Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maheshwari 2015
Maheshwari 2015
42]
Original Article
Abstract
Background and Aims: We aimed to measure the frequency of preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective cesarean
section (CS) and its impact on patients decision regarding the choice of anesthesia.
Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 154 consecutive patients, who were scheduled for elective
CS. Visual analog scale (VAS) for anxiety was the study tool, and VAS ≥50 was considered as significant anxiety. Enrolled
patients were interviewed by the primary investigator the day before the surgery and their VAS score and choice of anesthesia
technique either general anesthesia (GA) or regional anesthesia (RA) were recorded. Additional data included demographics,
parity, educational status, previous anesthesia experience and source of information.
Results: Preoperative anxiety (VAS ≥ 50) was seen in 72.7% of patients, which was significantly higher (P < 0.005) in patients
selecting GA (97.18%, n = 71/154) as compared to those selecting RA (51.81%, n = 83/154) for elective CS. Statistically
significant association of anxiety (P < 0.005) was seen with age <25 years, nulli and primiparous, higher education status,
previous anesthesia experience and source of information from nonanesthetist.
Conclusion: Patients scheduled for elective CS were found to have high frequency of anxiety (72.7%), and GA was observed
to be the choice of anesthesia technique in anxious patients.
Despite RA being the recommended technique for CS, it awareness of complications.[5,6,19,21] However, other studies
is contraindicated in cases when there is a patient refusal. contradict the association between anxiety and education.[18,23]
In our institution, patient’s refusal for RA is one of the
major reasons for the failure to achieve the internationally The study findings and literature state that nulliparous patients
recommended rate of RA for CS.[8,13,14] Other investigators tend to have a high level of anxiety.[18,20,21] While, Thorp et al.
have also cited maternal request as the chief reason for GA reported that previous experience does not reduce preoperative
especially in elective CS.[15,16] anxiety.[24]
The average age of patients presenting for CS in our hospital A significant association of anxiety was found in patients
during this study was 29.18 ± 4.46 years, and a correlation having previous surgery under GA, who preferred to have
was observed between age <25 years with anxiety that is GA again. Kindler et al., found higher scores of anxiety in
consistent with previous studies.[5,17,18] However, the study patients with previous negative experience.[18]
conducted by Domar et al., has failed to show age as a
determinant of preoperative anxiety.[19] Another factor related In this study, patients receiving information from other
to high anxiety in obstetric patients could be female sex as than anesthetist were more anxious, and majority of them
previous studies have reported a high level of anxiety in opted for GA. Studies have shown that the source of
the female gender.[18-21] Yet some studies failed to show any information from family/friends and misconceptions related
correlation of anxiety with female sex.[22,23] to anesthesia are the top most reasons for patients refusing
RA.[12,25] This misinformation could also be the source of
As per the findings, educated patients were more anxious anxiety influencing patients’ decision. In contrast patients,
as compared to less educated but the difference was not receiving information from anesthetist were less anxious, and
statistically significant. The literature also shows conformity majority of them selected RA. Previously reported literature
of high levels of anxiety among educated patients due to their has shown that a preoperative visit by an anesthetist alone
was almost as effective in reducing anxiety as compared 9. Vallejo MC, Phelps AL, Shepherd CJ, Kaul B, Mandell GL,
Ramanathan S. Nitrous oxide anxiolysis for elective cesarean
to the combination of the preoperative anesthetic visit
section. J Clin Anesth 2005;17:543-8.
and premedication.[26] Ngan Kee et al., concluded that 10. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale.
anesthetist do influence the decision of patients and can J Psychosom Res 1967;11:213-8.
encourage them for RA.[27] 11. Senel AC, Mergan F. Premedication with midazolam prior
to caesarean section has no neonatal adverse effects. Braz
J Anesthesiol 2014;64:16-21.
The study has few limitations for instance the indication for CS 12. Jlala HA, Bedforth NM, Hardman JG. Anesthesiologists’ perception
was not observed, which could influence the level of anxiety of patients’ anxiety under regional anesthesia. Local Reg Anesth
among parturient. However, factors like bad obstetric history, 2010;3:65-71.
complicated pregnancy and patients having congenital fetal 13. Jenkins JG, Khan MM. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section:
A survey in a UK region from 1992 to 2002. Anaesthesia
anomaly, were among the exclusion criteria of the study. In
2003;58:1114-8.
addition, the satisfaction score among parturients choosing 14. Halpern SH, Soliman A, Yee J, Angle P, Ioscovich A. Conversion
either GA or RA was not measured, but could have reflected of epidural labour analgesia to anaesthesia for caesarean section:
patient’s satisfaction in relation to the choice of anesthesia A prospective study of the incidence and determinants of failure.
technique. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:240-3.
15. Aiman J, Mahmood KT, Hussain R, Naeem R. Comparison of spinal/
epidural and general anaesthesia in elective C-section patient’s vs
Conclusion doctor’s choice. Int J Pharma Sci 2010;2:98-106.
16. Kan RK, Lew E, Yeo SW, Thomas E. General anesthesia for cesarean
section in a Singapore maternity hospital: A retrospective survey.
This study has clearly indicated that anxiety was one of the
Int J Obstet Anesth 2004;13:221-6.
reason for refusing RA in our patient population, therefore 17. Ebirim LN, Tobin M. Factors responsible for pre-operative anxiety
specific measures to reduce anxiety in these patients could in elective surgical patients at a University Teaching Hospital: A
help us in achieving the international target for RA in pilot study. Int J Anesthesiol 2010;29:1-10.
CS patients. It is suggested that every patient coming for 18. Kindler CH, Harms C, Amsler F, Ihde-Scholl T, Scheidegger D. The
visual analog scale allows effective measurement of preoperative
elective CS should be assessed for the presence of anxiety anxiety and detection of patients’ anesthetic concerns. Anesth
in their routine preoperative anesthesia assessment and Analg 2000;90:706-12.
patients found to have a high level of anxiety should be 19. Domar AD, Everett LL, Keller MG. Preoperative anxiety: Is it a
scheduled for an additional counseling session from an predictable entity? Anesth Analg 1989;69:763-7.
20. Moerman N, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Oosting H. The Amsterdam
anesthetist. This measure helps to reduce the anxiety level Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Anesth Analg
and assists in making a rational decision regarding their 1996;82:445-51.
choice for anesthesia technique. 21. Caumo W, Schmidt AP, Schneider CN, Bergmann J, Iwamoto CW,
Bandeira D, et al. Risk factors for preoperative anxiety in adults.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001;45:298-307.
References 22. Boker A, Brownell L, Donen N. The Amsterdam preoperative
anxiety and information scale provides a simple and reliable
1. Carvalho B, Cohen SE, Lipman SS, Fuller A, Mathusamy AD, measure of preoperative anxiety. Can J Anaesth 2002;49:792-8.
Macario A. Patient preferences for anesthesia outcomes associated 23. Uddin I, Abdullah K, Tahir J, Rahila I. Preoperative anxiety in
with cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1182-7. patients admitted for elective surgery in King Saud Hospital
2. Jawaid M, Mushtaq A, Mukhtar S, Khan Z. Preoperative anxiety Unaizah, Alqassim Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Pak J Med Sci
before elective surgery. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2007;12:145-8. 2002;18:306-10.
3. Shevde K, Panagopoulos G. A survey of 800 patients’ knowledge, 24. Thorp JM, Kennedy BW, Millar K, Fitch W. Personality traits as
attitudes, and concerns regarding anesthesia. Anesth Analg predictors of anxiety prior to caesarean section under regional
1991;73:190-8. anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1993;48:946-50.
4. Kennedy BW, Thorp JM, Fitch W, Millar K. The theatre environment 25. Ahmad I, Afshan G. Knowledge and attitudes of Pakistani women
and the awake patient. J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;12:407-11. towards anaesthesia techniques for caesarean section. J Pak Med
5. Jafar MF, Khan FA. Frequency of preoperative anxiety in Pakistani Assoc 2011;61:359-62.
surgical patients. J Pak Med Assoc 2009;59:359-63. 26. Egbert LD, Battit G, Turndorf H, Beecher HK. The value of the
6. Beilin Y, Rosenblatt MA, Bodian CA, Lagmay-Aroesty MM, preoperative visit by an anesthetist. A study of doctor-patient
Bernstein HH. Information and concerns about obstetric
rapport. JAMA 1963 17;185:553-5.
anesthesia: A survey of 320 obstetric patients. Int J Obstet Anesth
27. Ngan Kee WD, Hung VY, Roach VJ, Lau TK. A survey of
1996;5:145-51.
factors influencing patients’ choice of anaesthesia
7. Lack JA. Raising the standard: A compendium of audit recipes.
for caesarean section. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 37:300-3.
R Coll Anaesth 2006;3:166-7. Available from: http://www.rcoa.
ac.uk/system/files/CSQ-ARB-section8.pdf. [Last accessed on
2014 Apr] How to cite this article: Maheshwari D, Ismail S. Preoperative anxiety in
8. Ismail S, Shafiq F, Malik A. Technique of anaesthesia for different patients selecting either general or regional anesthesia for elective cesarean
grades of caesarean section: A cross-sectional study. J Pak Med section. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015;31:196-200.
Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Assoc 2012;62:363-7.