Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 7
refinement to achieve optimal results. The design and training of a neural network involve
careful consideration of various variables, such as the number of neurons, learning rate,
momentum, weight range, and the number of training steps. These variables are interdependent,
and any modifications can significantly impact the network's performance and accuracy.
different network configurations. The initial design consisted of 7 input neurons, 5 middle-layer
neurons, and 7 output neurons, including biases. The training settings were defined with a
learning rate of 0.3, momentum of 0.8, 5000 learning steps, and a weight range of -1 to 1.
However, this configuration yielded an average error rate of 0.8, which fell short of meeting the
For the second iteration, I decided to modify the network design by removing the biases.
Although this adjustment resulted in a slightly improved error rate, it still did not meet the
desired level of accuracy. This prompted me to explore alternative approaches that could
potentially yield higher accuracy within the minimum number of training steps.
In the third iteration, I maintained the previous training settings but increased the number of
middle-layer neurons to 10. This adjustment led to a significant improvement, with an error rate
of 0.6. The error graph exhibited a notable decrease with each additional training step, indicating
the potential for further accuracy enhancements. This improvement provided the motivation to
settings in an effort to optimize accuracy while maintaining the decreasing trend in the error
graph. The revised network design featured 7 input neurons, 10 middle-layer neurons, and 7
output neurons. The training settings were adjusted to include a learning rate of 5.0, momentum
of 0.2, 5000 learning steps, and a weight range of -1 to 1. This configuration resulted in an error
error graph trend than the previous iteration. Although I attempted further experimentation, no
significant improvements were achieved, leading me to conclude that this configuration was the
most effective. With confidence in the design, I decided to continue training the network for an
The additional training yielded remarkable results, with an error rate of 0.017443030540617112.
This achievement further solidified the effectiveness of the network design. Throughout this
iterative process, I gained valuable insights and lessons about the design and training of neural
networks.
One of the key lessons learned from this experience is the significance of the number of neurons
in achieving higher accuracy. Increasing the number of neurons, particularly in the middle layer,
often leads to improved performance. The added complexity and capacity for capturing intricate
patterns and relationships can contribute to enhanced accuracy. However, it is important to strike
a balance and avoid overfitting, where the network becomes overly specialized to the training
Moreover, the training settings, including the learning rate, momentum, weight range, and
number of learning steps, play a critical role in the convergence and performance of the network.
The learning rate determines the step size in weight adjustments during training, impacting the
speed and stability of convergence. A higher learning rate may result in faster convergence but
can also lead to overshooting and instability. On the other hand, a lower learning rate can ensure
stability but may slow down convergence. Similarly, the momentum parameter affects the impact
of previous weight adjustments on the current update, helping the network navigate through local
The weight range defines the initial range of weights assigned to the connections between
neurons. Setting an appropriate weight range is crucial for ensuring a balanced initialization of
the network and avoiding issues such as vanishing or exploding gradients. Lastly, the number of
learning steps determines the duration of the training process. Insufficient learning steps may
result in an undertrained network, while excessive learning steps can lead to overtraining and
poor generalization.
This iterative process of designing and training the neural network provided valuable insights
and lessons. It emphasized the importance of careful experimentation, fine-tuning, and attention
to detail throughout the process. While advanced algorithms and software tools play a significant
role in network development, hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the underlying
willingness to engage in extensive experimentation and refinement. Through the iterative process
of testing and evaluating four different network configurations, I gained valuable insights into
the significance of the number of neurons, training settings, and the iterative design process
itself. The final network configuration achieved an error rate close to zero, demonstrating the
The lessons learned from this experience extend beyond the specific project and serve as a
foundation for future endeavors. As technology advances and new challenges emerge, the ability
to design and train neural networks effectively becomes increasingly vital. With the ever-
growing volume of data and the need for intelligent decision-making systems, the optimization
References:
1. McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity.
Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/bf02478259
2. Haykin, S. (2009). Neural networks and learning machines (3rd ed.). Retrieved from
https://cours.etsmtl.ca/sys843/REFS/Books/ebook_Haykin09.pdf