A Comparison of Echocardiogram Parameters in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS)
Patients With and Without Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS)
1 1 1 1 1 Anisa Raidah OMS III , Nolberto Jaramillo OMS III , Casey Sciandra OMS III , Bernadette Riley DO , Todd J. Cohen, MD 1 New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Clinical Specialties, Old Westbury, NY
INTRODUCTION Value MCAS No MCAS Unit
RESULTS Mean EF 60.025 60.32609 % • Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS) • 35 EDS patients with transthoracic echocardiograms were SD EF 3.409645 4.610681 % is a chronic multisystem disorder caused divided into two groups: MCAS vs. no MCAS EF P value 0.693812 by inappropriate mast cell activation. • MCD group: n=12, age 36.4 ± 13.2 years, 11 females, 1 male Mean IVSd 0.78875 0.8730435 cm • It is commonly associated with EDS, a • No MCD group: n=23, age 37.5 ± 12.1 years, 23 females SD IVSd 0.1981978 0.1645223 cm connective tissue disorder. [1] • There was no significant difference in mean body surface IVSd P value 0.2215969 • Cardiovascular manifestations include area, left-ventricular ejection fraction, interventricular septal Mean LVIDd 4.340833 4.483913 cm arrhythmias, blood pressure thickness, left ventricular diameter during systole and SD LVIDd 0.5570125 0.4539097 cm dysregulation, pericarditis, heart failure, diastole, aortic diameter, and left atrial diameter (Figure 1A-F LVIDd P value 0.4526917 aneurysms, and vasculitis. [1] & Table 1). Mean LVIDs 2.728333 2.908696 cm • EDS patients are known to have an SD LVIDs 0.3647373 0.303679 cm increased risk of aortic dilation and mitral LVIDs P value 0.1583498 valve prolapse on echocardiogram. [2] A B Mean AoD 2.71 2.939565 cm • Echocardiogram parameters in patients SD AoD 0.2623668 0.441593 cm with MCD and EDS have not been AoD P Value 0.06301829 previously studied. Mean LAD 2.833333 3.063043 cm SD LAD 0.6139786 0.5195578 cm LAD P value 0.2823271 METHODS • Table 1. Mean values, P values, and standard deviations of • This study included all MCD patients with cardiac parameters amongst the MCAS and No MCAS groups.
EDS and an echocardiogram seen at the
C D Long Island Heart Rhythm Center. CONCLUSION • Echocardiographic parameters were compared between patients with and • Patients with MCAS and EDS have normal echocardiogram parameters without MCD, using the Wilcoxon rank that are not significantly different from sum test. those without. • These parameters included ejection • More studies on a larger cohort are fraction (EF), interventricular septal needed to characterize these groups diameter (IVSd), left ventricular internal E F as well as the differences in valvular diameter in diastole (LVIDd), aortic abnormalities. diameter (AoD), left atrial diameter (LAD) • Data are reported as mean + standard REFERENCES deviation. 1. Akin C, Metcalfe DD. Systemic mastocytosis. Annu Rev Med. 2004;55:419-432. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103822 2. Pepin MG, Byers PH. Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Type IV. In: Pagon RA, Bird TD, Dolan CR, et al., eds. GeneReviews [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-. Figure 1. Bar Graphs demonstrating no significant differences in http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.arktos.nyit.edu/books/NBK1494/?report=pri cardiac parameters amongst the groups. ntable (Accessed on May 18, 2013).