REGGANE NORD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SURFACE FACILITIES

COMMENTS RESPONSE SHEET CLIENT REVIEW CODE : B

Document Title : PIPELINE TRANSIENT STUDY SURGE ANALYSIS REPORT Client Comments Consolidated By : Ignacio TORRES Date : 12/02/2015
Document No. : PS-00000-1163-0105-E Petrofac Response By : AV Date : 16/06/2015
Rev : A
COMMENTS Client Position
Serial No. Page No. / Section CLIENT COMMENT CONTRACTOR RESPONSE
BY ( Open or Closed)
PIUL to update the number of modeled Wells.
1 Page 7 / Fig. 1-1 - Add RG-12 and RG-9 CRH Noted and Document is updated
- Remove AZSE -5 and AZSE-7

2 Page 7 / Fig. 1-1 PIUL to update the name of KLS Field: KLS-1 and KLS-4 CRH Noted and Document is updated

Pipeline aligment sheets are not still available. PIUL shall validate the Study again, once the different Noted. OLGA simulations are updated based on latest revised
3 Page 21 / Section 3.4 routes have been fixed.
CRH
Alignment sheets.

Noted. Instantaneous Ramp-up study is performed for the

Table 1 Ramp up. The exact time must be given. Ramp up shall be 0 to 30% of flow in order to achieve
4 the minium trun dwon of the GTP. That time need to be inmeditly flow.
ITG
Trunklines and Ramp-up time is not required to be updated.
Ramp-up scenarios such as 40% to 0% to 40% and 20% to 0% to 20% is
performed and 30% scenario is covered within the ramp-up study
performed and separate calculations for 30% case is not performed.

In without formation water case, Dry Well fluid composition is

saturated with water and OLGA simulation model is generated to
Table 1,2b/c are constructed assuming no water formation therefore the piging operation is for what allow the wet gas to flow through the pipeline. Liquid condensation
5 10 fluid? owing that no condenate is expected
ITG
in pipeline is expected from wet gas due to lower ambient
temperature and liquid content in the pipeline is verified against
the liquid handling capacity of Slug catcher.

Minimum ambient temperature for Winter case of 17 degC is

6 Page 20 Table 3,3,1 As per EPC BoD Rev D temp at 1 mts depth shall be 16,5ºC ITG updated from Table 5.5 of EPC Basis of Design document (PS-00000-
1161-0002-E)

7 Page 26 section 3,7 LP flare drum working volume shall 8,92 as per PDS ITG Noted and Document is updated

A sensitivity case study of 15 days maintenance shutdown for

Trunklines AZSE to GTP, RG1 to GTP and KL+KLS to GTP is
performed and resulted in pipeline temperature reaching minimum
ambient temperature of 17 degC which is greater than Hydrate
formation temperature (approx. 12 degC for AZSE and RG well
8 an additional case need to be evaluated for periods of > 15 days (maintenace shut down) ITG
fluids and 15 degC for KL well fluids).
section 4,5 All other systems are expected to have the same behaviour of
reaching the ambient temperature during prolonged shutdown and
hence 15 days shutdown calculation is not performed for other
trunklines.

All the OLGA simulations are performed for Instantaneous Ramp-up

9 Ramp up operation A ramp up operation instantaneusly from 0 to 40% ITG
operation from 0% to 40% and 0% to 20% only.

Table 4.5 indicates the list of cases for which OLGA simulation is
10 PIUL to explain what is table 4,5 for? ITG
performed.

11 GENERAL PIUL to provide OLGA simulation file related this study ITG Noted.

A sensitivity case study of 15 days maintenance shutdown for

Trunklines AZSE to GTP, RG1 to GTP and KL+KLS to GTP is
performed and resulted in pipeline temperature reaching minimum
ambient temperature of 17 degC which is greater than Hydrate
formation temperature (approx. 12 degC for AZSE and RG well
12 section 4,5 an additional case need to be evaluated for periods of > 15 days (maintenace shut down) ITG
fluids and 15 degC for KL well fluids).
All other systems are expected to have the same behaviour of
reaching the ambient temperature during prolonged shutdown and
hence 15 days shutdown calculation is not performed for other
trunklines.

All Steady state and Transient OLGA simulations are performed for
20%, 40% and 100% design flowrate. Plant turndown capacity of 30%
13 General PIUL is refaring to turndown cases taken the flow of 40% insted of 30% piul to correct ITG
is covered in results of 20% and 40% scenario. Hence dedicated 30%
calculations are not performed.

In the appendicies Figures PIUL to indicate the maximum limite allowence some KPIs for each graph.
14 General E.g for export pipeline velocity to add an additional line for the maximum velocity allowed, max drain ITG Referred graphs are revised in current revision of document.
volum in Slug catcher)

Slug volume details are updated in Executive summary and Section

Excecutive summary PIUL to include a table with volume slugs per trunk line at differt flow ITG
5 of the report for respective cases.

Well fluid compositions (both saturated wet gas + wet gas

- Fluid Compositions appended with formation water) are revised as per HYSYS
simulations performed for generating Heat and Material Balance.
 REGGANE NORD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SURFACE FACILITIES

COMMENTS RESPONSE SHEET CLIENT REVIEW CODE :

Document Title : Client Comments Consolidated By : Date :
Document No. : Petrofac Response By : Date :
Rev : B
Page No. / COMMENTS Client Position
Serial No. CLIENT COMMENT CONTRACTOR RESPONSE
Section BY ( Open or Closed)
 REGGANE NORD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SURFACE FACILITIES

COMMENTS RESPONSE SHEET CLIENT REVIEW CODE :

Document Title : Client Comments Consolidated By : Date :
Document No. : Petrofac Response By : Date :
Rev : C
Page No. / COMMENTS Client Position
Serial No. CLIENT COMMENT CONTRACTOR RESPONSE
Section BY ( Open or Closed)
 REGGANE NORD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SURFACE FACILITIES

COMMENTS RESPONSE SHEET CLIENT REVIEW CODE :

Document Title : Client Comments Consolidated By : Date :
Document No. : Petrofac Response By : Date :
Rev : D
Page No. / COMMENTS Client Position
Serial No. CLIENT COMMENT CONTRACTOR RESPONSE
Section BY ( Open or Closed)