Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/322088152
CITATIONS READS
5 286
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Vignesh R on 17 August 2018.
Original Article
Abstract R Vignesh,
Objective: To assess the correlation between different cheiloscopic patterns with the terminal C Vishnu Rekha,
planes in deciduous dentition. Materials and Methods: Three hundred children who are 3–6 years Sankar Annamalai,
old with complete primary dentition were recruited, and the pattern of molar terminal plane was
recorded in the pro forma. Lip prints of these children were recorded with lipstick‑cellophane Parisa Norouzi,
method, and the middle 10 mm of lower lip was analyzed for the lip print pattern as suggested Ditto Sharmin
by Sivapathasundharam et al. The pattern was classified based on Tsuchihashi and Suzuki Department of Pediatric and
classification. Results: Type II (branched) pattern was the most predominant cheiloscopic pattern. Preventive Dentistry, Meenakshi
The predominant patterns which related to the terminal planes were as follows: Type IV (reticular) Ammal Dental College and
Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu,
and Type V (irregular) pattern for mesial step, Type IV (reticular) pattern for distal step, and
India
Type I (complete vertical) pattern for flush terminal plane. No significant relationship was obtained
on gender comparison. Conclusion: Lip prints can provide an alternative to dermatoglyphics to
predict the terminal plane in primary dentition. Further studies with larger sample size are required
to provide an insight into its significant correlations.
Under each terminal plane, 100 children were taken so as predominant cheiloscopic pattern which was equally
to standardize the number of children under each group; distributed among children with primary dentition.
thereby, the results can be closely related to the patterns An increase in Type IV (reticular) and Type V (irregular)
obtained. patterns was seen in children with mesial step. Type IV
(reticular) pattern was seen in higher frequency in
Lip print was recorded using the lipstick-cellophane
distal step. Among children with flush terminal plane,
technique as proposed by Sivapathasundaram et al.[8] which
Type I (complete vertical) pattern was predominantly
provides good clarity and accuracy.[9] Matte finish lipstick
seen [Table 1]. There was no statistically significant
was applied with disposable cotton buds as suggested by
relationship seen in all three molar patterns when
Amith et al.[10] Children were asked to rub their lips gently
compared with the cheiloscopic patterns (P = 0.345). On
against one another and then to keep their lips in rest
comparing between genders, no statistically significant
position. The glue part of the cellophane sheet is placed relationship was noted [Table 2].
over the lips. After few seconds, the cellophane sheet
with lip print was carefully removed and was stuck onto a Discussion
bonded white paper [Figure 1]. Lip print was checked for
clarity, and if any smudging of the print was noticed, the Every human is distinct and unique in the pattern of
procedure was repeated once again. Children were asked to characteristics they exhibit. Lip prints are lines and
wipe off the remnant lipstick using wet tissue paper. fissures that appear as wrinkles and grooves in the zone
of transition between the inner labial mucosa and the outer
The collected lip prints were analyzed using a magnifying skin of human lip. The examination of these fissures is
glass by a forensic specialist who was not involved in the referred to as “cheiloscopy.”[8,12] Although its existence
collection of prints and also was not disclosed about the was noticed as early as 1902, its importance did not reach
terminal planes, thereby blinded from the data obtained. the researchers until it was found in a scene of murder.
The analyst read the lip prints based on the classification
given by Suzuki and Tsuchihashi in 1971.[11] Table 1: Cheiloscopic distribution in primary dentition
• Type I: Clear‑cut vertical grooves that run across the Cheiloscopic Mesial Distal step, Flush terminal P
entire lips pattern step, n (%) n (%) plane, n (%)
• Type I’: Similar to Type I, but do not cover the entire I 8 (8.0) 10 (10.0) 15 (15.0) 0.345
lip I’ 1 (1.0) 2 (2.0) 2 (2.0)
• Type II: Branched grooves II 67 (67.0) 69 (69.0) 66 (66.0)
• Type III: Intersected grooves III 1 (1.0) 3 (3.0) 0
• Type IV: Reticular grooves IV 14 (14.0) 14 (14.0) 11 (11.0)
• Type V: Grooves do not fall into any of the V 9 (9.0) 2 (2.0) 6 (6.0)
types, i.e., Type I–IV, and cannot be differentiated
morphologically.
Table 2: Gender comparison on distribution of
The middle part of the lower lip (10‑mm wide) was taken as cheiloscopic pattern in primary dentition
the study area, similar to the study by Sivapathasundharam Molar Pattern Gender P
et al.[8] Lip print pattern was determined by counting the Male, n (%) Female, n (%)
highest number of patterns in the above‑mentioned region. Mesial step I 6 (15.4) 2 (3.3) 0.311
Statistical analysis I’ 0 1 (1.6)
II 25 (64.1) 42 (68.9)
The data values were tabulated and subjected to statistical III 0 1 (1.6)
analysis. For comparison of proportions between all the IV 5 (12.8) 9 (14.8)
groups and also between genders, Chi‑square test was V 3 (7.7) 6 (9.8)
applied. Fisher’s exact test was used when any expected Distal step I 7 (15.6) 3 (5.5) 0.168
cell frequency <5 was obtained. SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS I’ 0 2 (3.6)
Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the data. II 28 (62.2) 41 (74.5)
A P < 0.05 is considered as statistically significant. III 2 (4.4) 1 (1.8)
IV 6 (13.3) 8 (14.5)
Results V 2 (4.4) 0
The mean age of the children was 4.99 ± 0.67 years. Flush terminal I 12 (21.1) 3 (7.0) 0.191
For the children having mesial step, 61% were females plane I’ 1 (1.8) 1 (2.3)
and 39% were males. Among the children having distal II 36 (63.2) 30 (69.8)
step, 55% were females and 45% were males. In children III 0 0
having flush terminal plane, 43% were females and IV 4 (7.0) 7 (16.3)
57% were males. Type II (branched) pattern is the most V 4 (7.0) 2 (4.7)
8. Sivapathasundharam B, Prakash PA, Sivakumar G. Lip 12. Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathod V. Cheiloscopy; the study of lip
prints (cheiloscopy). Indian J Dent Res 2001;12:234‑7. prints in sex identification. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:24‑7.
9. Verghese AJ, Vidyullatha VS, Shashidhar CM. A comparison of 13. Foster TD, Grundy MC. Occlusal changes from primary to
the methods for the recording of lip prints. Medicoleg Update Int permanent dentitions. Br J Orthod 1986;13:187‑93.
J 2010;10:62-3. 14. Onyeaso CO, Isiekwe MC. Occlusal changes from primary to
10. Amith HV, Anil V Ankola, Nagesh L. Lip prints – Can it aid mixed dentitions in Nigerian children. Angle Orthod 2008;78:64‑9.
in individual identification. J Oral Health Community Dent 15. Madhusudan K, Patel HP, Umesh K, Chavan S, Patel R, Patel R,
2011;5:113‑8. et al. Relationship between dermatoglyphics, cheiloscopy, and
11. Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. A new attempt of personal identification dental caries among dental students of Visnagar town, Gujarat.
by means of lip print. Can Soc Forensic Sci J 1971;4:154-8. Int J Adv Res 2015;3:952‑9.