Pr ee en LB ta Rel
Case Results
Recommended actions scored as bonus points
based on difficulty setting
Overall Score: 92.8%
Your Diagnosis:
Ischemic Stroke v
Your Disposition:
Admit to ICU Vv
DETAILED DISCUSSION
Click each category for scoring details
Review of Systems: -?>
Physical Exam: 100.0% >DETAILED DISCUSSI
Click each category for scoring details
Review of Systems: -
Physical Exam: 100.0%
Stabilization: 100.0%
Investigations: 783%
Interventions: 100.0%
Communications: 50.0%
Answers Revealed
Click to Rate the Case
wwewwy
Frere J cone cue ]
vvvvw veyUnnecessary: 2
Harmful: o
Critical Actions: 50f6
ECG
Assess for any rhythm disturbance that may have
potentiated this condition.
Fingerstick Blood Sugar
A fingerstick should be performed rapidly to rule
‘out hypoglycemia as a cause of symptoms.
Blood Type & Screen
Make sure thorois a blood bank sample in case this
patient needs blood products after definitive
treatment.
Coagulation Panel
Baseline coagulation studies are essential to this
patient's therapeutic course.
Complete Blood Count (CBC)
Assess for anemia and thrombocytopenia.
CT - Head
‘An emergent non-contrast head CT is critical to this
nationtie manariamant Tha nnmnaca ie tn a
xq
qqCommunications
Score: 50.0%
Critical: 1of2
Recommend Oofo
Unnecessary: °
Harmful: o
Critical Actions: 1of2
Talk to wife x|
‘The wife has critical information that will enable
definitive treatment.
Consult Neurology ~
A Neurologist will be essential to manage this patient
after admission.
Recommended Actions: OofoThis patient is suffering from an acute stroke in the left
MMCA distribution causing slurred speech and right
hemiparesis. The differential diagnosis includes other
acute CNS issues such as hemorrhagic stroke, SAH, and
SDH (EDH is unlikely given the lack of acute head
trauma since itis typically associated with skull
fracture rupturing the middle meningeal artery.)
Initial stabilization should be focused on establishing
IV access and getting a STAT head CT. The primary
purpose of obtaining an immediate head CT is to
exclude a hemorrhagic stroke in order to consider
whether the patient is a candidate to receive
thrombolysis (treatment of ischemic stroke with tPA).
Of note, CTA would also be appropriate but may not be
available in many ED settings; current guidelines
require only a noncontrast head CT and a concerning
exam so we have made it unavailable in this case. The
patient should be examined to make sure he is
protecting his airway and does not need to be
emergently intubated. Basic labs should be obtained in
anticipation of possible thrombolysis based on the
head CT result including CBC, Chem-7, coagulationpanel, and blood bank sample. ECG should be obtained
which demonstrates atrial fibrillation - this is new
onset and the likely cause of the embolic stroke. No
intervention is needed for the hypertension on arrival
as autoregulation will occur in the setting of ischemic
stroke - dropping the blood pressure will worsen
ischemia to the stroke penumbra.
While MRI/A can be obtained, it is not indicated prior
to TPA administration due to the potential time delay
in TPA administration. After confirming the head CT is
negative for acute hemorrhage, the patient's wife
should be interviewed to confirm that the “last-seen-
well" time is within 3 hours. She should be consented
prior to TPA administration (0.9mg/kg, max dose 90mg,
with 10% given as bolus followed by remainder infusing
over 60minutes) with the goal of administration within
30minutes of arrival. There is likely benefit to
administration of TPA within the 3-4.5 hour window
although the positive effect is less pronounced. It is
important to note that TPA administration is not
without associated risk, the primary risk being
intracerebral hemorrhage, which may affect up to 5-7%
of patients. Additional interventions may be available
at specialist stroke centers including catheter-directed
mechanical thrombectomy and may benefit selectpatients up to 24 hours after onset of symptoms.
Consultation with neurology can be performed either
before or after TPA administration (depending on the
ED environment, the ED physician may be the one
making the decision to lyse if the neurologist is not
immediately available). MRI can be obtained after
treatment but is not mandatory in the ED setting. The
patient should be admitted to the ICU for post-lytic
care. From a procedure standpoint, central line and
arterial line placement are contraindicated due to time
delay and, if performed, will be scored as harmful
actions.
Contraindications to TPA administration:
~ onset »3-4.5 hours
- CNS bleed (current or prior), neoplasm
~ CNS or spinal surgery within 3 months
- concern for infective endocarditis or aortic dissection
- uncontrolled HTN >/=185/110 after treatment
- GI/GU bleeding in past 21 days
- acute bleeding/Acute trauma
- CT with major infarct signs (likely irreversible)
- bleeding diathesis (INR>17, Plt <100K, high
PTT/heparin use within 24hrs, anticoagulant/direct
thrombin/direct factor Xa inhibitor use)Relative Contraindications:
- mild neurological deficit
- non-compressible arterial puncture within 7 days (or
LP)
- hypoglycemia (<50 mg/dL), untreated
- serious trauma or major surgery within 14 days
- prior history of GI/GU bleeding
~ seizure
- pregnancy
- large intracranial aneurysm or vascular matformation,
untreated
Additional relative exclusion criteria (3-4.5 hrs):
~ age >80
- anticoagulant use (regardless of INR)
~ severe stroke
~ history of prior stroke AND diabetes
References:
http://www.strokeahaorg
Wardlaw, Joanna M., et al. "Thrombolysis for acute
ischemic stroke, update August 2014.” Stroke 45.11
(2014): €222-e225.