Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In Cold Blood Question: To what effect does Capote use narrative viewpoint in the novel?
Intro:
Narrators often prioritise the use of certain narrative perspectives in order to manipulate how
the readers perceive the story. Crafting two narratives into a story adds complexity into the
events presented by characters, which may be told objectively or subjectively. This
conjunction of two perspectives is seen in Capote’s non-fiction novel, In Cold Blood. The
story recounts the murder of the Clutter family within Holcomb, Kansas, and the subsequent
effect it had on the community. The lives of the two murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry
Smith, are recounted in an equally detailed way to factually present both the stories of the
victims and the killers. Capote interchangeably utilises two narrative viewpoints to a great
effect, in order to separate the pieces of text that require the most emotional immediacy,
whilst structuring his narrative in the form of a factual, yet dramatic novel. This is evident by
the use of third person perspective during the summarised description of how the deaths of
the Clutter family affected the community, and the use of first person during Perry’s recount
of his life from childhood to present.
When hinting at the suspicion that arose in the Holcomb community after the murder, Capote
positions the audience as outsiders through a third person perspective, which is used to
emphasise the emotional impact it had on the characters. Although the Holcomb community
was indirectly affected by the murder, they were ironically united by their shared fear, and
separated by mistrust. Using a third person narrative is effective to reveal the actions that
the community took to stay safe in Holcomb, as they hurriedly ‘locked their doors’ after the
murders. The audience learns of the fragile loyalty and friendship between neighbours, as
Holcomb neighbours began to exchange ‘stimulated fires of mistrust’ at each other. This
dramatisation exhibits how quickly the community members had turned their backs towards
one another, as they all assumed that the murderer was a Holcomb resident. Being placed in
a spectator’s perspective helped the readers realise that the Holcomb community do not
know each other as well as they thought, which is why they viewed each other ‘strangely,
and as strangers’. Hence, a summarised viewpoint of how the community reacted to the
Clutter murder as a sign of caution was more effectively portrayed through a third person
perspective.
Conclusion:
Throughout the novel, Capote alternates between a first and third person narrative
viewpoint, in order to integrate both fact and fiction to craft a nonfiction novel. His omniscient
access to both wide-scale and personal perspectives can respectively inform the readers,
and lead them to sympathise with characters, further creating an immersive reading
experience.
Feedback: good!