Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Characterisation of Microstructures, Deformation, and Fatigue Damage in Different Steels Using Magnetic Barkhausen Emission Technique
Characterisation of Microstructures, Deformation, and Fatigue Damage in Different Steels Using Magnetic Barkhausen Emission Technique
INTRODUCTION
Tne characterization of microstructures, mechanical properties, deformation, damage initiation, and
growth by Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) techniques is assuming a vital role in various industries
because of the growing awareness of the benefits that can be derived by using NDE techniques for
assessing the performance of various components. Nondestructive evaluation is particularly assuming
greater significance in the assessment of material degradation, where investment in new plants is not
cost-effective and safe operational life of existing plants needs to be extended. In recent years, various
advanced NDE techniques have been successfully employed for characretization of defects and
microstructural features such as grain size, texture, nucleation and growth of second phases, assess-
ment of tensile, creep and fatigue properties, deformation, and damage.
1061-8309/01/3711-0789$25.00 © 2001 MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica”
790 BALDEV et al.
Most of the components and structures, subjected to complex service environment such as exposure
to elevated temperature and/or loading undergo degradation in mechanical properties like strength,
fracture toughness, etc. due to microstructural changes, corrosion, creep, and fatigue damage.
Microstructural features are decisive as these decide the physical, mechanical, and corrosion perform-
ance of materials.
With the advent of fracture mechnanics concepts, microstructure, defects as well as stresses must be
quantitatively characterized to have reliable and fail-safe materials and components. Any alteration in
the microstructure, which reduces the life or performance, should be predicted sufficiently in advance
in order to ensure safe, reliable, and economic operation of the components. This is possible when one
realizes that the interaction of the nondestructive probing medium with the material depends on the sub-
structural/microstructural features such as point defects, dislocation, voids, micro and macro cracks,
secondary phases, texture, residual stress, etc. While this is considered as advantageous for complete
characterization, many a time such comprehensive interaction of the probing medium with various
microstructural features may lead to complex signals, thus making interpretations very difficult and
requiring unfolding the signal to obtain the feature specific information. Under such conditions, use of
multiple NDE techniques and multiple NDE parameters in a complementary manner helps in isolating
the influence of one or a combination of specific microstructural features. The benefits of non-destruc-
tive characterization and the challenges in interpretation of results have led to intensive efforts world-
wide. Modeling, development of new sensors, advanced signal analysis, and materials science based
approaches are the new directions.
Nondestructive evaluation techniques like in-situ metallography, Acoustic emission (AE), ultra-
sonic attenuation and velocity measurements, acoustic harmonic measurement, magnetic Barkhausen
emission, acoustic Barkhausen emission, laser interferometry, positron annihilation, X-ray diffraction,
small angle neutron scattering (SANS), etc. are used for characterization of microstructutal features
such as grain size, precipitation and growth of second phases, etc. due to thermal aging, and creep and
fatigue damage. In this paper, use of MBE technique for characterization of microstructures, defor-
mation and fatigue damage in different steels is discussed.
When a ferromagnetic material is subjected to a varying magnetic field, the magnetic flux density dur-
ing magnetization varies in discrete steps as magnetic domain walls have to overcome various types of
obstacles during their movement. The discrete changes in magnetization induce electric voltage pulses in
pickup coil placed near the surface of ferromagnetic materials [1, 2]. This noise like voltage pulses were
first observed by Barkhausen in 1919 and this phenomenon is named as magnetic Barkhausen Noise
(MBN) or magnetic Barkhausen emission (MBE). The plotting of the RMS voltage of the MBE signal as
a function of magnetic field or the current applied to the electromagnetic yoke indicates the changes in
material parameters. Various parameters such as number of peaks and their heights and positions are used
for characterizing the materials with different microstructural and substructural features. It is the objective
of many studies to establish correlations between the MBE parameters and material parameters that would
be useful in assessing the fabrication quality and inservice performance assessment of components using
the MBE technique. In this paper, the developmental studies undertaken at the authors’ laboratory towards
meeting this objective are discussed.
(a) (b)
1.00
Tempered of 873 K Tempered of 873 K
Peak 1 Peak 2
Peak 1 Peak 2
RMS voltage of the MBE, V
0.75 ( )Quenched
( )15 h
( )0.5 h
( ) 25 h
( )1 h
0.50 ( ) 100 h
( )5 h
0.25
0.00
–0.7 –0.35 0 0.35 0.7 –0.7 –0.35 0 0.35 0.7
Applied current, A
Fig. 1. Variation in the RMS voltage of the MBE for different tempered 0.2% carbon steel samples.
(a) (b)
0.60
Tempered of 873 K Tempered of 873 K
Correlation 䊉
Correlation
coefficient = 0.96 0.50 coefficient = 0.99
䊉
0.15
Reciprocal of grain size, µm–1
0.40
䊉 䊉
0.10 䊉
0.30
䊉
0.20
䊉
0.05 䊉
d
0.10
0.00 0.00
–0.05 0.00 0.05 0.25 0.30 0.35
MBE peak 1 position, A MBE peak 2 position, A
Fig. 2. Relationship between the MBE peak (a) 1 and (b) 2 position and average size of (a) grain and (b) cementite pre-
cipitales for different tempered 0.2% carbon steel sampes
movement in different field ranges and two peaks in the MBE profile have been observed for these
steels in sufficiently tempered condition. The systematic changes in the height and position of these
two MBE peaks at different stages of tempering have been explained based on the variations in the
lath/grain size and type and size of carbides [3, 4]. Since the formation and growth of reverse domains
become more and more easy with the increase in grain size due to large demagnetizing field at the
grain boundaries and hence, the MBE peak 1 position shifts to lower magnetic field as shown
in Figs. 1a and 1b. Similarly, with increasing tempering time, the carbide size increases. The carbide
with higher size offers more resistance to domain wall movement and hence the field corresponding
to peak 2 shifts to higher filed, as shown in Figs. 1a and 1b. Excellent correlations between positions
of MBE peaks 1 and 2 and microstructural parameters (grain/lath size and carbide size), shown in
0.60 ( ) As received
(ferrite + lamellar pearlite)
0.20
0.00
– 0.7 – 0.35 0 0.35 0.7
Applied current, A
Fig. 3. Difference in the RMS voltage profile of the MBE for lamellar and spheroidized cementite structures in 0.3%
carbon steel
Figs. 2a and 2b, indicate that the MBE technique can be used to evaluate the changes in the grain size
and precipitate size in long-term aged ferritic steels. However, this is difficult in short-term aged con-
ditions, where the dislocation density is high, and the lath and precipitate sizes are very small.
(a) (b)
1.6 NBE coil probe, 80 dB 40
Applied Case
0.2 5
0.0 0
–0.70 –0.35 0 0.35 0.70 0.75 1.00 1.25
Applied current, A Case depth, mm
Fig. 4. (a) Variation in the rms voltage of the MBE signal with applied current at different voltages used for induction
hardening and (b) variation in the ratio of the MBE peak heights with case depth of the induction hardened shafts made
of CK-45
region could be directly correlated to the height variation of the two peaks in the MBE profile
(Fig. 4b). This method gives not only the case depth but also the quality of the case depth with respect
to the microstructure consisting of ferrite and martensite phases.
Stage 2 — Micro-yielding
It can be seen from Fig. 5 that the height of both MBE peak 1 and peak 2 decreases significantly well
before the macroyielding. This indicates the creation of grain boundary and Frank-Read type dislocation
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING Vol. 37 No. 11 2001
794 BALDEV et al.
0.75 319
0.50
0.25
0.00
– 0.7 (b) – 0.35 0 0.35 0.7
1.50
Tempered Peak 1 Peak 2
RMS voltage of the MBE, V
0.50 319
508
0.25
0.00
– 0.7 – 0.35 0 0.35 0.7
Applied current, A
Fig. 5. Variations in the RMS voltage profile of the MBE for different prior stress levels of tensile deformation in a tem-
pered 2.25Cr–1Mo steel.
( ) Stress
Magnetic flux density, T
1.2
MBE peak height, V
1.2 1200
( ) MBE
( )B 1.0
1.0 0 1000
Stress, MPa
( ) Bmax
0.8 800 0.8
Fig. 6. Typical variation in the MBE level, magnetic flux density, and the applied stress as a function of percentage no-
minal strain in quenched and tempered 2.25 Cr–1Mo steel specimen.
70 700
Stress, MPa
40 ( ) Base 400
MBE without load
( ) Weld
30 300
( ) HAZ
( ) Base
20 200
10 1 2 3 4 100
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Percentage strain
Fig. 7. Typical variation in the MBE level in the loaded and unloaded conditions and the applied stress as a function of
percentage nominal strain at weld, HAZ, and base metal regions of a HSLA steel weldment specimen.
sources even during the macro-elastic region (about 3/4 of the yield stress) causing the micro-plastic yield-
ing. The dislocation pile-ups created within the grain reduce the mean free path of domain wall displace-
ment and hence the MBE peak heights.
Stage 3 — Macro-yielding
Near the macro-yielding, the originally present two MBE peaks merge into single central peak with rela-
tively higher peak height and narrow profile width. It is known that the macro-yielding is associated with grain
rotation in order to maintain the boundary integrity between the adjacent grains for compatible deformation.
When such grain rotation occurs under the action of external tensile stress, the grain reorientation is such that
the <100> direction in some grains tends to align closer to the stress direction in order to reduce its magneto-
static energy by way of decreasing the normal component of magnetization across the grain boundary. This
results in domain alignment closer to the tensile stress direction and enhances domain wall movement during
magnetization along the stress direction and hence the increase in the micro-magnetic parameters.
MBN amplitude, G. V.
1 Hz
Cold work
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Fig. 8. Variation in RMS voltage of MBE signal with applied field for different cold worked AISI type 304 stainless steel.
steel has been measured at 50 mHz, 1 and 10 Hz applied field frequencies [8, 9]. The variation in the MBE
rms voltage with applied magnetic field is shown in Fig. 8 for the applied field frequency of 1 Hz. There is
a gradual increase in peak height and broadening of the MBE signal with increase in the cold work (Fig. 8).
Two parameters, half of the difference in the magnetic field corresponding to the two peaks of the MBE
signal (Hcm) and the maximum amplitude (Mmax) of the RMS voltage of the MBE signal were estimated. The
Mmax value was found to increase with the degree of cold work and the frequency of applied magnetic field.
The increase in Mmax was more pronounced in specimens with higher degree of cold work (> 20%) and at
higher frequencies of applied field. The increase in Mmax with frequency of magnetic field was attributed to
the higher rate of movement of domain walls with the applied field frequency causing a higher induction in
the pick up sensor. The increase in the Mmax with the degree of cold work is attributed to the increase in the
amount of α′-martensite. The MBE measurements can also be used, particularly at higher applied field fre-
quency, to detect the presence of α′-martensite even in 10% cold worked specimens. This study establish-
es that it is possible to use the MBE analysis for assessment of stress induced α′-martensite in nonstan-
dard/irregular shaped objects/components and at localised regions.
5.0 500
4.5 450
εa
4.0 400
MBE peak height
3.5 ( ) ± 0.75% 350
( ) ± 0.50%
3.0 Stress amplitude 300
( ) ± 0.25%
2.5 ( ) ± 0.75% 250
( ) ± 0.50%
2.0 200
( ) ± 0.25%
1.5 150
1.0 100
0.5 50
1 10 100 1000 10 000
Number of cycles
Fig. 9. Variation in the MBE peak height and stress amplitude at different stages of LCF for three different strain amplitudes.
movement of additional reverse domains produced at the crack surfaces. The rapid increase in MBE due
to crack initiation and propagation has been confirmed by the measurement of MBE on the crack and away
from the crack using surface MBE probe. This study suggests that the MBE can be used to assess the pro-
gressive accumulation of fatigue damage in ferrite steel components.
CONCLUSIONS
The developmental studies undertaken at the authors’ laboratory demonstrate the capabilities of
Magnetic Barkhausen Emission technique for characterization of microstructures, deformation, and
fatigue damage. Based on the two stage magnetization process modeled by the authors, the size of the
grain/lath and carbides in ferritic steels could be correlated with MBE parameters. The influence of mor-
phology of cementite (lamellar and spheroidized) on the MBE behaviour has been understood. Various
stages of tensile deformation, viz. (i) perfectly elastic, (ii) micro-plastic yielding, (iii) macroyielding, and
(iv) progressive plastic deformation in ferritic steels could be identified using the MBE parameters. The
hardening depth and its quality with respect to the microstructure in induction hardened specimens could
also be established using the MBE technique. MBE is found to be highly sensitive in detection of stress
induced martensite in stainless steels with metastable austenite phase. Different stages of fatigue damage
in 9Cr–1Mo steel, viz. (i) cyclic hardening, (ii) cyclic softening, (iii) saturation, and (iv) crack initaion
could be identified using the MBE parameters.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Authors wish to sincerely thank many colleagues from the Division of PIE and NDT Development and
Mechanical Metallurgy Division of IGCAR for their contributions.
REFERENCES
1. David, J., Introduction to Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, London: Chapman & Hall, 1994.
2. Tiito, S., Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Appl. Phys. Series, 1977, vol. 119, pp. 1–80.
3. Moorthy, V., Vaidyanathan, S., Jayakumar T., Baldev, R., and Kashyap, B.P., Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2000,
vol. 31, pp. 1053–1081.
4. Moorthy, V., Vaidyanathan, S., Jayakumar, T., and Baldev, R., Philosophical Magazine A, 1998, vol. 77,
pp. 1499–1514.
5. Vaidyanathan, S., Moorthy, V., Jayakumar, T., and Baldev, R., Mater. Sci. Tech, 2000, vol. 16 ( 2), pp. 202–208.
6. Moorthy, V., Vaidyanathan, S., Jayakumar, T., Baldev, R., and Kashyap, B.P., Acta Materialia, 1999, vol. 47
(6), pp. 1868–1879.
7. Vaidyanathan, S., Moorthy, V., Kalyanasundaram, P., Jayakumar, T., and Baldev, R., Metallurgical and
Materials Transactions, 1999, vol. 30 A, pp. 2067–2072.
8. Jayakumar, T., Microstructural Characterization of Metallic Materials Using Ultrasonic and Magnetic methods,
PhD Dissertation, Saarbrucken (Germany): Univ. of Saarland, 1996.
9. Jayakumar, T., Koble, T.D., Theiner, W.A., and Baldev, R., Nondes. Test. Evaln., 1993, vol. 10, pp. 205–214.
10. Moorthy, V., Choudhary, B.K., Vaidyanathan, S., Jayakumar, T., Bhanusankara, K.R., and Baldev, R., Int. J. of
Farigue, 1999, vol. 21, pp. 263–269.