Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Peritonitis

    Uploaded by

    Katalin
    15 views37 pages

    Original Title

    peritonitis

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    15 views37 pages

    Peritonitis

    Uploaded by

    Katalin

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 37
    2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape-convarilel180234-print ‘emedicine.medscape.com Medscape Peritonitis and Abdominal Sepsis Updated: Jul 23, 2019 Author: Brian J Daley, MD, MBA, FACS, FCCP, CNSC; Chief Editor: Praveen K Roy, MD, MSc Overview Background Poritonits is defined as an inflammation of the serosal membrane that ines the abdominal cavity and the organs contained therein, The peritoneum, which is an otherwise sterile environment, reacts to various pathologic stimuli with a fairy uniform inflammatory response. Depending on the underlying pathology, the resultant peritonitis may be infectious or sterile (ie, chemical ‘or mechanical). The abdomen is the second most common source of sepsis and secondary peritonitis.(1] Intra-abdominal sepsis, is an inflammation of the peritoneum caused by pathogenic microorganisms and their products,[2] The inflammatory process may be localized (abscess) or diffuse in nature. (See Pathophysiology.) Peritonitis is most often caused by introduction of an infection into the otherwise sterile peritoneal environment through organ perforation, but it may also result from other iritants, such as foraign bodies, bile from a perforated gall bladder or a lacerated liver, or gastric acid from a perforated ulcer. Women also experience localized peritonitis from an infected fallopian tube or a ruptured ovarian cyst. Patients may present with an acute oF insidious onset of symptoms, limited and mild disease, or systemic and severe disease with septic shock. (See Etiology.) Peritoneal infections are classified as primary (le, rom hematogenous dissemination, usually in the setting of an immunocompromised state), secondary (ie, related to a pathologic process in a visceral organ, such as perforation or trauma, including iatrogenic trauma), or tertiary (ie, persistent or recurrent infection after adequate initial therapy). Primary peritonitis is most often spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) seen mostly inpatients with chronic liver disease. Secondary peritonitis is by far the most common form of peritonitis encountered in clinical practice. Tertiary peritonitis often develops in the absence of the ‘original visceral organ pathology. (See Presentation.) Infections of the peritoneum are further divided into generalized (peritonitis) and localized (intra-abdominal abscess). This article focuses on the diagnosis and management of infectious peritonitis and abdominal abscesses. An abdominal abscess is seen in the image below. hitpstlemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print 17 2028.08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print Peritonitis and abdominal sepsis. A 36-year-old man with a history of Crohn disease presented with pain and swelling in the right abdomen, In figure A, a thickened loop of terminal ileum is evident adherent to the right anterior abdominal wall In figure B, the right anterior abdominal wall is markedly thickened and edematous, with adjacent inflamed terminal ileum. In figure C, a tight lower quadrant abdominal wall abscess and enteric fistula are observed and confirmed by the presence of enteral contrast in the abdominal wall ‘The diagnosis of peritonitis is usually clinical. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage may be helpful in patients who do not have conclusive signs on physical examination or who cannot provide an adequate history; in addition, paracentesis should be performed in all patients who do not have an indwelling peritoneal catheter and are suspected of having SBP, because results of aerobic and anaerobic bacterial cultures, used in conjunction with the cell count, are useful in guiding therapy. (See Workup.) ‘The management approach to peritonitis and peritoneal abscesses targets correction of the underlying process, administration of systemic antibiotics, and supportive therapy to prevent or limit secondary complications due to organ system failure, (See Treatment and Medication.) Early control of the septic source is mandatory and can be achieved operatively and nonoperatively. Nonoperative interventions include percutaneous abscess drainage, as well as percutaneous and endoscopic stent placements. Operative management addresses the need to contol the infectious source and to purge bacteria and toxins. The type and extent of surgery depends ‘on the underlying disease process and the severity of intra-abdominal infection For patient education resources, Digestive Disorders Center as well as Abdominal Pain (Adults), Appendicitis, Diverticulitis (Diverticulosis), Cirthosis, and Sepsis. medicine Anatomy ‘The peritoneum is the largest and most complex serous membrane in the body. It forms a closed sac (ie, coelom) by lining the interior surfaces of the abdominal wall (anterior and lateral), by forming the boundary to the retroperitoneum (posterior), by covering the extraperitoneal structures in the pelvis (inferior), and by covering the undersurface of the diaphragm (superior). This parietal layer of the peritoneum reflects onto the abdominal visceral organs to form the visceral peritoneum. It thereby creates a Potential space between the two layers (ie, the peritoneal cavity). ‘The peritoneum consists of a single layer of flattened mesothelial cells over loose areolar tissue. The loose connective tissue layer contains a rich network of vascular and lymphatic capillaries, nerve endings, and immune-competent cells, particularly lymphocytes and macrophages. The peritoneal surface cells are joined by junctional complexes, thus forming a dialyzing membrane that allows passage of fluid and certain small solutes. Pinocylotic activity of the mesothelial cells and phagocytosis, by macrophages allow for the clearance of macromolecules. hitpstlemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print 2iar 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape-convarilel180234-print Normally, the amount of peritoneal fluid present is less than 50 mL, and only small volumes are transferred across the ‘considerable surface area in a steady state each day. The peritoneal fluid represents a plasma ulttrafitrate, with electrolyte and solute concentrations similar to that of neighboring interstitial spaces and a protein content of less than 30 g/L, mainly albumin. In addition, peritoneal fluid contains small numbers of desquamated mesothelial cells and various numbers and morphologies of migrating immune cells (reference range is < 300 cells/u L, predominantly of mononuclear morphology) ‘The peritoneal cavity is divided incompletely into compartments by the mesenteric attachments and secondary retroperitonealization of certain visceral organs. A large peritoneal fold, the greater omentum, extends from the greater curvature of the stomach and the inferior aspect of the proximal duodenum downward over a variable distance to fold upon itself (with fusion of the adjacent layers) and ascends back to the taenia omentalis of the transverse colon, This peritoneal fold demonstrates a slightly different microscopic anatomy, with fenestrated surface epithelium and a large number of adipocytes, lymphocytes, and macrophages, and it functions as a fat storage location and a mobile immune organ, ‘The compartmentalization of the peritoneal cavity, in conjunction with the greater omentum, influences the localization and ‘spread of peritoneal inflammation and infections. edicine Pathophysiology In peritonitis caused by bacteria, the physiologic response is determined by several factors, including the virulence of the contaminant, the size of the inoculum, the immune status and overall health of the host (eg, as indicated by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Il [APACHE Il] score), and elements of the local environment, such as necrotic tissue, blood, or bile [3] Intra-abdominal sepsis from a perforated viscus (ie, secondary peritonitis or suppurative peritonitis) results from direct spillage of luminal contents into the peritoneum (eg, perforated peptic ulcer, diverticulitis, appendicitis, iatrogenic perforation). With the spillage of the contents, gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria, including common gut flora, such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, enter the peritoneal cavity. Endotoxins produced by gram-negative bacteria lead to the release of cytokines that induce cellular and humoral cascades, resulting in cellular damage, septic shock, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), ‘The mechanism for bacterial inoculation of ascites has been the subject of much debate since Harold Conn first recognized it in the 1960s. Enteric organisms have traditionally been isolated from more than 90% of infected ascites fluid in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), suggesting that the gastrointestinal (Gl) tract is the source of bacterial contamination, The preponderance of enteric organisms, in combination with the presence of endotoxin in ascitic luid and blood, once favored the argument that SBP was due to direct transmural migration of bacteria from an intestinal or hollow organ lumen, a phenomenon called bacterial translocation. However, experimental evidence suggests that direct transmural migration of microorganisms might not be the cause of SBP. ‘An alternative proposed mechanism for bacterial inoculation of ascites suggests a hematogenous source of the infecting ‘organism in combination with an impaired immune defense system. Nonetheless, the exact mechanism of bacterial displacement from the Gl tract into ascites fluid remains the source of much debate, ‘Anhost of factors contributes to the formation of peritoneal inflammation and bacterial growth in the ascitic fluid. Akey predisposing factor may be the intestinal bacterial overgrowth found in people with cirrhosis, mainly attributed to decreased intestinal transit time. Intestinal bacterial overgrowth, along with impaired phagocytic function, low serum and ascites ‘complement levels, and decreased activity of the reticuloendathelial system, contributes to an increased number of microorganisms and decreased capacity to clear them from the bloodstream, resulting in their migration into and eventual proliferation within ascites fuia Interestingly, adults with SBP typically have ascites, but most children with SBP do not have ascites. The reason for and mechanism behind this is the source of ongoing investigation, inolysis ‘Atterations in fibrinolysis (through increased plasminogen activator inhibitor activity) and the production of fibrin exudates have ‘an important role in peritonitis. The production of fibrin exudates is an important part of the hast defense, but large numbers of bacteria may be sequestered within the fiorin matrix. This may retard systemic dissemination of intraperitoneal infection and may decrease early mortality rates from sepsis, but it also is integral to the development of residual infection and abscess formation. AAs the fibrin matrix matures, the bacteria within are protected from host clearance mechanisms. Whether fibrin ultimately results in containment or persistent infection may depend on the degree of peritoneal bacterial ‘contamination. In animal studies of mixed bacterial peritonitis that examined the effects of systemic defibrinogenation and those of abdominal fibrin therapy, heavy peritoneal contamination uniformly led to severe peritonitis with early death (< 48 h) because of overwhelming sepsis. hitpstlemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-prnt ais7 2023. 05.27. 16:59 hntpssfemedicine medscape.comaricle!180234-print Bacterial load Bacterial load and the nature of the pathogen also play important roles. Some studies suggest that the number of bacteria present at the onset of abdominal infections is much higher than originally believed (approximately 2 x 108 colony forming unit [CFUJ/mL, much higher than the 5 x 105 CFUImL inocula routinely used for in vitro susceptibility testing). This bacterial load may overwhelm the local host defense. Bacterial virulence Bacterial virulence factors(4] that interfere with phagocytosis and with neutrophil-mediated bacterial killing mediate the persistence af infactions and abscess formation. Among these virulence factors are capsule formation, facultative anacrobic ‘growth, adhesion capabilities, and succinic acid production. Synergy between certain bacterial and fungal organisms may also play an important role in impairing the host's defense. One such synergy may exist between Bacteroides fragilis and gram- negative bacteria, particularly E coli (see the image below) , where co-inoculation significantly increases bacterial proliferation and abscess formation. Peritonitis and abdominal sepsis. Gram-negative Escherichia col Enterococci Enterococci may be important in enhancing the severity and persistence of peritoneal infections. In animal models of peritonitis with E coli and 8 fragilis, the systemic manifestations of the peritoneal infection and bacteremia rates were increased, as were bacterial concentrations in the peritoneal fluid and rate of abscess formation. Nevertheless, the role of Enterococcus organisms in uncomplicated intra-abdominal infections remains unclear. Antibiotics that lack specific activity against Enterococcus are often used suacessfully in the therapy of peritonitis, and the organism is not offen recovered as a blood-bome pathogen in intra- abdominal sepsis. Fungi ‘The role of fungi in the formation of intra-abdominal abscesses is not fully understood. Some authors suggest that bacteria and fungi exist as nonsynergistic parallel infections with incomplete competition, allowing the survival of all organisms. In this setting, treatment of the bacterial infection alone may lead to an avergrowth of fungi, which may contribute to increased morbidity Abscess formation ‘Abscess formation occurs when the host defense is unable to eliminate the infecting agent and attempts to control the spread of this agent by compartmentalization, This process is aided by a combination of factors that share a common feature, i impairment of phagocytotic killing. Most animal and human studies suggest that abscess formation occurs only in the presence of abscess-potentiating agents. Although the nature and spectrum of these factors have not been studied exhaustively, certain fiber analogues (eg, bran) and the contents of autoclaved stool have been identified as abscess-potentiating agents. In animal ‘models, these factors inhibit opsonization and phagocytotic killing by interference with complement activation. Cytokines ‘The role of cytokines in the mediation of the body's immune response and their role in the development of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and mukiple organ failure (MOF) have been a major focus of research over the past hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print ais7 2028. 05.27.1651 hips femedcine,medscape.convanile/180234-pent decade. Comparatively few data exist about the magnitude of the intraperitoneal'abscess cytokine response and implications for the host. Existing data suggest that bacterial peritonitis is associated with an immense intraperitoneal compartmentalized cytokine response. Higher levels of certain cytokines (ie, tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha], interleukin (IL-6) have been associated with worse outcomes, as well as secondary (uncontrolled) activation ofthe systemic inflammatory cascade. Cmedicine Etiology ‘The etiology of cisease depends on the type, as well as location, of peritonitis, as follows: + Primary peritonitis + Secondary peritonitis + Tertiary peritonitis + Chemical peritonitis + Peritoneal abscess Primary peritonitis ‘Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is an acute bacterial infection of ascitic fluid. Contamination of the peritoneal cavity is thought to result from translocation of bacteria across the gut wall or mesenteric lymphatics and, less frequently, via hematogenous seeding in the presence of bacteremia, ‘SBP can occur as a complication of any disease state that produces the clinical syndrome of ascites, such as heart failure and Budd-Chiari syndrome, Children with nephrosis or systemic lupus erythematosus who have ascites have a high risk of developing SBP, The highest risk of SBP, however isin patients with citrhosis who are in a decompensated state. [5] In particular, decreased hepatic synthetic function with associated low total protein level, ow complement levels, or prolonged prothrombin time (PT) is associated with maximum risk. Patients with low protein levels in ascitic Nuid (< 1 g/dL) have a 10-fold higher risk of developing SBP than those with a protein level greater than 1 g/dL. Approximately 10-30% of patients with cirthosis and ascites develop SBP_6] The incidence rises to more than 40% with ascitc fluid protein contents of less than 1 g/dl. (which occurs 15% of patients), presumably because of decreased ascitc fluid opsonic activity More than 90% of cases of SBP are caused by a monomicrobial infection. The most common pathogens include gram-negative ‘organisms (eg, E coli [40%], K pneumoniae [7%], Pseudomonas species, Proteus species, other gram-negative species [20%I) and gram-positive organisms (eg, Streptococcus pneumoniae [15%], other Streptococcus species [15%]. and Staphylococcus species [3%]) (see Table 1). However, some data suggest that the percentage of gram-positive infections may be increasing.[7, 8] One study cites a 34.2% incidence of streptococci, ranking in second position after Enterobacteriaceae {8} Viridans group streptococci (VBS) accounted for 73.8% of these streptococcal isolates. A single organism is noted in 92% of cases, and 8% of, cases are polymicrobial ‘Anaerobic microorganisms are found in less than 5% of cases, and multiple isolates are found in less than 10%. ‘Secondary periton Worldwide, secondary peritonitis accounts for about 1% of urgent/emergent hospital admissions and is the second most ‘common cause of sepsis in intensive care units [9] Common etiologic entities of secondary peritonitis (SP) include perforated appendicitis; perforated gastric or duodenal ulcer; perforated (sigmoid) colon caused by diverticulitis, volvulus, or cancer, and strangulation of the small bowel (see Table 1). Necrotizing pancreatitis can also be associated with peritonitis in the case of infection of the necrotic tissue. ‘The pathogens involved in SP differ in the proximal and distal gastrointestinal (Gl) tract. Gram-positive organisms predominate in the upper GI tract, with a shift toward gram-negative organisms in the upper Gl tract in patients on long-term gastric acid ‘suppressive therapy. Contamination from a distal small bowel or colon source initially may result in the release of several hundred bacterial species (and fungi); host defenses quickly eliminate most of these organisms. The resulting peritonitis is almost always polymicrobial, containing a mixture of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria with a predominance of gram-negative ‘organisms (see Table 1), ‘As many as 18% of patients who have cirrhosis with ascites who were initially presumed to have SBP have SP. In many of these patients, clinical signs and symptoms alone are not sensitive or specific enough to reliably differentiate between the 2 entities. A thorough history, evaluation of the peritoneal fluid, and additional diagnostic tests are needed to do so; a high index of suspicion is required hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print 537 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape-convarilel180234-print Table 1. Common Causes of Secondary Peritonitis (Open Table in a new window) Source Regions Esophagus Stomach Duodenum Biliary tract Pancreas ‘Small bowel Causes Boerhaave syndrome Malignancy ‘Trauma (mostly penetrating) latragenic* Peptic ulcer perforation Malignancy (eg, adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor) ‘Trauma (mostly penetrating) latragenic* Peptic ulcer perforation Trauma (blunt and penetrating) latrogenic*™ Cholecystitis Stone perforation from gallbladder (je, gallstone ileus) or common duct Malignancy Choledochal cyst (rare) ‘Trauma (mostly penetrating) latrogenic* Pancreatitis (eg, alcohol, drugs, gallstones) Trauma (blunt and penetrating) Iatrogenic Ischemic bowel Incarcerated hernia (intemal and external) Closed loop obstruction Crohn disease hitpstemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print a7 2028. 08.27.1651 Large bowel and appendix Uterus, salpinx, and ovaries hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print Malignancy (rare) Meckel diverticulum ‘Trauma (mostly penetrating) Ischemic bowel Diverticulitis Malignancy Ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease Appendicitis Colonie volvulus ‘Trauma (mostly penetrating) latrogenic Pelvic inflammatory disease (0g, salpingo-oophoritis, tubo-ovarian abscess, ovarian cyst) Malignancy (rare) ‘Trauma (uncommon) “Iatrogenic trauma to the upper GI tract, including the pancreas and biliary tract and colon, often results from endoscopic procedures; anastomotic dehiscence and inadvertent bowel injury (eg, mechanical, thermal) are common causes of leak in the postoperative period. ‘Common organisms cultured in secondary peritonitis are presented in Table 2, below[10} ‘Table 2. Microbial Flora of Secondary Type Organism Aerobic Gram negative Escherichia coli Peritonitis (Open Table in a new window) Percentage 60% EnterobacteriKlebsiella 26% Proteus 22% hitpstlemecicine medscape.comvartle/180234-prnt is 2028.05.27.1651 hips ilemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print Pseudomonas 8% Gram postive Streptococci 28% Enterococci 17% Staphylococci % Anaerobic Bacteroides 2% Eubacteria 24% Clostrdia 17% Peptostreptococci 14% Peptococci 1% Fungi Candida 2% ther rare, nonsurgical causes of intra-abdominal sepsis include the folowing: + Chlamydia peritonitis + Tuberculosis peritonitis + Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-associated peritonitis, ‘The most common cause of postoperative peritonitis is anastomotic leak, with symptoms generally appearing around postoperative days 5-7. After elective abdominal operations for noninfectious etiologies, the incidence of SP (caused by anastomotic disruption, breakdown of enterotomy closures, or inadvertent bowel injury) should be less than 2%. Operations for inflammatory disease (ie, appendicitis, diverticulitis, cholecystitis) without perforation carry a risk of less than 10% for the development of SP and peritoneal abscess. This risk may rise to greater than 50% in gangrenous bowel disease and visceral perforation. ‘After operations for penetrating abdominal trauma, SP and abscess formation are observed in a small number of patients. Duodenal and pancreatic involvement, as well as colon perforation, gross peritoneal contamination, perioperative shock, and massive transfusion, are factors that increase the risk of infection in these cases. hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print as7 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print Peritonits is also a frequent complication and significant limitation of peritoneal dialysis {4] Peritontis leads to increased hospitalization and mortality rates, Tertiary peritonitis Tertiary peritonitis (see Table 3, below) develops more frequently in immunocompromised patients and in persons with significant preexisting comorbid conditions. Although rarely observed in uncomplicated peritoneal infections, the incidence of tertiary peritonitis in patients requiring ICU admission for severe abdominal infections may be as high as 50-74%, Tuberculous peritonitis (TP) is rare in the United States (< 2% of all causes of peritonitis), but it continues to be a significant problem in developing countries and among patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The presenting symptoms are often nonspecific and insidious in onset (eg, low-grade fever, anorexia, weight loss). Many patients with TP have underlying cirrhosis, More than 95% of patients with TP have evidence of ascites on imaging studies, and more than half of these patients have clinically apparent ascites, In most cases, chest radiographic findings in patients with TP peritonitis are abnormal; active pulmonary disease is uncommon {< 30%). Results on Gram stain of ascitic fluid are rarely positive, and culture results may be falsely negative in up to 80% of patients. A peritoneal fluid protein level greater than 2.5 g/dL, a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level greater than $0 U/mL, or a predominantly mononuclear cell count of greater than 500 cells! L should raise suspicion of TP but have limited specificity for the diagnosis. Laparoscopy and visualization of granulomas on peritoneal biopsy specimens, as well as cultures (requires 4-6 wk), may be needed for the definitive diagnosis; however, empiric therapy should begin immediately. Table 3. Microbiology of Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Peritonitis (Open Table in a new window) Etiologic Organisms Peritonitis Antibiotic Therapy (Type) (Suggested) Class ‘Type of Organism E coll (40%) K pneumoniae (7%) Pseudomonas species (5%) Primary STS rao pecies (5%) Trd.generaton cephalosporin ‘Streptococcus species (15%) ‘Staphylococcus species (3%) ‘Anaerobic species (< 5%) secondary ca Second-geeration cephalosporin Gram. Enterobacter species Tire. generation cephalosporin negative Klebsiella species Penicillins with anaerobic activity Proteus species Quincones wih anaorobicactvty Quinolone and metronidazole stroptococcus species Aminoglycoside and metronidazole Gram-positive Enterococcus species hitpstemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-prnt 937 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print Bacteroides fragilis Other Bacteroides species ‘Anaerobio Eubacterium species Clostridium species Anaerobic Streptococcus species ‘Second-generation cephalosporin Enterobacter species Gram- seu Third-generation cephalosporin 'seudomonas species negative Penicilins with anaerobic activity Enterococcus species Quinotones with anaerobic activity Tertiary Quinolone and metronidazole ‘Aminoglycoside and metronidazole Gram-positive Staphylococcus species Carbapenems Triazoles or amphotericin (considered in fungal etiology) Fungal Candide species (Alter therapy based on culture results.) Chemical peritonitis Chemical (sterile) peritonitis may be caused by irritants such as bile, blood, barium, or other substances or by transmural inflammation of visceral organs (eg, Crohn disease) without bacterial inoculation of the peritoneal cavity. Clinical signs and symptoms are indistinguishable from those of SP or peritoneal abscess, and the diagnostic and therapeutic approach should be the same.[11] Peritoneal abscess Paritoneal abscess describes the formation of an infected fluid collection encapsulated by fibrinous exudate, omentum, and/or adjacent visceral organs. The overwhelming majority of abscesses occur subsequent to SP. Abscess formation may be a ‘complication of surgery. The incidence of abscess formation after abdominal surgery is less than 1-2%, even when the operation is performed for an acute inflammatory process. The risk of abscess increases to 10-30% in cases of preoperative perforation of the hollow viscus, significant fecal contamination of the peritoneal cavity, bowel ischemia, delayed diagnosis and therapy of the intial peritonitis, and the need for reoperation, as well as in the setting of immunosuppression, Abscess formation is the leading cause of persistent infection and development of tertiary peritonitis Epidemiology ‘The overall incidence of peritoneal infection and abscess is difficult to establish and varies with the underlying abdominal disease processes. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) occurs in both children and adults and is a well-known and ominous ‘complication of cirrhosis.{6] Of patients with cirrhosis who have SBP, 70% are Child-Pugh class C. In these patients, the development of SBP is associated with a poor long-term prognosis. ‘Once thought to occur only in those individuals with alecholic cirthosis, SBP is known to affect patients with cirrhosis from any ‘cause. In patients with ascites, the prevalence may be as high as 18%. This number has grown from 8% over the past two decades, most likely secondary to an increased awareness of SBP and heightened threshold to perform diagnostic paracentesis. hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print 10197 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print Although the etiology and incidence of hepatic failure differ between children and adults, in those individuals with ascites, the incidence of SBP is roughly equal. Two peak ages for SBP are characteristic in children: one in the neonatal period and the other at age 5 years, edicine Prognosis ‘Over the past decade, the combination of better antibiotic therapy, more aggressive intensive care, and earlier diagnosis and therapy with a combination of operative and percutaneous techniques have led to a significant reduction in morbidity and mortality related to intra-abdominal sepsis. Independent risk factors of the intra-abdominal view (IAV) for severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) or 30-day mortality appear to be the extent of peritonitis, dffuse substantial redness of the peritoneum, type of exudate (fecal or bile), and ‘a nonappendiceal source of the infection {12} In goneral, there is a 6% overall mortality in secondary peritonitis, rising to 36% in those who develop sepsis [9] ‘Spontaneous bacterial peritoni ‘The morality rate in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) may be as low as 5% in patients who receive prompt diagnosis and treatment. However, in hospitalized patients, 1-year mortality rates may range from 50-70%,{13] This is usually secondary to the development of complications, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, renal dysfunction, and worsening liver failure.[14] Patients with ‘concurrent renal insufficiency have been shown to be at a higher risk of mortality rom SBP than those without concurrent renal insufficiency, Mortality from SBP may be decreasing among all subgroups of patients because of advances in its diagnosis and treatment, The overall mortality rate in patients with SBP may exceed 30% if the diagnosis and treatment are delayed, but the mortality rate is less than 10% in faity woll-compensated patients with early therapy. As many as 70% of patients who survive an episode of ‘SBP have a recurrent episode within 1 year, and in these patients, the mortality rate approaches 50%. Some studies suggest that the recurrence rate of SBP may be decreased to less than 20% with long-term antibiotic prophylaxis (eg, quinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole); however, whether this improves long-term survival without liver transplantation is unclear, ‘Secondary peritonitis and peritoneal abscess Uncomplicated secondary peritonitis (SP) and simple abscesses carry a morality rate of less than 5%, but this rate may increase to greater than 30-50% in severe infections. The overall mortalily rate related to intra-abdominal abscess formation is, less than 10-20%. Factors thal independently predict worse outcomes include advanced age, malnutrition, presence of cancer, ‘a high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Il (APACHE I) score on presentation, preoperative organ dysfunction, the presence of complex abscesses, and failure to improve in less than 24-72 hours after adequate therapy. In severe intra-abdominal infections and peritonitis, the mortality rate may increase to greater than 30-50%. The concurrent development of sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and multiple organ failure (MOF) can increase the mortality rate to greater than 70%, and, in these patients, more than 80% of deaths occur with an active infection present. Soriano et al found that cirhotic patients with SP who underwent surgical treatment tended to have a lower mortally rate than did those who received medical therapy only (53.8% vs 81.8%, respectively) [15] Among the surgically treated patients with SP, the survival rate was greater in those with the shortest time between diagnostic paracentesis and surgery. These researchers ‘concluded that the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with SP could be improved via a low threshold of suspicion on the basis of Runyon's eriteria and microbiologic data, prompt use of abdominal computed tomography scanning, and early surgical evaluation. Tertiary peritonitis In comparison with patients with other forms of peritonitis, patients who develop tertiary peritonitis have significantly longer intensive care unit and hospital stays, higher organ dysfunction scores, and higher mortality rates (50-70%). Other factors affecting prognosis ‘Several scoring systems (eg, APACHE II, SIRS, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [MODS], Mannheim peritonitis index) have been developed to assess the clinical prognosis of patients with peritonitis. Most of these scores rely on certain host criteria, systemic signs of sepsis, and complications related to organ failure. Although valuable for comparing patient cohorts and institutions, these scores have limited value in the specific day-to-day clinical decision-making process for any given patient. In general, the mortality rate is less than 5% with an APACHE II of less than 15 and rises to greater than 40% with scores above hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print war 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print 15. Rising APACHE II scores on days 3 and 7 are associated with an increase of mortality rates to greater than 90%, whereas falling scores predict mortality rates of less than 20%, ‘The mortality rate without organ failure generally is less than 5% but may rise to greater than 90% with quadruple organ failure. Adelay of more than 2-4 days in instituting either medical therapy or surgical therapy has been clearly associated with increased complication rates, the development of tertiary peritonitis, the need for reoperation, multiple organ system dysfunction, and death. ‘Outcomes are worse in patients requiting emergent reoperations for persistent or recurrent infections (30-50% increase in the mortality rate); however, patients undergoing early planned second-look operations do not demonstrate this trend, Persistent infection, recovery of enterococci, and multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms, as well as fungal infection, are related to worse outcomes and recurrent complications. Patients older than 65 years have a threefold increased risk of developing generalized peritonitis and sepsis from gangrenous or perforated appendicitis and perforated diverticulitis than younger patients and are three times more likely to die from these disease processes. Older patients with perforated diverticulitis are three times more likely than younger patients to have generalized rather than localized (Ie, pericolic, pelvic) peritonitis, These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the biologic features of peritonitis difer in elderly persons, who are more likely to present with an advanced or more severe process than younger patients with peritonitis. Overall, studies suggest that hostrelated factors are more significant than the type and source of infection with regard tothe prognosis in intraeabdominal infections. (16] medicine Presentation History ‘The diagnosis of peritonitis is usually clinical. History should include recent abdominal surgery, previous episodes of peritonitis, travel history, use of immunosuppressive agents, and the presence of diseases (eg, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticulitis, peptic ulcer disease) that may predispose to intra-abdominal infections. ‘Abroad range of signs and symptoms are seen in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). A high index of suspicion must be maintained when caring for patients with ascites, particulary those with acute clinical deterioration. As many as 30% of patients are completely asymptomatic. Manifestations of SBP may include the following + Fever and chills (as many as 80% of patients) + Abdominal pain or discomfort (found in as many as 70% of patients) + Worsening or unexplained encephalopathy + Diarthea + Ascites that does not improve following administration of diuretic medication + Worsening or new-onset renal failure + tleus ‘Abdominal pain, which may be acute or insidious, is the usual chief complaint of patients with peritonitis. Iniially, the pain may be dull and pooty localized (visceral peritoneum); often, it progresses to steady, severe, and more localized pain (parietal peritoneum). Abdominal pain may be exacerbated by any movement (eg, coughing, flexing the hips) and local pressure. Ifthe underlying process is not contained, the pain becomes diffuse. In certain disease entities (eg, gastric perforation, severe acute pancreatitis, intestinal ischemia), the abdominal pain may be generalized from the beginning. ‘Abdominal distention may be noted, as well as signs of dysfunction of other organs. Symptoms may be subtle in patients on Corticosteroids, in diabetic patients with advanced neuropathy, and in hospitalized patients, especially the very young and the very old. In the presence of ascites, decreased fiction between the visceral and parietal peritoneal surlaces may reduce the symptoms of abdominal pain, as seen in patients with SBP. ‘Anorexia and nausea are frequent symploms and may precede the development of abdominal pain. Vomiting may be due to underlying visceral organ pathology (ie, obstruction) or be secondary to peritoneal irritation, hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print var 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print medicine Physical Examination ‘On physical examination, patients with peritonitis generally appear unwell and in acute distress. Many of them have a temperature that exceeds 38° C, although patients with severe sepsis may become hypothermic. Tachycardia may be present, as a result of the release of inflammatory mediators, intravascular hypovolemia from anorexia, vomiting and fever, and third ‘space losses into the peritoneal cavity. With progressive dehydration, patients may become hypotensive (5+14% of patients), as well as oliguric or anurie; with severe peritonitis, they may present in overt septic shock. When examining the abdomen of a patient with suspected peritonitis, the patient should be supine. A roll or pillows undemeath the patient's knees may allow for better relaxation of the abdominal wall ‘On abdominal examination, almost all patients demonstrate tenderness to palpation. In most patients—even those with generalized peritonitis and severe diffuse abdominal pain—the point of maximal tendemess or referred rebound tenderness roughly overlies the pathologic process (ie, the site of maximal peritoneal irritation), Most patients demonstrate increased abdominal wall rigidity. The increase in abdominal wall muscular tone may be voluntary, in response to or in anticipation of the abdominal examination, or involuntary because of the peritoneal iritation, Patients with severe peritonitis often avoid all motion and keep their hips flexed to relieve the abdominal wall tension. The abdomen is often distended, with hypoactive-to-absent bowel sounds. This finding reflects a generalized ileus and may not be present ifthe infection is well localized. Occasionally, the abdominal examination reveals an inflammatory mass, Signs of hepatic failure (eg, jaundice, angiomata) may be noted, Rectal examination often elicits increased abdominal pain, particularly with inflammation of the pelvic organs, but rarely indicates a specific diagnosis. A tender inflammatory mass toward the right may indicate appendicitis, and anterior fulness and fluctuation may indicate a cul de sac abscess, In female patients, vaginal and bimanual examination findings may be consistent with pelvic inflammatory disease (eg, ‘endometriis, salpingo-oophoritis, tubo-ovarian abscess), but exam findings are often difficult to interpret in severe peritonitis, ‘A.complete physical examination is important for excluding conditions whose presentation may resemble that of peritonitis. ‘Thoracic processes with diaphragmatic iritation (eg, empyema), extraperitoneal processes (eg, pyelonephritis, cystitis, acute urinary retention), and abdominal wall processes (6g, infection, rectus hematoma) may mimic certain signs and symptoms of peritonitis, Always examine the patient for the presence of external hernias to rule out intestinal incarceration Remember that the presentation and the findings on clinical examination may be entirely inconclusive or unreliable in patients with significant immunosuppression (eg, severe diabetes, steroid use, posttransplant status, HIV infection), in patients with altered mental state (eg, head injury, toxic encephalopathy, septic shock, analgesic agents), in patients with paraplegia, and in patients of advanced age. With localized deep peritoneal infections, fever andior an elevated WBC count may be the only signs present. As many as 20% of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis demonstrate very subtle signs and symptoms. New ‘onset or deterioration of existing encephalopathy may be the only sign of the infection at the inital presentation, Most patients with tuberculous peritonitis demonstrate vague symptoms and may be afebrile. medicine DDx Diagnostic Considerations ‘Thoracic processes with diaphragmatic iritation (eg, empyema), extraperitoneal processes (eg, pyelonephritis, cystitis, acute urinary retention), and abdominal wall processes (eg, infection, rectus hematoma) may mimic certain signs and symptoms of peritonitis, Always examine the patient for the presence of external hernias to rule out intestinal incarceration ‘According to Adler and Gasbarra, the following should be considered in the differential diagnosis{10] ‘+ Chemical irritants (eg, ble, blood, gastric juice, barium, enema or douche contents) + Chronic peritoneal dialysis + Chylous peritonitis + Eosinophilic peritonitis hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print 13097 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print + Familial Mediterranean fever ‘+ Fungal infections (eg, histoplasmosis, cryptococcosis, coccidicidomycosis) + Granulomatous peritonitis (eg, parasitic infestations, sarcoidosis, tumors, Crohn disease, starch granules) ‘+ Gynecologic disorders (Chlamydia peritonitis, salpingitis, endometriosis, teratoma, leiomyomatosi dermoid cyst) ‘+ Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-associated peritonitis (from opportunistic organisms) ‘+ Mesothelial hyperplasia and metaplasia + Neoplasms (ag, primary mesothelioma, secondary carcinomatosis, Pseudomyxoma peritonei) ‘+ Parasitic infections (eg, schistosomiasis, ascariasis, enterobiasis, amebiasis, strongyloidiasis) + Perforated viscus + Peritoneal encapsulation + Peritoneal loose bodies and peritoneal cysts + Peritoneal iymphangiectasis + Pyelonephritis + Sclerosing peritonitis + Splenosis ‘Vascular conditions (eg, mesenteric embolus, mesenteric nonocclusive ischemia, ischemic colitis, portal vein thrombosis, mesenteric vain thrombosis) + Vasculitis (eg, systemic lupus erythematosus, allergic vasculitis [Henoch-Schénlein purpura], Kohimeier-Degos disease, polyarteritis nodosa) Different I Diagnoses ‘= Acute Angioedema + Appendicitis + Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and Cystitis (Bladder Infection) in Females ‘+ Whipple Disease @medicine Workup Workup Approach Considerations Diagnostic paracentesis should be performed in all patients who do not have an indwelling peritoneal catheter and are suspected of having spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). In peritoneal dialysis patients with a peritoneal catheter, fluid should be withdrawn using sterile technique. Ultrasonography may aid paracentesis if ascites is minimally detectable or questionable. ‘The results of aerobic and anaerobic bacterial cultures, used in conjunction with the cell count, prove the most useful in guiding therapy for those with SBP.[17] With regard to ascitic fluid culture, direct inoculation of routine blood culture bottles at the bedside with 10 mL of ascitic fluid has been reported to significantly increase the sensitivity of microbiologic studies. The diagnostic and therapeutic approach to peritonitis and peritoneal abscess is summarized in the algorithm below. hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print vais 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print ‘and abdominal sepsis. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to peritonitis and peritoneal abscess. ine Peritonit medi Laboratory Studies Complete blood cell count and other blood studies Most patients will have leukocytosis (>11,000 cells/u L), with a shift to the immature forms on the differential cell count. Patients who have severe sepsis, are immunocompromised, or have certain types of infections (eg, fungal, cytomegaloviral) may not have leukocytosis or leukopenia, In cases of suspected spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), hypersplenism may reduce the polymorphonuclear leukocyte count. Blood chemistry findings may reveal dehydration and acidosis, Obtaining prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and intemational normalized ratio (INR) is indicated. Liver function tests may be indicated, Amylase and lipase levels should be obtained if pancrealits is suspected. Blood culture results are positive for the offending agent in as many as 33% of, patients with SBP and may help guide antibiotic therapy. Measurement of serum albumin allows calculation of the serum-to- ascites albumin gradient (SAAG). A SAAG of more than 1.1 is noted in SBP. Procalcitonin level Findings from a 2019 retrospective study (2016-2017) of 89 patients with abdominal sepsis suggests that serum procalcitonin level can be an indicator of severity and mortality in abdominal sepsis due to secondary peritonitis [18] There appeared to be statistical significance with a procalcitonin level above 10.1 meg/, Mannheim peritonitis score over 26 points, controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score above 6 points, and the presence of organic faults, but not with APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chroni¢ Health Evaluation) and SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) scores and mortality [18] Urinalysis A.urinalysis is used to rule out urinary tract diseases (eg, pyelonephritis, renal stone disease); however, patients with lower ‘abdominal and pelvic infections often demonstrate white blood cells (WBCs) in the urine and microhematuria. Stool sample In patients with diarrhea, evaluate a stool sample—employing a Clostridium dificile toxin assay, a WBC count, and a specific culture (ie, Salmonella, Shigella, cytomegalovirus [CMV)}—if the paliont's history suggests infectious enterocolitis. medicine hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print 1697 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print Peritoneal Fluid Analysis ‘The single best predictor of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is an ascitic fluid neutrophil count of greater than 500 cells! LiL, which carries a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 98%. By lowering the ascitic fluid neutrophil count threshold to 250, colisiy L, the sensitivity increases to 93% with only a minimal decrease in specificity to 94%. ‘The fluid should be evaluated for glucose, protein, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), cell count, Gram stain, and aerobic and anaerobic cultures. If pancreatitis or a pancreatic leak is suspected, amylase analysis should be added to the panel. Bilirubin and creatinine levels can be analyzed as well, if @ biliary or urinary leak is suspected as a possible etiology. The peritoneallascitic fluid characteristics or levels are then compared with their respective serum values, ‘The fluid in bacterial peritonitis generally demonstrates a low pH and low glucose levels with elevated protein and LDH levels. ‘Traditionally, ascitic fuid pH of less that 7.34 was consistent with a diagnosis of SBP; however, ascitic pH is less commonly measured because its unreliable and lacks specificity for the condition. ‘The diagnosis of SBP is established when the polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) count is 250 cells/uL or greater in Conjunction with a positive bacterial culture result. In most of these cases, as mentioned previously, cultures are positive for a single organism. Obviously, these patients should receive antibiotic therapy. Although up to 30% of cultures remain negative, most of these patients are presumed to have bacterial peritonitis; they should be treated. A significantly decreased peritoneal fluid glucose level (< 50 mg/dL), a peritoneal fluid LOH level much greater than the serum LDH, a peritoneal fluid white blood ccell (WBC) count greater than 10,000 cells/jL, a pH lower than 7.0, high amylase levels, multiple organisms on Gram stain, or recovery of anaerobes from the culture raises the suspicion of SP in these patients. Some authors recommend repeating the paracentesis in 48-72 hours to monitor treatment success (decrease in neutrophil count to < 50% of the original value), Culture-negative neutrocytic ascites (probable SBP) is established when the ascitic fluid culture results are negative but the polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PPMIN) count is 250 cells/uL or greater. This may happen in as many as 50% of patients with ‘SBP and may not actually represent a distincly different disease entity. Rather, it may be the result of poor culturing techniques or late-stage resolving infection. Nonetheless, these patients should be treated just as aggressively as those with positive culture results. Monomicrabial nonneutrocytic bacterascites exists when a positive culture rasult coexists with a PMN count of less than 250 cellsijL. Although this may often be the result of contamination of bacterial cultures, 38% of these patients develop SBP. Therefore, monomicrobial nonneutrocytic bacterascites may represent an early form of SBP. All study patients described who eventually developed SBP were symptomatic. For this reason, any patient suspected clinically of having SBP in this setting must be treated ‘Tuberculous peritonitis (TP) is identified by ascites with high protein content, a low glucose and low SAAG, elevated ascitic uid WBC count, and lymphocyte predominance. In TP, the fluid Gram stain and acid-fast stain results are rarely positive, and routine culture results are falsely negative in as many as 80% of cases. A peritoneal fluid protein level greater than 2.5 g/dL, LDH level greater than 90 U/mL, and predominantly mononuclear cell count of more than 500 cells/uiL should raise the suspicion of TP, but specificity for the diagnosis is limited. Laparoscopy with visualization of granulomas on peritoneal biopsy and specific culture (which requires 4-6 wk) may be needed for definitive diagnosis. Peritonits in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is indicated by contamination of the dialysis catheter; cloudy effluent, total fluid WBC count of greater than 100 neutrophils/uL, or presence of organisms on Gram stain Routine intraoperative peritoneal fluid cultures in defined acute disease entities (je, gastric or duodenal ulcer perforation, appendicitis, diverticulitis or perforation of the colon caused by obstruction or ischemia) are controversial. Several studies found no significant difference in patients with appendicitis, diverticulitis, and other common eliologias for bacterial peritonitis with regard to postoperative complication rates or overall outcomes. The antibiotic regimen was altered only &-10% of the time based (on operative culture data. In patients who had previous abdominal operations or instrumentation (eg, peritoneal dialysis catheter, percutaneous stents) and patients with prolonged antibiotic therapy, erica ilness, and/or hospitalization, these cultures may reveal resistant or unusual organisms that should prompt alteration of the antibiotic strategy. For a summary of ascitic fluid analysis, see Table 4, below. Table 4. Ascitc Fluid Analysis Summary I (Open Table in a now window) Routine Optional Unusual Less Helpful Cell count Obtain culture in blood culture (BC) Tuberoulosis (TB) smear and pH bottles. culture hitpstlemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print 16097 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print Albumin Glucose Cytology Lactate Total resin Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) Triglyceride Cholesterol Amylase Bilirubin Fibronectin Gram stain Alpha 1-antitrypsin Glycosaminoglycans medicine Bedside Reagent Strips ‘A development in the rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) has been the proposed use of bedside reagent strips read by a portable spectrophotometric device. In a pilot study, this combination achieved a 100% sensitivity in diagnosis of ‘SBP{19] Ina separate, small cohort, the average time saved from dipstick to laboratory results ranged from 2.73 hours (dipstick to validated result from automated counter) to 3 hours (dipstick to validated manual cell count of ascitic fluid). [20] More recently, a study that evaluated the sensitivity of a bedside leukocyte esterase reagent strip for the detection of SBP in 330 ‘emergency department ascites patients undergoing paracentesis (635 fluid analyses) found a 95% sensitivity, 48% specificity, 111% positive predictive value, and 99% negative predictive value at 3 minutes at the trace threshold of SBP prediction [21] Given these results, the reagent strip is not recommended as a standalone test. ‘This diagnostic method holds promise in replacing the time-consuming process of manual cell counting, which is often unavailable in many laboratories “after hours.” The decreased time to diagnosis may result in a significant reduction of the time from paracentesis to antibiotic treatment of presumptive SBP. medicine Radiography Plain films of the abdomen (eg, supine, upright, and lateral decubitus positions) are often the first imaging studies obtained in patients presenting with peritonitis. Their value in reaching a specific diagnosis is limited Free air is present in most cases of anterior gastric and duodenal perforation but is much less frequent with perforations of the ‘small bowel and colon and is unusual with appendiceal perforation. Upright films are useful for identifying free air under the diaphragm (most often on the right) as an indication of a perforated viscus. Remember that the presence of free air is not mandatory with visceral perforation and that small amounts of free air are missed easily on plain films. @medicine Ultrasonography ‘Abdominal ultrasonography may be helpful in the evaluation of pathology in the right upper quadrant (eg, perihepatic abscess, cholecystitis, bila, pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocyst), right lower quadrant, and pelvis (eg, appendicitis, tubo-ovarian, hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print wrist 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print abscess, Douglas pouch abscess). However, the examination is sometimes limited because of patient discomfort, abdominal distention, and bowel gas interference. Ultrasonography may detect increased amounts of peritoneal fluid (ascites), but its ablity to detect quantities of less than 100 mLis limited. The central (perimesenteric) peritoneal cavity is not visualized well with transabdominal ultrasonography. Examination from the flank or back may improve the diagnostic yield, and providing the ultrasonographer with specific information about the patient's condition and the suspected diagnosis before the examination is important. With an experienced ultrasonographer, a diagnostic accuracy of greater than 85% has been reported in several series. Uttrasonographically guided aspiration and placement of drains has evolved into a valuable tool in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal fuid collections, Advantages of ultrasound include low cost, portability, and availability. Disadvantages are that the test is operator dependent, land there is reduced visualization in the presence of overlying bowel gas and abdominal dressings. medicine Computed Tomography Scanning Itthe diagnosis of peritonitis is made clinically, a computed tomography (CT) scan is not necessary and generally delays surgical intervention without offering clinical advantage. However, CT scanning is indicated in all cases in which the diagnosis, ‘cannot be established on clinical grounds and the findings on abdominal plain films. CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis remain the diagnostic study of choice for peritoneal abscess and related visceral pathology. Whenever possible, the CT scan should be performed with enteral and intravenous contrast. CT scans can detect small ‘quantitis of fluid, areas of inflammation, and other gastrointestinal tract pathology, with sensitivities that approach 100%. (See the image below.) CT scanning can be used to evaluate for ischemia, as well as to determine bowel obstruction. An abscess is suggested by the presence of fluid density that is not bound by the bowel or other known structures. Gas within an abdominal mass or the presence of an enhancing wall and adjacent inflammatory changes are also highly suggestive of an abscess. Ischemia can be demonstrated by a clot in a large vessel or by the absence of blood flow. Gas within the intestinal wall or in the portal vein may also suggest ischemia, Peritonitis and abdominal sepsis. A 78-year-old man was admitted with a history of prior surgery for small bowel obstruction and worsening abdominal pain, distended abdomen, nausea, and obstipation. in figure A, a marked amount of portal venous {gas within the liver, mesenteric venous gas, and pneumatosis intestinalis are consistent with ischemic small intestine. The Superior mesenteric artery appears patent. The liver has a nodular contour consistent with cirrhosis. In figures B and C, markedly distended loops of small intestine containing fluid and air-luid levels are consistent with a small bowel obstruction, No focal fluid collections are identified, hitpstlemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-prnt 1897 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape.convarilel180234-print In abscess formation subsequent to secondary peritonitis (SP), approximately half of patients have a simple abscess without loculation, and the other half have complex abscesses secondary to fibrinous septation and organization of the abscess material. Abscess formation occurs most frequently in the subhepatic area, the pelvis, and the paracolic gutters, but it may also ‘occur in the perisplenic area, the lesser sac, and between small bowel loops and thelr mesentery. Peritoneal abscesses and other fluid collections may be aspirated for diagnosis and drained under CT guidance; this technique has become a mainstay of therapy. medicine Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful imaging modality for the diagnosis of suspected intra-abdominal abscesses. Abdominal abscesses demonstrate decreased signal intensity on T1-weighted images and homogeneous or heterogeneous increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images; abscesses are observed best on gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted, fat- suppressed images as well-defined fluid collections with rim enhancement. Limited avaitabiity and high cost, as well as the need for MRI-compatible patient support equipment and the length of the ‘examination, currently limit its usefulness as a diagnostic tool in acute peritoneal infections, particularly for patients who are critically il medicine Other Imaging Studies Nuclear scanning Nuclear imaging diagnostic studies have litle use in the intial evaluation of patients with suspected peritonitis or intra-abdominal sepsis. They are most frequently used in the evaluation of fever of unknown origin or in patients with persistent fever despite adequate antibiotic treatment and negative computed tomography scan findings. Contrast studies Conventional contrast studies (Ie, Gastrografin swallow, upper gastrointestinal tract study with follow-through, colorectal contrast ‘enema, fistulogram, contrast studies of drains and stents) are reserved for specific indications in the setting of suspected peritonitis or peritoneal abscess. medicine Treatment Approach Considerations ‘The management approach to peritonitis and peritoneal abscesses targets correction of the underlying process, administration of systemic antibiotics, and supportive therapy to prevent or limit secondary complications due to organ system failure, Trealment success is defined as adequate source control with resolution of sepsis and clearance of all residual intra-abdominal infection, Early control of the septic source is mandatory and can be achieved by operative and nonoperative means. Surgical interventions ‘Operative management addresses the need to control the infectious source and to purge bacteria and toxins. The type and ‘extent of surgery depends on the underlying disease process and the severity of intra-abdominal infection. Definitive interventions to restore functional anatomy involve removing the source of the antimicrobial contamination and repairing the anatomic or functional disorder causing the infection. This is accomplished by surgical intervention. Occasionally, this can be achieved during a single operation; however. in certain situations, a second of a third procedure may be required. In some patients, definitive intervention is delayed until the condition of the patient improves and tissue healing is adequate to allow for a (sometimes) lengthy procedure. Damage control surgery hitpsiemecicine medscape.comvartcle/180234-print 19197 2028. 08.27.1651 hips vlemedicine medscape-convarilel180234-print ‘Alternatively, over the past decade, in the setting of extensive abdominal inflammatory disease and septic shock, surgeons have used damage control operations (DCS) to temporarily drain the infection, quickly control the visceral leak, and defer any

    You might also like