Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The term KPI has become one of the most over-used and little understood terms in business
development and management. In theory it provides a series of measures against which
internal managers and external investors can judge the business and how it is likely to
perform over the medium and long term. Regrettably it has become confused with metrics – if
we can measure it, it is a KPI. Against the growing background of noise created by a welter of
such KPI concepts, the true value of the core KPI becomes lost.
The KPI when properly developed should be provide all staff with clear goals and objectives,
coupled with an understanding of how they relate to the overall success of the organisation.
Published internally and continually referred to, they will also strengthen shared values and
create common goals.
Only relating to Performance when it can be clearly measured, quantified and easily
influenced by the organisation. For example, weather influences many tourist related
operations – but the organisation cannot influence the weather. Sales growth may be an
important performance criteria – but targets must be set that can be measured.
Obviously KPI's cannot operate in a vacuum. One cannot establish a KPI without a clear
understanding of what is possible – so we have to be able to set upper and lower limits of the
KPI in reference to the market and how the competition is performing (or in the absence of
competition, a comparable measurement from a number of similar organisations). This means
that an understanding of benchmarks is essential to make KPI's useful (and specific to the
organisation), as they put the level of current performance in context – both for start ups and
established enterprises – though they are more important for the latter. Benchmarks also help
in checking what other successful organisations see as crucial in building and maintaining
competitive advantage, as they are central to any type of competitive analysis.
Different organisations need to monitor different aspects of their environment. For example,
the airline industry has a complex set of issues many of which (but not all) are different from
the dairy farmer. Ibis has created a number of separate business monitoring modules for
medium sized companies which we believe cover the majority of requirements for the
development and maintenance of their organisation, that are part of a bottom up planning
system based around knowledge centres.
For each monitoring module, one can then establish what the current level of performance is
in a measurable and understandable way. This is the current performance. From industry
sources, the benchmark level can normally be introduced (getting to benchmarks is often a
difficult process and one requiring a mixture of low cunning and/or sophisticated analysis).
Then a target level of achievement can be entered. Let us take an example of a financial
management module for an established manufacturing company and what it will tell us.
We can gain an enormous amount of information and control from such a chart, but obviously
not all components will meet the criteria of being a KPI – otherwise we are back into the
problem of measuring everything and not concentrating on a limited number of core criteria.
This ratio based analysis is combined with a review of individual projects – normally based
around the three key performance criteria, whether the project is on time, on budget and on
specification. For projects involving significant expenditure the measurement of stage gate
components will also significantly add to the level of control at a knowledge center level.
An example from the same knowledge centre would look like this:
As different individuals and organisations will put a different emphasis on each item of
information a definitive list of what is and what is not a KPI will depend on individual
decisions, and will vary considerably according to the stage of company development. Start
up enterprises need to place their emphasis on structural factors; established companies on
operational performance.
However, one can set some guidelines. The most rapid way to establish the KPI within any
set of monitoring information is to work through the three criteria in sequence.
Gross profit is one key measure to the success of the organisation. Research shows that
survival rates are linked to levels of gross profit; gross profit margins above that of the
competition provide clear evidence of competitive advantage.
Return on capital employed is another key measure of the success of the organisation. The
ability to use investment effectively is central to effective long term development.
Z score is a measure of the liquidity of the enterprise and clearly defines positive or negative
trends.
It would be the Ibis argument that the other components of the chart are not key – they are
valuable items of information but are not make or break aspects of company management
(unless they are grotesquely different from benchmark values).
Are these performance measures – can we quantify them and influence them?
Yes
Do these provide leading edge indications of future performance?
Yes
The conclusion from this analysis is that in financial reporting the company should
concentrate on gross profit, return on capital employed and Z scores as their key performance
indicators. Both gross profit and return on capital employed are part of the “model” balanced
scorecard for overall objectives that Ibis propose for the majority of enterprises as part of their
planning platform.
Other components within the financial reporting module that might be considered as KPI's are
factors such as the levels of gearing (debt/ equity ratio – DER), project success rates, bad
debt rates, and free cash flow (FCF). Including time, budget and specification to project
reporting would also be a natural addition.
In addition to the creation of the enterprise balanced scorecard, in which gross profit, return
on capital and Z scores are standard elements, the identification of KPI's in each of the
operational areas or knowledge centres also assists the enterprise in plan development.
These KPI's will change over time, but their creation as part of the initial creation of each
knowledge centre will focus and direct their operational activities.
In a decentralised planning system focused around knowledge centers the choice of key
performance indicators is the first stage in the re-evaluation of the information system to make
it more valuable and relevant to the operating unit rather than one that is centrally provided.
Thus the KPI determines what will drive that part of the enterprise and what information must
be collected to analyse and manage it. Such information gathering or software choices create
information networks that are relevant and provide data which is used specifically for
operational purposes, reducing information overload and information for information sake.
The KPI is central to a number of other elements in the planning platform which provides the
basis for answering the three crucial planning questions:
In addition to the creation of knowledge centres and business monitoring, KPI's have a vital
role to play in:
Training as part of a company wide approach to focusing staff and management on essential
operational requirements;
Identification of necessary actions in change management, exit planning and survival and
recovery planning;
They set priorities for investment appraisal, and the choice of emphasis that should be given
to the main strategies within the golden circle, consolidation (including cost cutting), market
penetration, ,market development and product development.
Training on key performance indicators, the creation of a business plan and standard
operating procedures is available from Ibis.