Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ADB Study
ADB Study
Semi-annual Report
April 2020
Your attention is directed to the ‘terms of use’ section of this website. In preparing any
country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or
reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian
Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other
status of any territory or area
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
(as of April 19, 2020)
ABBREVIATIONS
2
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Compensation - Means payment in cash or in kind for land, housing, income, and other
assets acquired or adversely affected by the Project. All compensation
is based on the principle of replacement cost, which is the method of
valuing assets to replace the loss at current market rates, plus any
transaction costs such as administrative charges, taxes, registration
and titling costs.
3
Community - CMP describes the current community land use, potential development
Management map, investment plans (targets and activities) and includes all sub
Plan (CMP) projects to be funded under INREMP
Free and Prior - The consensus of all members of the affected IP group is to be
Informed determined in accordance with their respective customary laws and
Consent practices, free from any external manipulation, interference and
(FPIC) coercion, and obtained after fully disclosing the intent and scope of the
activity, in a language and process understandable and appropriate to
the community. Broad community support may exist even if some
individuals or groups object to the project
Resettlement - All measures taken to mitigate any and all adverse impacts of a project
on AP property and/or livelihoods, including compensation, relocation
(where relevant), and rehabilitation as needed.
River Basin - A river basin is the portion of land drained by a river and its tributaries.
It encompasses the entire land surface dissected and drained by many
streams and creeks that flow downhill into one another, and eventually
into one river. The final destination is an estuary or an ocean
Watershed - A land area drained by a stream or fixed body of water and its tributaries
having a common outlet for surface runoff. It includes small watersheds
with an area of 10,000 hectares (ha) or less, medium-scale watersheds
of more than 10,000 ha up to 50,000 ha, and large
watersheds exceeding 50,000 ha.
4
Sub-watershed - Normally its boundary or divide is delineated topographically, following
the ridges in a landscape. However, its area can also be outlined based
on the bedrock formation that impacts groundwater. This divide is
called phreatic. The difficulty of groundwater study and the
convenience of using a contour map to outline the watershed boundary
resulted to the use of the topographic divide instead of the phreatic
divide. Inside a watershed, water is channeled through a network of
tributaries. Due to vast coverage of some watersheds, it is divided into
sub-watersheds. Watershed and sub-watershed is used
interchangeably in the INREMP context (Watershed Characterization
and Vulnerability Assessment using Geographic Information System-
DENR-FMB)
Upper River - The upstream portions of a river basin where the headwaters of
Basin streams and rivers emanate, consisting of lands with moderate to very
steep slopes and medium-to-high elevations relative to the river basin
valley
5
6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abbreviation……………………………………………………………………. 2
Definition of Terms……………………………………………………………. 3
Table of Content………………………………………………………………. 7
Executive Summary…………………………………………………………... 8
A. Background of the Report and Project Description…………………….. 9
B. Status of INREMP Subprojects Implementation……………………….. 10
Rural Infrastructure (RI) Subprojects……………………………………. 10
Natural Resources Management (NRM) Subprojects…………………. 16
Livelihood enhancement Support (LES) Subprojects…………………. 17
C. Objective and Scope of Social Safeguards Semi-annual Monitoring
Report………………………………………………………………………. 18
I. Objectives of Social Monitoring Report………………………………. 18
II. Scope of Social Monitoring Report…………………………………... 19
III. Subprojects Safeguards Performance Monitoring……..………….. 19
IV. Social Safeguards Performance Monitoring…..…………………… 19
Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement……………………. 19
Indigenous People…………………………………………………….. 21
D. Public Consultation and Capacity-Building…………………………….. 29
E. Grievance Redress Mechanism………………………………………….. 31
F. Institutional Arrangement…………………………………………………. 34
G. Overall Status, Issues, Concerns and Proposed Actions……………... 35
H. Appendices…………………………………………………………………. 35
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF APPENDICES
7
Executive Summary
INREMP is currently facilitating 60 rural infrastructure, 242 NRM and LES subprojects in
various stages. Social and environment safeguards documents such as social and environment
safeguards analysis, minutes of public consultations, involuntary resettlement (IR), indigenous
peoples (IP) and rapid environmental assessment (REA) checklists and waivers and quitclaims,
environmental impact assessment (EIA)/ environmental management plan (EMP),
environmental , environmental compliance certificate (ECC)/ certificate of non-coverage (CNCs),
cutting permits (as applicable) are appended to subproject documents (SPDs) submitted to ADB for
issuance of no-objection letter (NOL). As category A in IP, Category B for Involuntary Resettlement
and in Environment, rural infrastructure subprojects prepare IPPs and IEEs respectively. These
safeguards documents are cleared and disclosed at ADB website.
Social Safeguards compliance and monitoring results and findings, including grievance
redress mechanism are discussed in this document. Public participation and consultation,
capacity building and institutional arrangements are also included.
8
A. Background of the Report and Project Description
3. This Report is the 5th in the series of semi-annual monitoring reports and contains
progress achieved in the reporting period covering January to June 2019. As per Asian
Development Bank’s (ADB) Categorization, INREMP is Category A, in Indigenous People’s as
most of the areas in 4 URBs are within ancestral domains and/or occupied by IPs and Category
B in Involuntary Resettlement and Environment Safeguard. As access restriction issues and
unanticipated impacts during subprojects implementation are likely, safeguards documents such
as IPP, EMP, RP, ECC/CNC conditions/restrictions, due diligence reports and those identified in
the subproject proposals are monitored to ensure they are compliant to monitoring parameters
and criteria set forth in INREMP’s IPPF, RF and EARF.
2
NRM Subprojects include reforestation (REFO), assisted natural regeneration (ANR), conservation farming (CF), agroforestry,
commercial tree plantation (CTP) and community based protection and monitoring (CBPM).
9
and implemented by People’s Organizations (POs) and Local Government Units (LGUs). These
subproject interventions are expected to improve the use of natural and land resources, reduce
poverty and reverse environmental degradation.
6. As of June 2019, INREMP facilitated the preparation, development and processing of sixty
(60) RI subprojects (SPs) participated by LGUs in 4 URBs. The Rural Infrastructures subprojects
comprised of forty-two (42) access roads, eight (8) Level II water system, five (5) communal
irrigation system, four (4) footpath and one (1) trading center. Refer to Table 1 for details of status.
10
SPD submitted to ADB March 18,
2019
Construction of Malusong to
IEE - returned by ADB with
Lubuagan Mabongtot Finalization
comments on March 18, 2019
Footsteps/Footpath
IPP - on-going review by ADB
Bid Opening July 2, 2019
SPD endorsed to ADB March 7,
2019
Rehabilitation of Gawana
IEE - for revision
Barlig Domestic Water Systems Finalization
IPP - revised IPP sent to ADB on
(3DWS)
May 17, 2019 for review
Posting July (tentative)
SPD endorsed to ADB on March 21,
2019
IEE - for revision
Tanudan Pongod Bawbao Bacog CIS Finalization
IPP - revised IPP sent to ADB on
May 17, 2019 for review
Bid Opening April 30, 2019
SPD endorsed to ADB Feb 13, 2019
ADB NOL issued June 28, 2019
Mallango - Sumadel - Belong IEE - cleared by ADB June 7, 2019
Tinglayan
- Man-ubal FMR Procurement IPP - revised IPP sent to ADB on
May 17, 2019 for review
Bid Opening May 2, 2019
SPD endorsed to ADB Feb 13, 2019
IEE - cleared by ADB June 7, 2019
Rehabilitation of Tawang
Balbalan Finalization IPP - returned by ADB with
FMR
comments on May 12, 2019
Bid Opening May 7, 2019
ADB NOL issued June 28, 2019
SPD endorsed to ADB Feb 13, 2019
Tulludan - Ahin Road IEE - cleared March 7, 2019
Tinoc
Improvement Procurement IPP - returned by ADB with
comments
Bid Opening May 17, 2019
ADB NOL issued June 28, 2019
SPD endorsed to ADB March 17,
Tanudan Ga-ang FP 2019
Procurement
IEE - cleared May 11, 2019
Bid Opening April 30, 2019
SPD submitted to ADB on March 8,
2019
IEE - for revision
Bontoc Improvement of Mainit CIS Finalization
IPP - returned by ADB with
comments on May 24, 2019
Bid Opening June 7, 2019
SPD endorsed to ADB March 13,
2019
IEE - returned by ADB with
Improvement of Malucsad-
Pasil Finalization comments on March 7, 2019
Guina-ang-Puapo FMR
IPP - revised IPP sent to ADB on
May 30, 2019 for review
Bid Opening July 2, 2019
11
SPD submitted to ADB on March
28, 2019
Improvement of Tokok - IEE - for ADB review
Sadanga Finalization
Chagchag - Churao CIS IPP - returned by ADB with
comments on May 17, 2019
Bid Opening May 16, 2019
SPD endorsed to ADB Feb 14, 2019
IEE - for ADB review
Improvement of Ap-apac
Sadanga Finalization IPP - with ADB comments returned
Foothpath
to DA/CESM May 17, 2019
Bid Opening April 23, 2019
SPD endorsed to ADB March 18,
2019
IEE - returned by ADB with
Improvement from Kela-
Lubuagan Finalization comments on March 15, 2019
Bangtitan -Bakaw Footpath
IPP - returned by ADB with
comments on May 14, 2019
Bid Opening July 2, 2019
Rehabilitation of Tambingan SPD for revision of PSO Feb 26,
Sabangan Preparation
FMR 2019
7. As of June 2019, a total of 428 Peoples Organizations (PO) have implemented a total of
1,288 NRM subprojects in various modalities such as, Agroforestry(AGRO), Commercial Tree
Plantation (CTP), Assisted Natural Regeneration (ANR), Conservation Farming (CF),
Reforestation (REFO) and Community Based Protection and Monitoring (CBPM). For all URBs,
most areas under their subprojects have been developed or planted and some are already under
maintenance and protection.
8. DENR and Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) facilitated the management and
implementation of livelihood enhancement support subprojects in the different URBs except in
LLRB where DTI do not have any intervention. To differentiate, LES 1 is DENR-led where all URBs
have interventions while LES 2 is DTI led where LLRB is not included. Subprojects under LES 1
are already in the proposal development
17
stage, while for DTI-led LES, subproject proposal preparations and packaging activities were
undertaken through series of stakeholder and PO orientations and series of workshops and
meetings. The DTI Provincial Offices are requesting guidance from the DENR specifically on the
land acquisition considering that the regular Shared Service Facility (SSF) of DTI do not need land
acquisition as a result of project implementation. Sites for the SSF under the regular DTI project,
should have been the partner counterpart and should have acquired before proposal preparation
since it is one of the condition and criteria.
9. DENR-led LES, due to voluminous subproject proposals (SPPs) from POs of all URBs
were collated and categorized to facilitate efficient review, packaging and subsequent submission
to ADB for issuance of NOL. The following categories:
Category 1 is for Concrete drying pavement
Category 2 is for Irrigation Water facilities
Category 3 is for the Small constructed facilities
Category 4 is for the Agricultural machinery and milling facilities
Category 5 is for food processing facilities/equipment.
10. In 2019, the ADB has already cleared all Categories except Category 5 of LES 1 to start
the procurement process. The procurement was based on the ADB Procurement Guidelines which
involved shopping method where three quotation or canvas is required per item. The ADB issued
its NOLs on 28 November 2018 and 11 December 2018, covering the DENR-led LES for Category
1 and Categories 2-4, respectively covering 13 POs of the 4 URBs, while Category 5 is still pending
due to environmental safeguards concerns (refer Table 3).
11. The main objective of monitoring the implementation of Social Safeguards is to determine if
these RF/RPs, MOA, and IPF/IPPs are being carried out in accordance with INREMP Project
Administration Manual (PAM) and ADB Safeguards Policy Statement (SPS). The NPCO conducts
the supervision and in-house monitoring of the implementation of the RPs and the IPPs as
prescribed. The procedure for monitoring the MOA that the project proponent enters into with
affected IPs inside ADs is guided by the monitoring, evaluation, and reporting arrangements set
forth in that MOA. The monitoring of the IPP for affected ICCs/IPs living outside ancestral domains
will fall under IM in coordination with the NCIP.
18
12. The January to June 2019 Safeguard Semi-annual Monitoring Report intends to determine
and highlight the significant accomplishments for the period in terms of compliance with safeguards
requirements for IP and IR, adverse impact if any, and mitigating measures formulated to address
and lessen the impact.
13. The coverage of the SMR for the reporting period is the implementation of various subprojects
aside from the NRM. Given that most of the regular NRM subprojects in terms of area or site
development were already accomplished, most of them are in the maintenance and protection
activities that are being done on a quarterly basis. The PO partners are no longer tied up in the
plantation area but more on livelihood activities.
14. The implementation of Rural Infrastructure by the LGU has a separate safeguards
monitoring because the LGUs are the one required to monitor and supervise the construction and
shall see to it that all safeguards requirements are fully complied by the Contractor. However,
FMB/DENR as the executing agency of INREMP is responsible in the implementation and
monitoring of all subprojects of INREMP.
15. INREMP continuous to undertake internal monitoring thru the Site Management Officers
and M&E Officers. Both monitoring seeks to ensure that safeguards plans such as RPs,
IPP/CMPs, ADSDPPs, MOA with IPs, EMP/EIAMMPs, IEEs, ECCs, CNCs are carried out as
planned and in accordance to INREMPs RF, IPPF and EARF and ADB’s SPS 2009. Internal
monitoring indicators covers the following a.) budget and timeframe; b) public participation and
consultation; and c) benefit monitoring. At least 2 Safeguards monitoring tools3 were prepared for
this purpose. Series of orientations and trainings were conducted on the use of these tools.
Monitoring for NRM subprojects were undertaken by field implementing staff at respective
Watershed Management Project Coordinating Offices (WMPCO). The same is observed with RI
subprojects, except the LGU, as the one in-charge for the implementation of rural infrastructure,
takes the lead in monitoring. While the POs and LGUs as proponents are expected to conduct
monitoring more frequently, INREMP through its field implementing staff assigned conducted
monitoring on a monthly basis.
18. RI Subprojects that traverses or encroach in A&D lands, which is very minimal are
negotiated for purchase or donations. These lands are usually shoulders needed for the road
rehabilitation/improvement (roads are already existing/established) and only minimal portions of
land ownership mostly not exceeding 10% of the entire land and does not sacrifice productivity
and use. LES subprojects in A&D areas involves acquisition of areas for facilities and equipment
for processing, hence various land acquisition agreements are submitted by PO proponents.
19. With regards to LES, the POs were required to identify the areas within the community as
the possible location for the construction of facilities for LES. However, there should be proper
consultation and documentation on the process of land acquisition and proof of evidence on the
agreement reached between the PO and land claimant. While alternative location or sites for LES
subproject be identified if negotiations for acquisition fail. All NRM subprojects are managed by
POs who are under forest tenure arrangement and others are within the ancestral domains.
20. The table below showed the number of POs with LES 1 and LES 3 that will be needing a
land area for the construction of various livelihood facilities. These facilities ranges from drying
pavement, warehouse or storage area, livelihood center or processing center. The mode of
acquisition varies on the different situation and condition in the field, either waiver of rights,
community resolution, usufruct agreement, quit claim and others.
Table 4. Number of POs Requiring Land Acquisition for the Construction of Livelihood
Facilities
TOTAL 49 22
21. To address the issues and standardized the land acquisition procedures for LES
Subprojects, a “Land Use Mechanism Matrix” was prepared to guide field implementing unit staff
to facilitate compliance. The matrix presented various scenarios in terms of land classification and
land uses. In most cases especially in CURB, land areas for the construction of livelihood facilities
are within ancestral domain, wherein resolution of consent from the Council of Elders (COE) shall
be issued to designate a particular area for the use of the community for its livelihood activities.
Consent from the land claimant (family or clan) shall also be issued in favor of the PO to clearly
state the arrangement and agreements between both parties on the use and duration of the use
of the land parcel specifically for livelihood activities. The table below shows the different scenarios
and options for land acquisitions for livelihood activities of the PO partners. POs are registered
entities with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Department of Labor and Employment and
Cooperative Development Authority (CDA).
20
Table 5. Land Use Mechanism Matrix
22. The same matrix was also provided to DTI for their guidance in the construction and
establishments of Shared Service Facilities (SSF).
23. In addition “Project at a Glance” Forms were likewise to be complied to provide details on
location and size of the land where structure will be constructed. This form is designed to identify
in a summative format social safeguards compliance of proposed subprojects, including RI’s.
21
Indigenous Peoples (IP)
24. Subproject sites within ancestral domain lands undergo a Free and Prior Informed Consent
(FPIC) process to facilitate issuance of Certificate of Precondition (CP) as prescribed in RA 8371
or the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA) Law and the INREMP IP Framework. Joint validation
and consultation activities among the indigenous POs, National Commission of Indigenous
Peoples NCIP) and DENR were conducted, to solicit opinions and consent of IPs to implement
subproject activities in their domains. In CURB, NCIP issued CPs per subprojects, in cluster
barangays/ancestral domains or POs, while in BURB, CPs are secured per subproject types (NRM,
LES and RI) based on the area coverage and jurisdiction of the NCIP Community Service Center
(CSC) in the locality. CP for WIRB was already issued for ancestral domain lands occupied by
Eskaya Tribes in 2017. In BURB, all RI subprojects (access roads) within ancestral domains, were
issued with a Usufruct Agreement between the IPs and DENR. This agreement (appended in the
SPD) is a consent given by the indigenous POs through signed agreement by their Council of
Elders to rehabilitate/improve and use the subproject area/location.
Total
Pending CP application
Province CP Issued
submitted
Validated For Validation to NCIP
Apayao 4 1 0 5
Benguet 2 0 0 2
Ifugao 4 0 0 4
Kalinga 68 58 5 131
Mt. Province 11 10 0 21
Sub-Total 89 69 5 163
Bohol 1 0 0 1
Misamis Oriental 0 1 0 1
Bukidnon 0 1 2 3
Sub-Total 1 2 2 5
TOTAL 90 71 7 168
25. CP of WIRB for the Eskaya Tribe has been issued in 2017, while various CPs in CURB
have been simultaneously issued. As of June 2019 a total of 113 CPs have been issued in CURB.
There were 4 CPs from BURB issued and signed by the NCIP Regional Director on 27 February
2019. However, these CPs are still to be transmitted to the NCIP Central Office for signature of
the Ethnographic Commissioner and confirmation of the NCIP Chairperson.
26. Indigenous Peoples Plan (IPP) and/or Community Management Plan (CMP) totaling to 283
were prepared for the different subprojects to be implemented within ancestral domain or areas
occupied by indigenous peoples as specified in the IPPF. However, there were only a total of 135
CMPs updated and finalized to consolidate other CMPs into one, on a per ancestral domain or
tribal groupings. There were 88 CMPs prepared for CURB and 45 CMPs for BURB. In other URBs,
IPP was prepared for the Eskaya Tribe in WIRB and Ethnic Minority Development Plan (EMDP)
for Maranao communities of LLRB were already submitted and eventually cleared by ADB.
22
Table 7 LIST OF CMP/IPP/ADSDPP IN CURB SUBMITTED TO ADB
PO NAME OF
No. WATERSHED PROVINCE MUNICIPALITY
CMP/IPP/ADSDPP
1 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP CAFA -Calafug
2 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP UIIPA
3 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP BITO
4 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP GUICOMDA
5 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP GUIFA
6 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP ISGAFA
7 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP LFICA
8 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP KISFFA
9 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP KIFA
10 CONNER APAYAO KABUGAO CMP LTTA
11 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP AGFUDA
12 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP CAFA - MALAMA
13 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP MFA-MACATEL
14 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP MFA-MANAG
15 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP PIMAS
16 CONNER APAYAO CONNER CMP TIFA
17 CAL-OWAN APAYAO CONNER CMP PUGUIN
18 CAL-OWAN APAYAO CONNER CMP SFA
19 CAL-OWAN APAYAO CONNER CMP BRO
20 CAL-OWAN APAYAO CONNER CMP DAGA
21 KABAMAAM BENGUET BUGUIAS CALAMAGAN CMP
22 KABAMAAM IFUGAO TINOC KALANGUYA IPP
23 BAAGMADOLI IFUGAO HUNGDUAN IPP OF TUWALI TRIBE
24 BARTAN KALINGA TANUDAN ADSDPP OF IDAKARAN
25 BARTAN KALINGA TANUDAN GAANG AD CMP
26 BARTAN KALINGA TANUDAN LUBO ADSDPP
27 BARTAN KALINGA TANUDAN MANGALI ADSDPP
28 BARTAN KALINGA TANUDAN TALOCTOC AD CMP
29 CAL-OWAN KALINGA PINUKPUK CMP KATABBOGAN AD
30 CAL-OWAN KALINGA PINUKPUK CMP MAGAOGAO AD
PINUKPUK JUNCTION
31 CAL-OWAN KALINGA PINUKPUK
AD
32 CAL-OWAN KALINGA RIZAL CMP BUTBUT AD
23
33 CAL-OWAN KALINGA RIZAL CMP TOBOG (BULBUL)
34 CAL-OWAN KALINGA RIZAL CMP GAMONNANG AD
35 PITA KALINGA PINUKPUK DUGPA AD IPP
36 PITA KALINGA TABUK CITY BIGA AD IPP
37 PITA KALINGA TABUK CITY BULANAO CMP
38 PITA KALINGA TABUK CITY CABARITAN CMP
39 PITA KALINGA TABUK CITY GOBGOB CMP
40 PITA KALINGA TABUK CITY GUILAYON ADSDPP
41 PITA KALINGA TABUK CITY TOBOG AD IPP
UPPER KALINGA
42 PITA KALINGA TABUK CITY
KULIGONG CMP
43 PITA KALINGA TABUK CITY NANENG AD IPP
44 SALTAN KALINGA BALBALAN BUAYA SUBTRIBE CMP
CMP GUBANG
45 SALTAN KALINGA BALBALAN
ANCESTRAL DOMAIN
46 SALTAN KALINGA BALBALAN MABACA AD IPP
47 SALTAN KALINGA BALBALAN POSWOY AD IPP
48 SALTAN KALINGA BALBALAN CMP SALEGSEG TRIBE
49 SALTAN KALINGA PINUKPUK CMP BALLAYANGON
CMP DAO-ANGAN
50 SALTAN KALINGA PINUKPUK
ANCESTRAL DOMAIN
51 SALTAN KALINGA PINUKPUK CMP OF ACIGA
52 SALTAN KALINGA PINUKPUK CMP LIMOS
53 SALTAN KALINGA PINUKPUK CMP AMMACIAN AD
PINUKPUK AND CMP OF BANAO
54 SALTAN KALINGA
BALBALAN ANCESTRAL DOMAIN
55 SURUNG KALINGA LUBUAGAN MABILONG CMP
56 SURUNG KALINGA LUBUAGAN TANGLAG CMP
IPP IYUMA TRIBE OF
57 SURUNG KALINGA LUBUAGAN
LUBUAGAN
IPP IBALATOC TRIBE
58 SURUNG KALINGA PASIL
OF PASIL
IPP IBALINCIAGAO
59 SURUNG KALINGA PASIL
TRIBE OF PASIL
IPP ICAGALUAN TRIBE
60 SURUNG KALINGA PASIL
OF PASIL
61 SURUNG KALINGA PASIL GUINAANG ADSDPP
62 SURUNG KALINGA PASIL COLLAYO CMP
IPP IMAGSILAY TRIBE
63 SURUNG KALINGA PASIL
OF PASIL
IPP IDANGTALAN
64 SURUNG KALINGA PASIL
TRIBE OF PASIL
65 SURUNG KALINGA TINGLAYAN BANGAD CMP 24
IPP BASAO TRIBE OF
66 SURUNG KALINGA TINGLAYAN
TINGLAYAN
IPP DANANAO TRIBE
67 SURUNG KALINGA TINGLAYAN
OF TINGLAYAN
IPP BUTBUT TRIBE OF
68 SURUNG KALINGA TINGLAYAN
TINGLAYAN
69 SURUNG KALINGA TINGLAYAN TONGRAYAN IPP
70 SURUNG KALINGA TINGLAYAN SUMADEL TRIBE IPP
71 SURUNG KALINGA TINGLAYAN TULGAO CMP
72 SURUNG KALINGA LUBUAGAN Dangoy
73 KABAMAAM MT. PROVINCE BONTOC ALAB CMP
74 KABAMAAM MT. PROVINCE BAUKO BAGNEN CMP
KADIPO CMP (CMP
75 KABAMAAM MT. PROVINCE BAUKO
Bauko_KADIPO)
76 BARTAN MT. PROVINCE BARLIG BARLIG CMP (Fialig)
77 BAAGMADOLI MT. PROVINCE BONTOC BAYYO CMP
78 BAAGMADOLI MT. PROVINCE BONTOC BONTOC ILI CMP
79 KABAMAAM MT. PROVINCE GONOGON GONOGON CMP
80 BARTAN MT. PROVINCE BARLIG LIAS CMP
LOWER BAUKO
81 KABAMAAM MT. PROVINCE BAUKO
ADSDPP
82 KABAMAAM MT. PROVINCE SABANGAN SABANGAN CMP
83 BAAGMADOLI MT. PROVINCE SADANGA SADANGA CMP
84 KABAMAAM MT. PROVINCE SAGADA SAGADA CMP
85 BAAGMADOLI MT. PROVINCE BONTOC SAMOKI CMP
86 BAAGMADOLI MT. PROVINCE BONTOC TALUBIN CMP
87 BAAGMADOLI MT. PROVINCE BONTOC TOCUCAN CMP
88 BAAGMADOLI MT. PROVINCE BONTOC UPLAND BONTOC CMP
Portulin Talaandig
Tribal Association, Inc.
Portulin Talaandig Tribal
1 Muleta Bukidnon Pangantucan Association, Inc. (PTTAI)
Dagulos Lumad
Association, Inc.
(DALUMA)
Indigenous Peoples of
2 Muleta Bukidnon Maramag Saruyong Hills,Inc.
(IPSHI) 25
Farmers Association of
3 Muleta Bukidnon Pangantucan
Mendis, Inc. (FAME)
Bayanihan Millenium
4 Muleta Bukidnon Pangantucan Multi-Purpose
Cooperative (BMMPC)
Tangkulan Manubo
Tribal Conference
5 Muleta Bukidnon Damulog Peace Dev't Farming
Assoc. and Other
Services System
Angga-an Lumad
Forestry Farmers
6 Muleta Bukidnon Damulog
Association, Inc.
(ALUFFA)
Kalanawan CADT
Unified Claim
SAIA Higaonon Tribal
7 Tagoloan Bukidnon Malitbog Council (SAIA-HTC)
Itoy Amusig Higaonon
Tribal Community
Organization (IAHTCO)
Guihean Ancestral
Domain
Guihean Farmers Cluster
8 Tagoloan Bukidnon Impasug-ong Association (GFCA)
Ang Bag-ong Paglaum
sa mga Kababayen-an
sa Brgy. Guihean
Bukidnon Tribe of San
Luis, Malitbog,
Bukidnon
Tagmaray, Kalipay, San
9 Tagoloan Bukidnon Malitbog Luis, Mabuhay
Association
(TAKASAMA)
Sabangaan Madasigon
Association (SMA)
Dumalaguing
Highlands Farmers
Cooperative
10 Tagoloan Bukidnon Impasug-ong Dumalaguing Farmers
Association (DFA)
Bundaan Farmers
Association (BFA)
Sayawan Tribal Upland
Farmers Association
11 Tagoloan Bukidnon Impasug-ong
Nagkahisusang Mag-
uuma sa Sayawan
Gun-oban Upland
Landless Farmers
12 Tagoloan Bukidnon Manolo Fortich Association
Gun-oban Dapulan
Farmers Association
26
Higaonon Tribe of Vista
Villa, Sumilao,
Bukidnon
Panginuman Bukad
13 Tagoloan Bukidnon Sumilao
Palaopao Upper
Kulaman Indigenous
People Farmers
Association
Makatagbaw Higaonon
Tribal Group
14 Tagoloan Bukidnon Impasug-ong
Association
(MAHITRIGA)
Bukidnon Higaonon
Ancestral Domain
Tagoloan and
15 Bukidnon Malaybalay City Bukidnon Higaonon
Sawaga
Tribal Association, Inc.
(BUHITA)
Daraghuyan Damitan
Ancestral
16 Sawaga Bukidnon Malaybalay City DomainInhandig Tribal
Multi-Purpose
Cooperative (ITMPC)
Kalasungay Ancestral
Domain Unified
Members Association
17 Sawaga Bukidnon Malaybalay City
Kalasungay Anscetral
Domain Agriculture
Cooperative (KADAC)
Unified Claim
(Mapayag, Imbayao,
Capitan Angel)
18 Sawaga Bukidnon Malaybalay City Kalabasahon, Sinaburan
Tribal Farmers
Association (KASTRIFA),
Inc.
Bayawon Lucday
Lungayan Pendunay
Talaandig Tribal
Association Inc.
Bayawon Lucday
Lungayan Pendunay
Talaandig Tribal
Association, Inc.
19 Manupali Bukidnon Valencia City
(BLLUPENTTRAS)
Balsasida United
Farmers Association
(BUFA)
Kalatungan-Lilingayon
Asoociation for Human
and Ecological
Improvement (KALAHEI)
Basac Small Upland
20 Manupali Bukidnon Lantapan Dwellers Association
(BSUDA)
Salsalan Hu Katatau
21 Manupali Bukidnon Lantapan Incorporated, Inc.
(SHK) 27
Bol-ogan Tribal Council
22 Manupali Bukidnon Lantapan Incorporated
(BOTRICO)
Mapawa Integrated
Social Forest Farmers
23 Manupali Bukidnon Lantapan Association
Incorporated
(MAISFFA)
Victory Association of
Environment
24 Manupali Bukidnon Lantapan
Rehabilitators, Inc.
(VASER)
Lirongan Talaandig
Farmes Kauyagan
25 Manupali Bukidnon Talakag
Association, Inc.
(LITAFKA)
Datu Inhiwal
Mangganuhon
Ancestral Domain
Claim Beneficiary
Association
(DIMADCBA)
Datu Inhiwal
Mangganuhon Ancestral
Domain Claim
26 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Talakag Beneficiary Association
(DIMADCBA)
Hrs. of Mangganohon,
Manggamat
Development
Corporation
(HMMDCORP)
Green Life Agri-
Developers Association,
Inc. (GLAI)
Dumalaging Masimag
Tagbak Salimbalan
27 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Talakag
Alan (DUMA TA SA
ALAN)
Tagbak United
28 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Talakag Agroforestry Farmer
Association (TUAFFA)
Dagundalahon Ligoron
Baylanan (DALIBA)
29 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Talakag Higaonon/Talandig
Tribes Ancestral
Domain
Lacolac Higaonon
30 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Baungon Farmers Association
(LHFA)
Lantud Kahibunan
Igtulin Farmers’
31 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Talakag
Association, Inc.
(LAKIFA)
Sinagon Planters’
32 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Talakag
Association Inc. (SIPAI)
28
Baloyon Planters’
33 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Talakag
Association, Inc. (BPAI)
Kulubihon Pantalan
34 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Talakag Planters’ Association,
Inc. (KUPPAI)
Overlooking Malandog
35 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Talakag Planters’ Association,
Inc. (OMPAI)
Dagundalahon High
Land Farmers
36 Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon Talakag
Association, Inc.
(DAHILFA)
Balubal Integrated
Agusan-Cugman Cagayan De Oro
37 Misamis Oriental Social Forest Farmers'
Cluster City
Association (BISFFA)
Kapunongan Alang sa
Ugmang Masanag ug
38 Tagoloan Misamis Oriental Claveria Haruhay nga
Nilungtaran
(KAUMAHAN)
Mat-I Agroforest
39 Tagoloan Misamis Oriental Claveria Development
Association (MAGDA)
Mat-I Higaonon Free
40 Tagoloan Misamis Oriental Claveria Farmers Association
(MAHIFFA)
Tungao Dayunan
Cagayan De Oro Higaonon Dumagat
41 Cagayan de Oro Misamis Oriental
City Farmers Association
(TUDAHIDUFA)
Butay, Eva, Macopa
Cagayan De Oro Higa-onon Farmers
42 Cagayan de Oro Misamis Oriental
City Association
(BUEMAHIFA)
Kapunongan sa Bato
Cagayan De Oro
43 Cagayan de Oro Misamis Oriental Uplanad Tribal Tillers,
City
Inc. (KAB-UTT)
Cagayan De Oro Tagpangi Higaonon
44 Cagayan de Oro Misamis Oriental
City Association (TAHASS)
Mat-i,Man-ibay,
45 Tagoloan Misamis Oriental Claveria Civoleg, Langguyod
(MAMACILA)
27. Table 9 provides a summary of compliance with social safeguards before implementation of
subprojects and confirmed through issuance of NOL by ADB. It is noted that during this monitoring
period, there are no RPs being submitted to ADB for social safeguards review.
28. Consultations were held with key stakeholders of subprojects including IPs as applicable.
Minutes, attendance sheet and photographs are appended in the SPDs and SPPs submitted to
ADB for NOL. For subprojects within ancestral domain or with presence of IPs, consent/s are
solicited through series of DENR-NCIP-PO (with LGU for RI) joint validation, mapping and series of
consultation activities. These series of activities facilitate the following IP safeguards compliance:
29. CMP Updating and finalization were conducted from February to June 2019 with technical
assistance and editing provided by ADB. There were 135 CMPs in all URBs submitted to ADB.
30
Table 10. Summary of CMP Prepared and Submitted to ADB per URB
CURB 88 88
BURB 45 45
WIRB 1 1 (IPP)
LLRB 1 1 (EMDP)
TOTAL 135 135
30. The IPP/CMP described the visions and objectives of the tribal group and identified various
interventions they need to protect and develop the area to enhance the well-being of each
community member. The IPP/CMP shall also be used as the benchmark in conducting monitoring
to ensure that interventions will adhere to their culture and traditions and will not create adverse
impact to the area and to the community members.
31. The DENR shall conduct Internal monitoring and the indicators to be used shall cover the
following a.) budget and timeframe; b) public participation and consultation; and c) benefit
monitoring. At least 2 Safeguards monitoring tools3 were prepared for this purpose. Series of
orientations and trainings were conducted on the use of these tools. Monitoring for NRM
subprojects were undertaken by field implementing staff at respective Watershed Management
Project Coordinating Offices (WMPCO). The same is observed with RI subprojects, except the
LGU, as the one in-charge for the implementation of rural infrastructure, takes the lead in
monitoring. While the POs and LGUs as proponents are expected to conduct monitoring more
frequently, INREMP through its field implementing staff assigned conducted monitoring on a
monthly basis.
32. Continuous guidance and technical assistance for subproject proposal packaging with POs
and LGUs with emphasis on safeguards compliance were conducted in various URB especially for
the LES and other RI respectively.
33. For DTI-led LES 2, subproject proposal preparation training was conducted in January 2019
(BURB), March 2019 (CURB) and July 2019 (WIRB). The trainings conducted in these URBs focused
on the social and environmental safeguards requirements and mode of compliance to these
requirements. The trainings was facilitated by CESM and NPCO to orient the field units on the common
and minimum requirements of the IPF, RP and ESMR to be complied in preparing subproject proposals.
34. Procurement processes and requirements for RI subprojects were conducted headed by
FASPS and NPCO for the different LGUS in BURB and WIRB. Contractor’s obligations to compliance
of safeguards were reminded to LGU-SPMUs, specifically budget allocation for compliance of
safeguards, compliance to labor and health standards and local hiring with equal opportunities for
women and IP.
35. During the ADB Mission for Rural Infrastructure Monitoring held in various URBs, it was
observed that there was no pre-construction conference or meeting held which is very important
to level-off on the procedures and requirements among the key actors (LGU, DENR, Contractor,
PO), which is the reason that the ADB required that a pre-construction conference or meeting be
held for all RI subprojects prior to start of construction or civil works to level off on the requirements
and how to make corrective actions when problem arises during construction. Obligations of
Contractor including safeguards compliance stipulated in the EAIMMP, IEE, IPP/CMPs and other
safeguards documents were discussed and reiterated.
31
E. Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM)
36. In the previous submission, there was no report pertaining to grievances and issues arising
from INREMP implementation. It is only in 2019 that CURB reported several issues arising from
INREMP implementations. There were 5 cases that need the attention of the different offices of
the DENR at the field level. The 5 cases reported were somehow resolved with appropriate
recommendations and agreements. Table 7 showed the different cases, with the corresponding
actions taken and agreement reached.
Table 11. Summary Matrix for the Grievance Redress Mechanism as of June 2019
1. Position Paper of LIAS On Feb. 14, 2019, the DENR- These concerns were
IPO opposing the CAR communicated with the addressed by the PENRO
implementation of INREMP PENRO re: Res. No. 5-2015 of during consultations with the
the LIAS IPO, a letter dated community on April 11, 2019,
in the Natonin, Municipality
Dec. 2, 2018 of the IPO during which the PENRO,
of Mt. Province dated Secretary addressed to the together with the PPMO and
December 2, 2018. DENR Secretary opposing the RPCO Focal Person,
inclusion of Natonin consulted the communities on
Municipality in the their concerns on who will be
implementation of INREMP the direct recipient and
within the Lias Ancestral beneficiary regarding the
Domain due to boundary CBPM subproject to be
conflict between Barlig and implemented in the
Natonin Municipalities. The community and to obtain the
complainant went/wrote community’s consent or
directly to the DENR Secretary, resolution on who are the
bypassing the Barangay LGU, communities to be included in
WMCs or WMPCO and MLGU, the CBPM area.
PPMO/PINREMC and the
Regional Project Coordinating After the consultation on April
Office. 11, 2019, the Punong
barangay of Lias Silangan
With the existing boundary finally signed the resolution
conflict, direct beneficiaries endorsing the CBPM
and recipient cannot be subproject
determined.
The LIAS ICC was advised to
bring their request for the
delineation of relocation sites
to the Barlig Municipal Office
to be included in the LGU’s
comprehensive land use plan.
2. Follow up letter of Miss On March 14, 2019, the Office INREMP agroforestry
Asuncion Mendoza on the of the Regional Executive subproject, the Bar-Tan Focal32
cutting of trees and planting Director of DENR Person transferred the site to
of fruit trees within conflict communicated with the another area that was free of
area PENRO re: the follow-up letter land ownership conflict, which
of Mrs. Asuncion Mendoza was located in Sitio Chatol,
dated Aug. 9, 2018 on the Lingoy, Barlig, Mt. Province.
cutting of trees and planting of
fruit trees within a conflict site The issue on the cutting of
at Lat-oy, Fiangtin, Barlig that trees was resolved and the
was at the time identified as a LGU to plant trees to replace
site for an INREMP those they cut in accordance
agroforestry subproject. with the kiakay system, a
traditional practice wherein
The cutting of trees was done the council of elders shall
by the LGU to give way for the mediate to hear both sides to
construction of the new determine the probable cause
Material Recovery Facility on a and prescribe a remedial
property donated to the LGU action to settle the issue.
not knowing that there is
another claimant of the land. Regarding the family dispute
over the land that emerged,
the conflict was between the
Mr. Nasungan, the uncle of
Ms Mendoza and the donor of
the land who is also a relative
of the two, and the DENR
cannot intervene nor resolve
the case.
3. Petition to stop the CENRO Tabuk received the Final dialogue was conducted
INREMP subproject petition to stop the on March 2, 2019 and finally
implementation of INREMP at resolved/agreed that the
implementation in Dacalan,
Dacalan, Tanudan Kalinga on awarded Community-Based
Tanudan, Kalinga May 28, 2018. The petitioners Protection Monitoring
are mostly i-Dacalan residing in awarded to Gontawon
The petition came from those Tabuk City. Farmers Irrigators
who were not able to attend Association, Inc. (2,930 ha),
the consultation meeting Dacalan Peoples Association
despite the invitation to them, CENRO Tabuk formed a team for Development (DPAD)
and fearing that they will not to conduct consultation with the awarded with one (1)
be involved since they were residents of Brgy. Dacalan in Livelihood Enhancement
not present during the order to validate and confirm Support last 2017 be
meeting. the allegations in the Petition. cancelled and transferred to
other areas with no conflicts.
CENRO Tabuk again received
on February 4, 2019 the While the implemented
Resolution from the same subprojects will remain and
complainant last year 2018 be maintained by the POs in
requesting for the cancellation Dacalan, Tanudan, Kalinga
of all INREMP and other with the assistance of
related projects of DENR in INREMP staff.
Barangay Dacalan,
Municipality of Tanudan, The two subprojects were
Kalinga. then transferred to Upper
Mabaca Farmers Association
The NCIP presented the CP under Saltan WMU and the
issued saying that there was no LES was transferred to Laga-
opposition during their on Association under
community validation which 33
BARTAN WMU (Appendix 6)
lead the way to the issuance of
the CP.
4. The Office of the Regional The Office of the Regional Review of the documents
Director received an urgent Executive Director, the related to the controversy
request dated March 18, Regional Office issued the shows that the CENR Officer
2019 from Mr. Robert Special Order No. 2019-314 then drafted a report
Liggayo, on April 24, 2019 authorizing the conduct of an recommending the
requesting the DENR to investigation to resolve the cancellation of the contract
conduct an investigation protest on the cancellation of due to the contention of the
and make a resolution to Forest Management legal claimant which is the
resolve his protest in Partnership Agreement Barangay, and was concurred
relation to the INREM (FMPA) awarded to BML Agri- with by the PENR Officer. An
Project located at Forest and Reforestation order of cancellation was
Masablang, Tabuk, Kalinga. Association Under PITA WMU signed by the PENR Officer
on May 14-17, 2019 at on October 18, 2019
BML is represented by Mr. Pinukpuk, Kalinga
Liggayo with a homelot area of The Investigation Team
6.5 ha to be planted under The investigation team went recommended that certificate
Agro. However, the Barangay over the contract and other of cancellation of the BML
Officials claimed the subject pertinent documents of BML, Partnership Agreement be
area to be a communal and personally interviewed Mr. issued by the PENR Officer
pasture area and planting of Liggayo and met with the and the Municipality of Tabuk,
fruit trees will further establish Barangay Officials of Kalinga.
the false claim. Masablang, Tabuk, Kalinga
and the Barangay Chairman of Documents pertaining to the
the adjoining Barangay, cancellation of the subproject
Barangay Cawagayan, and details of relocation will
Pinukpuk, Kalinga. be further be monitored by
(Appendix 8) DENR Staff.
F. Institutional Arrangement
37. The National Project Coordinating Office (NPCO) is tasked to oversee safeguards
compliance in all project implementing units. To enhance NPCOs capacity, Project Consultants
were engaged:
1 Social Development Specialist (SDS-Assisting Professional) at NPCO
1 Social Safeguards Specialist (SSS for Rural Infrastructure) at NPCO
1 Social Safeguards Specialist (SSS) at TA-PMIC (National Level)
1 Environment Specialist (ES) at TA-PMIC (National Level)
10 Technical Extension Officers (TEOs) URB based at RPCO and PPMO
38. The SDS and SSS at NPCO provides assistance in the social and environmental
compliance and concerns of all subprojects in NRM and RI respectively. The SSS and ES of TA-
PMIC through Center for Environmental Studies Management (CESM) provides assistance in the
appraisal, safeguards screening and preparation of IPPs and IEEs, EMPs/EIAMMPs, of
subprojects in RI. At WMPCO Level, Watershed Management Officers (WMOs) and Community
Development Officers (CDOs) provide assistance to POs and LGUs in social and environmental
safeguards compliance of subprojects in NRM and RI.
39. TEO’s safeguards tasks specifically are: i.) Work with the NPCO, WMPCO and RPCO in
integrating social safeguards (indigenous people and involuntary resettlement),
environmental safeguards and gender and compliance to processes of all activities (subprojects,
trainings, workshops and others) in a watershed; ii.)Review and coordinate the integration of
social safeguards requirement in all subproject proposals and participate in Council deliberations
of such proposals and iii.) Provide support in internal monitoring of subproject implementation and
confirm the technical soundness of the social safeguard measures.
40. The LGU-SPMU coordinates and manages the RI subprojects. The Subproject
Management Unit (SPMU) is created for every subproject by virtue of an executive order.
However, it was noted during RI Safeguards Training, the SPMU executive order lacked a clear
person in charge and/or a unit that will be in charge of the safeguards monitoring and GRM as
well. As part of their workshop outputs, LGUs reconstituted their SPMUs to incorporate separate
unit for safeguards monitoring and GRM.
41. The overall status of Social Monitoring Report for January to June 2019 is satisfactory
considering that there was no identified adverse effect in the INREMP implementation. However,
the CURB have identified five (5) GRM cases but eventually with the coordination and cooperation
of various stakeholders and government units, the issues were settled.
42. There was no reporting in terms of land acquisition for the LES for the period considering
that there was no physical movement during the period. However, several orientations and
consultations were made to inform the POs on the modes of land acquisitions required before
going into the construction of livelihood facilities.
43. The DTI organized several trainings on subproject proposal preparation and requested
the NCPO and CESM to act as resource speakers to discuss the social and environmental
safeguards requirements.
35
44. In the succeeding period, among the key activities for safeguards compliance to be
monitored and reported are the following:
H. Appendices
36
Appendix 1
37
38
39
40
41
Appendix 2
42
B. PO Strengthening and Meeting to People’s Organizations
(Information, Education and Communication) for Information
Disclosure
43
procurement of equipments/materials/items to their proposed subprojects especially
with the quotation/canvass of goods to three dealers.
44
Appendix 3
45
46
47
48
49
Appendix 4
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
Appendix 5
58
Appendix 6
59
Appendix 7
60
Appendix 8
61
62
Appendix 9
63
64
65