You are on page 1of 11

Agriculture

Ecosystems &
Enwronment
ELSEVIER Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 53 (1995) 71-81

Effects of ammonia and root-knot nematode on tomato


Mujeebur Rahman Khan*, M. Wajid Khan
Enviromnental Pollution Research Unit, Departmentof Botany, Aligarh Muslim University,Aligarh 202 002, India
Accepted 27 July 1994

Abstract

Tomato plants inoculated with 2000 juveniles (JJ2) of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita race 1) or intermittently
exposed to 152/zg NH3 m-3 exhibited significant suppression in growth, yield and leaf pigments compared with uninoculated
or unexposed plants. However, NH3 at 76/zg m -3 did not cause significant effects. The leaves of nematode-inoculated or
uninoculated plants exposed to NH3 ( 152/zg m-3) turned yellow in all treatments.
Root galling and reproduction efficiency of M. incognita increased at 76/~g NH3 m-3 but was suppressed at 152/zg m-3.
Fecundity, however, declined at both levels. The nematode and NH3 interacted synergistically at 76/~g m - 3 and antagonistically
at 152/xg m -3. Reductions in the plant growth, yield and photosynthetic pigments of the tomato were greatest in post- or
concomitant-inoculation treatments at 152/zg NH 3 m - 3 and concomitant inoculation treatment at 76/zg m- 3. Nitrogen content
of foliage and roots increased significantly at both levels of the gas, being greater in post- and concomitant-inoculation treatments
at 152/zg and 76/xg m - 3, respectively. Meloidogyne incognita or NH3 decreased the number and size of stomata but increased
the width of stomatal pores. Length and number of trichomes increased in the exposed plants, but remained unaffected in plants
inoculated with the nematode alone. A positive correlation mostly occurred between width of stomatal pore and percent reduction
in the plant growth, yield and leaf pigments of tomato.

Keywords: Ammonia; Nematode; Tomato growth; Tomato yield; Nitrogen; Stomata

1. Introduction foliage and soil surface in the form of fine particles.


Accumulation of ammonium sulphate increases soil
Ammonia (NH3) is relatively little studied among acidity (Ryden et al., 1987). The NH 3 and NH4 com-
the air pollutants causing toxicity in plants. Atmos- pounds are later converted into nitrite and nitrate
pheric NH3 originates from the use of ammonium fer- through nitrifying bacteria, Nitrosomonas and Nitro-
tilisers, brick-kilns, ceramic and pottery industries, bacter.
refineries and cooling plants (Khan et al., 1991). The Ammonia creates a serious nutritional imbalance in
major source of NH3 is, however, intense livestock soil by excessively increasing soil nitrogen (Nihlgard,
farming or animal slurry dumps (Van Dijk and Roelofs, 1985) and causes direct toxicity in plants. Yellowing
1988). Ammonia readily reacts with ambient SO2 and of needles and reduction in carotenoids and chloro-
forms ammonium sulphate which deposits on plant phylls of Scot pine grown in an NH3 polluted area have
been reported (Van Dijk and Roelofs, 1988). Dueck
* Corresponding author at: Department of Plant Protection, Institute (1990) recorded 20% inhibition in seedling survival
of Agriculture, Shaft House, Qila Road, Aligarh Muslim University, of Calluna vulgaris exposed to 53 and 105 ~g NH 3
Aligarh 202 002, India. m - 3. The effect of NH3 on forest trees has been fairly

0167-8809/95/$09.50 © 1995 Elsevier Science B.V. All fights reserved


SSD10167-8809(94)00553-2
72 M.R. Khan, 11/1.W. Khan/Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 53 (1995) 71-81

well studied, whereas the response of crop plants has 2. Materials and methods
not been tested. Most of the research on NH 3 effects
has been carried out in the Netherlands, where NH 3
originating from stockbreeding is implicated directly 2.1. Exposure system
or indirectly in the general decline of forests (Van
Breeman and Van Dijk, 1988).
Forest decline is apparently a multipathogen-stress Three exposure chambers, each of 90 c m X 9 0
consequence, involving interactions of pollutants and cmX 120 cm dimensions were used. Two chambers
pathogens. Air pollutants can influence host-parasite were used to expose the plants to NH 3 and one for
relationships. Air pollution has been shown to affect control (ambient air) set. The chambers were made of
plant parasitic nematodes. Studies have shown that 03 transparent fibre glass with an exhaust duct at the top
at 490/zg m - 3 inhibited reproduction and development and a double-walled bottom. The exposure chambers
of Heterodera glycines and Paratrichodorus minor, have been described elsewhere (Khan and Khan,
while Belonolaimus longicaudatus and Aphelenchoi- 1993). The generation of NH3 gas in a generator (Stan-
des fragariae remained unaffected (Weber et al., dard Appliances, Varanasi, India) was principally
1979). Recently, Khan and Khan (1993) recorded based on heating of liquid ammonia. The degree of
enhanced disease intensity caused by Meloidogyne heating of liquid NH 3 and rate of suction of the gas
incognita on tomato exposed to 286/zg SO2 m-3. from the heating unit determined the concentration of
Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne species), one NH 3 gas, which was controlled by a flow meter. The
of the most important groups of plant parasitic nema- outlet of the generator was connected to the blower
todes, have an exceedingly wide host range and interact assembly of the chamber, which mixed incoming NH3
with other plant pathogens. Vegetable crops are their with ambient air and uniformly dispensed the mixture
preferred hosts. Meloidogyne incognita is widespread in the chamber. The desired concentrations of NH3, i.e.
in the tropics and subtropics and estimated yield losses 76 and 152/zg m -3 were obtained by calibrating the
in vegetable crops due to root-knot nematodes in dif- flow meter of the generator after repeated ammonia
ferent regions of tropics vary from 5 to 43% (Sasser, samplings inside the chamber with the help of a port-
1979). Root-knot nematodes induce development of able air sampler (Kimoto Electric, Osaka, Japan). For
cancerous outgrowths or knots on roots resulting in the sampling, 20 ml diluted sulphuric acid (absorbing
impaired absorption of water and minerals, transloca- medium for NH3) was poured into the impinger of the
tion of assimilates etc. (Khan and Khan, 1987; Veech air sampler. The sampler was placed inside the expo-
and Dickson, 1987). sure chamber and was run for 3 h. After sampling, the
Response of vegetable crops to NH3 gas has been medium was analysed colorimetrically to determine
rarely tested and there is no information on the inter- exact concentration of ammonia inside the chamber
action of NH 3 and plant parasitic nematodes. The pres- (Anonymous, 1986a). The blower of the chamber was
ent study on effects of NH3 on root-knot nematode and run at a constant air flow rate, i.e. 1.9 m s- ~. The air
tomato was carried out to determine the following: (with NH3) inside the chamber was replaced approx-
(i) effect of intermittent treatments of NH 3 at 76 and imately eight times in 1 min. To reduce differences
152 /~g m -3 on plant growth, yield, photosynthetic among chambers in the microclimate, the plants were
pigments and epidermal characters of tomato; rotated among the chambers at each exposure. For
(ii) cumulative effect of NH 3 and M. incognita on example, if the treatment of 76 ~g m - 3 was given on
different growth parameters of tomato as in (i); one occasion in chamber 2, the next time chamber 3
(iii) effect of intermittent exposures of NH3 on the was used for the same treatment. The mean concentra-
disease intensity and reproduction efficiency of the tion of NH3 inside the chamber after completion of all
nematode. the exposures was 76+8.37 and 152+ 13.8/xg m -3.
The third chamber, used for exposure of the control
(without NH3) plants was run at the same air flow rate
(1.9m s - l ) .
M.R. Khan, M.W. Khan/Agriculture, Ecosystemsand Environment53 (1995) 71-81 73

2.2. Treatments and plant culture harvested on 29 January 1989 and the following para-
meters were measured.

Three-week-old seedlings of tomato, Lycopersicon


2.3. Plant growth, yield and root-knot disease
esculentum Mill. cv. 'Pusa Ruby', grown in autoclaved
soil were transplanted on 31 October 1988, in 15 cm
Tomato plants were examined regularly for visible
diameter pots containing 1.5 kg steam-sterilised soil
disorders attributable to NH3 or root-knot nematode.
(clay, sand, compost, 2 : 1 : 1 ) . In some treatments
The flower buds developing during the 3 month period
freshly hatched second stage juveniles (JJ2) of root-
were counted. At termination, the number of fruits, per
knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita race 1 (Kofoid plant were counted and weighed, The soil in each pot
and White) Chitwood, obtained from single egg mass was saturated with water to facilitate root recovery at
glasshouse-culture were added (2000 JJ2 per pot) to the time of uprooting the plants to determine lengths
small holes made in the soil around the roots of tomato and fresh weights of shoot and root. Shoots and roots
seedlings. Inoculation and exposure of the plants to were dried in a hot air oven at 60°C for 48 h to determine
NH3 were done according to three modes of sequential dry weights. Betbre drying the roots, galls and egg
inoculation exposures. In pre-inoculation exposure, masses were counted and numbers of galls and egg
NH 3 treatment started 1 week before (on 7 November masses per gram fresh weight of root were calculated.
1988) nematode inoculation (on 15 November). In For determining fecundity (number of eggs per egg
post-inoculation exposure, the plants were inoculated mass) 100 egg masses picked from the roots (20 egg
(on 7 November 1988) 1 week before NH3 treatment masses were from each of the five fresh roots of
( 15 November). In concomitant-inoculation exposure, tomato) were blended in 500 ml of 1% NaOCI solution
NH3 treatment and nematode inoculation were done in a blender for 40 s. The suspension was sieved
simultaneously (on 15 November). A separate and through 100 and 400 mesh sieves. The retained eggs
independent set for each sequential treatment corre- were washed with water and transferred to a beaker
sponding to the date of inoculation was maintained. In containing 100 m l of water. The number of eggs in the
total there were four control (unexposed) sets: C1, suspension was determined with a counting dish under
uninoculated; C2, C3 and C4, inoculated, correspond- a stereo-microscope and fecundity was calculated.
ing to pre-, post- and concomitant-inoculation expo-
sures, respectively. Similarly, there were four exposed 2.4. Photosynthetic pigments and nitrogen
sets at each concentration of NH3: T1, uninoculated;
T2, T3 and T4, pre-, post- and concomitant-inoculation Carotenoids, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total
exposures, respectively. chlorophyll were determined by grinding 1 g fresh leaf
All treatments were replicated ten times and the pots tissue from third leaflet of the third leaf of branches of
were placed on glasshouse benches at 25 +__2°C in a each plant separately in 80% acetone with a mortar and
complete randomised block design. The designated pestle. The suspension was filtered through two What-
plants were exposed to NH 3 at 76 and 152 /zg m -3 man filter papers (no. 1) in a Buchner funnel equipped
every third day for 3 h from 09:00 h for 75 days in with a suction pump. The residue was again ground
separate chambers. Pots of the control set (C1-C4) with acetone and filtered. Final volume of the filtrate
were placed in the third chamber (air flow rate 1.9 m was made to 100 ml and percent transmittance in the
s - J) for the same duration at the same time. This cham- spectrophotometer was read at 480 and 510 nm for
ber was not connected to the NH 3 generator and hence carotenoids (MacLachlan and Zalik, 1963) and 645
received ambient air. The concentration of NH3 in and 663 nm for chlorophylls (Mackinney, 1941).
ambient air of the Botany Department, AMU was 7.18 Nitrogen content of leaves and roots was determined
/zg m 3. Each treatment received 27 NH3 exposures. by digesting dry powder (100 rag) in concentrated
In pre- and concomitant-inoculation treatments, expo- H2SO4 (98%) and H202 (30%) in Kjeldahl flasks.
sures (27) were completed on 22 January 1989, and After digestion, sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate
on 29 January in the pre-inoculation treatment. Five solutions were added to neutralise the acidity. Later,
plants out of the ten replicates of each treatment were 0.5 ml Nessler's reagent was added to 5 ml of the
74 M.R. Khan, M.W. Khan/Agriculture, Ecosystemsand Environment53 (1995) 71-81

solution and transmittance was read in a spectropho- caused yellowing of the leaf; NH3 at 76/xg m -3 did
tometer at 525 nm (Linder, 1944). not produce any visible injury. Root-knot nematodes
produced characteristic galls on roots of the inoculated
2.5. Leaf epidermal characters plants. There was no difference in NH3 injury on the
nematode inoculated or uninoculated plants. However,
Pieces ( 1 cm 2) of fresh and mature leaves, fixed in
the disease intensity (number of galls) was higher on
formaline-aceto-alcohol (FAA) and preserved in 70%
the plants exposed to 76/zg NH 3 m-3, regardless of
ethanol, were gently boiled in 40% HNO3 to separate
the mode of inoculation and exposure.
the epidermal peels. The peels were then stained with
iron alum and haematoxylin after washing in water
3.2. Plant growth
(Ghouse and Yunus, 1972), dehydrated in ethanol
series and mounted in DPX mountant. The numbers of
Meloidogyne incognita or intermittent exposures to
stomata and trichomes present on both the leaf surfaces
NH3 at 152/xg m - 3 caused significant decline in length
were counted and their sizes measured.
and fresh and dry weights of shoot and root, compared
2.6. Statistical analysis with uninoculated and unexposed plants (Table 1).
The suppression of root growth due to 152/zg NH3 was
The means of observations for each treatment were invariably significant at P ~<0.01. Nematode-inocu-
calculated. Data were subjected to analysis of variance lated plants intermittently exposed to NH3 (T2, T3 and
(ANOVA) for two-factor pot culture experiment, i.e. T4) exhibited suppression in growth parameters in
NH3 (0, 76 and 152/zg m -3) and nematode (0, pre-, comparison with their respective controls (C2, C3 and
post- and concomitant-treatments) and least significant C4). This effect was significant at P ~<0.01 for length
differences (LSD) were calculated at three probability and at P ~<0.05 for dry weight of root in post and con-
levels, i.e. P~<0.05, P~<0.01 and P<0.001 (Dospek- comitant treatments (T3-T4) at 152/xg m -3 (Table
hov, 1984). The experiment on effects of NH3 and 1). Corresponding values for pre-inoculation treatment
nematode on plant growth, yield, etc. had four controls were significant at P ~<0.05 and P ~<0.01. Fresh weight
(C1, C2, C3, C4) and four exposed sets (T1, T2, T3, of root decreased significantly in pre-inoculation expo-
T4). To test the individual effects ofNH 3and nematode sure (T2) at both levels of NH3 and in post-inoculation
on plant growth etc. the means of uninoculated-unex- exposure (T3) at 152/zg m -3 (P~<0.05) compared
posed plants (C 1) were compared with the inoculated- with C2 and C3, respectively. Overall, percent reduc-
unexposed treatments (C2, C3, C4) and uninoculated- tion in shoot was highest in concomitant treatment and
exposed (T1) plants. To test the combined effects, the in root in post-inoculation treatment at 152/~g m -3.
inoculated-exposed treatments (T2, T3, T4) were According to the two-factor ANOVA, individual
compared with their respective controls (inoculated- effects (F value) of NH3 and nematode were signifi-
unexposed plants), i.e. C2, C3 and C4, respectively. cant for all the considered plant growth parameters.
The data on nematode disease and reproduction were Interactive effect was, however, synergistically signif-
subjected to a single factor ANOVA and this experi- icant for fresh weight of root (Table 1).
ment had three controls (C2, C3, C4) and three
exposed sets (T2, T3, T4). To test the significance of 3.3. ~eM
differences between the treatments, inoculated-
exposed plants (T2, T3, T4) were compared with inoc- Intermittent exposures to NH3 at 152/xg m -3 and/
ulated-unexposed plants (C2, C3, C4, respectively). or M. incognita inhibited flowering and fruiting of
tomato. The decline in the number of fruits per plant
was significant in all the treatments of nematode
3. Results
(P<0.01) or 152 /zg NH3 m -3 (P~<0.001). The
3.1. Symptoms decline was significant at P ~<0.01 in infected-exposed
plants at 152/zg, and also at 76/xg m-3 in concomitant
Intermittent exposures of nematode inoculated or treatment compared with their respective controls
uninoculated tomato plants to NH3 at 152 /xg m -3 (Table 2). NH3 at 76/zg m -3 significantly enhanced
M.R. Khan, M. W. Khan/Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 53 (1995) 71--81 75

Table 1
Effects of NH3 and Meloidogyne incognito race 1 on the growth and dry matter production of tomato plants

Treatment NH3 Length (cm) Fresh weight (g) Dry weight (g)
(/zg m -3 )
Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot Root

CI Uninoculated control 0 48.3 29.8 43.1 14.5 8.5 2.17


T1 Uninoculated 76 49.1 30.2 45.5 15.0 8.3 2.21
152 43.0* 24.8*** 40.0* 12.1"** 7.5* 1.71"**
C2 Inoculated control 0 41.9' 25.1"** 38.6** 12.8" 7.4** 1.83"*
T2 Pre-inoculation exposure 76 39.7 23.3 37.9 11.0" 7.1 1.72
152 37.9 22.1 * 37.0 10.8" 6.9 1.48**
C3 Inoculated control 0 40.6** 24.5*** 37.1"** 12.3"* 7.2** 1.88"
T3 Post-inoculation exposure 76 39.4 22.8 37.5 11.8 6.7 1.75
152 38.3 21.0'* 37.0 10.8" 6.3 1.61'
C4 Inoculated control 0 40.1'* 24.9*** 37.0*** 12.5" 7.2** 1.90"
T4 Concomitant-inoculation exposure 76 38.7 23.1 36.4 12.0 6.6 1.70
152 36.8 21.9"* 35.9 11.2 6.5 1.64"
F value NH3 (d.f.=2) 5.80S 13.60S 5.82S 11.46S 8.12S 16.41S
Nematode (d.f. = 3) 7.28S 9.15S 5.13S 17.50S 12.57S 23.17S
NH3× Nematode (d.f. = 6) NS NS NS 3.04S NS NS

Each value is the mean of five replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the respective control: *P_<0.05; **P_<0.01;
***P _<0.001 ; S, significant at P < 0.05; NS, not significant at P < 0.05.

Table 2
Effects of NH 3 and Meloidogyne incognita race 1 on the yield of tomato plants

Treatment NH 3 Number Fresh weight (g)


(/~g m -3)
Flowers Fruits Fruits per plant Mean fruit

CI Uninoculated control 0 14 13 426 32.8


TI Uninoculated 76 16" 13 404 31.1
152 13 10"** 283*** 28.3*
C2 Inoculated control 0 12" 10"** 279*** 27.9*
T2 Pre-inoculation exposure 76 13 9 229* 25.4
152 11 8** 198"** 24.7
C3 Inoculated control 0 13 11'* 298*** 27.1"*
T3 Post-inoculation exposure 76 12 10 239** 23.9
152 12 9** 211"** 23.5
C4 Inoculated control 0 12 11"* 294*** 26.7**
T4 Concomitant-inoculation exposure 76 12 9** 211"** 23.5
152 11 9** 209*** 23.2
F value NH3 (d.f. = 2) NS 10.71S 37.40S 4.72S
Nematode (d.f. = 3) NS 15.30S 21.47S 13.88S
NH3× Nematode (d.f. = 6) NS NS 3.29S NS

Each value is the mean of five replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the respective control: *P_<0.05; **P_<0.01;
***P_<0.001; S, significant at P_< 0.05; NS, not significant at P < 0.05.

f l o w e r p r o d u c t i o n . In o t h e r t r e a t m e n t s at 7 6 / z g m - 3 all the t r e a t m e n t s , b e i n g significant in p l a n t s e x p o s e d


the f l o w e r i n g w a s u n a f f e c t e d in c o m p a r i s o n with the to 1 5 2 / z g NH3 m - 3 (P~< 0.05) or i n o c u l a t e d w i t h the
control, but w h e n it w a s c o m p a r e d w i t h the c o r r e s p o n d - n e m a t o d e ( P ~ < 0 . 0 1 ) . The h i g h e s t d e c r e a s e in m e a n
ing fruiting, t h e r e w a s 18.7% ( a v e r a g e ) inhibition in fruit w e i g h t o c c u r r e d in the c o n c o m i t a n t - i n o c u l a t i o n
fruit setting. M e a n fruit w e i g h t o f t o m a t o d e c r e a s e d in t r e a t m e n t at 152/.*g m -3. T h e total w e i g h t o f fruits p e r
76 M.R. Khan, M.W. Khan/Agriculture, Ecosystemsand Environment53 (1995) 71-81

Table 3
Effects of NH3 and Meloidogyne incognitarace 1 on photosynthetic pigments (kLgg- 1 fresh weight of leaf) and nitrogen content of tomato
plants

Treatment NH3 CarotenoidsChlorophyll a Chlorophyllb Total Nitrogen(%)


(/zg m- 3) chlorophyll
Foliage Root

C1 Uninoculatedcontrol 0 6.81 843 329 1172 1.49 1.91


TI Uninoculated 76 6.75 819 315 1134 2.32*** 2.45***
152 6.20** 748** 305* 1054" 4.27*** 3.83***
C2 Inoculated control 0 6.04*** 773* 310 1084" 1.16" 2.20**
T2 Pre-inoculation 76 5.73 724 290 1015 3.41"** 2.59***
exposure 152 5.48** 692** 286* 979** 5.14"** 3.91"**
C3 Inoculatedcontrol 0 5.95*** 755** 306 1062"** 1.22 2.10"
T3 Post-inoculation 76 5.57 708 280* 989 3.23*** 2.60***
exposure 152 5.40** 680** 272** 953** 5.21"** 3.94***
C4 Inoculated control 0 5.95*** 763** 309 1073" 1.07" 2.18"*
T4 Concomitant-inoculation 76 5.60* 691" 295 987* 3.48*** 2.63***
exposure 152 5.38** 679** 280** 960** 5.01"** 3.88***
F value NH3 (d.f~=2) 18.30S 25.15S 11.63S 21.81S 127.46S 109.20S
Nematode (d.f.= 3) 31.72S 38.50S NS 35.60S 35.83S 43.17S
NH3 x Nematode (d.f. = 6) NS 4.39S 3.18S NS 12.26S 9.61S
Each value is the mean of five replicates. Asterisks indicate a signifcant difference from the respective control: *P<0.05; **P<0.01;
***P < 0.001; S, significant at P __.0.05; NS, not significant at P < 0.05.

plant significantly declined ( P ~<0.001 ) in all the treat- effects of NH3 and root-knot nematodes, their interac-
ments of nematode a n d / o r 152/xg N H 3 m - 3 in com- tive effects were also significant for chlorophyll a and
parison with the yield of their respective controls, being chlorophyll b (Table 3).
lowest in the pre-inoculation treatment. At 7 6 / z g m - 3, Foliage and roots of the exposed plants contained
the decrease in inoculated plants was mostly significant significantly ( P ~<0.001) higher nitrogen compared
at P ~<0.01. Individual effects ( F value) of NH3 and with their controls (Table 3). The nematode, however,
M. incognita were significant for the number of fruits, caused a significant ( P ~<0.05) decrease in leaf nitro-
mean fruit weight and total weight of fruits per plant. gen, but root nitrogen increased ( P ~<0.01). Combined
The synergistic interaction was significant for weight treatments of NH 3 and M. incognita significantly
of fruits per plant (Table 2). (P~<0.001) enhanced the nitrogen contents o f both
leaves and roots compared with their respective con-
3.4. Photosynthetic pigments and nitrogen trols. Highest nitrogen contents of leaves and roots
were recorded in post- and pre-inoculation exposures
NH3 inhibited the synthesis of carotenoids and chlo- at 152 /xg m -3, respectively. Interactive effects ( F
rophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll in tomato value) of NH3 and root-knot nematode were synergis-
leaves. This inhibition was significant at 152/zg m -3 tically significant for foliar nitrogen and antagonistic
at P~<0.01 (Table 3). Meloidogyne incognita also for root nitrogen (Table 3).
caused a significant decrease (P~<0.001) in the pig-
ments compared with the uninoculated plants ( C 1 ) . 3.5. Foliar epidermal characters
Combined treatments o f the nematode and NH 3 at 152
/zg ( P ~<0.01 ) and 76/xg m - 3 ( p ~<0.05) significantly Root-knot nematode or NH 3 suppressed stomatal
suppressed the leaf pigments, compared with their numbers and their size as well as length of the stomatal
respective controls. Lowest carotenoids and chloro- pores on both surfaces of the leaves (Table 4). These
phyll a was recorded in concomitant treatments and effects were not significant at the lower level o f NH3.
chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll in post-inoculation Combined treatments of NH3 and root-knot nematode
treatment at 152 /zg m -3. In addition to individual in pre-inoculation-exposure at 152/xg m - 3 caused a
M.R. Khan. M.W. Khan/Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 53 (1995) 71-81 77

Table 4
Effects of NH3 and Meloidogyne incognita race 1 on leaf epidermal characters of tomato plants

Treatment (NH3 Number (cm -2) Length of Stomata (/xm) Stomatal aperture
(/.Lg trichomes (/zm)
m -3) (/xm)
Stomata Trichomes Length Width Length Width

C1 Uninoculated control 0 U 19925 2207 158.3 28.27 18.34 13.18 5.61


L 35804 4823 171.8 29.57 18.51 13.26 5.57
TI Uninoculated 76 U 19815 2271 159.7 28.11 18.15 13.22 5.74
L 35712 4790 170.1 28.74 18.38 13.22 5.70
152 U 19160** 2473*** 165.2" 26.81" 17.03" 12.25" 6.81"**
L 34651** 5421"** 179.7' 26.19" 16.82" 12.19" 6.87***
C2 Inoculated control 0 U 17679*** 2115 157.4 27.29* 17.08" 12.48" 5.91"
L 29514*** 4691 169.5 27.58* 17.19" 12.33' 5.76
T2 Pre-inoculation exposure 76 U 17428 2297** 160.4 27.03 17.28 12.21 6.70***
L 28739 4785 172.8 27.31 16.99 12.17 6.81"
152 U 17393 2501"** 166.5"* 25.48* 16.62" 11.76" 6.82***
L 28156** 5498*** 178.6" 25.17" 16.41" 11.81" 6.78***
C3 Inoculated control 0 U 17523*** 2092 157.0 27.29* 17.18" 12.37" 5.84
L 29601*** 4571 169.8 27.66 17.29" 12.39" 5.84
T3 Post-inoculation exposure 76 U 17516 2208 161.0 27.13 17.13 12.08 6.65***
L 29640 4713 172.3 27.18 17.81 12.12 6.61"**
152 U 17074 2546*** 165.2" 25.30* 16.54" 11.71" 6.83***
L 28902 5513"** 170.5 25.39* 16.51" 11.58" 6.80***
C4 Inoculated control 0 U 17603* 2050 156.0 27.11" 17.13" 12.25" 5.71
L 29437* 4539 170.5 27.37* 17.29" 12.25" 5.66
T4 Concomitant-inoculation 76 U 17720 2296** 158.9 27.41 16.91 11.93 6.69***
exposure L 29753 4780** 172.8 27.15 17.07 11.98 6.58***
152 U 17281 2570*** 166.0"* 25.18' 16.73' 11.69" 6.67***
L 28907 5571"** 171.1 25.22* 16.39" 11.61" 6.73***
LSD P < 0.05 U 522 129 6.25 0.71 0.39 0.43 0.29
L 871 183 7.38 0.86 0.54 0.61 0.34
F value NH3 (d.f. = 2) U 8.13S 27.8S 6.81S 3.71S 41.50S 32.55S 19.51S
L 7.20S 31.6S 4.29S 3.42S 37.13S 23.70S 17.30S
Nematode (d.f.=3) U 22.50S NS NS 9.50S 16.55S 18.58S NS
L 19.57S NS NS 11.07S 22.81S 18.02S NS
NH3 × Nematode (d.f. = 6) U NS 3.25 NS NS NS NS 3.18
L 2.78 NS NS NS NS NS 2.71

u, upper leaf surface; L, lower leaf surface.


Each value is the mean of five replicates.
Asterisks indicate a significnt difference from the respective control. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; ***P< 0.01; S, significant at P < 0.05; NS, not
significant at P < 0.05.

s i g n i f i c a n t ( P ~< 0 . 0 1 ) d e c r e a s e in the n u m b e r s o f sto- at 1 5 2 / z g NH3 m - 3 ; NH3 at 1 5 2 / z g m - 3 a l o n e or w i t h


m a t a o n the l o w e r l e a f surface. S t o m a t a l size ( l e n g t h M. incognita ( T 2 - T 4 ) i n d u c e d a s i g n i f i c a n t i n c r e a s e
a n d w i d t h ) , a n d l e n g t h s o f s t o m a t a l p o r e s w e r e signif- ( P ~<0 . 0 0 1 ) in the w i d t h o f s t o m a t a l p o r e s c o m p a r e d
icantly s u p p r e s s e d at P ~<0,001 in all the t r e a t m e n t s o f w i t h their r e s p e c t i v e c o n t r o l s ( C 2 - C 4 ) , b e i n g w i d e s t
NH 3 (152/zg m -3) and the nematode (T2-T4) com- in the p o s t - i n o c u l a t i o n t r e a t m e n t . N e m a t o d e - i n o c u -
pared with their controls (C2-C4). Lowest numbers lated p l a n t s e x p o s e d to 7 6 p,g m - 3 also s h o w e d signif-
o f s t o m a t a w e r e r e c o r d e d o n u p p e r a n d l o w e r l e a f sur- icantly w i d e r p o r e s o f s t o m a t a o n b o t h l e a f s u r f a c e s at
f a c e s in p o s t - a n d p r e - i n o c u l a t i o n s t r e a t m e n t s at 152 P ~<0.001. T h e i n c r e a s e in p o r e w i d t h in n e m a t o d e -
/zg m - 3, r e s p e c t i v e l y . S m a l l e s t s t o m a t a were, h o w e v e r , i n o c u l a t e d p l a n t s w a s not significant. T h e n u m b e r o f
observed on plants receiving pre-inoculation-exposure t r i c h o m e s significantly ( P ~ 0 . 0 0 1 ) i n c r e a s e d o n the
78 M.R. Khan, M. W. Khan/Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 53 (1995) 71-81

Table 5
Effects of NH3 on disease intensity reproduction and fecundity ofMeloidogvne incognita race 1 on tomato plants

Treatment NH 3 Number of galls per Number of egg masses Number of


(/xg m -3) per eggs per egg
mass
Root g fresh Root g fresh (fecundity)
system weight of system weight of
root root

C2 Inoculated control 0 131 10.23 114 8.91 229


T2 Pre-inoculation exposure 76 145 13.18** 129 11.72* 211
152 95*** 8.79 63*** 5.83** 197"
C3 Inoculated control 0 138 11.22 113 9.19 237
T2 Post-inoculationexposure 76 158" 13.38' 135" 11.44* 206*
152 106"** 9.72 54*** 4.95*** 172"*
C4 Inoculated control 0 135 10.8 118 9.44 224
T4 Concomitant-inoculation 76 156" 13.0" 141* 11.75* 218
exposure 152 92*** 8.21"* 41"* 3.66*** 141"**
Each value is the mean of five replicates, Asterisks indicate a signfiicant difference from the respective control: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01;
***P <0.001.

leaves of nematode-inoculated or inoculated plants 3.6. Nematode disease


exposed to NH3 at 152/xg m -3, being highest in the
Root galling caused by M. incognita in the nema-
concomitant-inoculation treatment. Similar effects of
tode-inoculated plants was enhanced significantly
7 6 / z g N H 3 m - 3 were obtained in the concomitant-
(P~<0.05) by exposure to 76 /xg N H 3 m - 3 (except
inoculation treatment on both leaf surfaces and in pre-
pre-inoculation exposure), compared with the controls.
inoculation treatment on the upper leaf surface
This effect was highest in post-inoculation treatment
compared with their respective controls at P~< 0.01.
(Table 5). Root galling was suppressed significantly
Trichome lengths were enhanced significantly
(P~<0.001) on plants exposed to 152/xg NH 3 m -3.
( P ~<0.05) in plants exposed to 152/zg m - 3 alone or
Lowest numbers of galls were recorded in plants o f
with the nematode in pre-inoculation NH3 exposure.
concomitant-inoculation treatment. A similar trend
Similar effects on trichome lengths were also recorded
occurred in numbers of galls per gram fresh weight of
on the upper leaf surface of plants which received post-
roots. Reproduction o f the nematode (numbers o f egg
inoculation ( P ~<0.05) and concomitant-inoculation
masses per root system or per gram fresh weight of
(P~<0.01) treatments at 152 /xg m -3. The longest
root) was enhanced at 76/zg m - 3 ( p ~<0.05) and sup-
trichomes were recorded when the uninoculated plants
pressed at 152/zg m - 3 ( p ~<0.001 ). Fecundity (num-
were exposed to NH 3 at 152 /xg NH 3 m -3. Similar
ber o f eggs per egg mass) o f the nematode was
increase in trichome lengths occurred in nematode-
significantly inhibited at P~< 0.001 in post- and con-
inoculated plants in pre-inoculation treatment at the
comitant-inoculation and at P ~<0.05 in pre-inoculation
same level o f NH3. According to A N O V A , individual
treatments at 152 /zg m -3 and at P~<0.05 in
effect o f NH3 was significant for all the considered
post-inoculation treatment at 76 /zg m - 3 compared
epidermal characters. The effect of M. incognita was
with the respective controls (Table 5). The lowest
not significant for number and length o f trichomes or
numbers of eggs were recorded in the egg masses
width o f stomatal pore. The interactive effect was syn-
obtained from the plants o f concomitant-inoculation
ergistically significant for width o f stomatal pore on
treatments at 152 ~ g NH 3 m -3.
both leaf surfaces and number of trichomes on the upper
leaf surface and antagonistically for the number of sto-
4. Discussion
mata on the lower leaf surface (Table 4).
A m m o n i a effects on photosynthetic pigments
appeared as a yellowing of tomato leaves. Gas ammo-
M.R. Khan, M. W. Khan/Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 53 (1995) 7141 79

nia, diffusing through stomata may have inhibited syn- The physiological disorders induced by M. incognita
thesis of carotenoids and chlorophylls. Breakdown or were responsible for the suppressions in plant growth
denaturing of chlorophylls may have also occurred, and yield of tomato. Root-knot nematodes can reduce
because NH 3 causes excessive loss of magnesium ions the yield of vegetables by 5-43% depending upon the
from the foliage of exposed plants (Van Dijk and Roe- species and geographical region (Sasser, 1979). The
lofs, 1988) as Mg + occupies a central position in the extremely high levels of total nitrogen in the leaves and
tetrapyrol ring of the chlorophyll molecule. Suppres- roots of plants exposed to NH 3, especially at the higher
sion of leaf pigments in nematode-infected plants may concentration, indicates that the plants may have suf-
also have resulted from impaired absorption and trans- fered from a severe nitrogen overload, resulting in sup-
location of nutrients from the roots due to pathogenic pressed plant growth, yield and photosynthetic
effects of M. incognita (Bergeson, 1966). Khan and pigments. Excessive accumulation of nitrogen in soil
Khan (1987) offered similar reasons for a decrease in and plant parts causes suppressions of plant growth and
carotenoids and chlorophylls of tomato plants infected yield (Krauss et al., 1986; Van Dijk and Roelofs,
with root-knot nematodes. 1988).
Conversion of ammonia into nitrogenous com- The joint action of NH3 (at 76 /zg m -3) and M.
pounds and their accumulation in leaves may account incognita was synergistic, leading to greater reduction
for the significant increase in foliar nitrogen of the in plant growth, yield and leaf pigments of tomato.
exposed plants. Some nitrogen may have been derived Wider stomatal pores in the inoculated-exposed plants
from the soil as well, as there was about a 63% and than the inoculated or exposed plants suggests that NH 3
170% increase in soil nitrogen in the pots exposed to uptake by leaves may have been enhanced because of
76/xg and 152 ~g NH 3 m -3, respectively (data not extra opening of stomata resulting from the interaction
presented in tabular form). Ammonia has been found of NH3 (at 76/zg m -a) and M. incognita. The signif-
icant increase in root galling of plants exposed to the
to increase nitrogen deposition in forest stands by as
lower level of NH3 shows that the increase in nitrogen
much as 10-20 times the natural supply of 6-10 kg N
content of soil and root (63% and 36%, respectively)
ha-1 year-~ (Anonymous, 1986b). In M. incognita
favoured the root-knot nematode. Excess of nitrogen
infected plants, the nematode-induced inhibition in the
in soil has been found to stimulate development of
upward movement of nutrients (Bergeson, 1966) was
nematode diseases (McClure and Viglierchio, 1966).
probably responsible for greater nitrogen content of
NH 3 at 152/zg m-3, and the nematode jointly caused
roots and lower nitrogen content of leaves. In the com-
antagonistic reductions in growth, yield and leaf pig-
bined treatments ofNH 3 and root-knot nematode, foliar ments of tomato plant. Diffusion of NH3 may have been
nitrogen was synergistically enhanced, i.e. the increase greater as stomatal pores were widest in the infected
was greater than the sum of the increases caused by plants exposed to 152/zg NH3 m -3. Low root galling
NH 3 and nematode individually. This synergistic inter- and decline in production of the nematode indicates
action possibly resulted from greater uptake of NH 3 by that 170% increase in soil nitrogen and 103% increase
the leaves. During the accelerated transpiration of in root nitrogen were harmful for the nematode. Such
plants infected with M. incognita (Odihirin, 1971), poor root galling by the nematode eventually resulted
stomata may have opened wide, leading to greater dif- in less suppressed plant growth, yield and photosyn-
fusion of NH 3 into the leaves, as we observed wider thetic pigments. Concentration-dependent stimulatory
pores of stomata in the nematode-infected plants. Inter- (268/zg m -3) and inhibitory (571 /xg m -3) effects
action of NH3 and the nematode was antagonistic (neg- of SO2 on root-knot nematodes have been recently
ative) for root nitrogen, i.e. the sum of increases in demonstrated by Khan and Khan (1993).
nitrogen caused by NH 3 and M. incognita individually Sedentary females of root-knot nematodes which are
was greater than their combined effect. This antagonis- responsible for parasitism obtain their nutrition from
tic effect may have been caused by the impaired func- giant cells which surround their head region. The quan-
tioning of the nematode-infected roots in relation to tity and/or quality of nutrients in giant cells may have
absorption of nutrients and downward translocation of been possibly reduced owing to poor health of the
photosynthates (Bergeson, 1966). plants exposed to 152/zg NH3 m-3. This poor nutrient
80 M.R. Khan, M.W. Khan/Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 53 (1995) 71-81

status of the giant cells would have resulted in inhibi- References


tion of egg mass production. Decline in the numbers of
eggs per egg mass (fecundity) may have been caused Anonymous, 1986a. Air Quality Monitoring: A Course Manual.
by the inadequate supply of nutrients to the females. National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur,
India.
Egg mass production by root-knot nematodes is sup-
Anonymous, 1986b. Effecten van Luchtverontreiniging op Terres-
pressed in nutrient-deficient hosts (Oteifa, 1953). trische Ecosystemen, met Name Bossen.-Staatsbosbeheer Afdei-
Reproduction of Heterodera glycines was found to be ing Planologie en Milieu, Utrecht, pp. 13-18.
suppressed in soybean plants exposed to 490/zg 03 Bergeson, G.B., 1966. Mobilization of minerals to the infection site
m -3 (Weber et al., 1979). of root-knot nematodes. Phytopathology, 56: 1287-1289.
Dospekhov, B.A., 1984. Field Experimentation. Mir Publishers,
The decrease in the number and size of stomata
Moscow, Russia.
seems to be a morphological adaptation of tomato Dueck, Th. A., 1990. Effect of ammonia and sulphur dioxide on the
plants to check the diffusion of gaseous air pollutants, survival and growth of CaUuna vulgaris (L.) Hull seedlings.
including NH 3. Similar epidermal adaptations devel- Funct. Ecol., 4:109-116.
oped in tomato plants in response to SO2 (Khan and Ghouse, A.K.M. and Yunus, M., 1972. Preparation of epidermal
peels from leaves of gymaosperms by treatments with 40%
Khan, 1993). The increase in the length and number HNO3. Stain Technol., 47: 322-324.
of trichomes may be a response of the plants to the air Khan, M.R. and Khan, M.W., 1987. Histophysiological alterations
pollutants. Trichomes provide an outer line of defence induced by Meloidogyne incognita in tomato leaves. Int. Nema-
for plants against stresses imposed from the atmosphere tol. Network Newsl., 4 (4): 10-12.
Khan, M.R. and Khan, M.W., 1993. Interaction of SO2 and root-knot
(Levin, 1973). Widening of the stomatal pores in
nematodes on tomato. Environ. Pollut., 81: 92-103.
exposed and/or inoculated plants indicates that despite Khan, M.W., Khan, M.R. and Khan, A.A., 1991. Effect of air pol-
the presence of these defences, they did not overcome lution caused by ceramic and pottery industries on powdery mil-
the adverse effects of the stress and thus damage was dew and root-knot nematodes on cucurbits. J. Indian Bot. Soc.,
sustained. The width of the stomatal pore mostly 70: 373-378.
Krauss, H.H., Heinsdorf, D., Hippeli, P. and ToUe, H., 1986. Unter-
showed a positive relationship with the percent reduc-
suchungen zu Emahrung ned Wachstum wirstschaftlich wich-
tion in different parameters, e.g. stomatal apertures tiger Nadelbaumarten im Tiefland der DDR. Beitr. Forstwirtsch.,
were widest in those treatments of nematode and NH3 20: 156-164.
(152 /zg m -3) that caused highest suppressions in Levin, D.A., 1973. The role of trichomes in plant defence. Q. Rev.
Biol., 48: 1-16.
plant growth, yield, etc.
Linder, R.C., 1944. Rapid analytical methods for some of the more
The present investigation revealed that NH 3, at 76 common inorganic constituents of plant tissues. Plant Physiol.,
/xg m - 3, is not toxic to tomato but its favourable impact 19: 76-89.
on root-knot nematode is alarming. Thus, low levels of Mackinney, G., 1941. Absorption of light by chlorophyll solutions.
NH3 may enhance the nematode population density J. Biol. Chem., 140: 315-322.
MacLachlan, S. and Zalik, S., 1963. Plastid structure, chlorophyll
substantially under ambient conditions, with plants
concentration and free amino acid composition of chlorophyll
being liable to sustain damage from these pests at levels mutant of barley. Can. J. Bot., 31: 1053-1062.
of the gas that are too low to have a direct impact on McClure, M.A. and Viglierchio, D.R., 1966. The influence of host
the plant themselves. nutrition and intensity of infection on the sex ratio and develop-
ment ofMeloidogyne incognita in sterile agar cultures of excised
cucumber roots. Nematologica, 12: 248-258.
Nihlgard, B., 1985. The ammonium hypothesis--An additional
explanation to the forest dieback in Europe. Ambio, 14: 2-8.
Odihirin, R.A., 1971. Effect of root-knot and lesion nematodes on
Acknowledgements transpiration and water utilization by tobacco plants. J. Nematol.,
3: 321-322.
Oteifa, B.A., 1953. Development of root-knot, Meloidogyne incog-
The senior author wishes to dedicate the present nita as affected by potassium nutrition of the host. Phytopathol-
paper to his beloved father Abba Aziz, who left this ogy, 43: 171-174.
"Ryden, J.C., Whitehead, D.C., Lockyer, D.R., Thompson, R.B.,
world on 30 August 1993 and who was a constant Skinner, J.H. and Gerwood, E.A., 1987. Ammonia emission from
source of inspiration. The author also acknowledges grassland and livestock production systems in U.K. Environ.
research associateship from C.S.I.R., New Delhi, India. Pollut., 48: 173-184.
M.R. Khan, M. W. Khan/Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 53 (1995) 71-81 81

Sasser, J.N., 1979. Economic importance of Meloidogyne in tropical Van Dijk, H.F.G. and Roelofs, J.GM., 1988. Effects of excessive
countries. In: F. Lamberti and C.E. Taylor (Editors), Root-knot ammonium deposition on the nutritional status and condition of
Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.): Systematics, Biology and Con- pine needles, Physiol. Plant., 73: 494--501.
trol. Academic Press, London, pp. 359-374. Veech, J.A. and Dickson, D.W., 1987. Vistas on Nematology. Soci-
Van Breeman, N. and van Dijk, H.F.G., 1988. Ecosystem effects of ety of Nematologists, Hyattsville, MD.
atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in the Netherlands. Environ. Weber, D.E., Reinert, R.A. and Barker, K.R., 1979. Ozone and sul-
Pollut., 54: 249-274. phur dioxide effects on reproduction and host-parasite relation-
ship of selected plant parasitic nematodes. Phytopathology, 69:
624-628.

You might also like