With its disciplined process of relating lesion visualization to symptoms, neuroimaging
is central to neurology and used by most of its subspecialties. Neurologists possess unique insights into the appropriate use of imaging and are well positioned to contribute important advances in neurodiagnostics. For these reasons, an understand- ing of neuroimaging makes us better neurologists. Neurologists who make urgent point-of-care decisions are particularly inclined to interpret directly from images; ex- amples include neurohospitalists, stroke specialists, critical care neurologists, inter- ventional neurologists, neurooncologists, and practitioners who use teleneurology. Advances in the burgeoning field of functional neuroimaging require a greater depth of neuroscience training and will certainly benefit from the active involvement of clinical and research neurologists who are also trained in neuroimaging. I hope to see in the future the establishment of efficient multidisciplinary “neuro” departments that merge neurology, neurosurgery, clinical neurophysiology, neuroradiology, nuclear neurology, and neurorehabilitation, according to which the equipment would be purchased and run on a service basis. This arrangement would optimize patient care, improve training, and expand opportunities for research. The evolution of anatomic and especially func- tional neuroimaging will dictate the need for neurologists to be sitting at the same table as our esteemed neuroradiology colleagues. To achieve any success in neuroimaging training efforts, a healthy respect for the complexity of imaging technology is needed that encompasses recognizing how arti- facts can mimic pathology, understanding how certain techniques can mask or high- light pathology, and learning the process for unbiased interpretation of images while concisely addressing the clinical question. Experienced neuroimagers find the mix of clinical neurology and imaging to be fulfilling and believe that such an integrated career can be an incentive for medical students to choose neurology as a specialty. Given the predictions of a dangerous shortfall in the US neurology workforce, this lure should not be taken lightly.
Neurol Clin 38 (2020) xi–xii
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2019.10.001 neurologic.theclinics.com 0733-8619/20/ª 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. xii Preface
As the editor of 2 previous issues on neuroimaging in Neurologic Clinics, I would like
to thank Dr Randolph Evans for bestowing and entrusting me with another.. Either Dr Evans believes in me or he is hoping I’ll get it right the third time. I would like to thank Donald Mumford, developmental editor of Neurologic Clinics at Elsevier, for his sup- port of the field of neuroimaging. I am indebted to all the authors who contributed their time and efforts to this issue. I would also like to thank my executive assistant, Amanda McFayden, for her tireless help in organizing and coordinating this issue. In my first issue, I thanked my family; in the second issue, I thanked my parents, and now I would like to acknowledge the great neuroimaging minds that have taught and guided me in my 35-year career as a neuroimaging neurologist. This includes Drs William Kinkel, Jack Greenberg, Lawrence Jacobs, Joseph Masdeu, Vernice Bates, and Joseph Fritz. I can only hope that I have shared that knowledge with the scores of neurologists, fellows, residents, and students that have trained at the DENT Neurologic Institute and at annual meetings of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Society of Neuroimaging, the latter of which I am proud to have served as President. It is my hope that you enjoy reading the latest neuroimaging issue of Neurologic Clinics as much as we enjoyed putting it together for you.
Laszlo L. Mechtler, MD, FAAN, FEAN, FASN
Dent Neurologic Institute Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center State University of New York at Buffalo 3980 Sheridan Drive Buffalo, NY 14226, USA E-mail address: lmechtler@dentinstitute.com