Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/339596015
CITATIONS READS
2 5,008
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Yesh Sharma on 16 June 2020.
Figure 1
REFERENCES
[1] Asmussen, DDS. Adhesion of restorative resin to dentin,
chemical and physicochemical aspects. Supplement 5, 68-74,
1992. International Symposium on Adhesive Dentistry.
[2] Bales David, 1987“Posterior composite resin restoration; a
restorative technique” Quintessence international 17; 777-784
[3] Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP;“A 5 year and 8 year
clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin”Quintessence
international 22; 143-151. 1991
[4] Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO“Protection Hypothesis for
composite wear.”Dent. Mater. 8; 305- 309; 1992
[5] Bertolti, R.L., DDS, Ph.D. Conditioning of Dentin Substrate.
I.S. on adhesive in Dentistry, Sup 5, 1992, 13-136.
Nanocluster [6] Bott Burkard, Harming Matthias, 1995.“Optimising Class II
composite resin esthetic restoration by use of ceramic
inserts”Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, 7(3); 110-117.
[7] Bowen RL, Eichmiller FC, Marjenhoff WA, Rupp
NW.“Adhesive bonding of composites”J. Am. Coll. Dent 56;
10, 1989.
[8] Bowen, R.L. DDs, W.A. Marjentoft, Ph.D. Development of an
adhesive bonding system. International symposium on
adhesives in dentistry. Supplement 5, 1992, 75-80.
Figure 2
Advantages:
Superior translucency and esthetic appeal, excellent
colour, high polish and polish retention.
Superior hardness, flexural strength and modulus
of elasticity.