Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • T02 Q2 Solution

    Uploaded by

    hassan saleh
    4 views7 pages

    Original Title

    T02_Q2_solution

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views7 pages

    T02 Q2 Solution

    Uploaded by

    hassan saleh

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 7
    QL. True and False 3 Niederlinski index can be used to eliminate unfeasible pairings of variables at an early stage in the design. ‘The use of the RGA to decide what control structure is best (i.e. choice of manipulated variable and controlled variables), is not in fact effective. - Niederlinski index is a necessary and sufficient condition for 2x2 system but only necessary condition for 4x4 Niederlinski index applies only when integral action is used in all loops and the setting of the controllers do have to be known. For more than 2x2, if Nieder index is negative, the system will be unstable for any controller settings and when it is positive, the system may or may not be stable and further analysis is necessary. For 3x3 system with P=4 and M2, the dimension of the dynamic mattix S is 12x9 For unconstrained MPC, K, can be evaluated offline (_) In MPC/DMC applications, although Mf control moves are calculated, only the first move is implemented (_) MPC/DMC consists of 4 main elements: 1) reference trajectory toward the set-point, 2) process output prediction, control action sequence computation, error prediction update( ) . Not all processes require MPC/DMC for effective performance, and only processes with constrained, multivariable control problems involving difficult dynamics has benefited the most of it(_) Qu ‘The following transfer function matrix has been identified for a distillation column. 12.8e* —-18,9e* Gy=] 162051 21 0c) 10.9541 14.48+1 %) {@) For 1-1/2-2 loop paring, simulate the closed-loop system response to step change of 0.75 in the yy set-point (no set-point change is desired in y,) Use Ky = 047, 5 =3.26; K., =—0.088 , 1), =9.35 Y/) Ab) Design « steady-state de-coupler; simulate the closed-loop system response to a step change of 0.75 in the y; set-point (no set-point change is desired in y:.) Use K = 0.30, Wt), = 0.307; K,,=—0.05, 1/ty=0.107 ?) Design a dynamic de-coupler; simulate the closed-loop system response to a step change of 0.75 in the y; set-point (no set-point change is desired in y,,) Use K = 0.30, W/), = 0.307; K,=-0.05,, I/ty, =0.107 (4) Suppose that the ‘real process’ is: Ise" -25e** =| 15s] 16s+1 Go)=| Wea! Meet 9s+1 12541 Implement on this real process the same dynamic de-couplers used in part (c), along with the same set of two-single loop controllers; compare the response to the same set-point change in ¥y1 with that obtained in part (c). Comment on the effect of plan/model mismatch on the performance of this set of dynamic de-couplers. Q Exted Bonus/ Simulate part (b) for the ease 0

    You might also like