Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Govpub C13
Govpub C13
^
Field Test of Hydraulic Performance of
a Single-Stack Drainage System at the
Operation BREAKTHROUGH Prototype Site
May 1973
Prepared for
May 1973
Prepared for
* PAGE
FOREWORD. i
LIST OF FIGURES v
LIST OF TABLES .
vi
,
ABSTRACT. .' 1
1. INTRODUCTION 2
'
l.I Background 2
1.3 Acknowledgments 4
2.3 Instrumentation 7
3. RESULTS 8
3.1 General 8
3.2.3 Self-Siphonage 10
Guide Criteria 12
4.2 General 12
Horizontal Drains 13
11
PAGE
Single-Stack Systems 14
APPENDICES:
Performance 16
A.l Terminology 16
Idle Traps 22
A. 3.1 Communications 22
A. 5. 4 Detection of Blow-Back 24
B. On-site Preparations 43
iii
PAGE
REFERENCES 57
1 >
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
(Stack No. 1) 28
Figure A3 '
MFLR Single-Kitchen Stack (Stack No. 3) 30
(Stack No. 5) 32
V
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
for Selection 33
Systems 34
Plumbing Systems 40
vi
FIELD TEST OF HYDRAULIC PERFORM/uNCE OF A SINGLE- STACK DPJ^INAGE SYSTEM
AT THE OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH PROTOTYPE SITE IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ABSTRACT
1
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
for several housing units at the King County prototype site in the Opera-
tion BREAKTHROUGH (OBT) program was derived from British designs and was
working paper was prepared in part from a careful review and analysis of
British and European data and in part from professional judgment (see
and use patterns produce heavier loads than those typically occurring in
British and European service, and because some of the important details
sanitary drainage system. Since the Uniform Plumbing Code (the model
2
^
to Washington State, NBS, and HUD, patterned after procedures that have
been used in similar situations and that are described in NBS BSS41 and
discussions .
in cooperation with officials of FBH and HUD; and with owners, occupants,
this paper.
3
and maintenance personnel. Identify causes of hydraulic performance
problems which may develop in the first few months of occupancy, with
systems.
I
d. Based on parts (a), (b), and (c), report on the adequacy of
the design and on the adequacy of possible modified designs that may be
authorized for study under part (b). Utilizing the results of this
The present report covers test procedures and results under item
completion of the work under items (b), (c), and (d) above.
and the conclusions drawn from these results are known to be applicable
only to the system tested. This situation arises in part from the fact
tion detail, and from the fact that many variations of so-called single-
1.3. Acknowledgments
3
The scope of this task has been reduced as discussed in section 4.2.3.
4
were made by the Seattle office of HUD and by the Prototype Site
Developer. Briefings were presented to FBH and the King County Building
and which utilized hydraulic loadings approximating the design flow rates
the particular DWV stacks to be tested was made by reviewing the plans of
the single-stack DWV system which was installed at the King County OBT site
of the particular DWV stacks selected for the tests are shown in
4
International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials.
5
.
These figures are, for the most part, copies of schematic piping dia-
tion of the hydraulic performance of any DWV system under load are the
following:
Before beginning stack testing under load, all fixtures were cali-
brated for drainage flow rate and all stacks selected for test were in-
fixtures (such as bathtubs and water closets) were set for optimum per-
formance^ and the automatic dishwashers were disconnected from the food-
Q
waste-disposal units."
5
See Appendix A for definitions. It is to be understood that the exclu-
^Visual inspection only. No pressure tests were made by NBS, since HDD's
®This was permissible and necessary since the dishwashers were not
visual means during the discharge of various fixtures. This was done to
traps was placed at the required points throughout the test stack and
2.3 Instrumentation
as follows:
appropriate times.
the means for the determination of water level changes in 0.1 in incre-
errors, as well as indicator light reading errors, were such that worst-
was developed by NBS specifically for use in the tests of the systems at
were used to determine water level before and after each test run requiring
7
detection of trap-seal depth changes in kitchen sink traps. This v/as
done by measuring the pressure necessary to push air through the trap
seal from the fixture side of the trap and/or by measuring the vacuum
necessary to draw air through the trap seal from the drain side of the
trap. For accurate results in the vacuum mode, this technique assumes
that the inside diameter of both the trap and fixture tailpiece are equal
of full trap-seal depth were determined in the pressure and vacuum modes.
This confirmed the reliability of the vacuum mode used with the traps
ing in ejection of suds, sewage, or gases out of the system) were based
the traps within the lowest branch interval, generally those connected to
3. RESULTS
3.1. General
Out of ten DIW stacks which were examined, four of these were found
8
ceilings, electrical fixtures, and other parts of the structure below
leaking DWV stacks on the site. Since the points of leakage were hidden
within the structure, no attempts were made to determine the exact loca-
tions or causes. Substitute stacks that did not exhibit leaks from dis-
charging fixtures were used in the tests for DWV system performance. No
pressure tests for leak detection were planned, nor were any made as part
trap seal observed after four runs was 0.3 in of water with an average
reduction of between 0.1 in and 0.2 in. These figures represent a trap-
50% oi the full trap-seal depth effectively satisfies the intent of all
9
Trap-seal retention of 50% or more in all traps on a DWV system
after repeated loading without refill of idle traps was set forth as an
tion in a trap with a 2-in seal depth has been indicated by research
experts j_ 5, 6_/ . More recently, the Building Codes Bureau of the State
H.3.8.1 as satisfying the intent of the New York State Building Construc-
During one run on stack No. la slight sucking sound was heard
momentarily in the floor drain; however, net seal reduction in the drain
was only 0.2 in. This could possibly indicate a reverse slope on the
floor drain branch. Because seal retention was adequate, and because no
blow back or suds ejection occurred, the momentary sucking action (air
at any trap was 0.6 in of water with most pressures averaging between
0.2 in and 0.4 in. These pressure fluctuations were well within a
3.2.3 Self-Siphonage
did occur was on a kitchen sink with the food waste disposal unit operat-
ing and with a full sink of detergent-charged water. In this case, the
maximum trap-seal reduction was 1.5 in from a 2.75 in original full trap
3.2.1. However, a person using the food waste disposal unit would not
normally operate it with a full sink of sudsy water, and would normally
wash the sink bowl with clean water (and thereby replenish the trap seal)
after draining the kitchen sink. Thus, this is not considered a signifi-
No trap-seal reduction was detected for this trap with clean water loads
nor with detergent loads with the food-waste disposal unit not running.
It was not known, at the time the tests were made, what significance,
particular lavatories. The cross flow may have resulted from improper
back- to-back lavatories. Such a branch assembly would perform the same
11
4. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
polation to systems other than those tested. Also, the fact that leaks
were found in some of the DWV systems by discharging the fixtures in pre-
whether there may have been leaks in the systems that were tested. If
undetected leaks existed in the DWV systems on which the hydraulic tests
were made, test results could have indicated somewhat better performance
than had there been no leaks. The program described herein did not pro-
vide for pressure testing for leak detection. Those items found to be
a. Leakage
The DWV system should not leak (Criterion H.3.2.1). The tests
had these same assemblies been tested on-site after completion of erec-
b. Cross flow
The OBT Guide Criteria state that excessive cross flow between
while unrelated to the single stack design, final housing unit inspec-
tion should verify that cross flow due to improper installation does not
exist
4.2. General
The results of the functional tests and the cross-flow and self-
siphonage tests did not reveal any significant problems. However, these
stalled in new and unused DWV systems. After a period of service, the
or other foreign matter, and this restriction can retard the discharge
the development of a hydrostatic head above the crown of the fixture drain..
With traditional designs, the use of a separate fixture drain for each
fixture served by that drain. However, with a back- to-back fixture ar-
or both of the traps served by the common branch, particularly where the
connection to the drainage stack is lower than the dip of the trap. Thus,
13
Possible Frost-Closure Effects
the single-stack design approach used in the King County system; hence,
sidered necessary.
tests will assess the performance of the special twin-ell fitting used
use experience with these designs. The data would include maintenance
and other applicable items. This survey would consist of sampled data
collected over a period of not less than three years, and it would include
drains.
4.2.5. Criteria for Design and Evaluation of Single-Stack Systems
However, this task was deleted with HUD and FBH concurrence for two
reasons. First, HUD made available to FBH a copy of the most recent
15
APPENDIX A. TEST PROCEDURE FOR DEMONSTRATION OF HYDRAULIC PEPFORMANCE
A.l. Terminology
for the sake of clarity, the following terms are specially defined for
this work.
load.
(idle) fixture. 10
16
Idle fixture - A fixture that is not discharged during the
of that fixture.
vents.
from the top dip of the trap bore upward to the free surface
of the water.
type of observation.
have been used in selecting test loads for DW testing j_ 1, 2, 3__/ . The
the effect of bathtubs that are connected to the same stack as water
In the selection of the test loads for the two- and three-branch
addition, test loads were selected that involved bathtubs. This pro-
component.
18
,
respectively.
Table a4, derived from a table presented in BSS 41 1_/ was used to
Table A5, also derived from BSS 41, was used to select composite loads
rounded to the next highest hundredth, were utilized: i.e., t/T = 0.01
for water closets and lavatories; t/T - 0.05 for bathtubs; t/T = 0.02 for
(2) A test load comprising water closets and bathtubs was determined,
(Lavatories for stack No. 1 and sinks for stack No. 4.)
sam., -biuach interval was applied. The estimated discharge from this
load was nearly the same as in (3), but involved a different combination
of fixtures.
19
(5) The test loads (in gpm) assumed (estimated) in the preparation
of the test plan for the multi-story systems were based on the results
It would have been appropriate to have used the flow-rate values deter-
mined from on-site calibrations, as in table Bl, but this was not done
because the test plan had to be completed before the site tests were
conducted. The estimated test load flow rates all exceeded the values
in most cases. It is significant that the actual test load flow rates
closely approximated the Hunter values, some loads being a little less
Table A6 compares the estimated test load discharge rates for the
multi-story systems with the values obtained from the "Hunter" curve.
the test loads for use in the determination of adequacy of trap-seal re-
the different types involved are first grouped before computing test
that the test loads utilized, computed in this manner, were actually
20
.
greater than if computed using the grouping approach and the greater
b. Discharge fixture
mechanism.
strainer removed.
21
Bathtub to 6 1/2 in above outlet orifice (25 gal)
mechanism.
applicable.
A. 5.1 Communications
circumstances where test personnel are distributed on two or more floors <,
22
Designated chief will signal load application and call for and record
for. This will serve to assure that confusion is kept to a minimum and
with the sink loads requiring detergent. Place the detergent required
for a single run in the sink bowl involved. Run tempered water (approx
off excess suds in container provided for the purpose so that the water
detergent run (the first and third runs in a series of four flushes) shall
manufacturer with the bathtub loads requiring such additive. Measure the
additive required for a single run and place in the bathtub involved in
the load. Run tempered water (approx 100*^?) at wide-open rate from
faucet to agitate the additive. Scoop off excess suds in container pro-
vided for the purpose so that the water level in the bathtub can be
23
(3) Paper diaper (in the water closet)--One large-size paper diaper
shall be flushed with loads requiring paper diaper. The paper diaper
by the manufacturer except that the cloth membrane shall not be removed
(the plastic membrane shall be removed). Each paper diaper run (the
i
A. 5. 3 Detection of Cross Flow
Where it is desired to detect cross flow (see table A2), add a small
quantity of suitable dye, before each run, to the active trap opposite the
idle trap being observed. After end of the run or series of runs, and
from the idle trap and observe for evidence of dye crossover.
floor idle fixtures (see table A2), station an observer at the critical
location. Observer shall observe visually the most critical idle trap
seal under suitable illumination, and shall listen for evidence of blow
load.
24
(1) Procedure, pneumatic approach ' --fill trap with v;ater. Close
trap seal.
(a) Place suction cup of instrument over drain outlet, and set
valves for vacuum mode. Operate squeeze-bulb pump slowly while observing
(b) Then set valves for pressure mode and repeat. Remove
completed, repeat procedures (a) and (b) and again record stabilized high-
values from gage for both vacuum and pressure modes. Generally, the
(*1 " ®2) > then trap-seal reduction may be approximated by bj^ - b2.
inside diameter of the trap and tailpiece are equal and constant.
(c) From (a) and (b), the initial values may be used to compute
the full trap-seal depth, the general relationship being H<:5^-^ ^i::^ bj^,
assuming the trap is symetrical and that the trap and lower tailpiece
25
(2) Procedure, electrical approach--Fill trap with water. Place
the trap seal, until with a slowly-moving upward motion of the probe, a
selected numbered lamp on the indicator panel begins to fade, but is not
impossible, recheck and record the highest lamp number that is "on".
After completion of hydraulic loading on the idle trap thus prepared, the
and record initial scale reading (hj^). After prescribed hydraulic load-
charge by lifting basket strainer out of sink. Measure the time duration
26
with and without the food-waste disposal unit operating during the dis-
to manufacturer's mark. Trip flush handle and measure time until flush
water delivered to the bowl through trap-refill tube and to tank through
hush tube during the time that water is being discharged from the tank,
and add this volume to the larger volume represented between the high
and low water levels in the tank, to obtain "total volume of flush."
water closet bowl into the drainage system differ somewhat from the
bowl, depending on the siphonic action and other aspects of the bowl.
27
<Sa>
Lavatory
Lavatory
Clothes Washer
(CWMg)
Lauudry Iray
(LT)
Cleanout
Connected Load = 35 Fixture UnitJ
Hunter Flow Rate =44 gpm
Floor Drain
(FD)
Figure Al
MFlR Back-To-Back Bathroom/ Laundry Stack
12311 N.E. 147th Court, Apartments IC, ID, 2C , 2D
Operation BREAKTHROUGH Prototype Site, King County, Washington
(Stack No. 1)
28
Figure A2
MFLR Back- To -Back Kitchen Stack
12311 N.E. 147th Court, Apartments IC and 2C
Operation BEIEAKTHROUGH Prototype Site, King County, Washington
(Stack No. 2)
29
Kitchen Sink
2 in
Kitchen Sink
A in Cleanout
Figure A3
- - MFLR Single-Kitchen Stack
12311 N.E. 147th Court, Apartments lA and 2A
Operation BREAKTHROUGH Prototype Site, King County, Washington
(Stack No. 3)
30
Lavatory
Figure <A4
(Stack No. 4)
31
Water Closet
(WCj)
J
Cleanout
Lavat
(L r u
0
Bathtub
(B2)
Expansion Joint
4 in
Kitchen Sink
Lavatory
(L^)
j
Water Closet
-> (WC^)
Clothes Washer
(CWM) 4 in
Cleanout
Figure A5
SEA Single Bath/Half Bath/ Kitchen/Laundry Stack.
12307 N.E. 147th Court (Lot 35)
Washington
Operation BREAKTHROUGH Prototype Site, King County,
(Stack No. 5)
32
Table Al
Stack Description j
Test Levitt Housing Type Rationale for
1 Order Unit No. Selection
33
.
Table A2
Description of Hydraulic Loads and Observations for Performance Demonstration of
Single-Stack Systems at the Operation BREAKTHROUGH Prototype Site, King County,
Washington (TEST PLAN)
Test Description
No.
Fixture (s) Estimated Observations
to be Discharge 15 '
(Remarks)
Discharged
gpm
1.1.1 10.0 Observe L^^ for cross flow, seal reduction
'2A(CW)
1.7.1 WC
2A(CW) + 64.0 Observe idle fixtures^ for seal loss and blow-back
on first floor and in basement
'2A(CW) +
*2A(CW) +
^2B(CW)
1.7.2 Same as 64.0 Except flush PD in WC2^ and use Bjj^^cy) instead of
1.7.1
^2B(CW)
1.7.3 Same as 64.0 Except use BB in B2^ and use B instead of
lA(CW)
1.7.1
B
2B(CW)
Based on the assumption of the following mean discharge rates;
WC = 27.0 gpm B = 13.5 gpm
Lav = 10.0 gpm S = 15.0 gpm
16,
For the purposes of this demonstration, it will be sufficient to make measurements
on only one trap of each pair of idle back-to-back fixtures that are plumbed
^ ...symetrically
Table A2 Continued
Test Description
No. Observations
Fixture (s) Estimated
15
to be Discharge (Remarks)
Discharged
1.8.2 WC
2A(PD) +
1^: Observe idle f ixtures^^ f or seal loss and blow-
back on first fl and in basement
wc
2B(CW) +
B
2A(CW)
1.8.3 Same as 67.5 Except use BB in B2^
1.8.2
3.1.1 15.0 Observe for seal loss and blow-back in
^2(CW)
3.1.2 Same as 15.0 Except use Det in S2
3.1.1
3.1.3 Same as 15.0 Except operate fwdu during discharge of sink
3.1.2
4.1.1 15.0 Observe for self siphonage of S^
^l(CW)
4.1.2' Same as 15.0 Except add Det and operate fwdu
4.1.1
4.2.1 52.0 Observe for seal loss and blow-back in idle fix-
^^2A(CW)+
tures on first fl and in basement
4a(cw)+
^l(CW)
4.2.2 Same as 52.0 Except use PD in WC^^
4.2.1
4.2.3 Same as 52.0 Except use Det in S^^ and operate fwdu
4.2.1
2.1.1 15,0 Observe for seal loss and blow-back in S
^2A(CW) lA
2.1.2 Same as 15.0 Except use Det in S^^ and operate fwdu
2.1.1
2.2.1 30.0 Observe for seal loss and blow-back in first
^2A(CW)+
floor fixtures
^2B(CW)
2.2.2 Same as 30.0 Except use Det in S^^ and operate fwdu
2.2.1
5.1.1 '1
10.0 Observe for self-siphonage of
(CW)
\ ^^Ibid
16 Ibid
NOTES: Subscripts for fixtures discharged indicate floor no., right or left side (A or B)
In back-to-back arrangements, and whether clean water (CW), detergent (DET), bubble bath
i(BB), or paper diaper (PD) is used.
35
Table A2 Continued
NOTES : Continued
The subscript fwdu stands for food-waste-disposal unit,
Fixture Symbols: WC - water closet
B - bathtub
L - lavatory (wash basin)
S - sink (kitchen)
CWM - clotheswashing machine
I DWM - dishwashing machine
LT - laundry tray (tub)
FD - floor drain
36
Table A3
Series No.
1.1.1, 1.2.1 Clean, cold water Cross flow and seal reduc-
1.3.1, 1.4.1 tion in certain fixtures on
1.5.1 2nd floor
1.2.2 Bubble-bath in warm •t
1.2.1
water in bathtub
1.3.2 II
13 1
Estimated lOO'F.
37
Table A3 Continued
II
2.2.1 II
1^ Ibid
38
<u
CO o
<1) o •H
o U)
4J c3
(U <U
CO
nl (1) o "O
4-J {J Cj CO
0) M
CJ CO
(1) CO CO
CO 'I Q CO
CO
00 n
UU r— (U tH CO
M CO QJ CU
•H o 4J tlO
V4 -i }_l
-
*pn
*
^
pr*1 CO
iH
3
r»
CO
(-;
1 rrl O 3 CO Cj
P-* O fl) CO
SI/ •H <u 4_) D
O 1 1 *J 4J CO
\j U O CO
OJ 0) r*
w 4J
1
<u
w VI/ U-l CO (U CO
O CO }^
4-* .-4 CO •f-l Q
>>
C3 }.l
CN Ol CM CO CO CO CO O 4-1 n.
P-l •H o w CO
4J o
r—i n CI O c o o
Q (U o 4-1
iH •H
0) 4-1 iH CO
HI CO CO3 <u
4J O rrs
C O 0) r-l
<a 0) •H CO
M ^ to i
0) 3 •p B o •H
o CO 4-t CO
< O e X c o
3 -H o u >,
cd CO 3 u O
M
PQ o
u i< a CO
•H O B 3
(0 0) •H •4-1 4-1 QJ 'd
H iH
60 •H
IS
U 3
CO •H
>
3 00 CO o .H
•H 00 c iH rH
CO d •H 3 a CO d
o 4-1 o >-l •H
}^ c CO •H <u (U
O •H 0) 4J d 0)
CO 4J »-l CU M
(U CO CO 00 3
0] >.T3 > 0 a CO 4-*
cd
^ (U
4-*
•H •H
00
CD
>-( •H
X
o ^3 CO o 4-1 o (4-1
(U <u •H •H 4-1 0)
rH CO CD x:
o 00 o
m (1) 00 CO 00 •H CO
0) CO C 4-> c c 4J o (U
H CO
•H
0) cs cn m so 00 o\ CO
e G •H CO u
CU 4-J 0)
00 0) pq •H U CO > ^ 00
a U <D O <U d o u
1-1
4-1
3
4J
G 4-1 M a CO
o X (U
0) c 0}
iH o
0)
C/}
o
M
M
o H o
(0
O U
(U
00 ON
(1)
•H
O3
39
I
1 AJ CO •H OJ
!-i OO 1 •VI CO cn 00 to
3 c e c c
O O CO ^U u u CO 0) (U
C w u O CD Cu
O cfl •H 0) 0) O
CJ o >-i
OJ -U J-)
3 X >
tU
CD 00 OJ
O O CD
Q) H
0) CM CO m vO
•H CO
00
>H
0)
>-l
to
u d
00
M CO CO CU -H
0) iH 3 OJ cn i-j >H rH CU CD
XI +J CD 0) o <u O
e C X •H u B u 4-J 5j CO
3 -r^ (1) >-i o u CO O 3 c
COO) J-i
0)
c -ca
0)
•H i4H
O
T3 T) CD u E
o rH d o B o
M
tu d
o
r-i CU 3 CO 0) 4-1
CO 00 CO o 4J 4-' & CD -H
o 00
1
rH rH CN
rH
o
cn CO
c (0
>> CD CD
4-)
CO
1 1 1 1
u r-i CM in ON •vT ON M
rH rH I" CD U 0) 3
0) 3 0) 4-t <J ^3
tH U O •H
e (U 3 c •rt UH > <U
0)
•u CD
a\
o U3 *J X o > O
o i-l
>-<
0)
E
-rl
CD
>>
0)
(D o CM in
<r
rH
o ^
CM
O -H
OJ <+H
(1) CD CD 4-1
to cn o CO CO MH
1 1
o 1 1
1 1
II rH CO in rH CO U CO o
C>0 c rH rH CN 0) CO CJ 0) O C d
c 0) 4J|h CJ rH o Uh (U o o
0) c 3 4-> c s •H
^ (U O CD CU
u
rH
O
CO
U
(U 4-1
6 00 3 •H >J CO
3
tH
<u
XI
O o eg CTv
cr U O i-i
3 O
3
• c 3
4-1
!-i
a>
o CM in rH rH CM CM CO is? CJ MH X OJ
<u
6 II
1
iH
1
cn
1
rH
1 1 1
CO V4
u c
o CO 0)
•H
*4H
X
4-1
•H
H
rH rH CM CO Xu Xu X rC
P
O ^— 4->| H rH H
4-1 U O
u
'
CD 3 •H CD CO
CO 0) 0)
00
a X^ CO rH
3 rH
•H
*J
iH
CM ^-l
M
CO
O Csl 00 vO CO u
CD
OJ
OJ
4-J
CO
^ cn
•
O CO ,
3 x:
u
O CM rH rH CM CO CO 00
U u
4-1 a
i—i &. >-j
X
1 1 1 1 1 1
CD rH CO CO CTi CO 00 3 CO
XO X
II
•H rH rH CM l*H CO 4-1 Cu cn
O e 73 Q 4J 1 H o 4-) X
<+-) 0) 0) CO O O -H CO
M-l c •H U C X)
CD CD O O o CU 00 d
o; O •H CD d CO
to
o
CO c
c
c
O o 1^ rH
rH o
CO
CTi
CO
•u
O
CU (U CO CL) •H
«
cn
CM CM x: 4-J x) d
U-l
o o
o •H 1 1 1 1 1 1 QJ 3 H X) o d -o o
J-l II <-i 00 in CM rH rH 0) CU •H o •H
CO rH CM CO 0) u C l+H -H 4-1
cn (U
N O
14-1 !-i 4-j| H CD c 3 C CO
(U 3 0) &, o <4H CU M
H Q CU >4H (U E o O CI. 0)
CO )-l
0)
in
o x:
4-1
O X o
O 14H
CU
o
a XI vD vO r~. u cn o 4J to
•H e o o cn rH CM CO <r c O
4->
CJ
3 •H
4-)
1
.H
<Ti
1
vT o1 1
r>.
1
r-«
1
r-
o XX
(1) CO CD
0)
•H
rH rH
•H
CU
>
^
'
QJ
^ — CO
II
rH rH CM CO 3
(1) -W -a -2
.
X ^
I
CO
iH ^ 4-j| H o C -H Cd E rH CO CO CD
(1)
cn 0) CO -C3 "
4J
•H
o 3
rH c
^ XO CU <U <U
u
cn 13 <U 00 rH — ^
U CJ
)-i o •H 4J C3 •rl
^ (X rH 3
o
<+-i <4-t o <3-
f-H
rH
rH
CN
CM
CO
in 00
in
3 O
00
-H
-U
XCO
CD OJ
00 rH
CO
O
CD
0) 0) »
(1)
o
II
1
iH m1 1
CM CM
1 1
CO
1
v£) o
rH
0)
CO
(U
Xo 4-) C
CO ^ CO-H
3 Cu
d
<u
tJ >, rH CM CO <3- c CO >-4 CO S-J TD >^ (U
•H o Pu •H -U
O3 c
MC
)H 13 >
CO (0 4-1
a> flj c O CO •H CO CU
<
3
o > 14H
O
o O Xl X
o* •H CD d 00
<u
o
in r~- CO o 00 00 CD CO •H d QJ
in rH CM -<3-
c c •H <u -a o •H E
1 1 1 1 1 1 0) O O O (U n •H
u VO vO 00 rH rH -H -rl P-i CJ w ^ X 3
•ulH
rH CM ^ X 4-1
CO
-U 0)
rH
CO _Q 4-1 Xl
CO CO (U 4-)
3
4J C C X 0) CD a, cn S 00
•H -H cn o CO
O in X XE CU -o u
•H B e 1-1 x; 23 H
^ d OJ
o
CM
CM
rH
•<r
CTi
00
rH
rH
X
H
o o
o a
o
u
(u
XE
4-) 2:
4J
CO
!-i
>
CO
14H C
D
1
rH
1
00 m1
CM
1 1
in O1
3 X -H (U
CM vj- vD <3N -o
0)
C
-T3
to
4-1
X
o
M
4J tU (U M CO -a
I—
3 X4J 4-1
CO
(U
U
l-i <u
>
o m 00 00 CO Q u (U
o rH
CM
00
CM
rH rH
CO
CM
O
o
l*H
O
-H C
-H
X
£-1
n
H
1
rH
1 1
in
1
CO
1
ON
1
ON o
CM
Csl
Cn!
rH 00 CvJ
4J|H rH rH
^0
I
Table A6
1.7.1^
1.7.2 35 44 64.0
1.7.3
'
1.8.2
35 44 67.5
1.8.3 1
2.2.1| 30.0
2.2.2
J
4.2.1^
4.2.2 26 38 52.0
4.2.3 J
3.1.1]
3.1.2 6 Not Appllca- 15.0
3.1.3 J
Values in this column are based on generally accepted fixture flow rates.
Actual flow rates, which were determined later by site calibration, dif-
fered from these values (see table Bl). Test-loao discharge rates computed
from the actual fixture discharge rates more closely agreed with the "Hunter"
loac values.
Hunter curve does not extend below 10 fixture units. Estimated "fair"
test loaa - 1 sink, or approximately 15 gpm.
NOTE: The f^ixture-unit loads were computed from the rating scheme given in
reference J_ 10__/, and the corresponding "Hunter" flow rates were obtained
from reference .
41
Table A7. Base* of Load Selection for Tests Involving Induced Effects at Different Floor Levels
FIXTURES
Test Fixture Types Nunber o£ r l.-.i-jzch Number to frequency of Guide for Load Type Per
Scries Comprising oi Inaicated be Discharged Ose,-^ t/T Choosing S'uiabers BS3 Al/CP 304
Load Type to be Together of Fixtures to Terminology
Considered in Load be Discharged
Computation
25 The values given are those determined iroa British sources. Io« term "t" is the duration of a single opera-
a period ot peak use.
tion of a tixture. and 'TT is the average tl-« betveen successive operations In
42
APPENDIX B. ON-SITE PREPARATIONS
a. Bathtubs
placed on masking tape which was attached to the inside of the tub be-
fore the surface was wetted. The bathtub was then drained and the time
necessary to empty all of the water into the building DWV system was
filling and draining the bathtubs were made as many as four times in
drain time was consistent with the time previously obtained on fixtures
of the same type and model, replicate measurements were not made. Attempts
were made to adjust the bathtub drain pop-up mechanisms such that a maxi-
mum flow rate could be obtained in the open position, and such that no
leakage into the drain occurred in the closed position. In some few
cases, elapsed time was recorded at intermediate depths while the bathtub
2^The time required to drain the small quantity of trail flow was
these tests.
43
established. In addition the time required to fill certain fixtures with
maximum water valve (faucet) openings was recorded; this was done in order
b. Lavatories
graduated container and the value recorded. Each lavatory was filled to
the overflow level and the pop-up stopper was released causing drainage
to occur. The time required to empty all of the water into the DWV
that described above for bathtubs. This measurement was repeated several
repeatability.
c. Kitchen Sinks
The dishwasher discharge line was disconnected from the food waste
disposal unit and a rubber stopper was installed in its place, on those
kitchen sinks which were to be used as idle fixtures (this was necessary
to the use of the pneumatic method for measuring trap-seal depth, because
this method required closing off all overflow openings and other supple-
of water were then placed in the kitchen sinks and time measurements were
made in a manner similar to that described for the bathtubs. These cali-
brations were conducted with the food waste disposal unit not operating,
and then were repeated with the disposal unit operating. The detailed
given in Appendix A. 5.
44
d. Water Closets
make the required computations, the following on-site procedure was used,
(1) The float mechanism was adjusted to yield a water level in the
(2) The elevation of the water surface was determined at the instant
that the tank flush valve closed, anu a corresponding reference mark made
(3) A reference mark was made on the inside of the tank at approxi-
mately the mid-range elevation of the water surface in the tank during
(A) Next, the supply stop valve was fully closed, and the tank was
emptied to the low-water level as determined in (2) . Then, with the tank
during the period of time when the tank flush valve was open in a normal
flush, was determined with the supply stop valve fully open.
(a) Time to empty tank (ending with drop of tank flush valve),
45
(b) Time to empty tank (ending with drop of tank flush valve),
The volume measurements described above were made on one water closet
of each manufacturers make and model type. The other water closets in-
volved in the tests were assumed to have the same volume/ discharge
characteristics as those of the same make and type which were actually
calibrated as described above. The tirue for each of the other water
closet tanks to empty (ending with the drop of the tank flush valve) was
measured, with the supply stop valve fully open, as in (6)(b) above. It
was assumed that the time for the tank to refill to mid-elevation, as in
(6)(c) above was the same for all the water closets of the same make and
type. It was also assumed that the volume of water delivered by the
trap-refill mechanism, as in (5) above, was the same for all the water
and average discharge rates for the several water closet tanks were com-
puted, as listed in table Bl. These rates include the small rates con-
emptying.
Full trap-seal depths were measured using the pneumatic method where
feasible and, when sufficient access was available, the results thus
46
B.2. Fixture-Leakage Abatement
for leakage around their drain and overflow fitting connections and,
other than the one selected, or with the wrong fixtures discharging. The
appropriate building, apartment, and lot numbers were recorded, and the
stack was assigned a number which was marked on tape and placed with each
into the DWV system was made, and a visual check for leaks was conducted.
Once stack selection and preliminary leak tests were completed, each
tion number and this number was placed on the fixture by means of mask-
active fixtures as called for In the test plan and improved verbal
the pneumatic water- level-change detector was used, and in such cases
47
Initial pneumatic readings were made and recorded. Check-out of the
48
Table Bl
27
Unit Number refers to the drawing code number of the dwelling unit in which the
fixture was located.
28
Lot number refers to the HUD lot location within the OBT Prototype Site.
29
With food-waste disposal unit running.
Table Bl Continued
;'8'
S^/5(R) Unknown 7.5 33.2 13.55
S^/5(R) Unknown 7.5 38.0 11. 84"^^
27 Ibid
2^Ibid
•
^29i5id
50
1 4 —
Table B2
1 A 11
1-1/ 10-11 Unknown / /o
rtJM / 1 A 11
10-11 Unknown ir 51 1\
27
Ibid
28 Ibid
The symbol "P" means the measurement is based on the use of the instrument in the
pressure mode, and the symbol "V" in the vacuum mode.
^^ This particular No. 3 stack (in Unit 10-11) was not tested. Ruler measurements were
not repeated on substitute No. 3 stack, which was tested.
51
m
CO
on
4)
43 V
E
4J »:
xt
a c
0) CO
4J
CO CO
>» c
CO o
CM
c c T3 o
> V
> > > > >
a 00 V u u
3 C 00 «
Xi « CD • • «0
4S o JO 43 43
'
(0 0 o o O 0
CO
» » ^
o o § o
t-4 r-l (
M-< <4-l
§ « CO « CO CO
C
^ '
a
r-l
«4.|
tt
O
CO
o o
ao
O o
CO
00 o CO M u U
c o CO U o u O u
o
CO eo O o o
c u 2:
0
u
> V *J
•H 3
cn CO U4
O o I I I I I i I I I I I I
4)
i-l (0
^ CO JS
a (0u
V e
X c
a Me
<
u
H CO
CO so
§3 OI
oI
oI
oo •
I
o I
oO * oO
I CM
•
»-<
• • •
O ^ CM
I
oo • • • oO
I CM
•
i-l
•
a I I I I I I oooo
I I oo ooo
I
»< «
9) 00
<
Csl
9 «
pq pq CQ U —,
^
fM <N»
» m
CM (N CM «v| CM CM
a
t—< r-l
U H
1— ' S
X a
CO CO >-) U
•H 3 CM
r- 04 —1 CM f-4 CM CO
00 jO • •
9— CM CM CO to
H 3 • • • •
2 .— 1— (-4 f—
52
'
a
'J- i
(0 60
J£ 6
M
CO U
e
8.
OS
-o 00
c 01
to
01
c m
o
u
«
> e
M 9
V o
01
S g M
«M
e
>v O
•-4
9
O. CO
a
9
60
u
«
es
<<
a Me
«
vO ^0 \0
ilO<-4«^
OO*** O O
O***** iO<Mcn O^ n
llOOO 0***l lOOO O'***
lOOOOO o***
I fvl CO I <-< CN ro i <M «N i I
OOO lOOOO o O t—
I: I I I I
o
o
9
e
« 09 CQ
w ^
9 V iJ CQ ^ S
CO CQ CQ 03 CQ CQ Z! CQ £ OQ CQ CQ ac
4J JO
K e PQCQ
<—I ^Q
U 3 Cbi U
,—1
«Q
-^H
U ^
,—
»J
I ^ _i 3 Q
U CQ )J U b4 n u H u
I— I3 »-H
i-J
^Q3U— ^H I Q 5
U
Cs« CO CO
<: CQ
CM •-4 CM 1—1
4J V CM • • • • • •
CO 00 1-4 CM
.o • • • • • •
• CM CM
53
c
o
QJ
C C/)
CO
6 c
CD •H
CA
<3- 13 U
<u
CO QJ
r" 0)
'^ CO 'O
>
e u u
< 0) o
l» •W J-lc
c
•1-1 "O
c a)
c3 Hi JC
0)
? o CJ
C c 0)
a
Ho
CO
J-l -Q
00 00 00
« « «9 X U
> C c c c 4-1
o o o T3 w to 0)
0)
J= C o H)
03
X) a a a a
0) ^ 1
3
o
4-1
1-1
o t4
OS n
1-1
CO
m) r-i OJ
1 < Q« c
^1 i
U-l
rH
>4-l
<-<
*r4
u
<U
J= to
4J CO
4) 0)
« aa CO
3
M c
o 0 o a. ^ >^
4J CO O
<u to (0
« o u
<u 0)
J3
u 3
2 a D o
I w CO CJ
CO
u to tfl
CO (U
<u M 4-1
•U D.
<u
u 0) !-l
0)
4>
4J
CO >
•1-1
O
•w 00 (0 a JZ
0*
c
o
W3
•r4
CO CO
U CM
o a.
o o i • I • • I
0.1 «)
l-i TO
oo >
CO
3 a;
to O
§ TO j= V 3
B in y CO
CO 0) 1—1
«) c J3 o
X i-i M O cu
CJ
C
"O
-H
<d
J3
S In
4)
U
lU
M-i
O to O
•rH
0
V CO
3 •^
O* QJ CO
4)
«
a Mc o u (U
^4 4-1
as 00 oq
c 3 CO
c
ft s 0^
O o O f-l <-• I o I
•»>»
i-l
OJ
•1-1
4-1
X
CJ
o •
d
•
d
• « • •
1
oo • 0ooo I
• o 4)
0) 4-1 1-)
0
1 o o o r-4 oo 1 1 I I I J3 ? to
CJ
>s
C
CO •l-<
(U C3
4.1 -o
X 4)
c
c 1-1 u
e cd CO
<u O
4J
« E c
c 4)
01 c o
QJ
o 3
•r-l
1—1 >
CO U
C a o > a>
0) 1-1 7)
o X)
4>
u u
OS o 6
CO
1—1
to o-
3 4> Cl
0) u ^ 4J
1-4
C 0) c
3 0
X g o5^ O 3 O o
3 iJ 3 Cvi U u e
(U 4-1 a>
E c
••^
h z
3 3 O 3 o
CO
CO
to 3
CO
0)
<D M u CO
4)
M 4-1 c 3 a
a to iH
c CO
1-1 <D -Mi
« >
0)
CO e U
4) 1-1 (U •l-<
4J >-( 11
CO 4-1 CO
CM Csl CO I— 1—1 CM CO o
0)
• • • O x: x;
CM CM CM Chi
H H Z3 CM
•
cn
• • • • • o 4-1 4J
<r
CO UO CO
54
APPENDIX C. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COOPERATION AND ASSISTANCE
under the able direction of Mr. Austin K. Van Dusen, Director, FBH.
furnished by Mr. Gail L. Ferry, Deputy Director, FBH; Mr. Jim Arvan,
Mr. Norman Latter, Technical Director, lAPMO; ana Messrs. Charles E. Kelly
and Stan Gerrard representing lAPMO in the Seattle area. Messrs. Arvan,
Latter, and Kelly also deserve special thanks for their long hours of
Management, King County; and Mr. Fred King, Chief Plumbing Inspector,
King County.
Special thanks are expressed to Mr. Randy Kirk, The Boeing Company,
and Mr. John H. McGowan, The Boeing Company, who handled the many de-
55
coordinating the meeting and transportation schedules of the BED person-
56
REFERENCES
1972).
(1966).
for New York State Urban Development Corp., Syracuse New York,
Plumbing System Design, Housing and Home Finance Agency HRP 15,
(March, 1951).
(1957).
58
.
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period
C o V e re d
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Final report 1972
451 Seventh Street, S.W.
14, Sponsoring Agency Code
Washington, D. C. 20410
16. ABSTRACT (A 200-word or less factual summary of most significant information. If document includes a significant
bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.)
Considering the needs for minimization of maintenance in service and for the continua-
tion of venting during cold weather, the following additional criteria can be identi-
fied:
(5) Ability to maintain adequate hydraulic performance over a long period of service
without excessive maintenance of branch piping.
(6) Adequacy of performance under climatic conditions conducive to frost closure of
vent terminals
- continued -
17. KEY WORDS (Alphabetical order, separated by semicolons) crossf low; field testing, plumbing; performance
criteria, plumbing; performance, functional; single-stack drainage; siphonage, induced;
siphonage, self; test loads, hydraulic; trap-seal reduction detector; trap-seal retention
18. AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 19. SECURITY CLASS 21. NO. OF PAGES
(THIS REPORT)
UNLIMITED.
UNCLASSIFIED
1
FOR OFFICIAL DISTRIBUTION. DO NOT RELEASE 20. SECURITY CLASS 22. Price
(THIS PAGE)
1
TO NTIS.
UNCLASSIFIED
USCOMM-DC 66244-P71
i
i-