Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In early 1999, BAE Systems invested roughly $150,000 to study its global operations to
determine whether it had the right information to support decision-making processes and if
BAE employees had the right learning systems to help them support their daily activities. The
results were remarkably revealing. The study showed that nearly two-thirds of BAE’s top 120
decision makers didn’t have the right information at key phases of the decision process.
Furthermore, 80% of BAE employees were “wasting” an average of 30 minutes each day
simply trying to locate the information they needed to do their jobs. Yet another 60% were
spending an hour or more duplicating the work of others. Finally, one of the biggest problems
revealed by the study was the large-scale information overload on the company intranets.
The information itself was often unstructured, and the search engines were inadequate for
conducting keyword searches to find information. After testing several search engine
technologies, BAE incorporated the best performer into the KM application on its corporate
intranet. The system paid for itself in just seven months. The first demonstration of its
effectiveness came in late 1999 when two different groups of BAE engineers in the United
Kingdom were working on wing construction issues for the company’s Harrier 2 military
aircraft. After using the KM system to search for wing specification information across the
company’s intranet, one of the engineering groups discovered that the other group was
working on the same problem. Catching this redundancy early in the cycle saved BAE
millions—more than enough to pay for the entire new system! Within one year, BAE
estimated the new KM system reduced the time needed to retrieve information from its
intranet by 90%. Even a company that specializes in building things that go very fast above
the ground can learn how to do things faster on the ground.
REQUIRED