HR4043

Seminar: Assessment Element Two

Objectives

• To clarify any questions that you have about feedback you have
received on Assessment Element One (poster)
• To action plan based upon the feedback that you have received
• To clarify your understanding of the Assessment Element Two
grading criteria
In small groups
• Share with your group members any questions that
you have about your feedback – specifically
understanding of the terms and statements
• As a group, try to respond to the queries
• Identify those comments that you are unable to
resolve as a group – for tutor feedback
• Be prepared to feedback to the class on your
discussions
Activity 2: As a class
• Share the comments that you have been unable to
resolve as a group with the class and tutor for
feedback
Activity 3: Individually
• Use the feedback that you have received to identify
actions to take forward into your essay
• Complete the following action planning table

Things that To build on Things which To address less

attracted positive attracted less positive
positive feedback I will positive feedback I will
comments …. feedback …
1

5
Assessment criteria
Criteria
  0-39%
Standard Not Met 1
Demonstrate an Very poor discussion of the
understanding of paradigms, paradigmatic perspective. No
critically discuss and paradigm has been chosen.
consistently apply the chosen Very limited use of
paradigm throughout the appropriate references.
piece of work Completely insufficient
  evidence of application of
MLO1,3 paradigm through the piece
  of work.
25 marks
Demonstrate an Completely insufficient
understanding of the theories discussion of theories related
related to the chosen to the chosen module
(maximum of two) module topic(s). No module topic has
topic(s) been chosen/ more than two
  topics have been chosen. Very
MLO 1,2,3 limited use of appropriate
  references.
25 marks
Demonstrate an ability to No analysis of relevant
critically analyse behaviours examples of behaviours and
and practices in the chosen practices in the chosen
organisation organisation has been
  attempted.
MLO 2,3,4
 
30 marks
Criteria
Demonstrate an ability No recommendations
to discern practice- are discerned from the
recommendations for preceding critical
the organisation analysis
 
10 marks
Presentation and Presentation and
referencing formatting throughout
  are completely
  insufficient.
10 marks Numerous spelling and
grammatical errors.
Failure to cite
references correctly in
the main text. No
reference list.
 
40-49%
Standard Not Met 2
Insufficient discussion of the
paradigmatic perspective.
Insufficient evidence of
understanding of the chosen
paradigm. Few references
have been appropriately used.
The chosen paradigm has not
been sufficiently applied
throughout the piece of work.
Insufficient discussion of the
chosen module topic(s).
Insufficient discussion of
relevant theories. Limited use
of appropriate references.
Insufficient analysis of
examples of organisational
behaviours and practices
using relevant theories, from
the chosen topic(s).
Description rather than
discussion provided.
Recommendations are
proposed but these are
generic in nature, and
not clearly discerned
from the preceding
analysis
Presentation and
formatting throughout
are insufficiently
professional.
Many spelling and
grammatical errors.
Referencing throughout
and in the reference list
is insufficiently correct.
 
50-59%
Meets Standard 1
Adequate discussion of the
paradigmatic perspective,
including adequate evidence
of understanding of the
chosen paradigm, with
adequate use of appropriate
references. More in-depth
and consistent application of
the chosen paradigm
throughout the piece of work
is required.
Theories related to the
chosen module topic(s) have
been adequately discussed,
with adequate use of
appropriate references.
Adequate analysis of relevant
examples of organisational
behaviours and practices
using relevant theories,
models and frameworks from
the chosen topic(s). However,
stronger links between theory
and organisational examples
is required to provide
comprehensive arguments.
Recommendations are
proposed that show
some relationship with
the preceding analysis.
Details are not though
fully considered
Presentation and
formatting are
adequate.
Few spelling and
grammatical errors.
Most references are
presented appropriately
in compliance with APA
style in the main text.
List of references is
adequately accurate.
Scales
60-69%
Meets Standard 2
Good discussion of the
paradigmatic perspective,
including critical discussion of
the chosen paradigm. Critical
use of a good range of
appropriate references. Good
and consistent application of
the chosen paradigm
throughout the piece of work.
Good discussion of the
theories related to the chosen
module topic(s), with critical
use of a good range of
appropriate references.
Good and critical analysis of
relevant examples of
organisational behaviours and
practices using relevant
theories, models and
frameworks from the chosen
topic(s)
Scales
Good recommendations
are made, discerned
from the preceding
analysis. Implications
are considered
Good presentation
throughout.
Spelling and grammar
of a good standard.
Very good APA
referencing throughout
the main text.
Accurate list of
references.
70-79%
Exceeds Standard 1
Very good discussion of the
paradigmatic perspective,
including in-depth critical
discussion of the chosen
paradigm, critically using a very
good range of appropriate
references. Very good and
consistent application of paradigm
throughout the piece of work.
Very good discussion of the
theories related to the chosen
module topic(s), with critical use
of a very good range of
appropriate references.
Very good and critical analysis of
relevant examples of
organisational behaviours and
practices using relevant theories,
models and frameworks from the
chosen topic(s)
Very good
recommendations are
made, discerned from the
preceding analysis.
Implications are considered
in detail
Very good presentation
throughout.
Spelling and grammar of a
high standard.
Very good APA referencing
throughout the
assignment.
80-89%
Exceeds Standard 2
Excellent discussion of the
paradigmatic perspective,
including in-depth critical
discussion of the chosen
paradigm, with excellent use of a
wide range of appropriate
references. Excellent and
consistent application of the
chosen paradigm throughout the
piece of work.
Excellent critical discussion of the
theories related to the chosen
module topic(s), with excellent
use of a wide range of appropriate
references.
Excellent and critical analysis of
relevant examples of
organisational behaviours and
practices using relevant theories,
models and frameworks from the
chosen topic(s)
Excellent
recommendations are
made, discerned from the
preceding analysis and are
clearly appropriate to the
organisation. Implications
are considered in detail
Excellent professional
presentation throughout.
Excellent spelling and
grammar.
APA referencing used
throughout the main text
and list of references.
90-100%
Exceeds Standard 3
Outstanding discussion of the
paradigmatic perspective,
including in-depth critical
discussion of the chosen
paradigm, with exemplary use
of an extensive range of
appropriate references.
Outstanding and consistent
application of the chosen
paradigm throughout the
piece of work.
Outstanding critical discussion
of the theories related to the
chosen module topic(s), with
exemplary use of an extensive
range of appropriate
references.
Outstanding and critical
analysis of relevant examples
of organisational behaviours
and practices using relevant
theories, models and
frameworks from the chosen
topic(s)
Excellent
recommendations are
made, discerned from
the preceding analysis
and are clearly
appropriate to the
organisation.
Implications are
considered
An outstandingly crafted
piece of work which is
professionally presented
throughout.
APA referencing used
throughout the main
text and for the list of
references.