THE EFFECT OF THE AMOUNT OF THE DRINKING WATERS AND ELECTRICITY CUSTOMERS ON THE NEED OF GREEN OPEN SPACES

IN SALATIGA

Destarita Indah Permatasari, S.T., M.E.

Agrarian Analyst, Salatiga Land Office

Destaritaindah@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

From the datas gathered from Stathystic Central Board in Salatiga we can concluded that there were a constant increased on the amount of Drinking Waters
Customers in Salatiga based on sectors groups as follows : household always became the first, followed by trade as the second. Became the third was industry.
While as the fourth, the fifth and the last were government, social, and others. While the other hand compared to the amount of electricity customers can
be summarized that industry became the highest, followed by household. Trade became the third. Government and others became the fourth and fifth. The
last rank was social.

Went from the literature whis was Wikipedia that gave information related to the dominant sectors on the waters usage which were agriculture, industry,
household, recreation, and environment activity.

The determination of green open space areas regarding of these factors according analysis by the authors : land areas; the population sizes; the need of
electricity and drinking water; the need of the housing areas; agricultures; industry; trade; office; and others; and the calculation of labours; rice fields
areas; the geografic locations; and the distant to the city centre.

From the scoring which was did, the policy recommendation was about the need of green open spaces based on the the scoring of each district; higher scor
showed the more areas needed for green open spaces. The results were : Argomulyo, Sidorejo as the fist and the second. The third and the fourth were
Tingkir and Sidomukti.

INTRODUCTION

Table 1

The Sales Value of Drinking Waters in Salatiga City during Period 2012 – 2021

The Sales Value of Drinking

Waters 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
1. Sosial/ Social 883 674910 883 674910 883 674910 860 641350 911 335440 911 335440
1.153.596 1.153.596 1.153
14 741 14 741 14 741
2. Rumah Tangga/Household 16 949 732020 16 792 021869 16 792 021869
235820 235820 235820 24.897.119 24.897.119 24.89
3. Instansi Pemerintah/ Government 1 063 828770 1 063 828770 1 063 828770 1 058 938015 482 034535 482 034535
1.685.087 1.685.087 1.685
4. Niaga/ commerce 2 321 709901 2 321 709910 2 321 709910 2 939 421180 3 230 272455 3 230 272455
4.194.292 4.194.292 4.194
5. Industri/ Industry 659 063970 659 063970 659 063970 442 975445 630 150150 630 150150
2.089.890 2.089.890 2.089
6. Khusus/ Private 125 326460 125 326460 125 326460 13 248240 1 808 134630 1 808 134630
350.554 350.554 350.5

7. Susut/hilang dlm. Penyaluran/ lost

in distribution

Salatiga 0

Source : Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

Figure 2.
The Sales Value of Drinking Waters in Salatiga City during Period 2012 – 2021
 The Sales Value of Drinking Waters
100%
50%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Salatiga
7. Susut/hilang dlm. Penyaluran/ lost in distribution
6. Khusus/ Private
5. Industri/ Industry
4. Niaga/ commerce
3. Instansi Pemerintah/ Government

Source: Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

From the datas gathered from Stathystic Central Board in Salatiga we can concluded that there were a constant increased on the amount of Drinking
Waters Customers in Salatiga based on sectors groups as follows : household always became the first, followed by trade as the second. Became the third
was industry. While as the fourth, the fifth and the last were government, social, and others.

Table 2.

The amount of Drinking Waters Customers in Salatiga City During Period 2012 – 2021

The amount of Drinking

Waters Customers 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
1. Sosial/ Social 640 640 640 648 667 667
707 707 707 707
2. Rumah Tangga/Household 24 187 24 187 24 187 24 837 25 612 25 612
27.778 27.778 27.778 27.778
3. Instansi Pemerintah/
171 171 171 172 140 140
Government 212 212 212 212
4. Niaga/ commerce 1 666 1 666 1 666 1 981 2 081 2 081
2.183 2.183 2.183 2.183
5. Industri/ Industry 41 41 41 43 42 42
42 42 42 42
6. Khusus/ Private 4 4 4 3 461 461
80 80 80 80
7. Susut/hilang dlm.
Penyaluran/ lost in distribution
Source: Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

Figure 2.

The amount of Drinking Waters Customers in Salatiga City During Period 2012 – 2021

The Amount of Drinking Waters Customers

30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Jumlah Pelanggan Air Minum 1. Sosial/ Social

2. Rumah Tangga/Household 3. Instansi Pemerintah/ Government
4. Niaga/ commerce 5. Industri/ Industry
6. Khusus/ Private

Source: Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

From the table and figure above, we can made a conclusion that there was a relatively constant number of drinking waters fluctuation. On another side,
there was a significant increased on house hold customers and recorded since 2018 became the first, highest, and the most dominan sectors of the share of
the amount of drinking waters customers.

Table 3.

The Sales Value of Electricity in Salatiga City During period 2012 - 2021

The Sales Value of

Electricity 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Rumah Tangga 167.204.077.143 187.962.150.719 41.712.904.338 9.221.942.884 9.221.942.884 36.849.729.725 38.60

Sosial 17.437.277.309 21.641.622.193 8.172.041.553 991.067.311 991.067.311 3.454.192.806 4.539

Bisnis 58.641.019.266 68.394.124.745 28.204.706.673 3.914.328.557 3.914.328.557 12.545.047.131 14.14

Industri 455.702.720.263 540.739.242.085 145.628.220.133 19.221.420.315 19.221.420.315 51.714.251.781 74.89

Pemerintah 28.955.516.354 34.177.469.923 14.777.160.965 1.976.061.822 1.976.061.822 5.953.424.493 5.751

Multiguna 10.851.312.541 14.783.604.263 7.118.613.806 22.688.705 22.688.705 - 190.1

Salatiga 738.791.922.876 868.698.213.928 245.613.647.470 35.347.509.594 35.347.509.594 110.516.645.936 138.1

Source: Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

The Sales Value of Electricity in Salatiga City During period 2012 - 2021
 Nilai Penjualan Listrik
1.000.000.000.000

800.000.000.000

600.000.000.000

400.000.000.000

200.000.000.000

-
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Rumah Tangga Sosial Bisnis Industri

Pemerintah Multiguna Salatiga

Source: Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

Based of the table and figure above, can be concluded that there was a constant fluctuation of the sales value on electricity in Salatiga City During Period
2012 – 2021. Industri became the highest electricity user, followed by household as the second. Trade as the third. Became the fourth and fifth were
Government and Others. The last was social.

Table 4

The amount of Electricity Customers in Salatiga City During Period 2012 - 2021

The amount of
Electricity
Customers 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Rumah Tangga 42337 42337 42337 62406 64585 67167 69744 72563 75266 77804
Sosial 6989 6989 6989 1921 2041 2140 2196 2272 2339 2407
Bisnis 15360 15360 15360 3120 3687 4103 4403 4486 4569 4716
Industri 44069 44069 44069 72 76 80 82. 87 89 90
Pemerintah 4695 4695 4695 419 439 467 491 508 524 542
Multiguna 264 264 264 0 0 12 30 45 63 76
Salatiga 113.714 113.714 113.714 67938 70828 73969 76946 79961 82850 85635

Source: Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

Figure 4.

The amount of Electricity Customers in Salatiga City During Period 2012 - 2021

Jumlah Pelanggan Listrik

120000

100000

80000

60000

40000

20000

0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Rumah Tangga Sosial Bisnis Industri

Pemerintah Multiguna Salatiga

Source: Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

Based on table and figure above, we can made some of results, which were that during that period of data series showed as follows: house hold lied the
highest rank, followed by industry. Trade as the tird. Became the fourth and fifth were social and Government. Others put on the last.

LITERATURES

Quoted from Wikipedia ( 2022) regarding Ecology and Climate Change Aspects whisch were the rank of water usage were as follows: agriculture, industry,
household, recreation, and environment activity.

Although the one and only of natural source of water surface within water catchment areas, waters total quatity within a time was depend on many
factors. Those factors included : capacity of lake, marsh field, and reservoir; land permeability under the reservoir; flow characteristic on water catchment;
the on time precipitation; and the average of local evaporation.

Furthermore still quoted from Journal related of the Availability of Green Open Spaces in Salatiga during period 2010 – 2020 explained that there was a
built land transformation formed as expansion which was very difficult to be controlled, so as the consequence was the land reducement which have
ecology functions in a City. That can appear environment problems. ( Rachmand and Sholeh, 2021).

still about Green Open Spaces in Salatiga, as the review from another point of view, Journal of Analysis of Availability of Green Open Space based on the
need of oxygen explained that the calculation of the minimum Green Open Space Areas quantitively counted due to :

Coverage area, which was 30 % of total area, consist of 20 % of public green open space and 10 % of privat green open space; and

The population size, which was 20 m2 per kapita distributed followed the hierarki.

Besides that, Jurnal related to Analysis of Green Open Space in Pankajene City, Sidenreng Rappang Regency produced a result that the problem regarding to
the lack of green open space in urban area was caused by the highhy need of space to support urban activity. This thing made certain difficulty for local
government on fullfil the rules on green open space minimum determination which was 20 % for public and 10 % for privat. The less availability of the space
usage became green open space also contributed by the highly and massive urban housing development as the impact of development of certain urban
areas. ( Hidayar, 2017).

METHODOLOGY
As the further steps, we should to know which factors effecting and how to calculate the need of green open spaces in Salatiga City. From the literatures
which were collected and continued with the simple analysis by scoring of some factors which were predicted effected, we then could give several
recommendation of the list based of the districts.

ANALYSIS

Table 5.
Service Sector which was predicted effected the Green Open Spaces Areas in Salatiga City
Presentase Tenaga Penggunaan
Kecamatan Kerja Penggunaan Lahan Penggunaan Lahan Lahan Tinggi Wilayah Jarak ke Ibukota
Pertanian Bukan
Kecamatan Jasa Sawah Sawah Bukan Pertanian
Argomulyo 64 9 755 1089 680 3,5
Tingkir 64 295 173 587 627 2,7
Sidomukti 64 49,7 361 735,3 626 2,5
Sidorejo 64 273 448 448 602 3,1
Source: Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

Table 6.
Manufacture Sector which was predicted effected the Green Open Spaces Areas in Salatiga City

Presentase Tenaga Penggunaan

Kecamatan Kerja Penggunaan Lahan Penggunaan Lahan Lahan Tinggi Wilayah Jarak ke Ibukota
Pertanian Bukan
Kecamatan Manufaktur Sawah Sawah Bukan Pertanian
Argomulyo 31 9 755 1089 680 3,5
Tingkir 31 295 173 587 627 2,7
Sidomukti 31 49,7 361 735,3 626 2,5
Sidorejo 31 273 448 448 602 3,1
 Source: Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

Table 7.
Agriculture Sector which was predicted effected the Green Open Spaces Areas in Salatiga City

Presentase Tenaga Penggunaan

Kecamatan Kerja Penggunaan Lahan Penggunaan Lahan Lahan Tinggi Wilayah Jarak ke Ibukota
Pertanian Bukan
Kecamatan Pertanian Sawah Sawah Bukan Pertanian
Argomulyo 5 9 755 1089 680 3,5
Tingkir 5 295 173 587 627 2,7
Sidomukti 5 49,7 361 735,3 626 2,5
Sidorejo 5 273 448 448 602 3,1

Source: Salatiga Stathystic Central Board, 2022

Table8.
Scoring of The Districts Need of Green Open Spaces Areas
Kecamatan Presentase Tenaga Kerja Penggunaan Lahan Topografi Jarak Jumlah Luas Total
Penduduk Lahan
Jasa Manufaktur Pertanian Sawah Pertanian Bukan Tinggi Ke- Urutan
Bukan Pertanian Wilayah Ibukota Luas
Sawah RTH
Argomulyo 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 44.693 (3) 1.853 36
(4)
4 4 4 4 1 2 3 2 44.024 (2) 1055 27
Tingkir (1)
4 4 4 2 2 3 2 1 43.055 (1) 1146 25
Sidomukti (2)
4 4 4 3 1 57.156 (4) 1624 30
Sidorejo 3 1 3 (3)
 Source: Author, 2022

CONCLUSION

The determination of green open space areas regarding of these factors according analysis by the authors :
a. land areas;
b. the population sizes;
c. the need of electricity and drinking water;
d. the need of the housing areas; agricultures; industry; trade; office; and others; and
e. the calculation of labours; rice fields areas; the geografic locations; and the distant to the city centre.

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on Scoring result of the District Needs on Green Open Spaces in Salatiga City, we surely recommended followed the rank based the largest to
the smallest, as follows:
a. Kecamatan Argomulyo ( 36 poin);
b. Kecamatan Sidorejo ( 30 poin);
c. Kecamatan Tingkir ( 27 poin);dan
d. Kecamatan SIdomukti ( 25 poin).

REFFERENCES

1. BPS Kota Salatiga, 2022.

2. Hidayar, Reza Ahmad. 2017. Analisis Penataan Kawasan Ruanhg Terbuka Hijau ( RTH) di Kota Pangkajene Kabupaten Sidenreng Rappang. 2017.
Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan.
3. Purwatik, Sri, dll. Analisis Ketersediaan Ruang Terbuka Hijau ( RTH) Berdasarkan Kebutuhan Oksigen. (Studi Kasus : Kota Salatiga).2014. Semarang :
Jurnal Geodesi UNDIP.
4. Rachman, Salsa Yusdanur dan Muh Sholeh. Ketersediaan Ruang Teerbuka Publim ( RTH) di Kota Salatiga Tahun 2010 – 2020. 2021. Kabupaten
Semarang : Journal Unnes.
5. Wikipedia.com.Aspek Ekologi dan Perubahan Iklim dalam Penguasaan Air. 2022.