bit rate
Component Choice:
Fiber optic communications systems include components unfamiliar to most communications system
designers, but their design is based on principles that differ little from their conventional
counterparts. Link analysis is carried out in much the same way as for an electrical cable system. The
chief distinction results from the increased bandwidth capability with fiber optic systems, which
allows the design engineer to make different trade-offs in determining the optimum transmission
format as well as source, detector, and cable types.
αf αf αf αf
lC lxp lxp lC lxp lC Photon Detector
Fiber Flylead
The fiber loss depends upon the wavelength and also the physical conditions of the fiber. The fiber
loss is generally higher than that the specified by the manufacturers. This is primarily due to micro-
bending of the fiber. Also the micro-bending loss is higher for 1550nm compared to 1310nm.
Therefore the overall loss could be higher at 1550nm than at 1310nm, although intrinsically silica
glass has minimum loss at 1550nm. Typical loss at 1550nm may lie in the range 0.4-0.5 dB/km.
The splice loss could be between 0.05-0.1 dB per splice.
Fiber Joints:
A major consideration with all types of fiber–fiber connection is the optical loss encountered at the
interface. Even when the two jointed fiber ends are smooth and perpendicular to the fiber axes, and
the two fiber axes are perfectly aligned, a small proportion of the light may be reflected back into the
transmitting fiber causing attenuation at the joint. This phenomenon, known as Fresnel reflection, is
associated with the step changes in refractive index at the jointed interface (i.e. glass–air–glass). The
magnitude of this partial reflection of the light transmitted through the interface may be estimated
using the Fresnel formula for light of normal incidence and is given by :
r = [(n1 – n) /( n1 + n)]2 where r is the fraction of the light reflected at a single interface, n1 is the
refractive index of the fiber core and n is the refractive index of the medium between the two jointed
fibers (i.e. for air n = 1).
The loss in decibels due to Fresnel reflection at a single interface is given by:
Loss Fres = 10 Log10 ( 1- r)
Hence, using the relationships given in equations, it is possible to determine the optical attenuation
due to Fresnel reflection at a fiber–fiber joint.
Fiber Splicing techniques:
A permanent joint formed between two individual optical fibers in the field or factory is known as a
fiber splice. Fiber splicing is frequently used to establish long-haul optical fiber links where smaller
fiber lengths need to be joined, and there is no requirement for repeated connection and
disconnection. Splices may be divided into two broad categories depending upon the splicing
technique utilized. These are fusion splicing or welding and mechanical splicing.
Fusion Splicing:
The fusion splicing of single fibers involves the heating of the two prepared fiber ends to their fusing
point with the application of sufficient axial pressure between the two optical fibers. It is therefore
essential that the stripped (of cabling and buffer coating) fiber ends are adequately positioned and
aligned in order to achieve good continuity of the transmission medium at the junction point. Hence
the fibers are usually positioned and clamped with the aid of an inspection microscope.
Flame heating sources, the most widely used heating source is an electric arc. This technique offers
advantages of consistent, easily controlled heat with adaptability for use under field conditions.
Electrode Electrode
Electrode Electrode
Electric Arc
Electrode Electrode
Move
Fiber Fiber Fiber Fiber
Electrode Electrode
Electric Arc
Figure 4.8: Schematic illustration of the prefusion method for accurately splicing optical fibers
Drawbacks of fusion splicing: Heat necessary to fuse the fibers may weaken the fiber in the area of
the splice. The tensile strength becomes low, around 30% compared with uncoated fiber before
fusion. It is therefore necessary that completed splice is packed so as to reduce the tensile loading
upon the fiber in the area of splice.
Mechanical Splices:
A common method involves the use of an accurately produced rigid alignment tube into which the
prepared fiber ends are permanently bonded. This snug tube splice is shown in figure 4.9 (a) and may
utilize a glass or ceramic capillary with an inner diameter just large enough to accept the optical
fibers. Transparent adhesive (e.g. epoxy resin) is injected through a transverse bore in the capillary to
give mechanical sealing and index matching of the splice. Average insertion losses as low as 0.1 dB
have been obtained with multimode graded index and single-mode fibers using ceramic capillaries.
However, in general, snug tube splices exhibit problems with capillary tolerance requirements.
Fiber Fiber
Figure 4.9 (a): Snug Tube Splice Figure 4.9 (b): Loose Tube Splice
A mechanical splicing technique which avoids the critical tolerance requirements of the snug tube
splice is shown in figure 4.9(b). This loose tube splice uses an oversized square-section metal tube
which easily accepts the prepared fiber ends. Transparent adhesive is first inserted into the tube
followed by the fibers. The splice is self-aligning when the fibers are curved in the same plane,
forcing the fiber ends simultaneously into the same corner of the tube. Mean splice insertion losses of
0.073 dB have been achieved using multimode graded index fibers with the loose tube approach.
Other common mechanical splicing techniques involve the use of grooves to secure the fibers to be
jointed. A simple method utilizes a V-groove into which the two prepared fiber ends are pressed. The
V-groove splice which is shown in figure 4.9(c) ,gives alignment of the prepared fiber ends through
insertion in the groove. The splice is made permanent by securing the fibers in the V-groove with
epoxy resin. Jigs for producing Vgroove splices have proved quite successful, giving joint insertion
losses of around 0.1 dB.
Epoxy
A further variant on the V-groove technique is the elastic tube or elastomeric splice shown in figure
4.9 (d). The device comprises two elastomeric internal parts, one of which contains a V-groove. An
outer sleeve holds the two elastic parts in compression to ensure alignment of the fibers in the V-
groove, and fibers with different diameters tend to be centered and hence may be successfully
spliced. The splice loss for the elastic tube device was originally reported as 0.12 dB or less but is
generally specified as around 0.25 dB for the commercial product. In addition, index-matching gel is
normally employed within the device to improve its performance.
Fiber Connectors:
In order to maintain an optimum performance, the connection must protect the fiber ends from
damage which may occur due to handling (connection and disconnection), must be insensitive to
environmental factors (e.g. moisture and dust) and must cope with tensile load on the cable.
Additionally, the connector should ideally be a low-cost component which can be fitted with relative
ease. Optical fiber connectors may be considered in three major areas, which are:
1) the fiber termination, which protects and locates the fiber ends.
2) the fiber end alignment to provide optimum optical coupling.
3) the outer shell, which maintains the connection and the fiber alignment, protects the fiber ends
from the environment and provides adequate strength at the joint.
Fiber connectors may be separated into two broad categories: butt-jointed connectors and expanded
beam connectors. Butt-jointed connectors rely upon alignment of the two prepared fiber ends in close
proximity (butted) to each other so that the fiber core axes coincide. Expanded beam connectors
utilize interposed optics at the joint (i.e. lenses) in order to expand the beam from the transmitting
fiber end before reducing it again to a size compatible with the receiving fiber end.
Cylindrical Ferrule Butt-joint Connector:
The basic ferrule connector (also known as concentric sleeve connector), which is the simplest
optical fiber connector design. The two fibers to be connected are permanently bonded (with epoxy
resin) in metal plugs known as ferrules which have an accurately drilled central hole in their end
faces where the stripped (of buffer coating) fiber is located. Within the connector the two ferrules are
placed in an alignment sleeve which, using accurately machined components, allows the fiber ends to
be butt jointed. It is essential with this type of connector that the fiber end faces are smooth and
square (i.e. perpendicular to the fiber axis).
Figure 4.10 shows the structure of a watch jewel connector ferrule. In this, the fiber is centered with
respect to the ferrule through the watch jewel hole. The use of the watch jewel allows the close
diameter and tolerance requirements of the ferrule end face hole to be obtained. Nevertheless, typical
concentricity errors between the fiber core and the outside diameter of the jeweled ferrule are in the
range 2 to 6 μm giving insertion losses in the range 1 to 2 dB with multimode step index fibers.
Adhesive
Plastic coating of
Watch Jewel fiber