This document discusses Jesus being invited to dine with Pharisees who were testing him. At the meal, Jesus healed a man with dropsy, knowing the Pharisees' thoughts. He then told a parable about humility and inviting the poor to meals. The Pharisees were prideful and exclusive in their social circles, failing to care for the poor like the Law and spirit of God intended. Their rejection of Jesus as Messiah led to disaster for Israel but opened salvation to all through his resurrection according to God's plan.
This document discusses Jesus being invited to dine with Pharisees who were testing him. At the meal, Jesus healed a man with dropsy, knowing the Pharisees' thoughts. He then told a parable about humility and inviting the poor to meals. The Pharisees were prideful and exclusive in their social circles, failing to care for the poor like the Law and spirit of God intended. Their rejection of Jesus as Messiah led to disaster for Israel but opened salvation to all through his resurrection according to God's plan.
This document discusses Jesus being invited to dine with Pharisees who were testing him. At the meal, Jesus healed a man with dropsy, knowing the Pharisees' thoughts. He then told a parable about humility and inviting the poor to meals. The Pharisees were prideful and exclusive in their social circles, failing to care for the poor like the Law and spirit of God intended. Their rejection of Jesus as Messiah led to disaster for Israel but opened salvation to all through his resurrection according to God's plan.
1 When you sit down to eat with a ruler, observe carefully what is before you, 2 and put a knife to your throat if you are given to appetite. 3 Do not desire his delicacies, for they are deceptive food.
Jesus was himself made the object of
such motives in Luke 14 when he was invited to dine with an unknown Pharisee ruler and his friends. The host did not love Jesus, and it is fairly certain that neither did his fellow Pharisees friends who shared the meal.
The occasion was the Sabbath day, and
they wanted to test Jesus to see whether he would defy their conventions and heal a man who had dropsy (the person might have oedema due to congestive heart failure.). From the beginning of the meal they were watching the Lord Jesus
Would he heal the man before such a
distinguished company of strict Sabbatarians, or not?
As usual, the Lord Jesus knew their
thoughts, and also as usual he threw them on the defensive. "Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath day?" he asked.
Unable to pronounce the good because
their hearts were evil; unable to speak the bad for very shame; they held their peace. So he healed the man with the dropsy, and let him go.
Not until he had left did Jesus continue
to address his hosts, and his restraint in this regard is worth noting.
When the formerly dropsical man had
left, the Lord Jesus turned to his learned hosts and reasoned with them. Which of them, he asked, if his son, or even his ox, fell down a well on the sabbath day, would not immediately draw him out, however much "work" was involved? They could not answer again to what Jesus had said.
They had invited the Lord Jesus so that
they might watch him. The couches upon which the guests reclined at meals were arranged so to form three sides of a square, the fourth being left open, to allow the servants to bring in the dishes. The "highest place" on the highest couch, was, thus, the "chief place"; and human nature, the same in all ages, inevitably made it eagerly coveted, and then the next highest seat was marked by its nearness to the highest, usually the host’s place.
There was no little scheming among
the Rabbis for the best position, and much anxiety on the part of the host not to give offence; by placing lower standing guests above others of higher standing.
The Lord Jesus had watched the antics
of these men of social status, as they sought for themselves the chief places at the meal, and so he told them a parable.
When they were bidden to a marriage
feast (where no doubt the place-seeking would be even more hectic) they should not recline in the chief place, lest someone of higher standing should come along, and the host ask them to take a lower place to make room for the honoured guest. in this way, they would be humiliated before all. If, however, when they were bidden they sat in the lowest place, the host might say to them, "Go up higher", and then they would be honoured in the presence of all the guests. "
Lk 14:11For all those who exalt themselves will be humbled,
and those who humble themselves will be exalted.”
The pride of these men lay, however,
not solely in their constant efforts at self-exaltation, but in their mutual exclusiveness from the rest of society. To them, the masses (the great unwashed) of the people, who, because they had to labour by honest sweat, could not spend their time on the endless rites needed to avoid "defilement", were a world apart. The labourer in the fields had no where to wash his hands before he ate, and if he had, would not have known the elaborate Rabbinical procedure for doing it. He was, therefore, no fit company for these Rabbis, who would have themselves become "defiled" by contact with him.
So the Scribes and Pharisees lived out
their lives moving in their own narrow circles; tier upon tier of exclusive "sets" in an exclusive society. The true principle that makes all men equal before God had been submerged beneath a man-made code that pandered to their pride and intellectual conceit, and worked only towards their own social advancement. According to Geikie, "It was an old custom in Israel to invite the poorer neighbours to the special meals on the consecrated flesh of offerings not used at the altar, and on similar half-religious occasions, to brighten their poverty for the moment by kindly hospitality. This beautiful usage was, in the time of Jesus, a thing of the past, for the priest or Rabbi of his day would have trembled at the thought of being defiled by contact with people whose position made it impossible to be as scrupulous in the observance of the endless legal injunctions demanded, as themselves". We who have lived most of our lives in an affluent society can, despite the corona, barely appreciate the plight of the poor in Christ's day. Like masses of the population in India today, they scarcely knew where their next meal was to come from. Nor was their condition temporary. There was no Welfare State, and there were few social services such as we know. The only hope of the poor for relief from their misery was the loving kindness of their fellowmen-a loving kindness which, if the Law of Moses had been obeyed in the spirit, would have been evidenced on every hand.
The supreme condemnation of these
Rabbis, therefore, was that they had taken this Law, which was good, and had turned it to their own ends. Whilst affecting to model their lives upon it, they had, in fact, denied it. They obeyed it in the letter-and went far beyond it by adding many more letters of their own-but, as for the spirit of loving their neighbour as themselves, they were complete and utter failures. They affected to love God, when indeed, they loved only themselves. For suffering humanity, such as the poor dropsical man who had so lately stood before them, they had no eye to pity. All they were concerned with was that their intellectual prowess should be recognised, and their social status advanced. One even suspects that they fed like leeches upon the life- blood of the nation, and sucked up much of the wealth that should have goneto the poor. Certainly, by their endless concern over the minor matters of the law, and the time they spent on ritual observances, they must have been parasites, for they could never have worked as other men. The parable of the Wedding Feast, the Lord Jesus had uttered to all. Now, he addressed himself to the host, and said, "When thou makest a dinner or a supper call not thy friends, nor thy brethren, neither thy kinsmen, nor rich neighbours; lest they also bid thee again, and a recompense be made thee. But when thou makest a feast bid the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind: and thou shalt be blessed for they cannot recompense thee; and thou shalt be recompensed in the resur rection of the just". One can imagine the host blushing, either with humiliation, or with rage, at this latest injunction. He knew full well how exclusive he was in his invitations to those who dined with him. The poor and the socially inferior might, after the custom of the east, look in at his august gathering, but never join it. Their gaze of hunger was ignored; their gaze of respect was part of the adulation due to those superior to them. The poor were part of the "accursed" who knew not the Law. They had nothing whatever to offer these Rabbis except respect, and that would certainly not have been heightened by closer contact. So they were left outside, and the spring of love was choked at its source with pride.
"If ye do good to them that do good to
you, what thank have ye?" How easy it is to do good among ourselves-with those who are our kith and kin, or our social equals, or those we know can help us in return. How hard indeed to love our neighbour as ourselves! We can be thankful that our association together at the Memorial Feast of our Lord, week by week, teaches us not to think more highly of ourselves than we ought to think, and brings us into close contact with brethren and sisters who, but for the grace of God in calling us, we would never have met.
Our meetings are, or should be,
classless, and they should help us, when we go outside into the highways and the byways of life, to offer the same kind of service, and be motivated by the same kind of love, as our Lord.
The Scribes and Pharisees are remote
from us, both in time and circumstance. We trust their attitude of mind is also remote; nevertheless, we do well to be on our guard against it. The fashions of self-advancement and self exaltation may change with the set-up of the society in which we live, but the human heart remains the same.
The Lord Jesus pronounced his
judgement upon the ways of the Scribes and Pharisees during his pilgrimage.
An inclusive world is promised.
Israel's failure to live according to their Law matched their rejection of him in whom it was fulfilled. In spirit they rejected their God. In fact they rejected their Messiah :
"He came to his own and his own
received him not".
Disobedience was followed by disaster
which overtook the nation in AD 70 from which only in recent times have they really begun to recover.
Israel's rejection of Messiah culminated
in his death. But such is the wisdom of God that in the outworking of His plan even this was according to His foreknowledge and counsel.
The Son was obedient to the Father in
all points. He was made perfect through suffering, and he was raised from the dead. His resurrection was due to the fact that his was a sinless life.
Death is for those who are conquered
by sin: here was one who conquered sin; therefore the grave could not hold him. With his resurrection the way was opened for the blessings of the promise to Abraham to come, and the plan of God to fill the earth with His glory
But the "times of the Gentiles" have
been running their course and are to be followed by "times of refreshing" for Israel: these will come only when the Lord returns from heaven. The kingdom of Israel will then be restored, Jerusalem will become the "throne of the Lord", and from this God- appointed capital will go forth laws which will be operative throughout the whole world. During this millennium— for this is what God has planned—all peoples (Jews and Gentiles) will taste the fruits of the promise to Abraham that in him and his seed all families are to be blessed.
In God's wisdom, a wonderful
opportunity was presented to the Gentiles when Israel rejected the Word of God.
God's plan is on a large scale, covering
the whole world. But while it is moving inexorably to its climax a very significant development is taking place within it—some Jews and Gentiles are being prepared for special responsibilities.