The setting is a small bar in Chicago in the 1920s.

Two men sit at a small table,

one dressed in a suit and the other in a leather jacket.
- I can't believe you're against prohibition! This law is doing wonders for our
society.
- Wonders? Are you kidding me? It's only caused more problems than it's.
solved.
- Nonsense! Crime rates have dropped, and people are becoming more
productive without the influence of alcohol.
- Productive? People are going blind from drinking bathtub gin, and the mafia
is making a killing selling illegal alcohol. How is that productive?
- Well, that's just a small price to pay for the greater good. Prohibition is saving
families from the harmful effects of alcohol.
- You're completely missing the point. People are always going to find a way to
drink, whether it's legal or not. This law is just creating more problems than it's
solving.
- I disagrees. This law is a necessary step towards a more moral and just
society. It's time we put an end to the scourge of alcoholism once and for all.
- You can't legislate morality. People are going to make their own choices
regardless of what the law says. All prohibition is doing is creating a black
market and making criminals rich.
- I understand your concerns, but I truly believe that this law is for the greater
good. It's up to us to uphold it and make sure that it's enforced properly."
- Enforced properly? The police are as corrupt as the criminals selling illegal
booze. Prohibition is a failed experiment that's only causing more harm than
good.
The two men continue to argue, each trying to convince the other of their
point of view. As the night wears on and the alcohol flows freely, their
arguments become more heated and impassioned. In the end, they both agree
to disagree, realizing that the issue of prohibition is far more complex than
either of them had originally thought.