The University of Sheffield yy Depariment of Civit & Structural Engineering Speeds Clv 3216200: Multi-storey Building Design Composite Slabs - Design Exercise 4.120mm trick siab with HiSond 55/1,00 prof figure) decking has three equal spans of 26m (see 4150 f wes | 66S viceabilty limit states for the profiled sheeting and the y the ultimate mit states and se composite slab Materials Loadings M Sh reinforcement grade 850 6mm diam Set mm cic = 1Bmméim ¢ ht of dex goo ‘Weight of wewt concrete g. Concrete ~ normal weight C3037 Construction loads g gui = 15 M deck — grade 320 gas Setf-weight of composite slab g- = 2.3 Manufacturer's data Longitudinal shear m = 86, k = 0.069 Weight of laorfinishes ge = 1.2 41 kNmim Live load q =50 48 kNmim Rew = G19 EN/mThe University of Sheffield Yay Department of Civil & Structural Engineering She C1V323/6200 Mult-storey building design Composite Beam Design Exercise 6r t on Typical Grid Layouts genet Esse ped i ? | tayor_[Coreete Deak yDS SFinay Sonia in Trapezoital | 254» /46 x {gu 02x 28 i 1B Teapezoidal 356 x Its 5! Sex 2x S a c Trapszoidsl | 457 x B22 Go “4S Dx (Gx 24 1D "Trapezoidal 532m Zio x AZ 386xi/ x 5! E Trapezoidal Giox 229 3 [457 x 19 74 ; A Re-entrant 254 «l4ox 43 84 hex St A Reentant | 3S¢x 171 5? SSexI2/x 5!) _ se TRe-entani 45)x152n@) | 489x 19Ix ED ea cep Reenvant 583% 210% 42 56x lin 5! 10 TE Reentant | 10x 228x125 457 x 19x 82 4 Aneaae Trapezcidal 2544 146% 3) | 403% 153x360 _ 2 8 Trapezcidal | 25@x171x 5) 356 x)" 45 13 fe penis! | 48)x 15 2x @O 45 7x 14x 67 ei) a8 Vapecodd | 633m 20x €2 $Séx 71x 45 is TE Trapezsidal Gi9x 224 x10] 459% 4x7 1ST Re-ent $oSxioex 3S | a8h5 102x905 [Renta 406% 140% He 38¢= 17m 45 Reentent | 457/52 G0 TAS Ix 14 7 Re-enton Six ox42 | 35¢xi7ixa5 1 Renan Giox 224.513 489 14l x 24 Summary Table EI=— Designesampie: ee ga 10.4 SECOND TYPICAL DESIGN EXAMPLE 10.4.1 Data ‘A 100 mm thick slab with HiBond 55/1.00 profiled decking has three equal spans of 2.80 m \Figure 10.4.1). A reinforcing steel mesh is piaced in the concrete slab, with 25 mm top cover, providing 188 mnm7jm of reinforcement (@ 6 mm, a= 150 mm). The steel decking is Grade 320, the concrete Grace (20/37 and the reinforcement is Grade 550. Consider the following loads self-weight of the slab a 2.3 kNim? = weight of floor finishes ep = L2kNjm? live load g = SO kNim Verify the ultimate limit states and the serviceability limit states of the profiled sheeting and of the composite slab, {20 60 $0, ss 66 | face wo; So pee st | | | $3. | fefeo ead: \ { 1 Lives | ets] Figure 10.4.1 Scheme of the composite slab 10.4.2. Verification fo the protiled decking ‘We assume that bending resistance is the determining criteria Loads Seif-weight of che decking Weight of the wet conorere ‘Construction load Statical system and loading cases are given in Figure 10.4.2 ECCS N° 87Design Manual jor Composite Stabe Figure 10.4.2 - Statical system and loading cases for the concreting stage 10-4.2.2 Ultimate limit states Maximum positive bending moment (case 1) M, Mg +7Q-Mgm 35 + 0.08 ap + 8) !2 + 15-0004 amy 2 = 135 0.08 - 2.34 - 2.82 + 1.5 - 0,094 - 1.52.32 Mj= 198 + 1.66 = 3.64 eNm/m Maximum negative bending moment (case 2) Mg= 1G “Mg +1Q° Mam = 1.35 - 0.10 (gap + ge) £2 - 1.5 0.117 + 0.050) am2 1? 2.48 147 = 3.95 kNmvm ECCS N° 87|= SS ee Design examples Corresponding support reaction (case 2) Rd =1G- Rg +7Q° Rom 35-11 (gap + gc) 1+ 1.5 (1.2 +055) qm?! = 135 11-234-28+15-1.75- 075-28 Manufacturer's information pap =~ 7.48 kNovm RR = 68.1 kNim Ceupport = 100 mm) Verfcations Mj=3.64kNoim < 6.744Nmin = Moy = Mt Mq=395 kNavm < 6.80 kNmim = Mag = M5, Ra= 1524 kNm/m < 61.9 kNavm = RRg = RR/ Yep id Ra + = 058+025 = 0.83 < 1.25 Mga/ta | RRA/%@ 104.23 Serviceabllity limit states Moment at serviceability limit states (case 3) Mser = (0.08 gap + 0.094 + ge) 2 =(0,08 - 0.12 + 0.094 2.22) Mger= 1.71 kN/mi Design Manual jor Composite Stabs —+ no reduction in stiffness lef = lod Manufacturer's information Deflection 2,65 0.12 + 3.4 + 2.22) 28004 _ = 384-21000-0.72- 108 FM Deflection limit 5 1 _ 2800 dadm = TR5 = Typ = 1.6mm < 20mm Check Sser 28.3 am < 15.6 mm 10.4.3 Verification of the composite slab Statical system and loading cases are given in Figure 10.4.3, It is assumed that the composite slab is designed as a series of simply-supported beams. CUT ceo cot reinforcing steel mesh q 8 Figure 10.4.3 - Statical system and loading cases for the composite stage 10.4.3.1 Ultimate limit states a) Design toad Pd = (1G (1 + 82) +7Q. Gb = (1.35 3 +12) + 15-5.) L0 Pd = 12.2 KN/m ECCS N° 37Design examples ea ) Bending Design bending moment = 122-282/8 = 12.0 kNmv/m Calculation of the design bending resistance Position of the neutral axis Ap fup/ta 1483-320 /1.1 -Apfipfap_ _ _1482-320/1.1_ _ * = 550.85 fexte ~ 1000°0.85-30/15 ~ 54mm Design bending resistance " Mp,ra= Ap typ ds = 34 Nom Check MjSMigq > 2.0< M4 OK ©) Longitudinal shear (m and k method) Calculation of the design shear force WL Nim Calculation of the design shear resistance ‘The values m and k for the FiBond 55/1.00 sheeting are the following m = 86 k= 0.069 Design shear resistance ViRd=bdpim ge +k lw : = 1000 - 92.5 (86 BZ g069 571.25 = 18.6 kNim afee 7000280074 ar ECCS N° 37pe neeernneemrennnnnnrrrrnrrttrretrrrr L| 1 __Design Manual jor Composite Siabs Check Va VIRG > 171 < 186 OK d) Partial interaction method 7 “The design shear strength ty Rd, determined with the same tests results as for the mv/and k values given in 10.3.3a). is ‘ty.Rd = 68.4 Nim? Shear span required for full shear connection. = Apvfyp _ 1882 320 431 avin Yap = Net betuRE = 431,10 +684) = 630m Design check (see figure 10.4.4) ae oa Mt [kim|n Figure 10.44 - Partial interaction diagram Figure 10.4.4 shows that Mgq < Mpg for all cross sections. ECCS N° 87