Case No - 13105/103U2022

ffi
qr{ilErq gq ffi* fuoqirrffi
couRT oF cHrEF COMMTSSTONER FOR PERSONS W|TH DTSABTLTTTES (DnTANGJAN)
kqFrfi irvkotrt foryq/Deparfnentof Emporermentof Personswith Disabilities (Diqyangjan)
r$rqrfutF qrq .fr offir fu@/Mhistsy of Social Justice and Emporverment
qRt[ S*DIT / Govemment of lndia

Case No. 1310611031/2022

Complainant:
Dr. Satendra Singh,
Doctor with Disabilities:
Agents of Change (DwDAoC)
,{5-303, Olive County, Sector-5,
Vasundh ar a, Ghaziabad, UP -20 I 2 I 2
Emai I : dr. satend ra@gmai l. com

Respondent:
(1) Director General of Health Services,
Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS)
446-4, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-l10108
Email: dghs@nic.in

(2) Secretary,
National Medical Commission,
Pocket- 1 4, Sector-8, Dwarka, Phase-1,
New Delhi-l 10077; Email: secy-mci @nic.in

Affected Persons: Candidates with disabilities aspiring Medical

Education.
Co dum

1. Complaint was received in the Court relating to relating to double

examination of the candidates who have successfully qualified NEET
exam. Hearing was conducted and this Court issued recommendation-order
dated 10.01 .2023, whereby this Court in Para 5.16 and 5.17 recommended
to increase the number of facilitation centres and also recommended to
form an 'expert committee'. Relevant paras of the Recommendation-Order
are as below -:

5.16 This Court recommends thot facilitation centres should be

increased.fro* I6 to many more in number so that divyang candidates do
not have to face un-necessary problems in evaluation. Furthermore, till
centres cannot be increosed, government medical colleges can be
authorized to conduct such evaluations.

5.17. This Court also recommends that asfar as issues relating to

problems foced by candidates during second evaluation, as the one raised
sd.rfua. g+arrffi q-+q, caTe =ro. fr-2, *acg-ro.
ET{DI, s-{ Rd-11o025; {wlTrr: or1_2os9236,r, 2oas22zs
5" Ftoor, NISD Bu ilding, Plot No.G-2, Sector-l0, Dwarka, New Delhi-l10075; Tel.: 01i-20992364, zoggz27s
E-mail : ccpd@nic. in ; Website : www.ccdisabilities. nic. i n
(qlt qhaT d q-*rqn d flag srt-tr wr$aZds ueqr rrow fud)
(Please quote the above file/case number in future correspondence)
Page | 1
 Case No - 13105/1031/2022

by the Complainont during online hearing, the Respondent shall form an

expert committee which shall comprise of medical practitioners, to
examine the various problems which arise and which are faced by the
candidates during second time evaluation. The recommendations of this
committee shall be shared with this Court.

2. Due to inadvertent clerical error a phrase which reads as - "such

committee shall also include doctor who is Person with Disability" could
not be included in the final recommendation order dated 10.01 .2023.
Hence, in Recommendation-Order dated 10.01 .2023,Para 5.17 is replaced
and shall be read as-
5.17 This Court also recommends that as far as issues relating to
problems faced by candidates during second evaluation, os the one raised
by the Complainant during online hearing, the Respondent shall form an
expert committee which shall comprise of medical practitioners, such
committee shall also include doctor(s) who is a Person with Disability, to
exomine the various problems which arise and which are faced by the
candidates during second time evaluation. The recommendations of this
committee shall be shared with this Court.

Dated: 05.04.2023

lr\,t\,A-
'r\;fu-
(Upma Srivastava)
Chief Commissioner
For Persons with Disabilities

Page | 2