Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Na 1
Na 1
and the effects of the two samples were observed in the 0.5% cream as compared
almost equal. However, the effect on the with the non-treated reference group, but
pain threshold was not obvious with the an obvious effect was obtained with 0.75,
lipophilic ointment. These results reveal the 1.0 and 1.5% DF. There was no significant
great influence of the base on anti-inflam difference in the effect among the three
matory effects of topical DF ointment, and groups. The inhibitory effect of DF cream on
a stronger effect of the cream and gel than UV-erythema was concentration-dependent.
the lipophilic ointment was observed. From The activity of the 1.0 and 1.5% cream was
the above results, we concluded that the significantly stronger than that of the 0.5 and
cream was the most superior as an external 0.75% creams (P<0.05), and there was no
DF ointment. significant difference in the effect between
2. Screening of the optimum concentration the 1.0 and 1.5% creams. The inhibitory
of DF cream effect on croton oil-induced edema in the ear
The anti-inflammatory activity of DF cream was not significant with the 0.5% cream,
was compared with DF concentrations of though an inclination to inhibition was
0.5, 0.75, 1.0 and 1.5%; and the results are observed. Obvious inhibition was obtained
shown in Table 2. No obvious effect on with the 0.75 and greater % cream, and the
carrageenin-induced paw edema was effect was especially strong with the 1.0 and
1.5% cream. There was no significant differ 2) Inhibition of edema
ence between the two higher concentrations. a) Inhibition of carrageenin-induced skin
In these experiments, only the cream of the edema: As shown in Table 3, DF cream had
base was examined simultaneously, but it had an inhibitory effect comparable to the existing
no effect on the inflammation. Seeing these three ointments, and the inhibitory rate of this
results, it appears that the anti-inflammatory cream was the greatest (33.4%) among the
activity of the DF cream depended on the tested ointments.
concentration of DF. A definite effect was b) Inhibition of carrageenin-induced paw
obtained with the 1.0 and 1.5% creams, but edema: Figure 1 shows the inhibitory effects
there was no significant difference in the of tested ointments on carrageenin paw
effect between those two concentrations. edema. DF cream had a strong inhibitory
Therefore, we concluded that the optimum effect, which was more potent than those of
DF concentration in the cream was 1.0%, BM cream and ML ointment, though there
and this concentration was employed for the was no significant difference.
dose of DF cream thereafter. c) Inhibition of croton oil-induced edema
3. Comparison with existing NSAI D in the ear: Table 3 shows the inhibitory effects
ointments on edema in the ear of mice induced by
1) Inhibition of increased vascular perme croton oil. DF cream had a potent inhibitory
ability effect which was comparable to that of ML
Table 3 shows the inhibitory effect on ointment. BM cream followed ML ointment
dye-exudation induced by histamine. DF in the strength of the effect, and the in
cream had an inhibitory effect which was hibitory rate of IM gel was slightly smaller,
nearly comparable to BM cream and ML though there was no significant difference
ointment. Though the inhibition rate was among the tested ointments.
greatest with IM ointment, there was no 3) Inhibition of ultraviolet erythema
significant difference among the test Figure 2 shows the inhibitory effect on
ointment. UV erythema in guinea pigs. DF cream had
Table 3. Effects of topical application of DF cream and reference preparations on various models of
acute inflammation
Fig. 2. Effect of topical application of DF cream
and reference preparations of ultraviolet erythema
on guinea pigs. Test ointment (100 mg) was topically
applied immediately after ultraviolet irradiation.
Each value represents the mean±S.E. of 5 male
Fig. 1. Effect of topical application of DF cream and
guinea pigs. The vertical bars indicate standard
reference preparations on paw edema induced by errors of the means.*-* Control, 0-0 DF
carrageenin in rats. Test ointment (50 mg) was cream, X -X BM cream, ( ........0 ML ointment,
applied topically 1 and 2 hr before carrageenin (1 %,
•-------0 IM gel. *P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
0.1 ml) was given s.c. into the plantar site of the rat
foot. Each value represents the mean±S.E. of 8 male
rats. The vertical bars indicate standard errors of the
means. 0-0 Control, C)-C) DF cream, lation tissue by paper disk method: Table 4
X-x BM cream, 0---- 0 ML ointment, S------0 shows the inhibitory effect on the weight
IM gel BM cream (Andarm=5% Bufexamac cream), of the granulation tissue that proliferated
IM gel (Inteban=l% Indomethacin gel), ML oint around the paper disk implanted under the
ment (Mobilat=2% salicylic acid, 0.2% mucopoly
saccharide polysulfuric acid ester, 1 % suprarenal rat back skin. The effects of three comparative
extract). These abbreviations are the same in all samples were almost equal with an inhibition
tables and figures. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 rate of about 15%, while DF cream had a
significant stronger inhibition rate (30%)
a potent inhibitory effect comparable to that than the others.
of I M gel. The effect was obvious also in b) Inhibition of wound healing: Table 4
BM cream, but it was significantly weaker shows the inhibitory effect on the healing of
than those of DF cream and IM gel. The the linear wound in the back skin of guinea
effect of ML ointment was weak, and it was pigs. The inhibitory effect of DF cream was
significant only at the 1st hr after UV ir potent, and that of ML ointment was even
radiation. stronger. The inhibitory rate of IM gel was
4) Inhibition of proliferation of the granu slightly less than that of DF cream, but there
lation tissue was no significant difference. Though an
a) Inhibition of proliferation of the granu inclination to inhibition was also observed
Table 4. Effects of topical application of DF cream and reference preparations on proliferation of
granulation tissue
(cream) and gel bases, were compared. produced a potent inhibitory effect on these
Among them, the cream and gel preparations edema. The activity was equal or superior to
had potent effects globally as compared the existing ointments on carrageenin
with the preparation with the lipophilic base. induced paw edema and on croton oil
We considered that the effect of the cream induced edema. Moreover, the inhibitory
was the most superior and stable. On the rate of DF cream was highest against car
other hand, there are both topical preparations rageenin-induced skin edema. In addition,
of an ointment with a lipophilic base and a DF cream also produced potent inhibition on
cream with an emulsion base in BM. Though UV erythema, comparable to IM gel. As
the detailed results were not shown in this compared with those drugs, the anti