https://fanyi.youdao.

com/download

Research Article

1-21

National :
2022 :sagepub.com/
journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/
03611981221134630 journals.sagepub.
com/home/trr

Vishal C. Kummetha1 Alexandra Kondyli2

(IDM)

( )
IDM ( )
( )
IDM 90
IDM
IDM
/

( )

(IDM) 1
Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR), University of South Florida,
IDM Tampa, FL
2
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering,
University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS

Corresponding Author: Vishal C. Kummetha,

kummetha@usf.edu
2 Transportation Research Record 00(0)

/
(EL) (MW) (8,9) IDM
(SA) (
) IDM ( )
IDM (8-11)
( )

an(t) t ;amax
;
1953 Pipes v0(t) ( );
1958 - vn(t) t ;
Gazis-Herman-Rothery (GHR) (1) Dvn(t) t ;
GHR s*n(t) ;
(1)
S0 ;
L-L
sn(t) ;
Newell
bcomf ;
(2,3)
Tn ;
D
Hoogendoorn (13) Fuller(12) -
(TCI)

Wiedemann 74
Wiedemann 99 Fritzsche (1,4 - 6) (13)
(
( ) Brookhuis Waard(14)
) u
(1) Boer(1999) MW SA

IDM (13)
(7)

(15) Manjunatha (15)

Hoogendoorn (13) IDM Hoogendoorn (13) MW
1 SA 40
Kummetha and Kondyli 3

:EL = ;MW = ;SA =

NASA( )
(NASA- tlx) (SAGAT) (
)
(15) (18-
Saifuzzaman (16) 20) 1
TCI Gipps IDM(16)
IDM IDM (TDIDM)

TDIDM
(16)
( )
1
TCI EL MW SA
(16,17)

Hoogendoorn (13)
IDM Hoogendoorn (13)

IDM
(26)
Hoogendoorn (13) / ( EL)

(15) /
(23,27 - 29)
( MW
SA EL) a
IDM 2 TCI
4 Transportation Research Record 00(0)

(18,19)

a
2

EL
MW SA 2

Facebook

50

1 90 ( =
:IDM = ;TCI = ;TR = 31.4 (SD) = 14.2 =
64 = 18 ) 3

50 65

( )
:
(
)
18 - 65 ;
; 1
a
;
IDM (b-IDM) MW SA EL
1000 ;
(
/
)

Acura MDX
170
Kummetha and Kondyli 5

:EL = ;MW = ;NASA- tlx = NASA( ) ;SA =

: SD( )

2 :(a) (b)

2
2
4

(EEG)

10
6 Transportation Research Record 00(0)

:pc/km/ln = (LOS) a F

30
(26)
9 0 8 3c
8 6
112.7 / (70 / )

1 2 4
3
5 6 (m/s)
(N) x y z (m)
(NADS) (SDLP) (m)
(30) (m/s) x y z (m) (s)
(m) (m/s2) (m/s3) 60 Hz
NASA-TLX
(SART)
1
/ Fovio FX3 (31)
6.4km (4 mi) 3

4 5 6 3 60 Hz
6 10
Windows MW SA
20 (ICA) 15 MW
5 (32) ICA
MW
Kummetha and Kondyli 7

3 (26) :(a) 1 2 (b) 3 (c) 4 5 6

252 (84
- 33 6
) ( r
SA ) 5(34)
5 4 1 2
( ) 14.4% 15.2%
(MLE)
SA ( ) 1 2 SA
/ (35) (pdf)
0
( 1 SA (1 SA 0 )
) (33)
(EEG) EL
-
Enobio 8 500 Hz
( Box-Cox
EEG(36) Pope (23)
) Minitab 19
10 ~ 20 8 EEG
:P3 PZ P4 CZ T7 T8 O1 FZ
common
8 Transportation Research Record 00(0)

:MLE =

4 :(a) (PDF) (b) PDF

(CMS) (DRL)
(36) EL Pope (23) Prinzel 40 Hz
(29) b/(a + u) (4-8 Hz) (8-13 Hz) 2 s epoch 5%
(13-22 Hz)(23,29) EEGLAB Darbeliai 2s
EEG EL (FFT) (PSD)
MATLAB Visual Basic PZ CZ P3 P4 b/(a + u) 10 s
(VBA) PSD EL
EEG 10
20 10s H10
20 EL MATLAB 1Hz (HR) HR MW
EEGLAB v14.1.1 (37) MATLAB MW (27,38,
Neuroelectrics (.easy) 39) 5
EEGLAB (.set) HR
EEG 500 Hz 240 Hz
HR 0 1
1.6 Hz 60 Hz
Kummetha and Kondyli 9

MW MW IDM (b-IDM) IDM

MW( NASA-TLX) SA(10

SART)
1 0.
05
Windows
(ANOVA) 6
1208

NASA-TLX SART
MW SA
6 1 2 NASA-TLX
5 SART ( 1)
10 Hz 3 4 5 6
NASA-TLX 4 5
6 SART
2 3 SART

MW SA

2 6
IDM
3 (F[1,82] = 7.168, p = 0.009 h2P= 0.080,1 -
b = 0.754) 5 (F[1,82] = 8.186, p = 0.005 h2P= 0.
091,1 - b = 0.807)

5 6
( = 227.28 m, p \ 0.001)
6
SDLP
4,5 6
SDLP

SDLP

(40-45) 6
SDLP

HR
5
:EEG = ;HR = ;NASA-TLX = ;
SART ;ICA = ;SA = ;EL = ;MW =
10 Transportation Research Record 00(0)

:SD = ;Sig. = ;Na = ;NASA-TLX = ;SART ;SDLP =

*
Sig.\0.05 ** \0 0.01

HR (r = 0.019, p \ 0.001)
ICA MW
(r = 0.022, p \ 0.001) SDLP
(r = 20.124, p \ 0.001)
EL
(r = 20.001, p = 0.372) 7 3

SDLP HR
ica MW

6 MW SA ( - 2se)
:MW = ;SA = ;SE = ;NASA- tlx = NASA(
) ;SART =
Kummetha and Kondyli 11

8 (46)
:min = ;Abs = ;Max =

7 B
A

A
B

7 3 :(a) (b) SDLP (c)

HR (d) EL (e) MW ICA (f) VIDM
6
:SDLP = ;HR = ;EL = ;MW = ;ICA =
;BPM = ;MW_ICA_left = MW ICA 5
5
( )(9)
(m/s)
(m/s3) (s) 9
64km/h 90 10
80 4 70%
6

K-means IDM IDM

K-means b-IDM IDM IDM
0.001 IDM( 1)
A 36 B 44 b-IDM( 2)
8 ( :F[1,78] = 27. a IDM( 1)
187, p \ 0.001; :F[1,78] = 164.415, p \ 0.
001; :F[1,78] = 17.456, p \ 0.001)
12 Transportation Research Record 00(0)

:SD = ;Sig . = ;Na = ;SDLP = ;NASA- tlx = NASA( ) ;SART =

8 A B IDM

(NRMSE) NRMSE 10%

IDM (A B)
IDM b-IDM IDM
75/25 A 36
27 9
B 44 33
11 IDM

IDM 8
IDM

B-IDM Group IDM 9 b- :IDM =

IDM IDM v0(t) amax IDM a

bmax Tn 7 SD
B-IDM (ANCOVA)
IDM 9 (
)
VBA
a 2
Kummetha and Kondyli 13

0\a 1 a 1( EL SA (1 = 0=
1 0.62%) )
ICA MW HR MW
(MW_HR) HR EL 95%
b-IDM
14 Transportation Research Record 00(0)

r 0.
17 r

(47-49)
(
) /

(8,15,47,50) (1-b)
SA MW_HR (0.0.8)
EL a
10
B 4

9 B-IDM Group IDM

A
r 0.205 B a
SA EL
(0.0.8) A MW_HR
a
:(b-)IDM =( )
0:0344
e
10 11
3.44% A
A 3 11 A b

10 A

:SS = ;MS = ;Sig . = ;Na = ;Ln = ;EL = ;SA = ;MW_HR = R = 0.412;r = 0.170;
r = 0.170; = 0.0757
Kummetha and Kondyli 15

11 B

:SS = ;MS = ;Sig . = ;Na = ;Ln = ;EL = ;SA = ;MW_HR = R = 0.452;r = 0.205;
r = 0.205; =
0.073.

12 IDM

B-IDM 12 13 14
12 13 b-IDM b-IDM
b-
IDM a 7
IDM IDM

IDM
5 6 NRMSE
(MAPE) m0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5

B-IDM b-IDM
( )

( )
IDM
Y ( b-IDM
);
^yt t ;
yt t ;
N (0.1 s ); (18-20)
(
ymax yt t=1 t=n ;
)
ymin yt t=1 t=n a.
b-IDM
16 Transportation Research Record 00(0)

11
:EL = ;r = Pearson rs= Spearman ;SA = ;MW_HR = ; v(t) =

IDM

a( 0 1 ) IDM (b-IDM)
( -
) (TCI) MW SA EL
NASA-TLX
SART
MW SA
Kummetha and Kondyli 17

12 A :(A) IDM (b) b-IDM :(b-)IDM =( )

13 B :(a) IDM (B) b-IDM :(b-)IDM =( )

(Lead v[t]) r
b-IDM a
: HR (MW_HR) MW EL (EL)
SA (SA) (distraction)
18 Transportation Research Record 00(0)

12 %NRMSE MAPE

:NRMSE = ;MAPE = ;IDM = ;(b-)IDM =( )

14 :(a) NRMSE % (b) MAPE

:avg = ;NRMSE = ;MAPE = ;(b-)IDM =( )

(51,52)

IDM
HR ( ) /
Kummetha and Kondyli 19

( Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 48, 2014, pp.

379 403.
)
2. Laval, J. A., and L. Leclercq. A Mechanism to Describe the
Formation and Propagation of Stop-and-Go Waves in
Congested Freeway Traffic. Philosophical Transactions of
the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical,
Physical, and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 368, No. 1928,
(MATC) 2010, pp. 4519 4541.
Evangelia 3. Chen, D., J. Laval, Z. Zheng, and S. Ahn. A Behavioral Car-
Chrysikou Hannes Devos Following Model That Captures Traffic Oscillations.
Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 46,
No. 6, 2012, pp. 744 761.
4. Olstam, J. J., and A. Tapani. Comparison of Car-Following
Models, Vol. 960. Swedish National Road and Transport
Research Institute, Linko ping, Sweden, 2004.
5. Schulze, T., and T. Fliess. Urban Traffic Simulation with
Psycho-Physical Vehicle-Following Models. IEEE Com-
puter Society, New York, NY, 1997.
: :Vishal C.
Kummetha, Alexandra Kondyli; :Vishal C. 6. Wiedemann, R. Simulation Des StraBenverkehrsflusses.
Institut fur Verkehrswesen, University of Karlsruhe, Ger-
Kummetha; :Vishal C. Kummetha, Alexandra many, 1974.
Kondyli; :Vishal C. Kummetha 7. Boer, E. R. Car following from the driver s perspective.
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and
Behaviour, Vol. 2, 1999. pp. 201 206.
8. Treiber, M., and A. Kesting. Microscopic Calibration and
Validation of Car-Following Models A Systematic
Approach. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.
80, 2013, pp. 922 939.
/ 9. Treiber, M., and A. Kesting. Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data,
Models and Simulation. Springer, Heidelberg; New York,
2013.
10. Treiber, M., A. Kesting, and D. Helbing. Delays, Inaccura-
cies and Anticipation in Microscopic Traffic Models. Phy-
sica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol.
360, No. 1, 2006, pp. 71 88.
/ 11. Kesting, A., M. Treiber, and D. Helbing. Enhanced Intelli-
: (MATC) gent Driver Model to Access the Impact of Driving Strate-
69A3551747107 gies on Traffic Capacity. Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering
Sciences, Vol. 368, No. 1928, 2010, pp. 4585 4605.
12. Fuller, R. Towards a General Theory of Driver Behaviour.
ORCID id Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2005, pp.
461 472.
Vishal C. Kummetha https://orcid. org/0000-0001-9464- 13. Hoogendoorn, R., B. van Arem, S. Hoogendoorn, and K.
6838Alexandra Kondyli https://orcid. org/0000-0002-3462- Brookhuis. Applying the Task-Capability-Interface Model
to the Intelligent Driver Model in Relation to Complexity.
0000 Presented at Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual
Meeting, Washington, DC, 2013.

/ 14. Brookhuis, K. , and D. Waard. Assessment of Drivers

Workload: Performance, Subjective and Physiological
/ Indices. In Stress, Workload and Fatigue (P. Hancock, and
P. Desmond, eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mah-
wah, NJ, 2001, pp. 321 333.
15. Manjunatha, P. , V. C. Kummetha, A. Kondyli, and L.
Elefteriadou. Validating the Task-Capability Extension to
the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) Using Driving Simula-
tor Data. Presented at 98th Annual Meeting of the Trans-
1. Saifuzzaman, M. , and Z. Zheng. Incorporating Human- portation Research Board,Washington, DC, 2019.
Factors in Car-Following Models: A Review of Recent
Developments and Research Needs. Transportation
20
16. Saifuzzaman, M., Z. Zheng, M. Mazharul Haque, and S.
Washington. Revisiting the Task Capability Interface
Model for Incorporating Human Factors into Car-Follow-ing
Models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodologi-cal,
Vol. 82, 2015, pp. 1 19.
17. Saifuzzaman, M. , Z. Zheng, M. M. Haque, and S.
Washington. Understanding the Mechanism of Traffic
Hysteresis and Traffic Oscillations through the Change in
Task Difficulty Level. Transportation Research Part B:
Methodological, Vol. 105, 2017, pp. 523 538.
18. Murphey, Y. L., R. Milton, and L. Kiliaris. Driver s Style
Classification Using Jerk Analysis. IEEE Workshop on
Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Vehicular Sys-
tems, Nashville, TN, 2009.
19. Feng, F., S. Bao, J. R. Sayer, C. Flannagan, M. Manser,
and R. Wunderlich. Can Vehicle Longitudinal Jerk Be Used
to Identify Aggressive Drivers? An Examination Using
Naturalistic Driving Data. Accident Analysis & Pre-vention,
Vol. 104, 2017, pp. 125 136.
20. Kondyli, A., and L. Elefteriadou. Modeling Driver Beha-
vior at Freeway Ramp Merges. Transportation Research
Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011.
2249: 29 37.
21. Kahneman, D. Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Engle-
wood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.
22. Mosaly, P. R., L. M. Mazur, F. Yu, H. Guo, M. Derek, D.
H. Laidlaw, C. Moore, L. B. Marks, and J. Mostafa. Relating
Task Demand, Mental Effort and Task Difficulty with
Physicians Performance during Interactions with
Electronic Health Records (EHRs). International Journal of
Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2018, pp. 467
475.
23. Pope, A. T., E. H. Bogart, and D. S. Bartolome. Biocyber-
netic System Evaluates Indices of Operator Engagement in
Automated Task. Biological Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 1,
1995, pp. 187 195.
24. Brookhuis, K. A. , G. de Vries, and D. de Waard. The
Effects of Mobile Telephoning on Driving Performance.
Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1991, pp.
309 316.
25. Endsley, M. R. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in
Dynamic Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 37, No. 1,
1995, pp. 32 64.
26. Kummetha, V. C., A. Kondyli, E. G. Chrysikou, and S. D.
Schrock. Safety Analysis of Work Zone Complexity with
Respect to Driver Characteristics A Simulator Study
Employing Performance and Gaze Measures. Accident
Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 142, 2020, p. 105566.
27. de Waard, D., and K. A. Brookhuis. Assessing Driver Sta-
tus: A Demonstration Experiment on the Road. Accident
Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1991, pp. 297 307.
28. Tampere, C. M. J., S. P. Hoogendoorn, and B. van Arem.
Continuous Traffic Flow Modeling of Driver Support Sys-
tems in Multiclass Traffic with Intervehicle Communica-tion
and Drivers in the Loop. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent
Transportation Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2009, pp. 649 657.
Transportation Research Record 00(0)
29. Prinzel, L. J. Empirical Analysis of EEG and ERPs for Psy-
chophysiological Adaptive Task Allocation. NASA, 2001.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010060403
30.The-National-Advanced-Driving-Simulator.MiniSim User
s Guide. Document version 19. The University of Iowa,
Iowa City, 2015.
31. EyeTracking-Inc. EyeWorks 3 User Manual. EyeTracking-
Inc., Solana Beach, CA, 2019.
32. Vogels, J. , V. Demberg, and J. Kray. The Index of
Cognitive Activity as a Measure of Cognitive Processing
Load in Dual Task Settings. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9,
2018, p. 2276.
33. Kummetha, V. C. Incorporating Biobehavioral
Architecture into Car-Following Models: A Driving
Simulator Study. Civil, Environmental, and Architectural
Engineering. Uni-versity of Kansas, Lawrence, 2020.
34. Minitab, LCC. Getting Started with Minitab 19. Minitab,
2019. https://www. minitab. com/content/dam/www/en/
uploadedfiles/documents/getting-started/Minitab19GettingSt
arted_EN.pdf
35. Kummetha, V. C., A. Kondyli, and H. Devos. Evaluating
Driver Comprehension of the Roadway Environment to
Retain Accountability of Safety during Driving Automa-
tion. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology
and Behaviour, Vol. 81, 2021, pp. 457 471.
36. Neuroelectrics. Neuroelectrics User Manual-Enobio 8. Neu-
roelectrics, Barcelona, Spain, 2019.
37. Delorme, A., and S. Makeig. EEGLAB: An Open Source
Toolbox for Analysis of Single-Trial EEG Dynamics
Including Independent Component Analysis. Journal of
Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 134, No. 1, 2004, pp. 9 21.
38. Tursky, B. , D. Shapiro, A. Crider, and D. Kahneman.
Pupillary, Heart Rate, and Skin Resistance Changes during a
Mental Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 79,
No. 1, 1969, p. 164.
39. Dahl, H., and D. P. Spence. Mean Heart Rate Predicted by
Task Demand Characteristics. Psychophysiology, Vol. 7,
No. 3, 1970, pp. 369 376.
40. Cooper, J. M., N. Medeiros-Ward, and D. L. Strayer. The
Impact of Eye Movements and Cognitive Workload on
Lateral Position Variability in Driving. Human Factors: The
Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol.
55, No. 5, 2013, pp. 1001 1014.
41. Strayer, D. L., J. Turrill, J. R. Coleman, E. V. Ortiz, and J.
M. Cooper. Measuring Cognitive Distraction in the Automo-
bile II: Assessing In-Vehicle Voice-Based Interactive Tech-
nologies. Technical Report. AAA Foundation for Traffic
Safety, Washington, DC, 2014.
42. He, J., J. S. McCarley, and A. F. Kramer. Lane Keeping
under Cognitive Load: Performance Changes and
Mechanisms. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2014, pp.
414 426.
43. Li, P., G. Markkula, Y. Li, and N. Merat. Is Improved
Lane Keeping during Cognitive Load Caused by Increased
Physical Arousal or Gaze Concentration toward the Road
Center? Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 117, 2018,
pp. 65 74.
44. Kountouriotis, G. K., R. M. Wilkie, P. H. Gardner, and N.
Merat. Looking and Thinking When Driving: The Impact
Kummetha and Kondyli
of Gaze and Cognitive Load on Steering. Transportation
Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol.
34, 2015, pp. 108 121.
45. Wang, Y., B. Reimer, J. Dobres, and B. Mehler. The Sensi-
tivity of Different Methodologies for Characterizing Driv-
ers Gaze Concentration under Increased Cognitive
Demand. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychol-
ogy and Behaviour, Vol. 26, 2014, pp. 227 237.
46. Kummetha, V. C. Incorporating Biobehavioral Architecture
into Car-Following Models: A Driving Simulator Study.
ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. University of Kansas,
Lawrence, 2020.
47. Yang, Y., K. Wada, T. Oguchi, and M. Iryo-Asano. Varia-
bility of Observed Drivers Car-Following Behavior on
Expressway Basic Segment. Transportation Research Proce-
dia, Vol. 25, 2017, pp. 1503 1532.
48. Siuhi, S. Parametric Study of Stimulus-Response Behavior
Incorporating Vehicle Heterogeneity in Car-Following
21
Models. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. University of
Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, 2009.
49. Kou, C. C. , and R. B. Machemehl. Modeling Vehicle
Acceleration-Deceleration Behavior During Merge Maneu-
vers. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 24, No.
3, 1997, pp. 350 358.
50. Vasconcelos, L., L. Neto, S. Santos, A. B. Silva, and A .
Seco. Calibration of the Gipps Car-Following Model Using
Trajectory Data. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 3,
2014, pp. 952 961.
51. Kaptein, N. A., J. Theeuwes, and R. Van Der Horst. Driv-
ing Simulator Validity: Some Considerations. Transporta-
tion Research Record: Journal of the Transportation
Research Board, 1996. 1550: 30 36.
52. Wynne, R. A., V. Beanland, and P. M. Salmon. Systematic
Review of Driving Simulator Validation Studies. Safety
Science, Vol. 117, 2019, pp. 138 151.