Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sevsere Hypophosphatimia
Sevsere Hypophosphatimia
PDF $ Split View % Cite & Permissions ' Share " Clinical Chemistry (
Journals Books
Author Contributions
PDF $ Split View % Cite & Permissions ' Share "
Authors’ Disclosures or
Potential Conflicts of Interest Advertisement
Honoraria
Case Description 331
Research Funding
A 52-year-old woman presented with a 14-year history of progressive proximal More metrics information
Expert Testimony muscle weakness and myalgia. She had been wheelchair-bound for the previous 10
Patents years, with a significant loss of height since the onset of symptoms. She was
previously healthy, with no family history of metabolic bone disease. Clinical
Other Remuneration examination revealed a proximal myopathy, short stature with marked Email alerts
References kyphoscoliosis and pectus carinatum. Her admission laboratory investigations
Article activity alert
showed severe hypophosphatemia, with a serum phosphate of 0.87 mg/dL (0.28
Author notes Advance article alerts
mmol/L [reference interval 2.5–4.5 mg/dL; 0.8–1.4 mmol/L]). 25-Hydroxy
vitamin D (25-OHD) was reduced with a normal 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D (1,25- New issue alert
< Previous Next > OHD). Laboratory results are summarized in Table 1. Of note, the tubular
maximum reabsorption of phosphate for glomerular filtration rate (TmP/GFR) Receive exclusive offers and updates
was 0.8 mg/dL (0.22 mmol/L [reference interval 2.0–3.4 mg/dL; 0.80–1.35 from Oxford Academic
mmol/L]), suggestive of renal phosphate wasting. Fibroblast growth factor 23
(FGF-23) was elevated at 9207 pg/mL (reference interval 12–49 pg/mL). Despite
phosphate and vitamin D replacement, the hypophosphatemia persisted.
See also
Table 1. Biochemical results at the time of admission (all serum unless specified otherwise). COMMENTARY
Commentary on Severe Hypophosphatemia:
Analyte Reference interval Result The Hidden Truth
25-hydroxy vitamin D <20 ng/mL—deficient; >30 ng/mL—sufficient 13 Latest Most Read Most Cited
Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase 14–42 IU/L 305 Analytical and Non-Analytical Variation May
Lead to Inappropriate Antimicrobial Dosing in
Creatinine 0.55–1.02 mg/dL 0.43
Neonates: An In Silico Study
2
Estimated glomerular filtration rate 90–120 mL/min/1.73m 117 A Case of Yellow Airway Secretions and Oral
Fluid
TmP/GFR 2.0–3.4 mg/dL 0.8
Severe Hypophosphatemia: The Hidden Truth
Fibroblast growth factor 23 12–49 pg/mL 9207
Commentary on Severe Hypophosphatemia:
Open in new tab The Hidden Truth
1. What are the causes of urine phosphate wasting? Medical Skills Medicine and Health
Journals
4. What is the diagnostic localization image of choice in this case?
Discussion
Fig. 1.
68
(A), Gallium 68 DOTATATE positron emission tomography/ computed tomography ( Ga DOTATATE
PET CT): soft tissue density (1.8 cm×1.8 cm), inferior to the right metatarsophalangeal joint of the
2nd and 3rd digit, with avid uptake of tracer (white arrow); (B), MRI right foot: soft tissue mass
plantar to the 2nd and 3rd metatarsal heads (open arrow). (C) Bone scan: ‘tie sign’ (black arrow),
‘rachitic rosary sign’ (black open arrow), ‘pseudo-reactivation’ of growth plates (black curved
arrow).
Due to the lack of awareness of this condition, there is often a prolonged lag time
between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis. Oncogenic osteomalacia, like X-
linked hypophosphatemia, exhibits decreased mineralization of newly formed
bone, and a useful clinical discriminator between the 2 diseases is the age of onset,
whereby X-linked hypophosphatemia typically manifests in the second year of life
(7). The predominant clinical presentation of TIO includes muscle weakness and
severe bone pain that is an unusual symptom for X-linked hypophosphatemia (7).
TIO may also present with or without bone deformities and pathological fractures
or pseudo-fractures.
These tumors are usually small and hence challenging to localize, with successful
localization achieved in only 61% of subjects utilizing a combination of functional
111
imaging including In-pentetreotide single-photon emission computer
tomography (Octreoscan-SPECT), fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission
18 68
tomography ( F FDG-PET/CT), and anatomical imaging (9). Ga-DOTATATE
PET/CT showed greater sensitivity and specificity in TIO localization when
18
compared to Octreoscan-SPECT/CT and F FDG-PET/CT (9).
The therapeutic modality of choice for TIO is surgical resection of the neoplasm. A
resection with wide margins is recommended to avoid persistent disease, local or
multifocal relapse, and/or distant metastasis when small amounts of residual
tissue remain (4). Therapeutic options for irresectable tumors include primary or
adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (4). Targeted therapy is based on the
expression of somatostatin receptors on PMTs. Octreotide and peptide receptor
177
radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Lu DOTATATE has been proposed, with a
variable but modest response (4). Alternative medical therapies utilized in FGF-
23–mediated renal phosphaturia include burosamab or cinacalcet (4). Burosumab
is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits FGF-23 (10). Data from an open
label phase 2 study, in patients with TIO, showed a significant increase in serum
phosphate from baseline, as well as an improvement in all measures of
osteomalacia at 48 weeks (10). Cinacalcet reduces renal phosphate wasting by
inducing a functional hypophosphatemia (4). Furthermore, vitamin D metabolites,
preferably calcitriol, and oral phosphate salts are recommended in those where the
tumor is not identified or irresectable (7).
A recent systematic review of 1725 TIO cases showed a male predominance, with
male patients also showing a higher incidence of fractures compared to women
(4). Almost 80% of TIOs were benign and a neoplasm was identified in 87% of
cases, with somatostatin receptor-based imaging modalities having the highest
sensitivity (4). The neoplasm is most frequently located in the lower limbs (53%
[femur, acetabulum, or feet]) and the head (30% [paranasal sinuses, maxilla, or
oral cavity]), with a preferential localization in the lower limbs seen in men,
compared to women predominantly localizing in the head (4, 9). The reason for
these site preferences is unknown, but sexual differentiation may be linked to
variations of expression of the FN1-FGFR1 fusion gene (4). Malignant TIO was
observed in 3.8% of patients and was associated with a higher risk of pseudo-
fractures, lower TmP/GFR, and higher calcium levels compared to non-malignant
TIO (4). Multifocal TIO occurred in only 6 patients and showed no biochemical or
clinical difference in presentation to unifocal TIO, except for a higher risk of
pseudo-fractures (4). Surgery was the therapeutic modality of choice (98.7%) in
patients with an identifiable tumor (4).
Case Resolution
Points to Remember
These tumors are usually benign and are typically small, thus proving a
diagnostic challenge.
Nonstandard Abbreviations
Human Genes
FN1-FGFR1
Author Contributions
All authors confirmed they have contributed to the intellectual content of this paper and
have met the following 4 requirements: (a) significant contributions to the conception
and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (b) drafting or
revising the article for intellectual content; (c) final approval of the published article;
and (d) agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the article thus ensuring that
questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the article are appropriately
investigated and resolved.
Upon manuscript submission, all authors completed the author disclosure form.
Disclosures and/or potential conflicts of interest:
Employment or Leadership
None declared.
F.J. Raal, fees for advisory board presentations on lipid-lowering therapy and
honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Regeneron, Novartis, and LIB
Therapeutics. No conflict of interest for the publication above.
Stock Ownership
None declared.
Honoraria
F.J. Raal, fees for lectures on lipid-lowering therapy and honoraria from Amgen,
Sanofi-Aventis, Regeneron, Novartis, and LIB Therapeutics. No conflict of interest
for the publication above.
Research Funding
None declared.
Expert Testimony
None declared.
Patents
None declared.
Other Remuneration
F.J. Raal, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, Sanofi-
Aventis, Regeneron, Novartis, and LIB Therapeutics.
References
1 Chakraborty PP, Bhattacharjee R, Mukhopadhyay S, Chowdhury S. ‘Rachitic rosary sign’ and ‘tie
sign’ of the sternum in tumour-induced osteomalacia. BMJ Case Rep 2016;2016:bcr2016214766.
Google Scholar WorldCat
2 Chong WH, Molinolo AA, Chen CC, Collins MT. Tumor-induced osteomalacia. Endocr Relat Cancer
2011;18:53–77.
Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
5 Dahir K, Zanchetta MB, Stanciu I, Robinson C, Lee JY, Dhaliwal R, et al. Diagnosis and
management of tumour-induced osteomalacia: perspectives from clinical experience. J Endocr
Soc 2021;5:bvab099.
Google Scholar Crossref PubMed WorldCat
6 Jonsson KB, Zahradnik R, Larsson T, White KE, Sugimoto T, Imanishi Y, et al. Fibroblast growth
factor 23 in oncogenic osteomalacia and X-linked hypophosphatemia. N Engl J Med
2003;348:1656–63.
Google Scholar Crossref PubMed WorldCat
8 Payne RB. Renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TmP/GFR): indications and interpretation.
Ann Clin Biochem 1998;35:201–6.
Google Scholar Crossref PubMed WorldCat
68
9 El-Maouche D, Sadowski SM, Papadakis GZ, Guthrie L, Cottle-Delisle C, Merkel R, et al. Ga-
DOTATATE for tumor localization in tumor-induced osteomalacia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2016;101:3575–81.
Google Scholar Crossref PubMed WorldCat
10 Jan de Beur SM, Miller PD, Weber TJ, Peacock M, Insogna K, Kumar R, et al. Burosumab for the
treatment of tumor-induced osteomalacia. J Bone Miner Res 2021;36:627–635.
Google Scholar Crossref PubMed WorldCat
Author notes
Previous Presentation: Portions of this manuscript were presented as a poster at the 52nd Society
of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa (SEMDSA) Congress, May 2017, in
Johannesburg, South Africa.
© American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-
mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard
Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
Advertisement
Online ISSN 1530-8561 Print ISSN 0009-9147 Copyright © 2023 American Association of Clinical Chemistry
About Oxford Academic Authoring Get help with access Oxford University Press Oxford University Press is a department
of the University of Oxford. It furthers
Publish journals with us Open access Accessibility News
the University's objective of excellence
University press partners Purchasing Contact us Oxford Languages in research, scholarship, and education
by publishing worldwide
What we publish Institutional account management Advertising University of Oxford
Oxford University Press uses cookies to
New features enhance
Rights your experience on our website. ByMedia
and permissions selecting ‘accept all’ you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings
enquiries
at any time. More information can be found in our Cookie Policy.