Marking Scheme – COMP 1786 Student: Nguyen Sieu (001272793)

Plagiarism issues? No Final grade: 65/100

Grading feedback
Implementation (80%, grade: 54)
 Enter details of trips (10%)
 Error validation (1%)
 Store, view and delete trip details (10%)
 Add expenses to a trip (10%)
 Search (10%)
 Export/Download (5%)
 UI design (6%)
 Code quality, performance, security, advanced validation (10%)
 Creative additional features to both apps (8%)
 Demonstration, interaction, showing progress to tutor and contribution with the
class (10%)

Feedback: Great. A native Android application implementing most required fea-

tures. Few bugs and very minor weaknesses. Great quality code but could be
more advanced. Able to show good knowledge of code implemented. Very nice
UI design. Additional features added, e.g., authentication
To improve: Code quality, validation and security can be optimized. The UI could
be improved for better look and feel and user experience. Proactiveness in inter-
action and contribution to the class is expected better. Lacking feature Export.

Report (20%, grade: 12)

Concise table containing a checklist of the features.
Write a reflection on how the app was developed. Discuss lessons learnt, what you
think went well and what you think could have been improved and how.
An evaluation of your app(s). Screen shots, Code snippet. Professional standard,
header page, page numbers, table of contents, headings, cropped images, figure
captions, no spelling or grammatical errors.
Feedback:
 Great report, including design, flow diagram, db schema, code structure, …
screenshots and code explanation.
 Nice introduction, self-evaluation, and conclusion.
 To be improved: lacking some insightful points about the features specified.
some grammar errors, inconsistent formatting. Great to have wireframes.