Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jerry Hu
Copyright © 2023 Jerry Hu
The characters and events portrayed in this book are fictitious. Any similarity to real persons, living
or dead, is coincidental and not intended by the author.
No part of this book may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or
by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without express written
permission of the publisher.
ISBN-13: 9798395515889
You'd be forgiven for thinking these were achieved during a bull market.
Surprisingly, these returns were earned during the worst three-year stretch
the American markets have ever faced—the period spanning from the peak
of 1929, just before the crash, to 1932, the market's lowest point. (Quoting
Bear Market Investing Strategies by Freeman Publications).
So, is it possible that a bear market can be your best opportunity to
snap up long-term winners? Here’s a few tricks to help you.
Peel the onion.
In times like these, most zombie companies fade away. How do you
identify them? By peeling back the layers like an onion. The core
information lies in the company's 10-K filings and other legally required
documents submitted to the SEC. Revenue, EBITA, ROE—all can be
manipulated. When it comes to recruiting, now is the time to screen
candidates meticulously, with a laser-focused approach. Mass hiring is no
longer an option. Extend interview frequency, meet candidates multiple
times and in different locations, incorporate case studies, or assign test
projects (which have proven to be highly effective). Everything that
previously seemed too time-consuming must now be prioritized. Whatever
method you choose, ensure you peel back the layers and thoroughly assess
the hiring risks. Also, exercise caution with mixed interview feedback. If
you usually follow a majority wins approach during good times, now you
need to weigh the dissenting voice more. Even a minority disagreement in
the interview panel could warrant a veto.
Seek out tenacious warriors.
Times like these call for warriors—individuals who can weather the
storm and endure. With cost-cutting measures in place, teams must operate
on frugal budgets, leaders need to be more hands-on, and you may need to
shift your target customers towards SMEs if you were previously focused
on corporates. In either case, you require adaptable and tenacious people
who can navigate rough waters. Start asking questions about how
candidates have overcome difficult times, whether in their personal lives or
careers. What matters most is how they managed to come out on top.
Patience is your greatest ally.
Now is not the time when candidates are scarce, rather, it's when good
candidates are hard to find. Attracting them is even more challenging. The
lesson here is simple: don't give up. Stay calm and exercise patience. You're
not playing dead, you're simply waiting for the right moment. Keep in mind
that the usual 90-day recruitment timeline may not apply anymore. Waiting
is a luxury you can afford, as the potential consequences of a bad hire and
the subsequent trickle-down effects can be devastating to the team. When
you're searching for value rather than growth, patience is the king.
So, break free from rigid norms and embrace the limitless potential of
startups. People are drawn to companies for more than just a name or
financial incentives. They seek passion, learning opportunities, and the
thrill of doing something exciting. In the world of startups, you have the
advantage of being agile and innovative. Take a proactive approach, and
you'll be astonished at the incredible talents you'll discover along the way.
CHAPTER 3
How much equity should I give
away?
Startup lawsuits often revolve around the tricky issue of equity
distribution. Startup equity, although it sounds glamorous and enticing, is
often misunderstood by most people. We've all seen those stories on TV
where the founders strike gold with their early-stage equities, but in reality,
they represent only a small percentage of the startup world. The harsh truth
is that most startups fail, and the value of company equities is closely tied to
the success of the business.
Now, I don't want to bore you with a Wikipedia-style explanation of
equity, as it's an incredibly complex topic. However, beyond all the
technicalities, how founders choose to distribute equity is where the
journey begins in establishing company culture. It sets the stage for how
people interact and how organizational strategies are shaped down the line.
Factors like the percentage of equity allocated, the type of equity offered,
vesting schedules, and the specifics of exit plans all play a crucial role.
When designed wisely, these elements can incentivize talented individuals
to join and stay with the company. But if handled poorly, they can lead to
unforeseen challenges and complications later on.
As the wise Daniel J. Boorstin once said, "The greatest enemy of
knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." Let's keep that
in mind as we navigate the complex world of startup equity.
But the most common equity products you will see are either options or
restricted stocks (e.g., RSU). Simply put, options are the ones you have to
purchase, so they come with a cost (usually at a pre-determined strike
price), and restricted stocks can be granted without the upfront payment
(you also have a choice to purchase certain restricted stock products).
Vesting schedules. As an employee, when you finish signing that offer
letter, it doesn't mean your equity is coming to your next month’s paycheck.
Usually there is a cliff period around one year or two years. Which means
you won’t be able to access those equities until you have served that much
period of employment with the company. Then there are schedules around
how many years the remaining percentage will follow. There are companies
that practice 20% each year, some companies giving 5% in the first year
then the last 50% in the final two years. Or companies granting you 50%
after the initial two years… As an employer, how you design the vesting
schedules reflect your management style and impacts on the total rewards
package later on. For example, if your rewards philosophy is heavy on
equities, of course when the company goes through turbulent times, the
valuation dilutes and so do people’s overall rewards. This inevitably leads
to attrition if without a contingency plan. One of the interesting initiatives
Amazon comes up with is to allow employees to use their company stock as
collateral toward a down payment on a home purchase without selling their
equity stake.
Even if your company is just very early on, getting some professional
advice in the circle about how you want to structure those equity designs is
probably worth the time and money. Even if it is just a few words on a piece
of napkin, they are legally binding and there are doors once you open
cannot go back. There are definitely innovative companies offering
specialized equity distribution products today like Carta.
There are two main types of stock options: Incentive Stock Options
(ISO) and Non-qualified Stock Options (NSO). ISOs come with tax benefits
and are given to startup employees, while NSOs are taxed based on the
difference between the exercise price and the market price at vesting.
As most likely the equity will be a big chunk of the senior exec’s total
compensation. It is quite common for a hybrid selection of instruments.
That could include a combination of options and RSUs. Options of course
are a much greater tool when designed carefully to be acting as the golden
handcuffs for certain levels of executives. The idea behind golden
handcuffs is to create a strong incentive for employees to stick with the
company, even if other opportunities come knocking at their doors. As an
employee, it's important to note that while golden handcuffs may seem
attractive, they also come with a trade-off. They can limit your flexibility
and freedom to explore other job options or career paths. So, it's a bit of a
give and take situation.
3. Non-exec Employees
Now this again depends on the company’s rewards philosophy. Not all
non-exec employees are entitled to equities in many startups. But there are
of course companies giving out equities to everyone no matter the seniority
like Amazon. There is a saying the earlier you join the more equity you will
get. This is actually only true in the sense when you are talking about
the value of the equity rather than the quantity. Companies' market
value adds up when more funds are being raised and revenue generated.
Equity is most in sync with a startup’s worth. So, when the company
valuation jacks up 300%, so would that initial 200k worth of shares. But
just like public companies, there are fluctuations and downtimes. Of course,
unfortunately if the startup is in trouble or goes bankrupt, then the initial
shares are just a piece of paper worth nothing.
Now, these RSUs don't magically turn into shares overnight. They also
have a vesting period where you have to hang tight and meet the company's
conditions. Once you've been patient and fulfilled the requirements, those
RSUs transform into real, tangible shares, and you become a proud owner
of a slice of the company.
Now one thing you should be aware of is the tax complication. For
most countries, your equity is part of your income hence you need to
contribute the mandatory income tax brackets accordingly. Now the
complications are due to your nationality, granting locations and the
business entity registry of your companies, you might need to pay
additional local tax when you are exercising the shares later on. But you
don't have to pay those taxes right away. You settle the bill when you sell
the shares, and then you might face capital gains tax on any increase in their
value. It's like the IRS wants its fair share, but you can be strategic and
make the most of your RSUs while keeping your tax situation in check.
Besides the sign-on equities, there is also another product quite popular
with the startup scene is RSA (Restricted Stock Awards). Similar product
but different on cost and vesting schedules. RSA is usually used as a
performance management tool to incentivize employees. For employees not
entitled to sign-on RSUs, RSA can be a powerful tool to motivate most
likely high performance junior staff.
How much should you set up for employee equity pools? Typically,
10-20% (for tech startups) and much less when the company grows up.
Depending on your business model, depending on the company
environment you want to create, I have also seen a continuous higher
percentage for a consulting model or game-centric companies. A few things
can be taken into consideration here though. First off, think about how
many employees you have or plan to hire in the future. You want to make
sure there's enough equity to go around for all the awesome folks on your
team.
So, how much equity should you allocate for investors ? Is it 10% or
20%? Well, there's no magic number either. Every startup is unique, starting
with different investment needs and seeking funding at different times. If
you relied on external funding to kickstart your business, my advice is to
tread cautiously when it comes to giving away equity.
As for advisors, they come in all shapes and sizes. They provide
valuable resources, consulting services, and believe in your company's
potential, so they ask for a piece of the pie in return. A common approach is
to set aside around 1-2% of equity for advisors. However, if you're
experienced and confident in your abilities, you may not even need advisors
at all.
Remember, finding the right balance between retaining control and
leveraging the expertise of investors and advisors is key. It's a delicate
dance, and it's crucial to consider your unique circumstances and long-term
goals when deciding how much equity to allocate.
Firstly, you need to determine the level of trade-offs you can tolerate
between agility and governance. While a decentralized model may offer
short-term agility, it requires a balance and deliberate decision-making
mechanisms to ensure sustainability. Secondly, you should assess the
headwinds and tailwinds from the external markets. For example, if the
economy is experiencing a downturn, decentralization may need to be
reconsidered for cost-efficiency purposes. Lastly, take into account the
background of the GM. If they are part of the founding team and have been
with the company from the beginning, it might be wise to grant them more
autonomy and trust their ability to bring the cultural elements of the
company to the region.
Finding the right timing and balance is crucial. It's important to assess
whether separating the product function will truly enhance collaboration,
improve the product's focus, and enable scalability. Every startup is unique,
and the decision should be made based on the specific needs, capabilities,
and stage of your company.
Richard pointed out that many startup founders face pressure from
investment committees to focus solely on increasing their headcount,
disregarding the long-term impact on sustainability and productivity. He
emphasized the importance of founders negotiating wisely on human capital
metrics during fundraising to ensure a balanced approach.
Now, I know what you might be thinking. Startups don't have the luxury
of extensive people data or time for elaborate planning sessions like big
corporations. Strategies are often developed on the go, with constant trial
and error. Is there a more concise way to do workforce planning?
If you're used to people simply giving you a call and getting headcount
approval, it's time to establish a documented process. If you have an HR
system, make use of it. If not, even simple emails can serve as a starting
point. The approval process should include justifications for the need, a
detailed plan, and approval chains. Despite having a million things on your
plate, reading these justifications should be a priority.
Take a cue from Amazon, where those directly involved in creating new
skills or enhancing customer experiences are considered direct headcounts,
while others are indirect headcounts. Amazon is famously known for
discouraging empire-building and avoiding excessive middle
management. Jeff Bezos himself believes that bureaucracy-loving C- and
D-players usually reside in middle management. This approach contributes
to Amazon's impressively low general and administrative expenses,
accounting for only 1.5% of total revenue.
Because there are no defined titles or role competencies yet exist in the
market. It is difficult to research what the competitions or successful models
have done, as the technologies are being developed or enhanced just so we
speak. The earlier founding companies like OpenAI emerged also overnight
without a systematic recording of the skills being scaled, or many times it
remains a million-dollar intellectual property that is impossible to access.
So start mapping. What are the current job taxonomies can you collect
for generative AI? Google is probably the best tool for this, but if you have
advanced Talent Intelligence tools (e.g., Talent Neuron, Draup,
Eightfold.ai…) that can aggregate every job board on the planet, it
definitely can make the job much faster and more efficient. What will pop
up? Things like Generative AI Engineer, Generative AI Machine Learning
Scientist, Generative AI Data Scientist, Generative AI Researcher,
Generative AI Java Developer…
Data collection
Maybe there are 100 or 300 of those job taxonomies, your first step is
collecting and mapping them all out. The good part is that because it’s still
hot, there are probably not that many titles out there. You will soon see a
pattern during the exercise. Another good part is that AI itself is not new, so
things like NLP (Natural Language Processing), deep learning, neuron
networks… can easily be referenced back to existing job taxonomies.
Data cleaning
Many jobs are just adding “generative AI” in front of a normal job title
without even changing the JD at all. So you can immediately eliminate
those JDs as they are essentially useless. But put a mark on which
companies post like this. You will soon be able to spot if some companies
are simply hoping to catch the wave without a proper comprehension or
sometimes plan of how to apply these skills. Those are probably not your
target company later on.
Filter the duplicates. What you might find is that there are possibly a
selective few of the most accurate capture of job taxonomies, most likely
from big tech or those original AI companies. Then the rest started to
copycat and eventually ended up with a dozen same things, just slight
modifications. The common pattern for those duplicates is reflected on the
use of the exact same JD templates.
If you had 100, maybe after the exfoliation, you are down to 50 or even
less jobs, you can begin the analysis process. First, I suggest you categorize
or group them into a few job families, could be engineers, data scientists,
developers…then you need to start gauging the JD very, very carefully,
possibly reading one word at a time.
What we are looking for here is really the specific skills or keywords
that are adjacent to generative AI. These could be GPT, VAE, GANs…,
mark them down and then look for the verbs associated with them, such as
architecting, designing, debugging…
Now why do you need to look for verbs? Verbs are a great vehicle to
spot the soft skills needed for those roles. For example, verbs like
architecting, design, modeling…This proves that Generative AI engineers
probably need very strong architectural skills, which then might give you an
idea for people who should be really good at problem solving and have
strong logical attributes.
Now the last important step is to understand who they have to work
with, and how they work together. Of course, this type of intelligence might
need qualitative interviews later on by talking to candidates/prospects
specifically. But it's good to mark them down for now and read as much as
you can. These people are very good targets for reskilling, since they are
already working with the engineers. They are exposed to a certain level of
the job one way or another. If they have the interest, it’s your go-to group
for training.
Data visualization
Ideally once you have finished this detailed analysis, you would be able
to put together a graph of the competency model. The model could be a few
layers, such as the base layer with the must-have and the foundational skill-
sets, then comes the nice to have and enhanced skills, the last layer, top of
the pyramid would be those really niche skills that are performed by usually
a distinguished scientist or researcher. These again are great tools to help
see which group can be re-skilled or trained easily and usually goes from
bottom to top. This will come very handy when it comes to workforce
planning, learning and training… everything beyond recruiting.
From the previous job mapping exercise, you would probably have
generated a list of the companies and be able to categorize them into a few
groups, such as big tech, startups, by geolocation as well.
The insights gained from these primary connections are invaluable. You
can gather information from 3-5 key company organizational charts and
share competitive intelligence with the hiring or workforce planning team.
This will help refine your hiring requests and identify opportunities for
reskilling. It may seem like a lot of effort, but without conducting proper
research, scouting and disrupting the talent market can lead to falling
behind as the market matures. It's similar to the stock market where initial
listings face skepticism and rumors. If you're not careful during this period,
it can affect your reputation in the long run. In the recruiting world, it
means avoiding vague job descriptions or making uninformed decisions
without understanding the market dynamics. In a niche talent market like
AI, where there are only 300,000 practitioners globally, with only 27%
being women, according to McKinsey’s research on AI talent, people often
know or know of each other, and word of mouth can make or break a team's
brand. So, even if you don't hire any top prospects initially, building a
community is essential.
The second tier of prospects is likely to be the ones you actually hire.
This is where you can leverage the knowledge and information you've
accumulated to accurately target, prospect, and attract them. Start by
researching their research labs, specific professors, lab lineage, the journals
they publish in, how they acquire their skills, and the relevant courses they
take. It's important to understand how they continuously refine and enhance
their skills. This approach should be based on evaluating their skills rather
than just assessing their qualifications.
The last tier of prospects includes those without direct experience but
are trainable or possess skills similar to those already present in your
organization. In a competitive market, there will be times when you can't
compete for offers or struggle to attract top talent. In such cases, reskilling
becomes a viable hiring option. It's important to simultaneously target
prospects from both the second and third tiers to ensure timely hiring
success.
Ideally, you should have a team that has previous experience in M&A
from financial, business, operations, legal, or HR perspectives. The more
diverse the expertise, the better, as M&A touches upon various aspects of
both companies involved. Let’s break down the M&A cycle by stage.
Pre-deal
Once you have completed your homework and identified an excellent
M&A opportunity, it's crucial to involve the talent team immediately. The
worst-case scenario is to have HR come in after the deal is done to clean
up the mess. This often results in a significant number of resignations and
low morale among teams. People should be informed of your decisions
early on. If possible, have the HR team involved during the pre-deal due
diligence process. Remember that a merger of two companies is not just a
business investment, but also an investment in its founders and teams. If the
two startups have vastly different approaches to organization and culture,
it's likely to lead to failure from the start. Considering your acquisition is
most likely not a large company, it's fair to seriously consider people side of
the equation in decision-making to create a mutually beneficial outcome.
In the deal
You have done your research, everything seems fine and you begin
negotiating the terms and entering a potential M&A deal. This is where
extensive HR M&A work comes into play. While it's important to be
thorough, keep in mind that, as startups, you may not have access to
detailed due diligence processes due to missing data. Sometimes, you'll
need to rely on experiences and intuition for judgment. However, you
shouldn't overlook any aspect of rewards, talent, organization, operational
models, decision-making processes, and so on.
2. Organizational Structure:
3. Talent Assessment:
You see, our tech teams were mainly proficient in Java, while the
company we acquired relied heavily on .NET as their backend language.
Initially, we thought transitioning would be a breeze since Java is widely
used and finding skilled developers shouldn't be a problem. But we failed to
consider the people & culture aspect, and that's where things went south.
The engineers from the acquired company lacked the agility and
learning mindset we had hoped for. Moreover, their company culture didn't
support such transition efforts. What we thought would be a smooth
migration turned into a complete disaster. Most of their engineers decided
to leave rather than adapting to new technologies, leaving us with a
shortage of manpower. Our own team had to step in and help implement the
migration initiatives, costing us both money and invaluable time.
It was a humbling lesson for us. We realized that the number one
mistake we made was not involving our CTO in the M&A process. We
wrongly assumed that it was a small company and only financial matters
seemed relevant. But we were wrong. The lesson we learned here is to
involve all relevant stakeholders during due diligence, including every
member of your senior leadership team. For instance, a CTO's insights and
expertise are invaluable in the decision-making process.
Post-deal
So you spend weeks, probably months of work and finally the deal is
closed. You feel good about your judgment, and think this merger will work
out perfectly. But don’t forget the post-deal work, as they are equally
important. Even the perfect match won’t guarantee a sustainable marriage if
no one is making an effort. And right after closing the deal, it’s the most
precious time that needs that extra layer of care.
From a people standpoint, you need to steadfastly follow the progress of
the integration and make quick decisions if necessary. This could be
changing leadership, switching responsibilities, exiting unfit… The issue
can become very messy if you don’t act quickly. I have personally
witnessed both teams backfire and resulted in a terrible merger due to
culture or different leadership styles.
One of my experiences was on the acquiree side of the merger, where we
were incorporated into a tech giant through a corporate venture deal. At
first, everything seemed to be going smoothly during the pre and early
stages of the merger. However, around three months into the process, things
took a turn for the worse.
Initially, we assumed that integrating our culture would be seamless due
to similarities in our business nature and the age group of our employees.
As a result, we didn't take any specific measures to realign our cultures.
Since we were the ones being acquired, some people believed they needed
to conform to the corporate culture entirely, some people were very
confused. However, despite the surface-level similarities, we soon
discovered that our approaches and ways of doing things were vastly
different. Various factors, such as being a series A startup and our founders'
background in finance, played a significant role in these differences.
Consequently, we witnessed key individuals, along with their teams,
deciding to leave the company following the merger. With our core team
gone, the product and other teams began to crumble. Attempting to mitigate
the damage, we tried integrating teams from the corporate side, but it didn't
work out. They lacked the understanding of our product and the dynamics
of the new market we were entering. Moreover, recruiting new talent
became increasingly challenging as our company's reputation suffered from
the departure of influential employees who spoke negatively about the
organization.
The lesson we learned from this experience was the critical importance
of implementing culture alignment meetings, evolving our culture, and
establishing a new cultural structure immediately after the merger. It's
crucial not to overlook the details, as they can accumulate and eventually
backfire, leading to the destruction of the entire merger.
For the operational level of things, it is just equally as important when it
comes to job leveling, compensation…and if those issues are not addressed
quickly, they will enlarge and intensify as you go. This is also the time you
should be as transparent as possible. If things are still work-in-progress, do
NOT hide or make up excuses. It is recommended to rather give out an
honest timeline and your intention/plan of how to make it work. Again,
people can be demanding but we also understand it is not an easy task and
requires loads of effort, from all parties.
To recap, here's a summary of the key areas we discussed earlier that
require special attention.
● Tap into the resources of your investment partners, like venture capital
firms, for support and advice.
● Consider expert help from HR consultants or management firms if
needed.
● Build a diverse team with M&A experience from different
perspectives.
● Involve the HR team early on, during the pre-deal stage, to avoid post-
deal mess and low morale.
● Pay attention to crucial aspects during the deal, such as culture fit,
organizational structure, talent assessment, compensation, HR policies,
communication, employee integration, legal compliance, HR technology,
and performance evaluation.
● Act quickly to address culture clashes and operational issues after the
deal closes.
● Stay cautious and keep improving post-merger.
Remember, successful M&A requires empathy, transparency, and
ongoing effort from everyone involved.
CHAPTER 7
Driving change as you scale
So you began noticing the inefficiencies around communication among
teams, a lack of cohesive cultural representation across the company, or the
gap between desired vs. current talent and organizational capabilities. These
are some potential signs for you to start thinking about driving CHANGE.
As much as you want to retain the sweet family culture when you first
started, you have to face some harsh realities that change is inevitable and it
will not be sustainable to continue the old way of doing things. Policies and
processes will need to be in place to ensure information can be cascaded up
and down accurately and smoothly. And throughout the change
management process, you may need to let go of some dear friends, hiring
professionals, and investing in a number of organizational development and
culture initiatives.
Here are a few common change scenarios most startup companies will
have to go through.
1. Bad managers.
People leave because of bad managers, plain and simple. But are you
hiring the right people to be managers in the first place? Your recruiting
team should prioritize assessing people management skills, even if startup
hiring teams are often impressed by candidates' drive, entrepreneurial spirit,
and performance records. Look for managers with direct or indirect
experience, or the potential to develop into great leaders. Evaluating
management skills is a mix of art and science, making it challenging for
someone without experience to judge another's capabilities. Your manager
interview committee should include senior leaders to make informed
decisions. Another strategy is to have experienced directors lead the team
and train potential managers for success. Ensure that the successors
genuinely want to be managers, rather than forcing them into the role due to
seniority or pressure from above, which may not align with their career
aspirations.
Implementing effective manager training is crucial and should be
consistent, measurable, and practical. Avoid wasting money on generic
management courses that people take just for the sake of it. Instead,
consider review sessions where managers can directly hear feedback from
employees. The key is to ensure that the majority of feedback is honest and
insightful.
Amazon’s Daily Connection Survey
The daily connection survey at Amazon is a practice where employees
provide regular feedback on their managers. It allows employees to share
their thoughts, concerns, and experiences related to their managers'
performance on a daily basis. This survey serves as a platform for
employees to voice their opinions and provide feedback on managerial
effectiveness. It enables Amazon to gather real-time insights, empower
employees, track manager performance, and drive continuous improvement
in management practices.
Manager training covers technical and soft skills, and there's much to
learn and improve. However, the most important step is to foster awareness
within the company that promotes a culture of good managers. Educate
and reward people accordingly, emphasizing that a good manager culture is
a core goal. It's not just about educating managers themselves, it's about
cultivating a broader manager mindset throughout the organization.
2. Rewards are NOT transparent.
This issue goes beyond startups and is one of the main reasons why
people leave. However, it's really an excuse to say there's nothing you can
do about it. One tip I suggest for startups is to provide clear guidelines and
tools to help educate employees on how to calculate the value of their
equity. Often, startup equity lacks a proper system or documentation, and
this becomes problematic when shareholders demand transparency or
potential legal issues arise. You can utilize simple tools to educate
employees on equity and demonstrate the growth potential if the company
succeeds. It's important for startups not to make unrealistic promises when
the management themselves are unsure of the values. This can come across
as deceptive, even if unintentional. Another aspect to improve in terms of
rewards is the benefits package. Refer to Chapter 6 for ideas on how to
improve your startup's benefits strategy.
While the actual content of your rewards is important, it's equally critical
to regularly update employees on your rewards philosophy and show the
progress you're making. If you're aiming to promote a rewards culture that
emphasizes ownership (particularly through equity), take the time to
explain the reasoning behind this approach and the expected outcomes.
Connect it to your business model and projected returns. Additionally, when
expanding into new regions, startups may initially have minimal benefits in
place. However, it's essential to provide consistent updates and a timeline
for improvement, even if they involve small additions like dental plans.
People feel better when they see the effort being made. Avoid making
excuses to delay announcing any rewards improvements just because you're
not fully prepared yet.
3. Toxic Culture
One of the most common complaints about startup culture is the lack of
work-life balance, which often leads to burnout. While it's expected that
startup employees need to take on multiple roles and handle heavy
workloads within tight deadlines, there's a distinction between working hard
and working smart. Encouraging a startup culture that only values and
rewards working hard will only exacerbate the issue.
To address this, start by examining your workforce planning, and
identify areas where you can streamline and optimize workflows through
the use of mechanisms and technologies. Finding ways to enhance
efficiency and productivity can alleviate the burden on employees and
create a healthier work environment. Additionally, promoting flexibility
within the startup can foster a culture of working smart. When employees
have the freedom to save on transportation costs or work remotely from a
picturesque island, they can utilize the extra time gained to contribute
positively to the company, such as writing positive reviews on platforms
like Glassdoor.
By prioritizing work-life balance and implementing measures to support
it, startups can not only mitigate burnout but also cultivate a more
sustainable and productive work culture. Remember, the well-being of your
employees directly impacts their performance and long-term commitment
to the company.
According to Bhavik Vashi, former General Manager, Asia of Anaplan,
"One of their best practices was to distinguish the influence of culture from
the profit and loss (P&L) statement. By granting regional leaders the
autonomy to cultivate their own unique subcultures, they were able to fully
embrace and appreciate the diversity within decentralized teams. This
approach allowed for greater empowerment and fostered a culture of
inclusivity within the organization."
4. Communication is imperative.
Job security is an ongoing concern for individuals working in startups.
While it may seem like everything is going well on the surface, there are
instances where cash burn exceeds sustainable limits. Achieving a delicate
balance between sharing pertinent information with your staff can be
challenging. However, it's crucial to prioritize transparency and honesty
in your communication efforts, or at the very least, demonstrate your
genuine attempts to do so.
In times of economic hardship or when the entire industry is facing a
downturn, pretending that everything is fine won't provide job security to
your employees. Instead, it's essential to engage in authentic, action-
oriented communication that addresses the challenges at hand. By openly
discussing the situation and sharing your plans and strategies for navigating
difficult times, you can foster trust and provide your team with a realistic
understanding of the company's position.
While you may not have all the answers or be able to guarantee
complete job security, genuine communication shows your commitment to
addressing concerns and working towards sustainable solutions. This
approach helps build a resilient workforce that understands the realities of
the business environment and can adapt accordingly.
To keep people loyal to your startup, you need to address their concerns
and create a supportive environment. Attrition is bound to happen, but by
actively tackling issues and prioritizing employee satisfaction, you can
reduce turnover and build a committed team. Look for consistent themes
and make necessary changes, whether it's improving management, being
transparent with rewards, offering growth opportunities, or promoting
work-life balance. Conduct exit interviews to gather valuable feedback and
improve. By focusing on effective management, transparent rewards, work-
life balance, and open communication, you'll create an engaging workplace
where people are motivated to stay and contribute. Remember, investing in
your people is investing in the success of your startup.
CHAPTER 9
Life after IPO
Congratulations on reaching a major milestone in your entrepreneurial
journey! All those sleepless nights and hard work have paid off. Now, let's
talk about life after reaching this point. While many promising startups
receive tempting acquisition offers along the way, some choose to stick with
the IPO route because they want to continue reaping the rewards of their
labor.
Before we delve into what comes next, let's discuss why you might
consider going public. Interestingly, there's a growing trend of IPO
resistance among venture-backed startups. While it used to be the coveted
prize in the 90s, nowadays, many companies prefer to stay private. They
enjoy the freedom and control that comes with avoiding Wall Street's
expectations. Private markets have proven to provide abundant capital,
sometimes even more than the IPO route.
However, let's not overlook the alluring perks of a holy grail IPO (aside
from the obvious ego boost). Going public can enhance your company's
branding and corporate credibility, particularly if you operate in sensitive
industries. It also allows you to convert your appreciated investments into
cash more easily by hitting the "SELL" button. Moreover, an IPO fuels
mergers and acquisitions, enabling you to renew your product cycle and
keep up with growth.
Not only does an IPO benefit the company, but it also brings joy to early
team members. For them, it's a kind of finish line. They may prefer to cash
out, take a breather, or embark on a new venture.
Now, amidst all the legal and financial complexities swirling in your
head, don't forget to meticulously plan the people aspect of the equation.
This includes preparations before, during, and after the transaction.