Reprinted from
Volume 141, 12 February 2015
ELSEVIER
STEM
SISTER AUT
onlay
Complete Clarification Solution for
Processing High Density Cell Culture
Harvests
Sladjana Tomic, Lise Besnard, Benjamin Farst, Rainer Reithmeier,
Rolf Wichmann, Pierre Schelling, Christian Hakemeyer
On-line Access via: www elsevier.com/locate/seppur‘Ne spony i asumed by Hovis eos aay jury nor nage vo pasos er ope) as amar of pedo
Tn, ngieoe or eters o om any se operation of ary methods, pes, insets, or Wess ond inthe materi een.
eos of apd advance inthe edcal sence port inepende!verekon of hagnore and rg degen be made
Sepurcon od Ptcation Technolgy 14 (2015) 268-275,
Contents lets avaiable at ScioncaDiect
Separation and Purification Technology
journal homepage: www.clsevi
r-com/locate/soppur
Complete clarification solution for processing high density cell culture
harvests
Deo
Sladjana Tomic**, Lise Besnard’, Benjamin First®, Rainer Reithmeier‘, Rolf Wichmann,
Pierre Schelling®, Christian Hakemeyer”
Somat Sms oa 0, eM, 2 3) awa, ee
“nea en oman ot pment ae Does ohne 7 shear
“anna rua on at Boar Rah eps mR? 377 Pre Corny
horioy of oma ngnering eperme 9 Becherl nd Cel Engineering 1 Den ner, rt Fp ra 5, 4227 Doran, Germay
‘ei ene 15 Gerber 2014
‘expression systems have not oly edo cll cultures with very hgh densty and increased prot tes,
but also to fed steams with 2 high proportion of solids apd colli that reduce the efclency ofthe
Separation step ses with tale-ap exit and instalation limit the atractvenes of centration.
‘whereas larieation sey by depth ation canbe costly duet igh ir areas reqaed. Therefore,
an efcent manufartare process must be developed to overcome these resticions In tis study We
‘eres
Soa sion Dyesent a complete separation solution that combines cel harvest pretentment vith a poleationic
Peco focusing agent (yaalydmetylaamonium chord or pDADNTAC) followed by dep ation
sing depth flters that were specially developed for filtration of ecuateé or precptated Feed
Streams Muliple antibody feed streams treated wth pOADMAC and subsequent tere sing pe-
treatment adapted depth filters resulted in mproved removal of alsa colli, increased clarfeation
"roughput, ecient reduction of DNA and high process ye. The residual level of pDADMAC inthe
fluates was asesed by surtace pasion resonance specrascpy. Overall. this next generation ela
‘on salton presented herein led to aroust igh yield economical separation process with enhanced
Impurity removal hat canbe readily incorporated iv current cafiation patos.
1 tntroduction|
‘Downstream purification of antibodies requires the clarification
‘of harvested cell culture broth to remove plugging components
land enable economic reuse of chromatography columns for many
‘yees. Traditional clarification of mammalian cell culture harvests
Consists of one ara combination of several separation technologies,
‘such as centrifugation, tangential flow tration (TFF) and normal
flow ftaton (NFR).
Inorder to increase the productivity, intense efforts in mamma-
lin expression systems have been invested. While in the past
decades eel culture processes of monoclonal antibodies resulted
in titers of about 1 gil, productivities exceeding 10 g/L are now
reported {1}. Tis is generally combined with cell density levels
‘of >20 million cells and cell viability <50% [23]. In such
* caeponing er Te: 4 985673603
no ass: jana tomiconereroupc Tome).
pear 1015 seppurz0r4 2.02
153s sem 14 ther BA abs eee
harvests the high proportion of sold biomass (cell, cell debts
and colloids) and high content of soluble byproducts (host cel pro-
{eins and DNA) reduces the performance of traditional separation
technologies. Disk stack centrifuges requite greater discharge
frequency andjor acceleration rates and produce larger pellets,
potentially leading to yield issues. In addition, che rise in colloid
Toads with high biomass and low cell viability arvests result in
ay plugging of the subsequent depth fier [4] Likewise, open
‘channel TF cassettes exhibit lower x and capacty due wo higher
Solid content, hence requiring higher filtration area. NFF filters
equire more internal volume to hold the increased biomass and
‘may experience erler breakthrough of fine particulates. This leads
toa lower capacity ofthe biaburden filter or the need to imple
ment a second dept fer device
“To overcome these limits of traditional separation technologies
various pretreatment approaches based on precipitation or occu
Tation techniques have been éeveloped and evaluated over the
years [5]. While precipitation relies on lowering the solubility ofa Toma partion a fet Techno 1 201) 28-275,
solutes inorder to create solid particles, flocculation relies on the
azzrezation of particles Flocculation occurs if the van-der-Weals
[traction between particles ourveghs the electrostatic repulsion
according to DLVO theory (Deraguin, Landau, Verwey and
(Overbeek) Floculating agents canbe use to tigger the aggree3-
tion of dispersed pariculates into larger-size clusters. Typically,
positively charged polymers ae used as occulating agents (eg
polyamines, polyethylenimine, polyallyiimethylammyonium
Chloride (pUADMAC, Fig. 1) or chitosan), The flocculation mechs
nism using polycationic polyelectrolytes has been extensively
studied (67) They are widely used in wastewater treatment and
paper manufacturing. but recent studies have looked at applying
Aoculation in biopharmaceutical applications (88). However. 2
setting or centrifugation step is often used in order to separate
Maccuated material, because traltional depth fkers cannot
handle high solid feed streams.
‘The objective ofthis study was to develop an efficent separa
tion solution that comprises cell harvest flocculation, followed by
depth tration, Multiple antibody cel culture ids were treated
‘with POADMAC and tered ciectly through pretreatment
adapted depth filters, without any additional adjustment step.
‘The separation effectiveness for pDADMAC-mediated flocs was
benchmarked with the performance ofa tractional depth tation
approach. In addition, pDADMAC dose-effect on harvest particle
Size distribution was assessed to provide a beter understanding
fof the pOADMAC Nleculation mechanism
2. Materials and methods
21, Cell culture ond protein expression
Antibodies used in this study were prduced in Chinese
hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines, which reached a ell density of
1.3-1.6 10” total cells, turbidity of "1000 NTU (21:10 ils=
tion with water gave for mAbt 1830 NTU and for mAb2 1880
NTU) and viability at harvest of 37% and 70% for mAbt and
‘Abo, respectively. mAbI titer was 0 g/L, whereas mAb2 was
expressed atthe level of 15g. The monoclonal antibody mAb3
feed stream (12> 10" total celsfml with 80% vibilty and
turbidity >1000 NTU) was solely treated with pDADMAC in order
toanalyze the particle size distribution upon flocculation.
22. Rocultion of el culture
‘The optimum dose of PPADMAC (obtained as purified 10% solu-
tion from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was Rist defined in 2
screening experiment where 40™mL of the representative cell
culture harvest were mixed with increasing amounts ofthe poly
‘ationic polymer ranging from 0 to 0.2% wt. Ate incubation for
Simin st room temperature, the locculated cal culture was
centrifuged at 20003 for 5-10 min Hereaus Instruments Hana,
Germany), followed by filtration using 0.2 jim Milex® ters.
Centrate turbidity of the various samples was determined using a
portable rurbidimeter model 2100P 1SO (Hach, Berlin, Germany).
Frtered supematants were submitted for product concentration.
HCP and DNA analysis and compared to non-treated, centrifuged
feed
23. tration experiments
‘The optimized flocculation condition, which was judged mainly
bby means of centrae turbidity, was applied on 3 larger volume of
feed. A portion of the cell culture harvest of about 4L was treated
with pDADMAC and carfed using pretreatment adapted depth
Ivers (Carisolve" 20MS, OMS and! GOHX graded depth filters
{all uPOD device format of 23 cm, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt,
Germany). 20MS is designed to clarify smaller aggregated
Dariles (of 20 um), 40MS for medium aggregated particles (of
440m) and GOHX for larger aggregated particles (of 60 um). In
parallel, the untreated cell culture harvest was filtered using
traditional depth filters featuring diatomaceous earth layers of
Aitferent pore size (ilistak DOHC and KOH depth fers, Merck
KGaA. Darmstadt, Germany). The traditional depen filters were
ssembled either inline at. 1:1 Alte area rato or cecoupled using
the labscale POD format of 270.m’ for DOHC. For the various fe
trates, the capacity of each depth fer grade was evaluated using
the Fr, constant flow sizing method [10] Briefly, the feed solution
‘was pumped through the various test depth filters at a constant
filtrate fx of 95-138 mh). The differential pressure, curula
tive fate volume and turbidity were recorded as a function of
process time. The depth filtrate quality was assessed by measuring
the capacity of 2 sterlizing grade filter (0.5/0.2 um Millipore
Express® SHC, 35cm? filter area, Merck KG2A, Darmstadt,
Germany) at constant pressure of 5 psi (0.4 bar. The sizing of
these filters was performed according to the flow dscay Vi
‘method (11)
24, Analytical asays
The tuiidity was measured using the 2100P 150 portable
turidimeter (Hach, Berlin, Germany). The product concentration
was measured with an IgG assay ublizing the COBAS INTEGRA
400 plus (COBAS® INTEGRA4OO plus Roche Diagnostics, Germany)
(CHO-Host Cell Protein (HCP) levels were assessed using a set of
ant-CHOP reagents, including CHO HCP standard and proprietary
Aanti-cHO HCP antibodies. Analysis was. performed applying
ELISA-based assay. The HCP clearance was calculated as lgarth-
‘mic removal factor (LRV}:
ng HCP mi feed
ng HCP, mi irate
Residual host cell DNA. was detected by quantitative PCR
(aPCR}-Similarty, the DNA clearance was calculated using the fol
Towing equation:
RV = log, a)
LRV = lo, a
pg DNA/m filtrate
‘The particle size distribution of untreated and flocculated fed
expressing mAb3 was measured using a coulter counter (CASY
“Model T7C analyzer, Roche Diagnostics GmbH) which has a detec-
tion range from 3.2 to 120 um, The amount of residual PDADMAC
was determined by surface plasmon resonance technology (SPR)
sing the Biacore T200 enhanced sensitivity (GE Healthcare)
according to polymer’s manufacture. The samples obtained after
filtration were diluted 1:10 before being subjected to SPR. The
‘nial binding rates were potted against the pDADMAC concentra-
‘ion resulting into a regression cuve with a correlation coeficient
R=0981
ae
chem of HEA he hep raed uteToe ipernity 12015) 29-275. ™
3. Results and diseussion
311, Fccuttion optimization study
Inorderto characterize the effect ofthe polymer concentration
call culture fluids containing monoclonal antibody mAbI or mab2
‘were mixed with inereasng amounts of PDADMAC. For either feed
stream a decrease in turbidity was observed as compared to that of|
the untreated feed stream (Fig. 2) This indicates that pDADMAC is
effective in focculatng cells and cellular debris. The polyationie
polymer presumably adsorbs onthe surface of negatively charged
Patile by electrostatic interaction, Thereby i induces the forma-
tion of larger-size patces that sediment faster by applying cen-
tsiagal force at low accelerations. At higher polymer dases the
turbidity of the centrate increases again. Ths turbidity increase
Is not caused by the polymer alone as it shows no turbidity
increase over concentration range used (data not shown), and the
‘acceleration rate was relatively ow to have a significant impact
fon the floes, but cannot be completely excluded. It seems that
the turbidity is rather allected by floc properties. tis assumed that
the locculant dosage depends on the ell density, as the portion of|
{otal biomass (cells colloids) increases wit increasing cel density.
“Turbidity is significantly reduced ever a wie range of pDADMAC
concentrations indicating that one can have a robust process from
bateh-to-bateh. The lowest centate turbidity was achieved With
(005% wt pDADMAC, This final concentration was taken as the
appropriate polymer dosage for the clarification of mabt and
Aba,
No product loss was determined for all flocculant conditions
tested, implying the high specificity of pDADMAC for negatively
charged particles The protein concentration analysis of filtered
Supernatants revealed recoveries of >S8% compared to uncreated
feed streams. An unusual increase of product recovery. was
‘observed following pDADMAC flocculation with more than 005%
‘wt, Tis may be de to interference frm relatively higher level
(of residual polymers in these samples impacting the reliability of
the Ig6 quantification assay. This effect has noc been observed
when the samples vere measured with an analytical Protein A
‘Chromatography method (data not shown).
22. fect of the polymer onthe parle ize dstibuion
‘The article size distribution of the cll culture harvest before
and after flocculation was investigated, AS the feeds streams
Tut TU)
a a a
OADMAG tha concnraton
2. Fcuaton imzato study whites ADADMAC ans ed pst cent Tabily (an eave (SB oes are shown
containing mADI or mAb2 were not analyzed for particle sizes,
an aliquot of mab3 harvested cell culture uid was submited for
particle size analysis (Fig. 3} The mean particle diameter in the
lntreate cel culture suspension was determined to particle size
of about 22 um. It is assumed that a similar behavior for mMAbt
and mA? expressing cell cultures would be obtained [12] Upon
3 cascade of electostati interactions, the particle size distribution
is shifted towards larger and likely denser flocs. Interestingly. the
higher dose of pDADMAC has ot rested in the formation of big
set particles °72 um) or higher volume ofthe particles with a
‘ean diameter of 22 um, The analysis rather revealed that the
Sverage size decreared (to about 20 jum) with the highest dose of
[PDADMAC used. Furthermore, the volume of the particles in the
‘ange of 10 um (“unflcculate peak") increased with pDADMAC
concentration. This all supports the hypothesis that a generous
polymer addition destablizes larger size clusters and corelates|
‘withthe inrease in centrate turbidity upon flocculation of high
polymer dose.
‘he second, smaller particle size peak in the untreated feed
stveam represents a poplation that might be hard to remove evea
‘with traditional separation techniques. Kempken et al. (13)
assessed the clarification efficiency of mammalian cell cultures
by using a disk stack centrifuge and determined that a substantial
cello oad below um was present in the liquid phase after cell,
Separation, Notably, there isa decrease in Volume of particles with
2 mean diameter of 4-5 ym. This population was likely stablized
jn pDADMAC-mediatedflocculates,
33. Filter capacity throughput and protein recovery
‘A depth tration train consisting of DOHC followed by XOHC is
targeted for traditional clarification of biopharmaceuticals pro-
dduced in mammalian cell culture. The summary of filtration perfor
‘mance resuits on MAT and mAD2 feed streams is shown in
Table 1. The endpoint throughputs and pressure drop values are
reported, in most cases filtration experiments were run uncil a
pressure drop of >15 psi wat reached, The tration tan consisting,
‘f DOHCIKOHC in seres ata 1:1 fier area cao was evaluated for
lunreated broths resulting in depth filter loadings of 118 and
112 Um? for mAbt and mA respectively. The higher endpoint
pressure for DOHC in this two-stage depth filtration set-up ind
fates that this grade predominately contributes to the cell and ct
oid retention. The very low turbidity of fna rates compared to
that of bulk harvests (1000 NTU) implies vey good retention by
+f tf # F
OADMAG ta concowaton
[DOADMAC concent fr Ab!) sa MAGE eB} (ee mean ae erences ents Mp gd ee eed oe wemm Toma parton od Pfeil 1 (2015) 28-25,
volume
Parise damater um)
3 Fate se cso a tepesenatve CHO cl cue ed sa
{rap tat wat ceed and abated for abe Dat sve som for
Shested hg Me) ans pOADMAC eed lected stam or
Seren ofthe aren tocol hs gr eer he rede reed
‘oihewed vesbon sare)
oe € e s rod f.
the fter media. The throughput result obtained from the uncou-
pled assembly suggest that the capacity of the secondary filter may
exceed 500 Lm? anda ratio of 3:1 of 4:1 (DOHC to XOHC) may be
‘more adapted
In comparison, the experimental assays performed on the bulk
harvest that was flocculated with a pDADMIAC dose of 05% wt
and subsequently filtered through pretreatment adapted dept l-
{ers provided promising capacities. ll pretreatment adapted depth
Alters demonstrated trial capacities of >350 Lm while the pool
{rbidity was similar to tha of the control run (untreated feed pro-
«essed using DOHCIXOHC filtration tain}. No increase inthe tur-
bidity ofall Altres was observed 12h post depth tration (@ata
rot shown), implying tht flocculation was complete at the time
of filtration. 20M and 40S filters performed with higher capac-
tes compared to 6OHX, te acer is designed to retain particles of|
pretreated feed streams of 60 jum. Therefore data suggest thatthe
fetention was not solely achieved by sieving. but adsorption may
also contribute to it Furthermore, the depth filters are nominally
‘ated and process conditions could have an effect on the retention
efficiency ofthe filters. There was lite diference in depth fta-
tion performance of 20MS and 40MS for mAb with a 105 higher
40M filter capacity compared to 20MS for mAb2
"Among other factors, the recovery of antibodies was set as ci-
terion for 2 successful clarification. The analysis revealed that
>9T% and >92% of mAbI and mAb2, respectively, were recovered
DA clerace (LAV)
-
LOL OES
4 ces efrmane in ems tbe impure HC? (tan A (ght entane shown oY (hog ection var mb (hg ie) and mab (ack
el dariterettan of he elena
hth owe oem the reader redo he web vero tt ale)
‘iuen penne obtained fer depth and eile es in the ication of monconl anism ad AB? Ug eet the wana (uaueute oe
Tren Recast conden Dep ie
nb Unwed DonepoHe 275 8
nested Done 3a 1
‘oss pomomnc ins 1S So
Mose poate ws 28 on
fase poamnc Goes 2
maka Unread oucrowc zp aa
fost ponomnc ens tas =
Mos panne st oe
ose poate ote 1D =
‘abe Ap p=) Pasha a)
oak bi TU) Pra ace Sere er Heap
20 2 10m
Fy a SomTome pron a Pro rey 2 (2015) 20-275 2»
Response (AU)
-feERERE
Time see)
Response (RU)
Tie 20)
i 5, Resa pOADMAC eet sn PR specosay. esas eves YDADNAC in sandal (ean sales (ah ae Sbowe in Sensgrans, whee de
‘Ser abtien ster doph anon wee ates ED tee feng re Rang te: Pa
inthe filtrates compared to untreated feed streams. Thus. loccula-
tion with pDADMAC and subsequent filtration through pretreat-
‘ment adapted depth filters were efficient i canifying mADI and
‘maba,
‘The sterile ter capacities for each filtrate are also shown in
Table 1 trates denoted with Vina values >1000D1m di noe
show significa flux decay within the experimental range and
hence are considered to be non-pugzing fluids
Tn summary, the floceulaton of the cell culture harvest with
[BDADMAC and subsequent filtration using retreatment adapted
4epeh tration simplifies te clarfiation of mammalian eet cl
“ue broths expressing monoclonal antibodies compared to depth
filtration without prior flocculation. The clarification throughput
‘oud be increased versus the standard clarification trai by flter-
ing occulated broths through pretreatment adapted depth filters
Gesigned to capture larger particles. Throughput is likely depen-
‘dent on the total cell density and viability Nevertheless, the use
‘of a flocculant in combination with pretreatment adapted depth
filtration provides robust performance with the potential of redc-
ing lication to a one-stage filtration process. Other pretreat
‘ment approaches showed comparable simplification [12.14] Ths
Compressed and simplified process can be applied to various
‘mAb-containing cell culture harvests with effective removal of
cells and ell debs,
34, Removal of soluble impure from mab feed streams
‘The clarification experiments with mAb and mAb2 demon-
strated an efficient removal of cells and cll debris. At this stage.
‘ny adcltiona clearance of soluble contaminants euch as hos ell,
[DNA ad proteins) wil hkely have positive impact on the down-
seam unit operations, although purification performance might
be euler dependent [15]. The removal of host cell proteins
(HCP) and nucleic acids (DNA) during the casifiation process of
‘ADI and mAb? has been investigated in this study and compared
to the coresponding untreated cell culture harvest Fig. 4. Follow
ing filtration of the untreated cell culture harvest with DOHC)
.OHC, the level of HCP remains high compared tothe feed material,
although for some harvests a more effective HCP clearance is seen
‘The removal of HCP coud not be significantly improved by Noceu-
lation and us of pretreatment adapted depth tes. The DNA level
was not significantly reduced when the untreated feed streams
were filtered through DOHC/XOHC depth filters. As the residence
{ims of the harvests within the depth ters were similar for cou-
pled and decoupled assemblies, he -fld higher loadings on XOHC
In the decoupled mode obviously lowered DNA clearance in the
secondary filtrate poo. By contrat, abi and mAR2 Mocculated
feed streams that were processed using pretreatment adapted
depth filters demonstrated >3 login and >5 logo clearance of
(strongly negatively charged) DNA. 20M and 40MS ters showed
highest removal of host ell DNA greater than 5 logs. These results|
demonstrate good host cell DNA clearance asa result of the loccu-
Iacin precess with pDADMAC,
5.5 Detection of residual focewant
‘As polycationic polymers are Becoming more and more attrac-
tive in biopharmacetical applications, they have been investi-
gated for their cytotoxicity to minimize the risk of any harm for
patents [16,17], Previous reports based on in vivo assays have
shown that polycationic polymers can change cell morphology
and induce hemolysis depending on the polymer propery. dose
{and incubation time. Plyethylenimine isthe most cytotoxic pely-
‘er tested, whereas the results on pDADMAC-mediated hemolysis
suggest tha upto a dose of 10 ppm no disturbance ofthe red blood
cell membranes was observed [16
In the present study, we have analyze for residual pDADMAC
ater depth and stele fltation appiving SPR spectroscopy. The
Sensograms of pure pDADMAC-standards and pDADMAC-
containing samples clariying mAbl are shown in Fig. 5. The
response signal of standard increased with increasing pDADMAC
‘i )
Flvaton train
ie. catatonia er A fe eth (DANE, XE, 205
stan ane cl Se er queens Moe oes 3 0
iterate recede wea Teme at prt fenton Teta 1 (2015) 28-25,
rece O ner] & | Hy ev
rep. o> > >
SEED Pelpeep@e pes
ser | | |S | aS
1g 7. me ders te actin chim by POADMAC Nee rgd pres uc calls (bp). acc as (els) ad at CHO prota
(hte pre) re cated y ieee ment ef pale POADINC
arin mane hee ples exes psitie cage 98 oe aie
Stace ss ano tbe epi rs ofan oppose