Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WildTeam 2021 Grant Writing For Wildlife Conservation v1
WildTeam 2021 Grant Writing For Wildlife Conservation v1
0
GRANT WRITING FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
Acknowledgements
We raised the money to develop this best practice through the income generated from our
training and consultancy services, and a kind donation of a private donor. We are very
grateful to the following reviewers, who provided suggestions that helped to improve earlier
versions of this document:
1
GRANT WRITING FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
Authors
Adam Barlow, WildTeam UK
Lucy Boddam-Whetham, WildTeam UK
Matthew Creasey, WildTeam UK
Léa Kaplani, WildTeam UK
Beth Robinson, WildTeam UK
Thirza Loffeld, WildTeam UK
Photo credits
Front cover: David Clode
Introduction: Ekamelev Zav
Principles: Unknown
Selecting a grant: Unknown
Gathering information: Marvin Nauendorff
Creating content: Michael Bernander
Refining content: Aurelien Designatic
Preparing the application: Ian Kelsall
Processing the application: Paul Hewart
References: Eric Karits
Citation
WildTeam. 2021. Grant Writing for Wildlife Conservation v1. Wildlife Conservation
Professional Series. WildTeam, Cornwall, UK.
2
GRANT WRITING FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
The above copyright does not cover the use of the following items (which are covered by
separate copyrights):
• The WildTeam logo.
• All photos used in this best practice.
• Any best practice content referenced to another source.
3
GRANT WRITING FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
Contents
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 7
Purpose ........................................................................................................................... 8
Application ...................................................................................................................... 8
Overview ....................................................................................................................... 10
Supporting resources ..................................................................................................... 11
PRINCIPLES ..................................................................................................................... 12
Overview ....................................................................................................................... 13
Choose wisely ............................................................................................................... 13
Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 13
Application ........................................................................................................................................ 13
Set up for success ......................................................................................................... 14
Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 14
Application ........................................................................................................................................ 14
Get yourself noticed ...................................................................................................... 15
Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 15
Application ........................................................................................................................................ 15
SELECTING A GRANT ...................................................................................................... 16
Overview ........................................................................................................................17
Identify potential grants .................................................................................................17
Make a short list.............................................................................................................17
Carry out due diligence ................................................................................................. 19
Make a final decision .................................................................................................... 19
GATHERING INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 20
Overview ....................................................................................................................... 21
Collate application guidelines ....................................................................................... 21
Extract Project plan information .................................................................................... 21
Collect background information.................................................................................... 21
Assemble supporting materials .................................................................................... 22
CREATING CONTENT ...................................................................................................... 23
Overview ....................................................................................................................... 23
4
GRANT WRITING FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
5
GRANT WRITING FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
6
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
7
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
One of the most common ways for a conservationist to raise funds to cover the costs of their
work and sustain their organisation is by applying for grants [1]. However, grants commonly
have a high number of applicants, making them very competitive [2-3]. The ability to create
high-quality grant applications is, therefore, a key conservation skill, often mentioned as a
desired attribute in conservation job adverts [4]. Building on fundraising guidance from the
conservation [1] and development sectors [5-8], the purpose of this best practice is to
provide conservationists with guidelines to help them raise more funds through grants.
The Strategy Development for Wildlife Conservation [10] and the Monitoring and Evaluation
for Wildlife Conservation [11] best practices can be used to create the overall Project plan,
which provides the content for any grant applications. Finally, the best practice on
Stakeholder Engagement for Wildlife Conservation [12] provides guidance on developing
relationships with donors, partners and other stakeholders, that may in turn improve the
chances of the grant application being successful.
For all WildTeam best practices, it is important that conservationists use them intelligently,
by deciding for themselves how to adapt and apply the guidance to best suit their needs.
8
INTRODUCTION
9
INTRODUCTION
Overview
Box 2. Definition of terms.
The terms “project” and “project team” are
used throughout this best practice to refer to Project: An effort to achieve a measurable
any type of team or level of conservation impact, within a defined schedule and
work, i.e. project, programme, and budget.
organisation level (Box 2). Likewise, the term
“Project plan” is used to refer to any level of Project team: Made up of a number of
plan, i.e. project, programme, and roles that are collectively directly
organisation level (Box 2). responsible for carrying out the project.
This best practice begins with a set of Project plan: The blueprint for the project,
overarching principles to guide the project containing all the major information
team when creating their grant application, required to carry out and assess the
and then describes each step of project.
the process.
[9]
The 7 steps of the process are:
The steps in the process are sequential (Figure 2), and each is made up of a series of
activities.
10
INTRODUCTION
Supporting resources
A set of supporting resources is provided to help a project team develop a grant application
using this best practice. These supporting resources are made up of the supporting
documents referred to in this best practice, as well as connected best practices, training
opportunities, and other resources (Table 1).
11
PRINCIPLES
PRINCIPLES
12
PRINCIPLES
Overview
The purpose of the Principles is to provide a project team with a set of fundamental
approaches and attitudes to guide them through the grant application process. There are
3 principles:
• Choose wisely to encourage the project team to only apply for grants that match
their conservation strategy.
• Set up for success to help the project team develop a realistic grant application.
• Get yourself noticed to help the project team to create a grant application that stands
out.
The project team should follow all principles to ensure that they produce the best possible
grant application. However, it is up to them to decide how to apply each principle to best
suit their project.
Choose wisely
Purpose
Given the competition for grants, a project team may feel compelled to apply for every grant
opportunity they come across. With this approach, however, they may unintentionally fall
into a cycle of short-term, reactionary thinking that compels them to carry out whatever sort
of work a donor will fund. This could lead to the project team:
• Reducing impact, by carrying out work that is unsuitable for the situation and not at
a large enough scale to make a meaningful difference.
• Increasing fundraising time and budget, because they have to develop a whole new
strategy to match the criteria for every new grant opportunity.
• Increasing management time and budget needed to manage an ever-increasing
assortment of disconnected work.
The purpose of the Choose wisely principle is, therefore, to encourage the project team to
focus on raising funds to support the type of conservation work that they think will have the
most impact for the situation they want to change.
Application
The project team can apply the Choose wisely principle during the Selecting a grant step of
the grant application process. To apply this principle, the project team should ideally only
apply for grants that will help them to implement their existing conservation strategy [10], or
part of it. However, it will be rare for a project team to find a grant that exactly matches their
requirements, as donors will often specify a narrow range of activities that they will provide
grants for, and restrict the scale and type of costs the grant can cover. In such cases, the
project team must decide how much they are willing to compromise to meet the donor
criteria. For example, the project team may consider carrying out lower priority activities in
13
PRINCIPLES
order to secure the funds to support the high priority activities. If there is not a suitable grant
available that closely matches with the project team’s conservation needs, then they should
pursue other sources of funding, e.g. private donors.
Application
To apply the Set up for success principle, the project team should:
• Only set objectives for direct results that are inside project control, and not set
objectives for indirect results that the project contributes to but are not inside project
control [11]. For example, setting an objective of “by 2024, to increase local farmer
support for jaguar conservation by 20%” and not setting an objective related to an
increase in the jaguar population.
• Identify and document risks to the work to help manage donor expectations. For
example, “there is a risk that political instability may delay the survey of wildlife
products in local markets“ [9].
• Increase the schedule for completing activities to enable the project team to adjust
their work to manage risks and issues encountered during the course of their work.
How much the project team should extend the schedule will depend on the level of
14
PRINCIPLES
Guidance on creating the above type of content can be found in the Creating content section
of this manual. Guidance on setting objectives can be found in the Monitoring and
Evaluation for Wildlife Conservation best practice [11]. Guidance on managing risks and
issues can be found in the Project Management for Wildlife Conservation best practice [9].
In the short-term, applying the Set up for success principle may make the project team’s
application appear less competitive compared to other applications that promise greater
impact with a similar schedule and budget. However, it will help the project team in the
long-term to build their reputation with donors through the way they deliver on the grants
that they do secure, compared to the underachievement of others that submit an unrealistic
application.
Application
To apply the Get yourself noticed principle, the project team will need to refine their
application content so that it is easy for the donor to understand and assess. This can be
achieved by the project team paying careful attention to such things as their use of
terminology and language (see Refining the content). The project team will also have to
create content that presents a compelling rationale, and an overall application that is well-
presented and organised. This can be achieved by the project team making appropriate
use of quotes, figures, and photos (see Enhancing the content), and making sure that all
parts of the application are error-free, well-formatted, named, and organised (see
Preparing the application). It is important to note, however, that following the Get yourself
noticed principle is secondary in importance to developing a strong Project plan to base the
application on.
15
SELECTING A GRANT
SELECTING A GRANT
16
SELECTING A GRANT
Overview
The first step in the grant application process is for the project team to select a grant that
closely matches the conservation work that they want to carry out, is accessible and
manageable, and is provided by donors that meet with the project team’s ethical
standards. The activities for the Selecting a grant step are shown in Figure 3 and described
below.
• Biodiversity area the project team are working to conserve. Some grants may only
be available for work being carried out in specific geographic areas, e.g. the
Mediterranean Sea.
• Biodiversity targets the project team are working to conserve. Some grants will only
be available for work being carried out on a particular species or ecosystem type,
e.g. black rhinoceros or cloud forest.
• Threats the project team wants to reduce. Some grants will only be available for
work being carried out to address a narrow range of threats, e.g. the illegal wildlife
trade or climate change.
17
SELECTING A GRANT
• Activities the project team have identified as of high conservation priority. Some
grants may only be available for certain types of conservation work which the donor
has identified as important, e.g. developing new technology or capacity building.
• Timeframe in which the project team will be able to submit their application and
plans to begin work. In some cases, the deadline for submitting applications will be
too soon for the project team to prepare a high-quality application. In other cases,
the timeframe for processing applications and releasing funds may be too long to
enable to project team to begin work when they had planned.
• Eligibility of the project team. Some grants will only be available to certain types of
organisation (e.g. registered charities) or those based in certain regions or countries.
• Accessibility to applicants. Some donors have open calls for applications that any
eligible project team can apply for. Other donors have closed applications, which
only project teams contacted by the donor are able to apply for. Therefore, unless
the donor has requested an application, grants with closed application processes
will be inaccessible for the project team.
• Funding level required. Some grants will not provide enough funds to cover all of the
work the project team want to carry out. In such circumstances, the project team
can still select the grant to cover part of the work, while also looking for additional
grants to fill remaining funding gaps.
• Budget restrictions on fund expenditure. Some grants will not provide funds for
certain budget items or may otherwise insist on a maximum amount or proportion
of the budget that can be spent on each item. For example, a grant may only provide
a certain level of funding to cover salaries, or may not be used for purchasing a
vehicle.
• Administrative capacity of the project team. It is important for the project team to
assess if the effort required to apply for (and subsequently administer) a grant is
worth the amount of funds that the grant will provide. For example, it may take
£1,500 worth of project team time to apply for and then administer a £3,000 grant.
Likewise, larger grants may well have additional administrative processes that the
project team must follow, e.g. financial procedures concerning the purchasing of
equipment.
To make a shortlist of grants based on the above criteria, the project team can review
information from the following sources:
18
SELECTING A GRANT
• Environmental impact with respect to anything the donor does that degrades nature.
• Animal welfare with respect to anything the donor does that harms animals.
• Human rights with respect to anything the donor does that harms people.
• Legality with respect to anything the donor does that is against national laws and
international conventions.
19
GATHERING INFORMATION
GATHERING INFORMATION
20
GATHERING INFORMATION
Overview
The project team should now gather all the information they need to create the content for
their grant application. They can use the Application checklist tab of the Grants tracker to
make a note of the content requirements of the grant in question. The sequence of activities
for carrying out this step are shown in Figure 4 and described in detail below.
21
GATHERING INFORMATION
• Annual reports and website content that capture information relating to the project
team’s overall vision, mission, strategy, and impact objectives.
• Financial reports such as annual accounts.
• Status and donor reports to provide information on what the project team have
achieved in the past [9].
• Previous grant applications to the donor from the project team, their organisation,
or others.
• Policy documents that the project team’s work is guided by, in relation to such areas
as project management, financial procedures, human resources, equal opportunity,
anti-terrorism, health and safety, and ethics.
• Curriculum vitae of project team members.
• Photos that show the biodiversity area, biodiversity targets, threats, stakeholders,
and proposed activities.
• Branding guidelines to inform how the project team will format their application
documents if appropriate.
• Government permissions for carrying out the proposed work.
22
CREATING CONTENT
CREATING CONTENT
23
CREATING CONTENT
Overview
The project team can now use the information they have gathered to create the application
content. This step provides guidelines on how the project team can develop a clear structure
for their grant application and create content for sections that are commonly required.
Although the specific names for the different application sections will vary between grant
applications, the activities for this step can be adapted to develop content that conforms to
any application guidelines. For example, the content created for “impact” in this step may
be used as content in a section labelled “Outcomes”, “Outputs” or “Deliverables” for a grant
application. The activities for the Creating content step are shown in Figure 5 and described
below.
24
CREATING CONTENT
Develop a structure
Before creating a single word of content, it is important that the project team create a
structure that is easy to follow and presents a compelling rationale for the planned project.
Normally, the application guidelines will list the required section headings, defining the
information that must be provided. However, there is normally room for the project team to
use sub-headings within each section to help create a well-ordered structure. The project
team can also make a list of the points that they want to make under each sub-heading to
ensure a coherent flow of rationale (Box 5). These bullet points can then be removed when
the project team come to create the final section text. Once the project team have created
a structure for each section of the application, they can start to populate this with content.
The need
25
CREATING CONTENT
• Conservation priority: How endangered the biodiversity target is, and how they have
been highlighted as a conservation priority in local, national, or international
conservation plans.
• Donor priority: How protecting the biodiversity target links directly to the donor’s
priorities [14].
• Ecological importance: How the biodiversity targets support the existence of other
wildlife and habitats.
• Cultural importance: Described in terms of how the biodiversity target is part of
human cultural practices and beliefs
at a local, national, or international Box 6. Human well-being.
level [15-16].
• Contribution to human well-being: Human well-being relates to personal
How the protection of the wildlife and security, access to the basic materials for
a good life, health, good social relations,
area of interest contributes to human
and freedom of choice and action [17].
well-being [17] (Box 6).
• Status of biodiversity target: The population size and trend of the biodiversity target.
• Status of threats: The severity and extent of threats to the biodiversity targets [10].
• Current behaviours and influences: How human behaviours and associated
influences are driving the threats [10].
• Activity importance: What activities are needed to improve the current situation.
It may not be possible, appropriate, or useful for the project team to create content for all
the possible needs listed above. Instead, they should focus on highlighting the types of
need that are most compelling and most relevant to donor priorities. An example of need
content is shown in Box 7.
26
CREATING CONTENT
The need
• Direct results: Results that will be directly attributable to the work the project team
carries out [11]. For example, “increasing the commitment of elected politicians to
support the building of new wind farms”.
• Indirect results: Results that the project team’s work will contribute to but that will not
be in their control [11]. For example, “increased building of wind farms”.
• Additional benefits: The expected additional benefits to other wildlife and humans.
For example, “the building of additional wind farms will create extra green jobs”.
27
CREATING CONTENT
This content can be captured as text (Box 8) and shown in either a planned change diagram
[11] or logframe (see Enhancing content).”
By 2028, this project will result in 120 forest guards trained in advanced patrolling
techniques, community engagement, and ethics of law enforcement. These new skills
will help increase the detection and prevention of illegal activities, boost the morale and
confidence of the forest guards, and lead to a strengthening of relations between
national park staff and local communities. These benefits may encourage government
staff administering other protected areas in the country to also acquire such training.
28
CREATING CONTENT
Result type Result Objective Tolerance limits Indicator Monitoring method Evaluation method
Direct result Reduced By 2028, littering by 50-90% Number of litter Litter survey Social survey of
littering by tourists has items/km2 tourists
tourists decreased by 70%
Indirect Increased Not applicable Not applicable Number of nesting Nesting beach Dead turtle
result population size females/year/km survey necropsy survey of
of loggerhead of nesting beach plastic ingestion
sea turtles
29
CREATING CONTENT
The work for this project will be carried out over 2 years, starting on the 5th of January
2027 and finishing on the 4th of January 2029. Our work will be organised into the
following work packages and associated activities:
This combination of awareness campaign and hotline work packages has proven to be
an effective means of reducing wildlife crime in other countries, such as Thailand and
Ireland. This work also builds on previous efforts by the Stop Wildlife Trade Now Society,
who have identified the main wildlife trade markets in the area.
30
CREATING CONTENT
We carried out a total of 8 focus group discussions and 30 interviews to better understand
the perspectives of the local fishing community with respect to the proposed designation
of a new national park that could potentially restrict the community’s previous fishing
practices. We then engaged 10 fishing community representatives to help identify areas
within the new national park that would be co-managed by local communities and the
park authorities for the purposes of sustaining fishing livelihoods. We will conduct a bi-
annual stakeholder meeting to report on progress, share our experiences, and gather
suggestions about how we can improve our work for the benefit of wildlife and
stakeholders alike.
There is a risk that obtaining government permission for training customs staff to identify
wildlife products will take longer than expected. This would delay the start of the training
work package by up to 6 months. The project team will reduce this risk by arranging
monthly meetings with key government decision-makers to track progress of the
permission application and to quickly respond to any additional information needs.
31
CREATING CONTENT
• Salaries
• Infrastructure
• Equipment
• Consumables
• Transport
• Accommodation
• Food
• Training
• Legal and professional services
• Insurance
• Bank charges
• Taxes
• Fixed costs
• Administration
• Contingency
Some of the above costs may be grouped under a broader “overhead” category if needed
to simplify the budget content. The project team should then also show any planned income
from such sources as:
The project team should then allocate the income from different sources to cover all project
costs and differentiate between confirmed and planned income where necessary [1].
Depending on any budget format described in the application guidelines, the project team
may consider organising the budget expenditure and income with respect to budget items,
work packages, or both (Table 3-4) [1].
32
CREATING CONTENT
33
CREATING CONTENT
For some applications, the project team may also need to supply a budget narrative to
further explain or justify the planned expenditure and income (Box 13) [14].
Costs: The total fuel costs of £218.7 is needed for three survey trips to monitor changes
in snare density between seasons. Each survey trip will require 1,344 miles of driving over
rough terrain using an estimated 80 miles/gallon of diesel fuel, at the cost of
£4.34/gallon (equivalent to £72.9/survey trip).
Income: The estimated income of £456 from selling pangolin design t-shirts is equivalent
to selling 38 t-shirts/month through our website. This is a conservative estimate of t-shirt
sales based on previous sales figures ranging from £360-£600/month.
Cost-effectiveness: The overall teacher training cost of £5,600 includes the training of 28
teachers on how to design and deliver classes on environmental issues, and is equivalent
to a cost of £200/teacher. Each teacher will then go on to deliver 2 weeks of such classes
per year, with the cost of their teaching time paid for by the government, and amounting
to £1,100/teacher, equating to a total of £30,800/year for all 28 teachers.
34
CREATING CONTENT
After this work has been competed, no further lobbying or training activities will be
required. This is because, by the end of the work, Louisiana state law will have been
updated to make it compulsory for shrimp boats to use turtle excluders, and four
government employed marine enforcement officers will be able to provide local shrimp
boat captains with training in the use and attachment of turtle excluder devices. However,
we will require additional funds to continue the monitoring of turtle excluder device use
by shrimp boat captains over the following 3 years. This monitoring is needed to enable
the authorities to assess the effectiveness of their continued training and enforcement
activities. We will seek the funds to support these monitoring activities from the Sea Turtle
Alliance Fund.
• Roles and responsibilities: Described in terms of what each team member will do
with respect to the work the grant is funding. It may also be important to show how
the project team members will be connected in terms of their line management, in
which case a simple project team structure diagram can be created (see Enhancing
content) [14].
• Ability: Described in terms of the qualifications and skills that enable the project team
to carry out the work effectively [14].
• Experience: Described in terms of how project team members have managed past
grants and conducted similar types of activities (Box 15).
• Learning: Described in terms of both previous successes and failures.
• Relationships: Described in terms of the relationships the project team have built up
with important stakeholders through previous work and collaborations.
• Resources: The project team can mention what resources (infrastructure and
equipment) they have in place to help carry out the planned activities.
35
CREATING CONTENT
The project team may also consider supplementing the project team content by adding a
brief description of the organisation they work for, highlighting such characteristics as:
The project manager for this work, Elena Ramos, has 8 years’ experience carrying out
research and conservation work in the Pacaya-Samiria National Reserve. Under Elena’s
leadership, the project team have effectively delivered work under 8 grants, including 2
from the Manatee Conservation Fund. Over this time, Elena has also built strong
relationships with important stakeholders for the proposed work, including local
community leaders, fishing boat captains, and jet ski hire staff.
36
CREATING CONTENT
Need: The Javan slow loris is critically endangered due to habitat loss, killing for use in
traditional medicine, and capture for sale as an exotic pet. The Javan slow loris is present
in the Dieng Mountains of Java, but their current population has not been assessed. Such
research is needed to help assess the effectiveness of ongoing conservation efforts. While
the local exotic pet trade in Javan slow loris has been assessed, it is also necessary to
carry out a behaviour change campaign to reduce the demand of these animals through
this trade.
Impact: The main objectives of this work will be by 2026 (1) to increase the understanding
in conservation organisations and government agencies about the current status of the
Javan slow loris population in the Dieng Mountains, and (2) to reduce the purchasing of
Javan slow loris as exotic pets by 15%, compared to 2018 levels.
Activities: This project will be carried out over 3 years, starting a month after we have
secured the required funds. The work will be split into research and behaviour change
work packages. For the research work, we will conduct a population survey using
acoustic sensors to detect the calls of the Javan slow loris. We will use these sensors to
survey a sample of 2 km2 grid cells distributed across all major habitat types of the Dieng
Mountains. For the behaviour change work, we will spread the demand reduction
messages through radio adverts, posters, and speeches by local leaders.
Stakeholder engagement: Four students from Teuku Umar University have agreed to be
volunteer data collectors for the Javan slow loris population survey, and permission for
this survey has been approved by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. A total of 23
local purchasers of Javan slow loris and 5 shopkeepers involved in the exotic pet trade
have been consulted to help design the behaviour change campaign.
Budget: The total budget for this work is £73,500. A total of £35,000 has already been
secured as match funding from a private donor and the remaining £38,500 is requested
in this grant application.
37
ENHANCING CONTENT
ENHANCING CONTENT
38
ENHANCING CONTENT
Overview
The project team should now enhance the content they have created by adding in
compelling content and well-presented information to help make their application stand
out. The activities for this step are shown in Figure 6 and described below.
• Need to show how different stakeholders agree with the need to resolve the issues
the work will address.
• Impact to show how different stakeholders support the proposed changes.
• Activities to show how different stakeholders endorse the proposed work, and that
the work will help achieve the desired impact.
• Project team to show how others endorse the skills, experience, and professionalism
of project team staff.
• Stakeholder engagement to show that stakeholders feel included in the grant
application process (Box 17).
39
ENHANCING CONTENT
Need: “If we knew the best places to build wildlife corridors over roads, we would do it”.
Director of government infrastructure planning.
Impact: “Having a real say in how the National Park is managed will give us a chance to
help save the forest that feeds our families”. Bambuti elder.
Activities: Through a previous pilot project, a former bird hunter had set up a private bird
sanctuary on his farm and stopped hunting birds altogether.
Project team: Freshwater Alliance Fund listed The Lake Titicana protection squad as a
high performing grantee for 4 years in a row.
Stakeholder engagement: 18 (90%) of the local mayors that we consulted said that they
would do everything in their power to support the work in their towns.
Create boxes
The project team should add in boxes where appropriate to highlight important information
that they want to bring to the donor’s attention, e.g. quotes or definitions of terms (Box 18).
41% of cattle farmers said that they would shift to organic farming practices if the new
food label increased consumer demand for organically produced beef.
59% of cattle farmers said that they would shift to organic farming practices if they
received the proposed 10% organic farming subsidy.
Create tables
The project team should see where additional tables can be used to help display linked
information that cannot be succinctly included in the main text. For example, information
about planned indicator values split up across years would be easier to understand if
presented in a table rather than in text (Table 5).
40
ENHANCING CONTENT
Create a logframe
A logframe is a special type of table that shows how activities are linked to impact and how
the progress of the work will be monitored [8,18]. There are a wide range of logframe
formats and associated terminologies used in grant applications [6,18], but an example of
how different elements are linked together in a typical logframe is shown in Figure 7 [6,8].
An explanation of what the project team need to include in each part of the logframe is
provided in Table 6 [6].
41
ENHANCING CONTENT
42
ENHANCING CONTENT
The project team should only ever use a logframe, however, to summarise a project plan,
rather than using it as a framework to generate a Project plan in the first place. This is
because a logframe is not able to show all linkages between activities and impact [18]. The
project team should, therefore, have already created an overall Project plan or similar
document before creating a logframe [10]. The conservation strategy, and monitoring and
evaluation sections of the Project plan should then be used to create content for the
appropriate part of the logframe table (Table 7). In this case, the project team will have to
rewrite the risks from the project plan so that they are turned into a positive description of
what would happen if the risk did not occur. An example of a completed logframe is
provided in Table 8.
Table 7. Source of content from Project plan sections for creating content for each part
of a logframe.
Objectives Indicators Means of verification Assumptions
Goal Monitoring and Monitoring and Risks*
Conservation strategy evaluation evaluation
43
ENHANCING CONTENT
44
ENHANCING CONTENT
45
ENHANCING CONTENT
Create figures
A figure is any photo or graphic used to present information in an engaging and easy to
understand way. A bad figure can take up valuable space that could otherwise be used for
compelling text, whereas a well thought-out graphic can enhance the application by
emphasising a point, explaining complex or lengthy information, and improving the overall
appearance of the document. For any figure, it is important that:
• Text is legible and ideally the same size and font as the text used in the main content.
• Colours provide contrast so that the graphic elements will be easy to distinguish,
including by those that have colour vision deficiency.
• Blank space is minimised to reduce the overall space taken up by the figure.
• A key is included whenever needed to identify figure items.
• Resolution is sufficient for the figure to be clear, without making the overall
application difficult to share due to a large file size.
Charts: Charts are an effective way to show the status or trend of something relating to the
content. For example, the project team could use a pie chart to show the number of people
from different stakeholder groups that supported the increase in fines for wildlife crimes.
An example chart is shown in Figure 8.
46
ENHANCING CONTENT
Photos: Photos can be used to effectively show such things as the place where the work
will take place, the biodiversity targets, the threats to those targets, or the proposed
activities that will be carried out (Figure 9). The project team should make sure any photo
they use is labelled correctly and credited where necessary.
Diagrams: For grant applications, diagrams will most commonly be used to show the work
schedule (Figure 10) [9], project team structure (Figure 11) [9], a current situation diagram
(Figure 12), or a planned change diagram (Figure 13) [10]. Guidance on how to create current
situation and planned change diagrams is provided in the connected Strategy Development
for Wildlife Conservation best practice [10].
Activity Month
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Removing invasive
species
Constructing the
boundary fence
Enhancing the
visitor centre
47
ENHANCING CONTENT
48
ENHANCING CONTENT
49
ENHANCING CONTENT
50
ENHANCING CONTENT
Maps: The project team can use maps to show geographic information, e.g. the location,
shape, size, and important features of the area that the work will affect. All maps should
have a north arrow, scale, and key, and only show the features that are relevant to the
application content (Figure 14).
Create a title
The project team should create a title for the grant application that emphasises why the
proposed work is important. To create such a title, the project team should focus on what
they will achieve (their impact) rather than what work they will carry out (their activities) (Box
19).
51
REFINING CONTENT
REFINING CONTENT
52
REFINING CONTENT
Overview
If an application is badly written, it is less likely to be successful. The funder will find it more
difficult to understand the rationale for the project, and it will also indicate to the donor that
reports and other outputs from the project may be of a similar poor quality. The project
team should, therefore, spend time refining the content so that it provides a well-written,
easy-to-understand case for support. The activities for this step are shown in Figure 15 and
described below.
Remove repetition
Repetition of content is when the same point is made multiple times, either in the same or
different sections of the application. The only place where there should be some repetition
is in the summary. Otherwise, any repetition will create a badly organised and confusing
application, and the repeated content will take up valuable space in which other important
points could have otherwise been made to strengthen the application. The project team
should, therefore, remove repetition in the content wherever possible (Box 20). It should be
noted, however, that repetition is not the same as using different sources of information to
support an important point (see Evidence statements).
53
REFINING CONTENT
Box 20. Example content before and after repetitive text has been removed.
Content with repetition: About 40% of government ministers support new legislation that
would prevent the future building of fossil fuel power stations. That means about 60% of
ministers still do not support the legislation. The fact that a majority of ministers do not
support the new legislation means that it is unlikely to be made into law.
Content with repetition removed. About 60% of ministers do not currently support a
proposed new law that would prevent the future building of fossil fuel power stations.
Shorten sentences
The project team should break up longer sentences into shorter sentences wherever
possible, to make it easier for the donor to understand the points being made (Box 21).
54
REFINING CONTENT
Box 23. Example of excessive and appropriate use of adjectives and adverbs.
Excessive use of adjectives: Funds are very urgently needed to support the crucial work
of conducting important research into the movement patterns of young two-towed sloths.
Minimise acronyms
Box 24. Acronyms.
Acronyms (Box 24) are sometimes useful to
help the project team reduce text by An acronym is an abbreviation formed
shortening an otherwise lengthy name. For from the initial letters of other words e.g.
example, using “IUBSC” instead of “the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable,
Realistic, Timebound)
International Union for the Building of
Shopping Centres”. Acronyms can, however, make the content more difficult to follow if the
donor is not familiar with those acronyms (Box 25) [8]. The project team should, therefore,
only use acronyms that they are confident will be familiar to the donor because of their
common use, or otherwise when they think it is essential for helping the flow of the content
by reducing the reproduction of long names throughout the content.
If the project team does use acronyms, then it is important that they spell the names out in
full the first time they are used, after which the acronyms should be used in all subsequent
instances. If the project team needs to use many (>10) acronyms, they can consider adding
a list of acronyms at the start of the application.
55
REFINING CONTENT
Content with acronyms: The DC have 15 trained CI officers to implement the new WTE
law, but have no access to the WT application that would enable them to collect WT data.
Replace jargon
Experienced project teams may have picked up and absorbed a huge amount of
conservation jargon (Box 26) through their education, work, and professional interactions.
While all these terms may make sense to the
Box 26. Jargon.
project team, they may not be understood,
or may be interpreted differently by those Jargon is specialist terminology used by a
reviewing the application. If the project team group that is difficult for others to
use such jargon in an application, they will understand, e.g. agricultural
create content that is difficult to understand intensification.
and hide the otherwise strong points they are trying to make. To make sure that the
application is easy to understand, any terminology the project team uses in the content
must be consistent, as simple as possible, and either self-explanatory or defined where
necessary (Box 27).
The Golden lip fern of the Western Ghats ecoregion is an endangered lycopod that has,
through allopatric speciation, developed unique alleles that distinguish it from its nearest
clade. The negative trajectory of the population during the Anthropocene Epoch can be
directly attributed to the interactive, persistent effects of current land‐management
agricultural strategies. A multi-disciplined, collaborative, holistic approach using social
science informed by conservation psychology is, therefore, needed to remove drivers of
this threat and encourage the uptake of green infrastructure initiatives.
56
REFINING CONTENT
The project team should pay particular attention to using the donor’s language in the
impact, monitoring and evaluation, and budget sections, because the use of other terms in
those sections may disqualify the application (Box 28). The project team can use the Grant
worksheet to make a list of the key terminology and phrases that the donor uses in its grant
guidelines, annual reports, and website, and then infuse those into the content at all
appropriate places. The project team should also be sure to use the same spelling used in
the application guidelines, e.g. using North American spelling for a North American grant
application.
Box 28. Example content using project team and donor language.
Content using project team language: The work will contribute to an increase in the
capacity of marine inspection officers enforcing laws relating to the disposal of sewage
sludge by cruise ships at sea. The work will include activities to both train and equip those
officers.
Content using donor language: This main outcome of this project will be to help increase
the capacity of marine inspection officers enforcing laws relating to the disposal of
sewage sludge by cruise ships at sea. The project inputs will be the training and
equipping of those officers.
Active tense: The village mayor supported the ban on cattle grazing within the
community forest.
Passive tense: The ban on cattle grazing within the community forest was supported by
the village mayor.
57
REFINING CONTENT
Evidence statements
The project team should refer to a source of evidence that supports the point they are
making. To provide evidence that the statement is true, the project team can cite peer-
reviewed papers, reports, and media articles. To save space and avoid breaking up the
flow of the content, the project team should cite sources using numbers in the content,
rather than author names and dates (Box 30). Unless stipulated in the application
guidelines, it should not matter how the references are then listed, as long as they are
presented in the same way, i.e. each reference should have the same sequence of
information.
Over 70% of park rangers agreed that they would be able to arrest more poachers if they
had better equipment35.
58
PREPARING THE APPLICATION
59
PREPARING THE APPLICATION
Overview
Now that the project team have created, enhanced, and refined the content of the main
application document, they should now prepare the full application so that it is ready to
process. This involves preparing supporting documents, formatting documents, naming
documents, and making final checks (Figure 16).
Wherever possible, the project team should tailor all supporting documents so that they are
focused on providing only the information required for the application. For example, the
project team can tailor curricula vitae so that they emphasise relevant attributes. Likewise,
the project team should avoid preparing supporting documents that have not been
requested by the donor.
Format documents
The format (arrangement and presentation) of the application indicates to the donor how
much care they can expect from the project team in creating high-quality documents such
as donor reports. The project team should, therefore, standardise the font, colours, and
spacing throughout all documents submitted as part of the application.
60
PREPARING THE APPLICATION
Name documents
The project team should now name all of the application documents in a standardised way
that captures information about who has created the document, when the document was
created, the contents of the document, and the current version of the document [9]. If there
is a specified or logical sequence that the documents should be ordered in, then the project
team should start each document name with a number to indicate its sequence with
respect to the other application documents (Box 31).
These checks can be done by the project team reviewing the application and comparing it
with the Application checklist tab of the Grant worksheet. Further guidance on the process
of creating and managing documents is provided in the connected Project Management
for Wildlife best practice [9].
61
PROCESSING THE APPLICATION
62
PROCESSING THE APPLICATION
Overview
The application is now ready for the project team to process. The activities for processing
the application are shown in Figure 17 and described below.
Submit application
The project team must submit the application before the deadline, and exactly in
accordance with the procedure documented in the application guidelines. Each donor will
have their own way of accepting submissions. Some may require the application to be
emailed to a point of contact in the donor team, while others may have their own online
submission platform. The project team can use the Grants tracker to record this submission.
Confirm submission
Some donors will quickly inform the project team when they have received their application.
If the project team have not received confirmation that their application has been received
within 1 week of submission, then they should contact the donor.
Track submission
The project team can use the Grants tracker to note the date when a decision will be
reached on their application. If the project team have not received the result on their
application 1 week after the decision due date, they should contact the donor.
63
PROCESSING THE APPLICATION
Respond to result
When the donor communicates the result of the application, it is important that the project
team acknowledge that result, whatever it may be. If the application was not successful,
then the project team should thank the donor for considering their application and ask for
feedback to learn why the application was declined. The project team can either ask for
general feedback or for the detailed evaluation notes and any associated scores provided
by each reviewer. This feedback information will enable the project team to create stronger
applications in the future [1].
If the application was successful, then the project team should thank the donor for their
support, complete any additional paperwork associated with the grant (e.g. contracts), and
confirm the receipt of funds to the donor. While this is the end of the grant application
process, it is not the end of what the project team must do to maintain and strengthen their
relationship with the donor. Guidance on carrying out donor engagement activities can be
found in the connected Stakeholder Engagement for Wildlife Conservation best practice [10].
64
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
65
REFERENCES
2. Sanders, M. J., Miller, L., Bhagwat, S. A., and Rogers, A. 2019. Conservation
conversations: A typology of barriers to conservation success. Oryx, pp.1-10.
3. Lucas, J., Gora, E., and Alonso, A. 2017. A view of the global conservation job market
and how to succeed in it. Conservation Biology, 31, pp.1223-1231.
4. Blickley, J. L., Deiner, K., Garbach, K., Lacher, I., Meek, M. H., Porensky, L. M., Wilkerson,
M. L., Winford, E. M., and Schwartz, M. W. 2013. Graduate student's guide to necessary
skills for non-academic conservation careers. Conservation Biology, 27, pp.24-34.
5. Carlson, M. and O'Neal-McElrath, T. 2008. Winning grants step by step (Vol. 4). John
Wiley and Sons.
6. Dearden, P., Jones, S., and Sartorius, R. 2002. Tools for development: A handbook for
those engaged in development activity. Londres, Royaume-Uni: Department for
International Development.
7. Hoefer, R. 2017. Funded!: Successful Grantwriting for Your Nonprofit. Oxford University
Press.
8. Smith, N. B. and Works, E. G. 2006. The Complete Book of Grant Writing. Sourcebooks,
Inc.
10. WildTeam. 2021. Strategy Development for Wildlife Conservation v2. Wildlife
Conservation Professional Series. WildTeam, Cornwall, UK.
11. WildTeam. 2021. Monitoring and Evaluation for Wildlife Conservation v1. Wildlife
Conservation Professional Series. WildTeam, Cornwall, UK.
12. WildTeam. 2021. Stakeholder Engagement for Wildlife Conservation v1. Wildlife
Conservation Professional Series. WildTeam, Cornwall, UK.
13. Flyvbjerg, B. 2013. Quality control and due diligence in project management: Getting
decisions right by taking the outside view. International Journal of Project
Management, 31, pp.760-774.
66
REFERENCES
14. Ward, D. 2008. Writing grant proposals that win. Third edition. Jones and Bartlett
publishers. Sudbury, Massachusetts.
15. Garibaldi, A. and Turner, N. 2004. Cultural keystone species: implications for ecological
conservation and restoration. Ecology and society, 9.
16. Mills, L. S., Soulé, M. E., and Doak, D. F. 1993. The keystone-species concept in ecology
and conservation. BioScience, 43, pp.219-224Alcamo, J. 2003. Ecosystems and human
well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
17. Alcamo, J. 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment.
Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
18. Margoluis, R., Stem, C., Swaminathan, V., Brown, M., Johnson, A., Placci, G., Salafsky,
N., and Tilders, I. 2013. Results chains: a tool for conservation action design,
management, and evaluation. Ecology and Society, 18.
67
REFERENCES
david-clode-XMnQnYND9JU-unsplash
68