Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPRING 2021
Stefano B
1588-1592 – Chair in mathematics in Pisa (in fact he started off studying medicine).
1592-1610 – Chair in Padua.
1609 – First interest for the telescope (originally built in the Netherlands) that he improves
and presents to the Venice government.
1610 – Book: Sidereus Nuncius (announces the discovery of Jupiter’s satellites). Observation of Saturn (that
he saw as a sort of “Mickey Mouse”).
1632 – Book: Dialogue Concerning the Chief World Systems (the book that got him in trouble).
1633 – Trial. He was tried by the Inquisition in Rome, where he was found suspect of heresy, and forced
to declare that all of his findings were wrong. He was confined to his house in Arcetri near Florence.
(2) He described the concept of Basic Relativity in physics, which can be stated as follows: "the
laws of mechanics will be the same for all observers moving at the same speed and direction with
respect to one another.”
(More here:
https://www.atnf.csiro.au/outreach/education/senior/astrophysics/galileo.
html)
(6) He described the Law of the pendulum as well as the principle of inertia.
Some more things you should definitely know about Galileo, his life, his
times and his achievements:
(1) He was not always right in his scientific statements or successful in his
experiments!
He was wrong about comets, that he believed to be a play of light rather than
physical objects.
He believed that the planets’ orbits were circular rather than elliptical.
His perception of Saturn was not correct.
He attempted (unsuccessfully) to measure the speed of light by placing
observers with lanterns about a mile apart. The idea was good, but the
Giuseppe Bertini (1825–1898) - Galileo technology available wasn’t.
Galilei showing the Doge of Venice how to
use the telescope (fresco) Villa Andrea
Ponti, Varese, Italy
(2) Galilei did not regard himself as a public adversary of religion. He would have
probably described himself as a pious Catholic. However, he had three children
out of wedlock. One of them, Virginia, became a nun (Sister Maria Celeste) and
took care of him in his last days.
(3) Of course,the trial was tough and unfair but Galileo did not go to jail nor was
he physically tortured. (See Finocchiaro’s reading).
-----------
The Copernican system, as the name says, was not new, but had been introduced
by the Polish astronomer Copernicus (1473-1543) who studied in Bologna.
heliocentrism was even older than Copernicus, having been proposed for instance
by Philolaus (480-385 BCE) and Aristarchus of Samos (310-230 BCE).
People did not believe in geocentrism because they were silly! It is quite in
accordance with everyday/non-experimental observations (like Aristotelian
physics).
So what was new about Galilei and why did he get in trouble?
A “popular,” OVERSIMPLIFIED version of the Galileo Affair goes like
this…
The Dialogue is a work in which several characters talk and compare the
Copernican system with the Ptolemaic one (geocentric ---> from the
Greco-Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy, 90-168 AD). The Copernican
system turns out to be the correct one.
“Then Joshua spoke to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the
Amorites before the sons of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, ‘O sun,
stand still at Gibeon, And O moon in the valley of Aijalon.’ So the sun stood
still, and the moon stopped, Until the nation avenged themselves of their
enemies.”
One. Galilei was an atomist and his views conflicted with the official explanation of
the doctrine of Eucharist (See handout).
Two. Galilei had powerful enemies in the Church and wasn’t always a good
diplomat.
The Dialogue presents geocentrism through a character called Simplicio (“simple”!)
that Galileo’s adversaries interpreted as a caricature of the Pope.
This was not correct (Galilei was probably mocking another colleague) but it shows
you that also personal sympathies and antipathies were involved.
Three. Heliocentrism was not a new idea, but Galilei had PLENTY OF EVIDENCE!
Also:
Four. The Dialogue was written in Italian. That he murmured
“Eppur si muove!”
(“And yet it moves!”)
Five: Heliocentrism is also religiously challenging (the Earth and hence the humans is a myth….
are no longer "at the center" )
In conclusion you should consider the Galilei affair , rather than JUST a
dispute over the specific point (Heliocentrism/Geocentrism) as…
A POWER GAME CONCERNING WHO HAS THE FINAL WORD
ABOUT THE BIBLE’S INTERPRETATION.
-----------
Galileo had expressed his ideas about the interpretation of the Bible in
a letter to the Grand Duchess of Tuscany, Christine of Lorraine (1615):
“If the sacred scribes had had any intention of teaching people certain
arrangements and motions of the heavenly bodies, or had they wished
us to derive such knowledge from the Bible, then in my opinion they
would not have spoken of these matters so sparingly in comparison
with the infinite number of admirable conclusions which are
demonstrated in that science.”
“I would say here something that was heard from an ecclesiastic of the
most eminent degree: “That the intention of the Holy Ghost is to teach
us how one goes to heaven, not how heaven goes.”
http://inters.org/Galilei-Madame-Christina-Lorraine
Vatican Science Panel Told By Pope: Galileo Was Right