mechanism which attacks the primal object for it's
goodness; This gives rise to the persecutory anxieties and a pushes the ego into an inherent sense of being incapable of holding goodness within and of the object. But in course of time, if this envy is worked through the intregration of objects and self (markedly ability to concieve and accept goodness and badness of the self in more integreted manner), i.e with progressive movements in depressive position; then there arises a sense of guilt for the projected destructiveness toward the object. And if this guilty is bore well by the ego, there's a corresponding reparation to the object and self. But pain of guilt is excruciating for the ego to deal with....and in an instance where the infant was still swinging between two positions and hasn't progressively moved from Depressive position then the guilt can cause splintering and disintegration of the ego. And each of these parts of ego also spiliting the object correspondingly, act as a persecutor. Such early forms of guilt could be resultant of the excessive envy product of the greed of the similar intensity. Excessive envy toward the feeding breast can disrupt the secure oral gratification. And as observed in infants the pleasure of being fed and suckling leads gentalia arousal, but at an instance where this oral gratification is disrupted, the process of feeding becomes sexualised and disintegrates from other aspects like security, goodness, love, ability to give and recieve; and such individuals are found to hold inclinations toward promiscuous and sexualised behaviours (which is a marker symptom in borderline personality disorder). It is indeed a part of the developmental process, in which oral, anal, genital stimulations overlap and are confused in phantasies but aggressive predominance of one (genital) over other (oral), as the oral desire is a precursor of growth, this can create a premise for pathological development.
At the sixth month of development, the 0edipal complex
sets in the psyche with sensory and mental development of being able to percieve the presence of rivalary objects (father). The unison of mother and father are symbolically represented as the amalgam of penis and breast. An envy which is worked through well with sufficient guilt experienced during the progressive depressive position then rather experiences jealously toward the rival object which is also intertwined with love. But an excessive envy which has disintegrated ego and object and become persecutory will hold an agressive phantasy based on the introjected and projected element of the mental life, that the perceiving penile object has further more contaminated the breast. Abraham mentions the oral desires (breast)are equated with penile. We can see that early unresolved excessive envy toward primal object continues in form of penis envy and the unison of both can be viewed as persecutory and destructive. A working through this looped and dimensional intertwining of 0edipal complex and envy can lead to a good enough latency and sublimation which conduced the process of learning (without confusion) and artistic endeavours in children.
In clinical picture, envy takes many forms ...and a
person who has reached the capacity of jealousy can descend down to envy as well. Observed in pts who are jealous of analyst's other engagement can reduce her down to not knowing anything.
We see through multiple examples that envy reflects in
pt's behaviour of interrupting the interpretation...acting out and incapacitating the thinking of the analyst, subtle dreams of sucking out some random pike etc etc etc...